Re: Re: Unit 193: Declaration of intent

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:53:28PM +0200, Michael Ole Olsen wrote: > If you cannot stand behind your work with your real name, you should not be > in Debian IMO I disagree with this in so many levels. [..] > What is the problem with using real name? What's a 'real name' for you? > If you

Re: GR Proposal: replace "Chairman" with "Chair" throughout the Debian Constitution

> > === BEGIN GR TEXT === > > Title: Replace "Chairman" with "Chair" throughout the Debian Constitution > > All appearances of the word Chairman shall be replaced with the word Chair. > > === END GR TEXT === Seconded. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > In 2005, the body of Debian Developers passed a General Resolution[1] > requiring > the creation of a declassification team for the debian-private mailing list. > For the past ten years, the implementation of this GR has never

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > In 2005, the body of Debian Developers passed a General Resolution[1] > requiring > the creation of a declassification team for the debian-private mailing list. > For the past ten years, the implementation of this GR has never

Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support

Hi Markus, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:38:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 18.05.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Ana Guerrero Lopez: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> the LTS team would like to make a s

Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi folks, > > the LTS team would like to make a short announcement on bits.debian.org. > We think it is worth mentioning that armel and armhf are supported > architectures in Wheezy LTS. Please find our draft below. Thank you

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Bug#807149: infinipath-psm: FTBFS: Unsupported architecture i686

tags 807149 pending thanks On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:27:05PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: infinipath-psm > Version: 3.3+7.g05f6f14.open-1 > Severity: important > Justification: fails to build from source > > infinipath-psm's debian/control file claims > > Architecture: amd64 i386 > >

Bug#811940: infinipath-psm: FTBFS with GCC 6: defined but not used

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:50:44PM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: infinipath-psm > Version: 3.3+7.gec1d6d2-3 > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-unused-const-variable > > This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been

Updated Debian 8: 8.4 released

The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/ Updated Debian 8: 8.4 released pr...@debian.org April 2nd, 2016https://www.debian.org/News/2016/20160402

Updated Debian 7: 7.10 released

The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/ Updated Debian 7: 7.10 released pr...@debian.org April 2nd, 2016 https://www.debian.org/News/2016/2016040202

Bug#818973: python-imdbpy: Retrieval of top250 listing returns empty list

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:28:31PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Package: python-imdbpy > Version: 5.0-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch upstream > > The get_top250_movies() function is returning an empty list for me. This > is upstream issue BB #46 (I can't find a link to this report

Bug#808760: kdbg: FTBFS: Unknown CMake command "check_include_files".

Thanks a lot Eriberto! I'm going to upload this orphaning the package. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Control: tags 808760 patch > Control: tags 808760 upstream > > Hi, > > The attached patch will fix this issue. > > Regards, > > Eriberto > Description:

Bug#808760: kdbg: FTBFS: Unknown CMake command "check_include_files".

Thanks a lot Eriberto! I'm going to upload this orphaning the package. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:40:24PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Control: tags 808760 patch > Control: tags 808760 upstream > > Hi, > > The attached patch will fix this issue. > > Regards, > > Eriberto > Description:

Re: does Debian help detect gravitational waves?

Hi, A bit late to the party, but today I found this article that was published by the defunct site http://time.debian.net in June 2008: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Publicity/DebianTimesTeam/PressReleases/GravitationalWaveDebianCluster Looks like we finally have the proof that Debian helped a

Bug#814677: packages.debian.org: file is found in wrong suite(s)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important Hi, When I search "ibchecknet" in the "Search the content of packages" available at https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages with the options: - paths ending with the keyword - Distribution: stable - Architecture: any I get:

Bug#814677: packages.debian.org: file is found in wrong suite(s)

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important Hi, When I search "ibchecknet" in the "Search the content of packages" available at https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages with the options: - paths ending with the keyword - Distribution: stable - Architecture: any I get:

FYI [Publicity-commits] [announcements] 01/01: edit footer to match other announcements]

--- Begin Message --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. ana pushed a commit to branch master in repository announcements. commit ee7b77d2bcbba86a5166434e9b13893ed3f5aabb Author: Ana Guerrero López Date: Fri Feb 12 18:30:20 2016 +0100 edit

Debian 6.0 Long Term Support reaching end-of-life

The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/ Debian 6.0 Long Term Support reaching end-of-life pr...@debian.org February 12th, 2016https://www.debian.org/News/2016/20160212

Bug#782143: pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1 > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-3 > > Control: tag -1 jessie > > > > On Wed, Apr

Bug#782143: pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1 > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-3 > > Control: tag -1 jessie > > > > On Wed, Apr

Re: Statistics

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 06:43:30PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > After sending my previous email I checked a bit more carefully and I > > added 3 female DD. There is probably more people missing from the > > years 2013-2015. The page wasn't as much as up

Re: Statistics

Hi u! On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote: > Hi! > > just for myself and for fun I wanted to recompile some statistics on > women in Debian. (Last data I have in memory is about 10 years old - and > looks pretty much the same as what I've found for the present situation). > > I

Re: Statistics

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:29:37PM +, u wrote: > Hi Ana, > > Ana Guerrero Lopez: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote: > > The data about female participation is at this page: > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics &

Re: [sta...@fosdem.org: Your stand proposal for FOSDEM 2016 has been accepted]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > - Forwarded message from FOSDEM Stands Team - > > Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:54:55 +0100 (CET) > From: FOSDEM Stands Team > To: Geert > Subject: Your stand

Re: [sta...@fosdem.org: Your stand proposal for FOSDEM 2016 has been accepted]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 08:15:10PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Hi Ana, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:54:30PM +0100, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > > > - Forwarded mes

Re: Software Freedom Conservancy needs our cash

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:49:17AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Software Freedom Conservancy needs our cash"): > > On 2015-12-02 02:35, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > >> Indeed. And instead of simply adding blog posts, the

Bug#804851: please add a slurm-llnl-emulator package

Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > Please consider adding a -emulator package to allow run slurm > in emulation mode as described at [1]. > Your git repo [2] doesn't seem to be up to date, so I made a patch > against the current package in unsta

Bug#806320: New list: debian-...@lists.debian.org

Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, There is a Debian HPC community scattered mostly around the upstream projects and we include in Debian plenty of specific HPC software (slurm, ofed stack,... see more at [1]). It's about time we try to gather all the folks in the same place and I

Bug#804851: please add a slurm-llnl-emulator package

he slurmd and slurmctld package. These packages binaries +have now the suffix -wlm and the binaries in slurm-wln-emulator got +the suffix -wlm-emulator. +The binaries are handled with alternatives, having the emulator package +a higher priority value. + + -- Ana Guerrero Lopez <a...@debi

Bug#803878: O: kdbg -- graphical debugger interface

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like to orpha kdbg. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#803878: O: kdbg -- graphical debugger interface

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like to orpha kdbg. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#802173: remind: please ship ical2rem.pl and possibly other contrib scripts

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 02:40:36AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > Package: remind > Version: 03.01.15-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi! > > Please include ical2rem.pl, and possibly other scripts, from contrib in > the remind Debian package. > > Use case is that I have been looking for something

Bug#797593: ITA: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:46:50AM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > retitle 797593 ITA: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool > owner 797593 a...@debian.org > thanks > > I had offered to co-maintain this in #760152, so I'm glad to pick it > up. Might potentially move it to the

Bug#797593: ITA: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:46:50AM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > retitle 797593 ITA: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool > owner 797593 a...@debian.org > thanks > > I had offered to co-maintain this in #760152, so I'm glad to pick it > up. Might potentially move it to the

Bug#799220: O: tintin++ -- classic text-based MUD client

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have stopped playing MUDs, therefore I'm orphaning this package. Adam Borowski has done some development in upstream so if he's interested in adopting the package, he should have priority. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#799220: O: tintin++ -- classic text-based MUD client

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:05:29AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:48:40AM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > Adam Borowski has done some development in upstream so if he's interested > > in adopting the package, he should have priority. > > I

Bug#799220: O: tintin++ -- classic text-based MUD client

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have stopped playing MUDs, therefore I'm orphaning this package. Adam Borowski has done some development in upstream so if he's interested in adopting the package, he should have priority. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#799220: O: tintin++ -- classic text-based MUD client

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:05:29AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:48:40AM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > > Adam Borowski has done some development in upstream so if he's interested > > in adopting the package, he should have priority. > > I

Bug#797593: O: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like to orphan the package fabric. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#797593: O: fabric -- Simple Pythonic remote deployment tool

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like to orphan the package fabric. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see

Bug#797248: [Pkg-ofed-devel] Bug#797248: mstflint: FTBFS: error: ‘curr_toc’ ... [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Chris West (Faux) wrote: Source: mstflint Version: 4.0.1+1.43.g97d7275-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Tags: sid stretch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC:

Bug#797248: [Pkg-ofed-devel] Bug#797248: mstflint: FTBFS: error: ‘curr_toc’ ... [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Chris West (Faux) wrote: Source: mstflint Version: 4.0.1+1.43.g97d7275-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Tags: sid stretch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC:

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: - get.debian.org get.debian.org and redirections for every release like get.debian.org/$RELEASE would be great.

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: - get.debian.org get.debian.org and redirections for every release like get.debian.org/$RELEASE would be great.

Re: squeeze update of remind?

On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:17:57AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Ana, On Mi 29 Jul 2015 23:13:39 CEST, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues

Bug#793212: yakuake: Yakuake don't detect newer version of konsole

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:53:18PM +0200, rollopack wrote: Package: yakuake Version: 2.9.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, with konsole 4:14.12.3-1 yakuake on opening a tab report the error: Yakuake was unable to load the Konsole component. A

Bug#793212: yakuake: Yakuake don't detect newer version of konsole

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:53:18PM +0200, rollopack wrote: Package: yakuake Version: 2.9.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, with konsole 4:14.12.3-1 yakuake on opening a tab report the error: Yakuake was unable to load the Konsole component. A

[Debconf-discuss] you should have gotten at email if you're staying at the hostel

Hi, Subject says it. If you're staying at the hostel, you should have gotten an email with your provisional room details. If you don't have that email, mail registrat...@debconf.org ASAP Ana ___ Debconf-discuss mailing list

Re: [Debconf-discuss] you should have gotten at email if you're staying at the hostel

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Ana Guerrero Lopez writes ([Debconf-discuss] you should have gotten at email if you're staying at the hostel): Subject says it. If you're staying at the hostel, you should have gotten an email with your provisional room details

Bug#778016: NMU guide

Hi doko, I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#778016: NMU guide

Hi doko, I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#778016: NMU guide

Hi Matthias, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:23:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07/08/2015 08:15 PM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: Hi doko, Matthias I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html

Bug#778016: NMU guide

Hi Matthias, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:23:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 07/08/2015 08:15 PM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: Hi doko, Matthias I think it would be a useful time investement for you to read: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html

Bug#784854: MIA for Karolina Kalic karol...@resenje.org

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Karolina Kalic wrote: Hi everybody, As I can remember, MIA team contacted me a while ago. And I explained that I can not continue my work for Debian at the moment. The packages should have been orphaned properly after that. I don't know what

Bug#784854: MIA for Karolina Kalic karol...@resenje.org

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Karolina Kalic wrote: Hi everybody, As I can remember, MIA team contacted me a while ago. And I explained that I can not continue my work for Debian at the moment. The packages should have been orphaned properly after that. I don't know what

Bug#784448: [amarok] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: amarok Version: 2.8.0-2.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784455: [cb2bib] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: cb2bib Version: 1.4.9-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in

Bug#784456: [cantata] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: cantata Version: 1.5.2.ds2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced

Bug#784459: [cutycapt] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: cutycapt Version: 0.0~svn6-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear David Paleino da...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#784460: [digikam] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: digikam Version: 4:4.4.0-1.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784461: [fatrat] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: fatrat Version: 1.1.3-5 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Cristian Greco crist...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784457: [clam-networkeditor] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: clam-networkeditor Version: 1.4.0-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as

Bug#784455: [cb2bib] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: cb2bib Version: 1.4.9-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in

Bug#784468: [goldendict] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: goldendict Version: 1.5.0~git20131003-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Dmitry E. Oboukhov un...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784460: [digikam] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: digikam Version: 4:4.4.0-1.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784464: [freecad] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: freecad Version: 0.14.3702+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as

Bug#784466: [gammaray] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: gammaray Version: 2.1.0-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784465: [gambas3] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: gambas3 Version: 3.5.4-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Gambas Debian Maintainers pkg-gambas-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784472: [kadu] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kadu Version: 1.3-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Patryk Cisek pat...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784464: [freecad] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: freecad Version: 0.14.3702+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as

Bug#784462: [fcitx-libpinyin] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: fcitx-libpinyin Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear IME Packaging Team pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784473: [kadu-mime-tex] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kadu-mime-tex Version: 1.0-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Patryk Cisek pat...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784467: [goldencheetah] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: goldencheetah Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear KURASHIKI Satoru lur...@gmail.com, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784463: [fontmatrix] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: fontmatrix Version: 0.6.0+svn20110930-1.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Oleksandr Moskalenko ma...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784470: [hotot] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: hotot Version: 1:0.9.8.14-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784471: [k3b] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: k3b Version: 2.0.2-8 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784477: [kde-runtime] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kde-runtime Version: 4:4.14.2-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784475: [kbibtex] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kbibtex Version: 0.4-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in

Bug#784474: [kalgebra] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kalgebra Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

[Pkg-gambas-devel] Bug#784465: [gambas3] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: gambas3 Version: 3.5.4-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Gambas Debian Maintainers pkg-gambas-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784475: [kbibtex] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kbibtex Version: 0.4-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in

[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#784466: [gammaray] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: gammaray Version: 2.1.0-3.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#784471: [k3b] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: k3b Version: 2.0.2-8 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784494: [merkaartor] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: merkaartor Version: 0.18.1-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784490: [kvirc] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: kvirc Version: 4:4.2.0-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784493: [libqt4pas] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: libqt4pas Version: 2.5-12 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Matthias Klumpp m...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784488: [ktp-auth-handler] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: ktp-auth-handler Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce].

Bug#784496: [mixxx] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: mixxx Version: 1.11.0~dfsg-4 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced

Bug#784495: [mathgl] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: mathgl Version: 2.2.2.1-3 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Debian Science Maintainers debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in

Bug#784497: [metview] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: metview Version: 4.4.8+dfsg.1-8 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784500: [navit] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: navit Version: 0.5.0~svn5900+dfsg.1-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Gilles Filippini p...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784506: [phantomjs] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: phantomjs Version: 1.9.0-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear TANIGUCHI Takaki tak...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784499: [musescore] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: musescore Version: 1.3+dfsg1-0.1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Toby Smithe tsmi...@ubuntu.com, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784503: [openwalnut] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: openwalnut Version: 1.4.0~rc1+hg3a3147463ee2-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Sebastian Eichelbaum eichelb...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de Sebastian Eichelbaum openwal...@nemtics.com, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are

Bug#784502: [openms] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: openms Version: 1.11.1-5 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear The Debichem Group debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

Bug#784501: [nmapsi4] Qt4's WebKit removal

Source: nmapsi4 Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4webkit-removal Dear Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org, As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4's WebKit as announced in [announce]. [announce]

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >