Hi, is there someone working on this? if yes let me know please
otherwise I'll try to do it when I have time
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, is there someone working on this? if yes let me know please
otherwise I'll try to do it when I have time
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can you tell me if this issue is still reproducible on latest version
please?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this should be solved in 5.31b+dfsg-1 if I remember good.
Can someone tell me if this issue still reproducible on latest version
of memtest86+ please? (5.31b+dfsg-4)
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this should be solved in 5.31b+dfsg-1 if I remember good.
Can someone tell me if this issue still reproducible on latest version
of memtest86+ please? (5.31b+dfsg-4)
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This issue is very old, in latest 2 versions in git there is the part
changed but different from the patch, I suppose was fixed long time ago.
Can you tell me if the issue is still present on latest version instead?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hi, version < 5.31b+dfsg-1 was crashing/freezing on major of cases for
different issues, the latest version use the latest upstream beta
version and additional patches solved all freeze/crash cases I saw
except multiboot (now disabled by default)
If the issue is still reproducible also on
Il 10/02/2022 21:35, Olaf Buddenhagen ha scritto:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:39:58PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Hi, /etc/kernel-img.conf seems specific options related to kernel so I don't
think is good do some additional condition based on it, I don't know other
similar option that can
small info: openssl 3.0 support was backported in freerdp 2.5.0
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: fixed -1 5.31b+dfsg-1
Il 11/01/2022 18:12, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Hi, 5.01-3.1 add only a serial console fix and should not be the cause
of regression.
The previous version was of years before and I suppose was ok because
built with older gcc, with newer gcc I saw some issue
Hi, /etc/kernel-img.conf seems specific options related to kernel so I
don't think is good do some additional condition based on it, I don't
know other similar option that can be used out of this.
If there are other possibilities or the problem is relevant please tell
me I will reconsider it.
Hi, I don't remember about that very old memtest86+ version (of over 10
years ago), in version >=5.01 update-grub run always on postins, in
5.31b+dfsg-4 I only added to not run it in a container
are there still problems with the latest memtest86 + versions about
update-grub? if yes can you
Hi, I don't remember about that very old memtest86+ version (of over 10
years ago), I saw 2 case of wrong memory (that seems differently) with
5.01 and was solved recently with 5.31b and other patches.
Can someone tell me if this issue is still reproducible on latest
version please?
ncy=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* New maintainer (Closes: #969191)
* another changes to makeiso.sh to make the build reproducible:
- add -uid and -gid to 0 to xorriso options
- replaced "echo -e" with printf
* d/postinst: don't run update-grub if in a container
* d/con
ncy=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* New maintainer (Closes: #969191)
* another changes to makeiso.sh to make the build reproducible:
- add -uid and -gid to 0 to xorriso options
- replaced "echo -e" with printf
* d/postinst: don't run update-grub if in a container
* d/con
control: retitle -1 ITA: memtest86+ -- thorough real-mode memory tester
control: owner -1 !
Thanks to Yann Dirson for his works on package.
I have been using memtest86+ for many years for both work and not,
version 5.01 in debian stable/testing/unstable as I saw in latest years
on major of
control: retitle -1 ITA: memtest86+ -- thorough real-mode memory tester
control: owner -1 !
Thanks to Yann Dirson for his works on package.
I have been using memtest86+ for many years for both work and not,
version 5.01 in debian stable/testing/unstable as I saw in latest years
on major of
Fantoni Sat, 05 Feb 2022 13:16:03 +0100
+
cinnamon (4.8.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
diff -Nru cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control
--- cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control 2021-02-15 01:12:15.0 +0100
+++ cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control 2022
Fantoni Sat, 05 Feb 2022 13:16:03 +0100
+
cinnamon (4.8.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
diff -Nru cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control
--- cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control 2021-02-15 01:12:15.0 +0100
+++ cinnamon-4.8.6/debian/control 2022
Il 01/02/2022 15:57, Jeremy Bicha ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:15 AM Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I doubt that they do a rebase of cjs too recently, unless the maintainer
of some other distro does it, such as the one of fedora. now upstream
are preparing new version of them distro (mint) based
Il 01/02/2022 15:57, Jeremy Bicha ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:15 AM Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I doubt that they do a rebase of cjs too recently, unless the maintainer
of some other distro does it, such as the one of fedora. now upstream
are preparing new version of them distro (mint) based
Hi, thanks for replt, is high probable you don't have issue with grub
itself but memtest86+, the version in stable/testing/unstable don't work
in major of case as I saw, experimental one with latest upstream version
and other patches have many fixes for newer hardware and newer gcc and
also
Hi, thanks for replt, is high probable you don't have issue with grub
itself but memtest86+, the version in stable/testing/unstable don't work
in major of case as I saw, experimental one with latest upstream version
and other patches have many fixes for newer hardware and newer gcc and
also
Il 02/02/2022 11:56, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:55:18 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
>> Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I
prepared an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with
some tests and another small fix for a c
Il 02/02/2022 11:56, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:55:18 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
>> Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I
prepared an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with
some tests and another small fix for a c
Control: fixed -1 5.31b+dfsg-1
Il 01/02/2022 19:05, Roman Savochenko ha scritto:
Hi, Fabio
On 30.01.22 23:34, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Hi, I reproduced the similar issue many times and should be solved in
memtest86+ 5.31b+dfsg-1, can you confirm using the new version that
is now in experimental
Control: fixed -1 5.31b+dfsg-1
Il 01/02/2022 19:05, Roman Savochenko ha scritto:
Hi, Fabio
On 30.01.22 23:34, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Hi, I reproduced the similar issue many times and should be solved in
memtest86+ 5.31b+dfsg-1, can you confirm using the new version that
is now in experimental
n't add the same USB devices to the guest twice
- tests: Fix hyperv @mode handling on libvirt 8.0.0
(Closes: #997367)
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n't add the same USB devices to the guest twice
- tests: Fix hyperv @mode handling on libvirt 8.0.0
(Closes: #997367)
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Il 01/02/2022 14:22, Jeremy Bicha ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com
Package Name: mozjs91
Version: 91.5.1
Upstream Author: Mozilla et al
License: MPL-2.0+ etc
Programming Lang: C++
Description:
Il 01/02/2022 14:22, Jeremy Bicha ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com
Package Name: mozjs91
Version: 91.5.1
Upstream Author: Mozilla et al
License: MPL-2.0+ etc
Programming Lang: C++
Description:
Hi, I reproduced the similar issue many times and should be solved in
memtest86+ 5.31b+dfsg-1, can you confirm using the new version that is
now in experimental?
About memtest86 package I suppose it is no longer supported because
version 5 and newer are proprietary and there is no new work
Hi, I reproduced the similar issue many times and should be solved in
memtest86+ 5.31b+dfsg-1, can you confirm using the new version that is
now in experimental?
About memtest86 package I suppose it is no longer supported because
version 5 and newer are proprietary and there is no new work
Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I prepared
an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with some tests
and another small fix for a crash case:
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/virt-manager/-/merge_requests/12
can someone merge it and do a new build
Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I prepared
an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with some tests
and another small fix for a crash case:
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/virt-manager/-/merge_requests/12
can someone merge it and do a new build
the build
reproducible (Closes: #982240)
* use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH instead of add BUILD_DATE in d/rules
* d/rules:
- use dh_auto_build instead of make
- restore a change for kfreebsd
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the build
reproducible (Closes: #982240)
* use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH instead of add BUILD_DATE in d/rules
* d/rules:
- use dh_auto_build instead of make
- restore a change for kfreebsd
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: found -1 5.01-3
the iso on usb pendrive not working is not "a regression" of
experimental build, I tried older version I saw that have the same issue
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: found -1 5.01-3
the iso on usb pendrive not working is not "a regression" of
experimental build, I tried older version I saw that have the same issue
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
today on the tests for 5.31b+dfsg-3 I saw that iso is working on cd but
not on usb, looking at www.memtest.org "Pre-Compiled Bootable ISO" is
the same but "Auto-installer for USB Key (Win 7/8/10)" produce a
different content that I not found in source code from a fast look, I
don't know how to
today on the tests for 5.31b+dfsg-3 I saw that iso is working on cd but
not on usb, looking at www.memtest.org "Pre-Compiled Bootable ISO" is
the same but "Auto-installer for USB Key (Win 7/8/10)" produce a
different content that I not found in source code from a fast look, I
don't know how to
thanks for test the package in experimental and report
the iso part should not be different from upstream except the the
reproducibility changes (that I saw that was not working), today I did a
small patch that make the iso with xorriso instead of cdrkit and a
working change to make build
thanks for test the package in experimental and report
the iso part should not be different from upstream except the the
reproducibility changes (that I saw that was not working), today I did a
small patch that make the iso with xorriso instead of cdrkit and a
working change to make build
Hi, in recent days I had prepared a git for chntpw, contacted the
maintainer, then prepared the patches to convert to dh and compat 13 and
also solve other few issues.
the maintainer is still active and he told me he would revise my
changes, anyway thanks to Adrian Bunk for your pending
Hi, in recent days I had prepared a git for chntpw, contacted the
maintainer, then prepared the patches to convert to dh and compat 13 and
also solve other few issues.
the maintainer is still active and he told me he would revise my
changes, anyway thanks to Adrian Bunk for your pending
ncy=medium
.
* QA upload.
* d/patches/dmi-more-ram-slots-and-buffer-overflow-fix.patch:
prevent crash for buffer overflow in DMI memory and increase
supported memory devices from 16 to 128 (Closes: #1003906)
Thanks to Lionel Debroux
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
D
ncy=medium
.
* QA upload.
* d/patches/dmi-more-ram-slots-and-buffer-overflow-fix.patch:
prevent crash for buffer overflow in DMI memory and increase
supported memory devices from 16 to 128 (Closes: #1003906)
Thanks to Lionel Debroux
Regards,
--
Fabio Fantoni
OpenPGP_signature
D
Control: found -1 5.01-3
Thanks Lionel Debroux for report and the patch, I'll add for next build
when I'll have time
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: found -1 5.01-3
Thanks Lionel Debroux for report and the patch, I'll add for next build
when I'll have time
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, 5.01-3.1 add only a serial console fix and should not be the cause
of regression.
The previous version was of years before and I suppose was ok because
built with older gcc, with newer gcc I saw some issue and was solved in
new version now in experimental.
OpenPGP_signature
Hi, 5.01-3.1 add only a serial console fix and should not be the cause
of regression.
The previous version was of years before and I suppose was ok because
built with older gcc, with newer gcc I saw some issue and was solved in
new version now in experimental.
OpenPGP_signature
Hi, I used many times memtest86+ but never broken hardware and I suppose
also in this case is not the cause.
What I have seen in several cases instead in which it restarted/turned
off/blocked that the cause was an overheating problem that should be
solved BEFORE these tests, in my cases was
Hi, I used many times memtest86+ but never broken hardware and I suppose
also in this case is not the cause.
What I have seen in several cases instead in which it restarted/turned
off/blocked that the cause was an overheating problem that should be
solved BEFORE these tests, in my cases was
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
I also had freeze with 5.01 but in new version in experimental as saw in
my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Hi, this bug is really old.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this bug is really old.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
I also had freeze with 5.01 but in new version in experimental as saw in
my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Hi, this bug is really old.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this bug is really old.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw this, only similar with black screen on uefi
mode that is not support and version in experimental avoid add grub
entries
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw this, only similar with black screen on uefi
mode that is not support and version in experimental avoid add grub
entries
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw this.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw this.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, if there will be no
reply I'll close this.
Hi, I also had similar freeze with 5.01 but in new version in
experimental as saw in my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, I also had similar freeze with 5.01 but in new version in
experimental as saw in my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, I also had similar freeze with 5.01 but in new version in
experimental as saw in my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, I also had similar freeze with 5.01 but in new version in
experimental as saw in my tests solves freeze cases.
Please reply if this still happen on latest version, otherwise I'll
close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw false positive.
Without reply that this still happen on latest version I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 (on pc/servers where works) and on new version in
experimental I didn't saw false positive.
Without reply that this still happen on latest version I'll close this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 I saw that is not working (including freeze) on many of
recent computers, new version in experimental as saw in my tests solves
freeze cases.
Without reply that this still happen on latest version
Hi, this bug is really old, I didn't know (or remember) about these
older version.
About 5.01 I saw that is not working (including freeze) on many of
recent computers, new version in experimental as saw in my tests solves
freeze cases.
Without reply that this still happen on latest version
Hi, new build is now in experimental with latest upstream beta version
(5.31b)
about coreboot git some links are not working, one working seems this:
https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/memtest86plus but latest
commit was of 2 years and half ago and is based on 5.01
on other linked
Hi, new build is now in experimental with latest upstream beta version
(5.31b)
about coreboot git some links are not working, one working seems this:
https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/memtest86plus but latest
commit was of 2 years and half ago and is based on 5.01
on other linked
Il 10/01/2022 12:38, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 09.01.22 22:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
a.out should be excluded. Please do not forget to add a +dfsg suffix
to the upstream version.
first time I do a repack in many years (if I remember
Il 10/01/2022 12:38, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 09.01.22 22:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
a.out should be excluded. Please do not forget to add a +dfsg suffix
to the upstream version.
first time I do a repack in many years (if I remember
Il 07/01/2022 15:32, Michael Webster ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Webster
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, miketwebs...@gmail.com
* Package name: bakunbak
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Michael Webster
* URL :
Il 07/01/2022 15:32, Michael Webster ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Webster
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, miketwebs...@gmail.com
* Package name: bakunbak
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Michael Webster
* URL :
Il 10/01/2022 14:01, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 09.01.22 17:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
@Bastian: is it good now?
Yes. But I am not sponsoring this, as already written in some Salsa
comment.
from a fast look I saw your comments only in one xapp PR and was about
the upload of other
Il 10/01/2022 14:01, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 09.01.22 17:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
@Bastian: is it good now?
Yes. But I am not sponsoring this, as already written in some Salsa
comment.
from a fast look I saw your comments only in one xapp PR and was about
the upload of other
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:47:49 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>> I did wrong to do a QA upload?
>
> No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer
Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:47:49 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>> I did wrong to do a QA upload?
>
> No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer
Il 25/12/2021 19:36, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Hi, here I don't understand why title refer to nemo-compare but RFS
was opened about nemo-audio-tab
In any cases some useful infos:
upstream have all nemo extensions in one repository:
https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo-extensions
major
Il 25/12/2021 19:36, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Hi, here I don't understand why title refer to nemo-compare but RFS
was opened about nemo-audio-tab
In any cases some useful infos:
upstream have all nemo extensions in one repository:
https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo-extensions
major
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I did wrong to do a QA upload?
No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA
Group" to be formally correct.
Ah... sry, I saw only now the mistake of not merging debi
Il 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
I did wrong to do a QA upload?
No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA
Group" to be formally correct.
Ah... sry, I saw only now the mistake of not merging debi
since the last upload:
memtest86+ (5.31b-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* QA upload.
As you have left out the changes from
c1cf11ee824384a63f961a59299a9666d8ed6a45 to the release of -4,
this is not really a QA upload. Please include the changes including
since the last upload:
memtest86+ (5.31b-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* QA upload.
As you have left out the changes from
c1cf11ee824384a63f961a59299a9666d8ed6a45 to the release of -4,
this is not really a QA upload. Please include the changes including
Control: retitle -1 RFP: mint-themes -- A collection of Mint themes
Hi, mint-y-theme was superseeded by mint-themes
https://github.com/linuxmint/mint-themes
it depends on mint-x-icons mint-y-icons that also are not present in
debian repository
upstream debian/ is not "ready" for uploading
Control: retitle -1 RFP: mint-themes -- A collection of Mint themes
Hi, mint-y-theme was superseeded by mint-themes
https://github.com/linuxmint/mint-themes
it depends on mint-x-icons mint-y-icons that also are not present in
debian repository
upstream debian/ is not "ready" for uploading
+ (5.31b-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* QA upload.
* New upstream version 5.31b (Closes: #989030, #977217)
* Merge from ubuntu:
- Use elf version by default that should works on major of system.
- Drop the multiboot image from the GRUB menu for now,
+ (5.31b-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
[ Fabio Fantoni ]
* QA upload.
* New upstream version 5.31b (Closes: #989030, #977217)
* Merge from ubuntu:
- Use elf version by default that should works on major of system.
- Drop the multiboot image from the GRUB menu for now,
Hi, I saw this package marked for autoremoval (from testing) on 16
January for this RC bug, it is widely used (looking popcon), including
by me.
Is there any news on this?
Thanks for any reply.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, I saw this package marked for autoremoval (from testing) on 16
January for this RC bug, it is widely used (looking popcon), including
by me.
Is there any news on this?
Thanks for any reply.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Il 07/01/2022 12:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
Hi Fabio!
On 1/7/22 12:06, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Hi, I saw cdrkit orphan with RC bug but someone that want adopting it
from a message of over one years ago without uploads
@John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: you still want adopt it?
Yes, I'm
Il 07/01/2022 12:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto:
Hi Fabio!
On 1/7/22 12:06, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Hi, I saw cdrkit orphan with RC bug but someone that want adopting it
from a message of over one years ago without uploads
@John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: you still want adopt it?
Yes, I'm
Hi, I saw cdrkit orphan with RC bug but someone that want adopting it
from a message of over one years ago without uploads
@John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: you still want adopt it?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi, I saw cdrkit orphan with RC bug but someone that want adopting it
from a message of over one years ago without uploads
@John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: you still want adopt it?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Il 01/01/2022 03:31, Leandro Cunha ha scritto:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 4:06 PM Maxime Lombard wrote:
Hello,
I'm an user of Debian since 10 years ago and it's only now that i decide to
help to packaging.
I send this email about wine and wine-development package which are not updated
Il 29/12/2021 17:15, Jeffrey Ratcliffe ha scritto:
Package: cinnamon
Version: 5.0.6-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I try to shutdown the PC.
* What was the outcome of this action?
I get the error message: "A stop job is running for session 2 of user "
The shutdown process then
Il 10/12/2021 20:39, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Il 06/11/2021 20:45, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:
Il 06/11/2021 19:16, Laurent Bigonville ha scritto:
Source: freeipmi
Version: 1.6.6-3
Severity: important
Hello,
Since systemd and libsystemd-dev have been added to the BD, freeipmi
is not built
201 - 300 of 1170 matches
Mail list logo
