Re: Future of ADT

2015-05-31 Thread Radim Kubacki
2015-05-26 11:36 GMT+02:00 Lars Vogel lars.vo...@gmail.com: http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipseGradle/article.html Currently the Eclipse Gradle tooling cannot import Android projects, the current focus is the support of Java projects. Android support seems planned for the 1.0 release,

Re: Future of ADT

2015-05-26 Thread Ralph Bergmann | the4thFloor.eu
Am 11.05.15 um 17:55 schrieb Massimo Montecchi: Please, maintain ADT in a working state for future versions of Eclipse. see https://github.com/eclipse/andmore and http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipseGradle/article.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Future of ADT

2015-05-19 Thread Massimo Montecchi
is a first fix for this. Expect another one sometimes next week. For new features, our focus is Studio. On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Csaba Kozák kozak...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Can we get an official statement about the future of ADT? From the outside it seems ADT is a little

Re: Future of ADT

2015-05-19 Thread Massimo Montecchi
Please, maintain ADT in a working state for future versions of Eclipse.!!! Il giorno venerdì 4 luglio 2014 14:15:13 UTC+2, b0b ha scritto: Eclipse + ADT being slowly abandonned is worrying me. I'm an happy Eclipse user. I don't want to switch to another IDE. Eclipse + ADT has been extremely

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-06 Thread Guy Tavor
we get an official statement about the future of ADT? From the outside it seems ADT is a little-bit abandoned project. It does not get any improvements, only the most crucial updates to stay compatible with the new SDKs. With ADT 23, even the compatibility updates were missing

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-04 Thread b0b
Eclipse + ADT being slowly abandonned is worrying me. I'm an happy Eclipse user. I don't want to switch to another IDE. Eclipse + ADT has been extremely reliable for a long time now. My somewhat complex project builds reasonnably fast with ADT. I don't even know if I could build it with gradle

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-03 Thread Ricardo Gladwell
On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 02:20:31 UTC+1, Xavier Ducrohet wrote: For new features, our focus is Studio. One of the most important features we would like to see if the Eclipse ADT is support for AAR libraries. Is this still on the cards? -- @rgladwell -- You received this message because

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-03 Thread vogella
On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 6:16:24 PM UTC+2, Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) wrote: On Wed, Jul 2, 2014, at 11:18, Kevin Schultz wrote: I have never met anyone that has used IntelliJ extensively but still prefers Eclipse I do not know how you define extensively, but I definitely have met

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Murphy
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014, at 11:18, Kevin Schultz wrote: I have never met anyone that has used IntelliJ extensively but still prefers Eclipse I do not know how you define extensively, but I definitely have met people who do not like IntelliJ. There are developers who use NetBeans too, or no IDE at

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Justin Breitfeller
From what I can tell, most of the really good teams are using Android Studio + Gradle or IntelliJ + Maven already. I think that is a bit early to say. I would say we are a good team, but we haven't successfully been able to migrate over due to our builds simply not working in gradle. In

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Justin Breitfeller
. On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 11:18:31 AM UTC-4, Kevin Schultz wrote: I think the future of Eclipse+ADT is pretty clear to anyone following the development of Android Studio. It is going to be a second class citizen at best. I honestly hope that it gets killed off completely so as not to pull

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Justin Breitfeller
From what I can tell, most of the really good teams are using Android Studio + Gradle or IntelliJ + Maven already. I think that is a bit early to say. I would say we are a good team, but we haven't successfully been able to migrate over due to our builds simply not working in gradle. In

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Xavier Ducrohet
What's going on with your projects? Do you have custom logic in there? I'm interested in helping you figure out the need to call assemble twice. On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Justin Breitfeller mrsl...@gmail.com wrote: From what I can tell, most of the really good teams are using Android

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread jdONeill gMail
Another showstopper to full migration is lack of NDK support with Studio, specifically NDK Debugging. It is not clear to me what the migration pattern will be for developers who require NDK debugging. On 7/2/14, 8:16 AM, Mark Murphy wrote: On Wed, Jul 2, 2014, at 11:18, Kevin Schultz wrote:

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-02 Thread Justin Breitfeller
Sorry I am getting this information relayed from one of my coworkers. The exact error we get is: error: cannot access NonAcceleratedOverlay public class MyProjectOverlay extends SomeBaseClass ^ class file for org.osmdroid.views.overlay.NonAcceleratedOverlay not found On Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Re: Future of ADT

2014-07-01 Thread Csaba Kozák
Thanks for both of your answers! I should not have bring the problems of SDK 23 here. It affects the Gradle build system too, also i was sure that you guys will fix it. Thanks for the first patch, appreciated! Xavier is very, very diplomatic, but i guess this means ADT will indeed go away. I

Re: Future of ADT

2014-06-30 Thread Xavier Ducrohet
kozakcs...@gmail.com wrote: Can we get an official statement about the future of ADT? From the outside it seems ADT is a little-bit abandoned project. It does not get any improvements, only the most crucial updates to stay compatible with the new SDKs. With ADT 23, even the compatibility updates