shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Up
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:56:16 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.2.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:15:38 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> This pull request addresses the open ends left by
>> [JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
>> - #11272
>>
>> Changes:
>> - [x] Extend list of targeted exports o
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:56:16 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.2.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with five additional
commits since the last revision:
- F
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:15:38 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> This pull request addresses the open ends left by
>> [JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
>> - #11272
>>
>> Changes:
>> - [x] Extend list of targeted exports o
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with five additional
commits since the last revision:
- F
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revisio
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revisio
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Upda
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Upda
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last r
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:42:58 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:42:58 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contain
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last r
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev
shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler` module
> - [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.javadoc` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.compiler` module
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:16:54 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This pull request addresses the open ends left by
> [JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
> - #11272
>
> Changes:
> - [x] Extend list of targeted exports of `jdk.internal.opt/jdk.internal.opt`
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:16:54 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This pull request addresses the open ends left by
> [JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
> - #11272
>
> Changes:
> - [x] Extend list of targeted exports of `jdk.internal.opt/jdk.internal.opt`
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:44:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Create an internal Version record to hold and compare versions of the form
> (major, minor, micro).
> Add `OperatingSystem.version()` to return the version of the running OS.
> Replace uses of os.version in java.base.
> Subsequent PRs will
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:44:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Create an internal Version record to hold and compare versions of the form
> (major, minor, micro).
> Add `OperatingSystem.version()` to return the version of the running OS.
> Replace uses of os.version in java.base.
> Subsequent PRs will
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.2.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
-
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.2.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
-
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 20:24:00 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Please review this trivial change when ZipFS returns the wrong
> java.nio.file.FileSystemException message due the the parameters being
> reversed.
>
> I also included a simple junit test as part of the fix.
>
> Mach5 tiers1-3 are
This pull request addresses the open ends left by
[JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
- #11272
Changes:
- [x] Extend list of targeted exports of `jdk.internal.opt/jdk.internal.opt` to
`jdk.compiler` and `jdk.javadoc`
- [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler`
This pull request addresses the open ends left by
[JDK-8236919](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8236919):
- #11272
Changes:
- [x] Extend list of targeted exports of `jdk.internal.opt/jdk.internal.opt` to
`jdk.compiler` and `jdk.javadoc`
- [x] Use shared `CommandLine.java` in `jdk.compiler`
+ M10
... erm +1 for releasing 3.0.0
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7725
> I would like to release the next version of surefire.
>
> Next radical proposal: switch version to 3.0.0 and stop producing
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:02:51 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Darragh Clarke has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> cleanup based on feedback
>
> test/jdk/java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java line 66:
>
>> 64:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:28:14 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java line 75:
>>
>>> 73: @Test
>>> 74: public void main() throws IOException {
>>> 75: IPSupport.throwSkippedExceptionIfNonOperational();
>>
>> This can throw
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:32:49 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I wonder if testng (and junit) can be configured to fail the test if no test
> methods were present, to flag such mistakes.
JUnit's CLI tool has:
`--fail-if-no-tests Fail and return exit status code 2 if no tests are
found.`
We can
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:32:49 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I wonder if testng (and junit) can be configured to fail the test if no test
> methods were present, to flag such mistakes.
JUnit's CLI tool has:
`--fail-if-no-tests Fail and return exit status code 2 if no tests are
found.`
We can
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 08:59:29 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The non-hotspot tests integrated with JEP 425/428 were mostly TestNG tests.
> We'd like to convert these JUnit in the main line in advance of other updates
> to these tests in 21. The changes are mostly mechanical and trivial:
>
> -
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 08:59:29 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The non-hotspot tests integrated with JEP 425/428 were mostly TestNG tests.
> We'd like to convert these JUnit in the main line in advance of other updates
> to these tests in 21. The changes are mostly mechanical and trivial:
>
> -
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:51:52 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> URLFromURITest.java was mixing JUnit 4 and Jupiter APIs, this is just a
> simple cleanup to swap it to use only Jupiter.
>
> I looked around to see if there were any other tests affected but this seems
> to be the only one.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:34:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The ModuleReader implementation for exploded modules maps resource names to
> file paths. A small oversight is that it doesn't handle InvalidPathException
> which is thrown when the resource name maps to something that can't be parsed
>
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:45:06 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on th
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:45:06 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on th
.ROOT`
> files.
>
> This pull request was created by copying the following and using 7.1.1 at
> appropriate places:
> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11416
Christian Stein has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. Incremental vie
.ROOT`
> files.
>
> This pull request was created by copying the following and using 7.1.1 at
> appropriate places:
> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11416
Christian Stein has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. Incremental vie
.ROOT`
> files.
>
> This pull request was created by copying the following and using 7.1.1 at
> appropriate places:
> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11416
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
.ROOT`
> files.
>
> This pull request was created by copying the following and using 7.1.1 at
> appropriate places:
> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/11416
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
This pull
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:07:44 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.1.1.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
This pull
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:44:12 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg `7.1`.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:44:12 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg `7.1`.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
Please review the change to update to using jtreg `7.1`.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
This pull
Please review the change to update to using jtreg `7.1`.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the requiredVersion has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
This pull
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:40:19 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This PR copies the `CommandLine.java` file from module `jdk.compiler`
> (package `com.sun.tools.javac.main`) into the `jdk.internal.opt` module,
> creating a new package with name `jdk.internal.opt`. That new
> `jdk.
rule".
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jartool` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jlink` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jpackage` module
> - [x] Check for related but renamed(?) usages of `CommandLine.java` in other
> JDK tools: `js
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:40:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Now that the javacserver no longer has any ambitions outside being a
>> buildtool customized for the JDK build process, a lot of abstractions and
>> generalizations can be removed.
>>
>> This will allow the actual behavior to be
rule".
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jartool` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jlink` module
> - [x] Remove `CommandLine.java` from `jdk.jpackage` module
> - [x] Check for related but renamed(?) usages of `CommandLine.java` in other
> JDK tools: `js
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:40:19 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This PR copies the `CommandLine.java` file from module `jdk.compiler`
> (package `com.sun.tools.javac.main`) into the `jdk.internal.opt` module,
> creating a new package with name `jdk.internal.opt`. That new
> `jdk.
This PR copies the `CommandLine.java` file from module `jdk.compiler` (package
`com.sun.tools.javac.main`) into the `jdk.internal.opt` module, creating a new
package with name `jdk.internal.opt`. That new `jdk.internal.opt` package is
then exported to the following modules:
- `jdk.jartool`
-
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:06:16 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Or is the replacement so imminent that it's not worth the effort?
This. I aim to replace `javacserver` with a well-tested `javatoolportal`
buildtool in the coming months. An almost working POC is already available -
but forcing it to go
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:22:43 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The sjavac ("smart javac") was an ambitious project. It should parallelize
> java compilation, create a background daemon process that kept the JVM "hot"
> with the JITted javac code, define a public api so only noticeable changes
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:24:21 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:24:21 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:38:33 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> So I guess at the minimum we would have to downport those test changes to be
> able to test older JDKs with the new jtreg, right?
Yes. Otherwise those tests will fail as they still do depend on hard-coded
names of 3rd-party JAR files.
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:38:33 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> So I guess at the minimum we would have to downport those test changes to be
> able to test older JDKs with the new jtreg, right?
Yes. Otherwise those tests will fail as they still do depend on hard-coded
names of 3rd-party JAR files.
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:36:04 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Is jtreg 7 downward compatible? Can I use it to test older JDKs, if yes, down
> to which version?
Yes, down to JDK 11.
Quote from [Coming soon: jtreg
7](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2022-August/006869.html)
> Also
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:36:04 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Is jtreg 7 downward compatible? Can I use it to test older JDKs, if yes, down
> to which version?
Yes, down to JDK 11.
Quote from [Coming soon: jtreg
7](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2022-August/006869.html)
> Also
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 14 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Update configure to
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 14 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Update configure to
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:14:12 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello Christian, is it intentional that in some file the minimum required
> jtreg version is represented as `7` (`lib-tests.m4`) and in some other files
> as `7+1` (GitHub actions config file, then the TEST.ROOT files)?
Yes. Some systems
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:14:12 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello Christian, is it intentional that in some file the minimum required
> jtreg version is represented as `7` (`lib-tests.m4`) and in some other files
> as `7+1` (GitHub actions config file, then the TEST.ROOT files)?
Yes. Some systems
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 13 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Update configure to check for jtreg 7 or later
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 13 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Update configure to check for jtreg 7 or later
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update configure to check for jtreg 7 or later
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9393/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update configure to check for jtreg 7 or later
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9393/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Revert junit.java
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Revert junit.java
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 10 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Revert junit.java
Commit
https://github.com/
.ROOT`
> files.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 10 commits:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8289798-jtreg-7
- Revert junit.java
Commit
https://github.com/
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:24:21 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 08:24:21 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the `requiredVersion` has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
-
Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the `requiredVersion` has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
-
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:26:30 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Enhance `JAXPPolicyManager` to setup required permissions for `jtreg` 7 by
> accept version information in JAR file names.
>
> Find details in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292182
This pull request has now bee
> Enhance `JAXPPolicyManager` to setup required permissions for `jtreg` 7 by
> accept version information in JAR file names.
>
> Find details in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292182
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit si
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 03:41:04 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove unused import statement
>
> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/libs/jaxp/library/J
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:18:50 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove unused import statement
>
> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/libs/jaxp/library/
Enhance `JAXPPolicyManager` to setup required permissions for `jtreg` 7 by
accept version information in JAR file names.
Find details in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292182
-
Commit messages:
- 8292182: [TESTLIB] Enhance JAXPPolicyManager to setup required permissions
for
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:28:46 GMT, Thiago Henrique Hüpner
wrote:
>> 8287760: --do-not-resolve-by-default gets overwritten if --warn-if-resolved
>> flags is used
>
> Thiago Henrique Hüpner has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 06:45:49 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> With project Skara, the ability to run a set of sanity build and test jobs
>> on selected platforms was added. This functionality was driven by
>> `.github/workflows/submit.yml`. This file unfortunately lacks any real
>>
On Sun, 22 May 2022 05:58:25 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Commit
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/655500a4f5e3abcff176599604deceefb6ca6640
> for issue [JDK-8286654](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286654)
> added an optional description accessor on the `
On Tue, 24 May 2022 04:58:44 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Commit
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/655500a4f5e3abcff176599604deceefb6ca6640
>> for issue [JDK-8286654](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286654)
>> added an optional description accessor on the `ToolProvider`
On Tue, 24 May 2022 04:50:58 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/ToolProvider.java
>>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:32:09 GMT, Anthony Vanelverdinghe
wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/ToolProvider.java
>>
> This commit adds an API note to ToolProvider about being reusable/reentrant.
Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/ToolProvider.java
Co-authored-by: Anth
This commit adds an API note to ToolProvider about being reusable/reentrant.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286815: Add API note to ToolProvider about being reusable/reentrant
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8833/files
Webrev:
Commit
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/655500a4f5e3abcff176599604deceefb6ca6640
for issue [JDK-8286654](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286654) added
an optional description accessor on the `ToolProvider` interface. It included a
typo in` jlink`'s description resource key
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:56:47 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This PR adds an optional description accessor on `ToolProvider` interface.
>
> This PR also adds short description for each of the listed tool:
> - `jar`
> - `javac`
> - `javadoc`
> - `javap` and `jdeps`
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:56:47 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> This PR adds an optional description accessor on `ToolProvider` interface.
>
> This PR also adds short description for each of the listed tool:
> - `jar`
> - `javac`
> - `javadoc`
> - `javap` and `jdeps`
On Thu, 19 May 2022 06:21:40 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/javac.properties
>> line 387:
>>
>>> 385:
>>> 386: javac.description=Read Java declarations and compile them into class
>>
101 - 200 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
