Re: CMake's check-compiles fails to parse WITH_GZFILEOP

Or just latest zlib-ng update -- upstream change https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7adbb4cec4e1 got to fedora with update to 2.1.5 (Dec 27) and koschei started to fail Dec 28: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/evolution-data-server Not sure whether it's

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 10:07 AM Honza Horak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:20 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:09 AM Honza Horak wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 3:18 PM Stephen Gallagher >> wrote: >> >

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 10:09 AM Honza Horak wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 3:18 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:36 AM Michael Dawson > wrote: > &

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

omer applications and third party > applications that they might be running. > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:35 AM Honza Horak wrote: > >> > >> Unless I interpret it wrong, you're saying that we actually need some > flexibility in what /usr/bin/node means, which

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

ase > will be EOL long before the version of RHEL is. > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 3:42 AM Honza Horak wrote: > >> Sure. My current use case is preparing a nodejs v20 container image >> similar to previous versions at [1]. I want to use the latest stable fedora >> and exp

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

I'm trying to solve it too complicated, feel free to suggest any other solution. [1] https://github.com/sclorg/s2i-nodejs-container/ Honza On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:27 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:19 AM Honza Horak wrote: > > > > The current

Re: nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

CCing Michael from the node.js upstream to share his opinion on this idea as well. Honza On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:17 PM Honza Horak wrote: > The current implementation of alternative nodejs versions in a single > Fedora (say 38), is this: > * the main version (v18 in F38) ships /usr

nodepick idea: allow using any node version as /usr/bin/node

The current implementation of alternative nodejs versions in a single Fedora (say 38), is this: * the main version (v18 in F38) ships /usr/bin/node * alternative versions ship only /usr/bin/node-XX Node modules packaged as RPM (e.g. nodejs-nodemon) then often include this hard dependency:

Re: Workflow and other problems with the Fedora container infrastructure

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 5:51 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:02:59PM +0100, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > If we migrate our container images to some other registry (e.g. a common > > fedora space on quay.io), we’ll be able to rebuild them after every > merged > > PR or every week,

Re: [Maria-discuss] Weird behavior in Fedora 34 server

Ha, I failed to see this reply, so will close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036572 as a duplicate of this original one. Honza On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 2:37 AM Daniel Black wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:31 PM Daniel Black wrote: > > > > There's no reported bug of this on

Re: [Maria-discuss] Weird behavior in Fedora 34 server

I've reported that issue into Fedora tracker as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036572 because if anything should change, it must be there. What does not help is that it is not working the same way all the time, in my empty fedora 34 container it installs mariadb as a dependency as

Re: [Maria-discuss] sssd with authentication plugin pam

t;>>>> mabarkd...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> I see Redhat has issues with MariaDB 10.3 working with pam plugin >>>>> but it sounded like 10.5 should work? >>>>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942330 >>>>&

Re: [Maria-discuss] sssd with authentication plugin pam

m/raw/2TKhYygT > > Not sure if there is anything useful in there. > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:31 PM Honza Horak wrote: > >> Michael, can you share, please, which operating system and builds >> (upstream packages or those from the distribution) do you use? >>

Re: [Maria-discuss] sssd with authentication plugin pam

Michael, can you share, please, which operating system and builds (upstream packages or those from the distribution) do you use? Thanks, Honza On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:35 PM Michael Barkdoll wrote: > Hi, I'm having issues getting the pam plugin to work with Rocky Linux 8 > (RHEL 8) with

Re: Python 3.10 breaks regression tests with traceback changes

Anybody had a chance to look at the proposed patch? Honza On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:31 PM Honza Horak wrote: > I missed Tom already started the thread, so just passing the other mail > with a patch proposal here: > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHKMWPk0bMUvwV7x

Re: Python 3.10 breaks regression tests with traceback changes

I missed Tom already started the thread, so just passing the other mail with a patch proposal here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHKMWPk0bMUvwV7x4pYxbtNMCVvpBVi%3Do%3DS96MFYTr_WKZ7UA%40mail.gmail.com Honza On 5/11/21 6:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote: $SUBJECT was discovered in Fedora 35

plpython subtransaction test failure with Python 3.10

ot; -- Make sure we don't get a "current transaction is aborted" error SELECT 1 as test; The attached patch makes the traceback look the same in Python 3.10 and also in earlier versions. Regards, Honza From dc0bbf61345c64d8ea261b85513611d9e7fc5606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Honz

Re: Do we work with LLVM 12 on s390x?

On 4/22/21 6:35 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 4/21/21 6:40 AM, Honza Horak wrote: On 3/19/21 8:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund writes: I think the error above comes from a "mismatch" between the clang used to compile bitcode, and the LLVM version linked to. Normally we're somewha

Re: Do we work with LLVM 12 on s390x?

On 3/19/21 8:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund writes: I think the error above comes from a "mismatch" between the clang used to compile bitcode, and the LLVM version linked to. Normally we're somewhat tolerant of differences between the two, but there was an ABI change at some point,

Re: Options given both on cmd-line and in the config with different values

On 4/14/21 7:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Honza Horak writes: I'm trying to understand what is happening in the following bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935301 The upgrade process makes it a bit more difficult, but it seems to boil down to this problem -- even when

Options given both on cmd-line and in the config with different values

Hello hackers, I'm trying to understand what is happening in the following bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935301 The upgrade process makes it a bit more difficult, but it seems to boil down to this problem -- even when pg_ctl gets clear guidance where to find datadir

Chain scratch builds in koji using a module

Hi folks, I found this thing and thought it might be useful for testing depended packages before committing, something similar to the chain scratch builds in koji, that are not available (to my knowledge). I didn't realize before we can use module builds for any package set, that does not

[Fedora-legal-list] Spot's RH mail on legal wiki page

Hey, there is tcall...@redhat.com still mentioned on one place on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main ("Documentation Licenses" section). Please, change it to legal@ as on different places, as the Spot's RH mail does not work any more. Thanks, Honza

Re: PostgreSQL 13 - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On 7/8/20 12:24 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: When we updated from PostgreSQL 11 to PostgreSQL 12 in Fedora 32, there was no targeted rebuild of the dependent packages and a dozen of packages failed to install. We were firefighting this between beta and final in:

Re: [scl.org] Queries regarding nodejs 12 image

Version nodejs v12.16.1 is already available in the container, the updated container was released few days back. Regards, Honza On 3/25/20 7:14 AM, Abhinay Purty wrote: Hello, Any updates on the last 2 queries ? Thanks in advance. On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:46 PM Abhinay Purty

Re: [scl.org] Nginx Container - Secure version question

The nginx container is supported on all those environments -- OpenShift (thus also Kubernetes), or directly on RHEL (via docker/podman). There are just differences in how to put configuration and data files that nginx daemon should use. If the documentation is not perfect, we welcome any

Re: plan to orphan cassandra

On 9/8/19 8:19 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 09. 19 20:15, Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira wrote: Honza, Can we discuss the possibility to hand over the package to me? I am the guy who annoyed you on scl mailing list and I'm red hatter too. I'm interested to have this working on OpenShift since

Re: mongo-cxx-driver 3.4.0 is available

Sorry for the delay, the update is done in Rawhide. I don't plan to update F31 as it is a library rebase, unless there is a good reason. Honza On 9/6/19 5:17 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 7/10/19 8:01 AM, Petr Kubat wrote: Hi Till, On 7/10/19 7:39 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, I'm trying

plan to orphan cassandra

Cassandra has been originally packaged by folks in our team, in the time we had some stakes there. Since then, priorities changed and also people involved are not in our team any more. We tried to keep it packaged in Fedora with reasonable effort, but turned to be too big burden recently

Re: [scl.org] JMC for CentOS

Based on no feedback, it doesn't seem so, and I'm not aware of any immediate plans either. However, given the SCLo SIG is open for community builds, feel free to drive this yourself -- if you're willing and able to build the packages in CBS, we can help you to set-up the build tags etc..

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On 1/29/19 11:57 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 29. 01. 19 v 11:39 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 29. 01. 19 11:29, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MongoDB_Removal == Summary == Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is not a Free Software

Re: [scl.org] devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 missing from CentOS 7 SCL Repo

We only provide the x86_64 architecture for most of the collections, with just few exceptions, due to limited resources on people side. Sorry. Honza On 09/11/2018 08:55 PM, Perelman, Nathan wrote: devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 is listed as being included in the Redhat distribution (e.g.

Re: transfig license change

On 07/16/2018 09:59 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-07-18 09:11, Honza Horak wrote: License of transfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8 The fig2dev/lib/.c files

Re: xfig license change

On 07/16/2018 09:54 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-07-18 09:25, Honza Horak wrote: License of xfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ PR submitted, not yet merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 Hans or Steve, please, merge. The lib/.c

xfig license change

License of xfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ PR submitted, not yet merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 Hans or Steve, please, merge. Thanks, Honza ___ devel mailing list --

transfig license change

License of transfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On 02/25/2018 08:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:12:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote: Hi! During the last days there

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On 03/01/2018 04:00 PM, Petr Šplíchal wrote: To sum up what I've heard so far from the developer side: * I would like to enable tests for my component (yes, I want) * I will take care of them (really, I see the benefit in CI) * I want to easily collaborate on tests with qe (direct commits) * I

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On 02/14/2018 05:28 PM, Petr Šplíchal wrote: Hi! During the last days there have been concerns raised regarding what is an appropriate content for the tests namespace. [1] My original idea was to enable sharing tests even across branches of the same component, not only for tests to be used by

Re: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS?

On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: Hi Honza, On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment

[scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS?

It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS sharing *[1]. The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your

[fedora-websites] Issue #774: Search button missing on the wiki pages

hhorak reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` I'm very surprised I cannot find search button on the wiki pages to serach through the wiki content: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Guidelines (just a random page, same case on others) Is

[scl.org] Updated SCLs with PostgreSQL 9.4 and 9.5, MySQL 5.6 and 5.7, MongoDB 3.2 available for testing

I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. There are the following packages updates available in centos-sclo-rh-testing: rh-postgresql94 rh-postgresql95 rh-mongodb32 rh-mysql56 rh-mysql57 For

[scl.org] Updated SCLs with NodeJS 4 and 6, Ruby 2.4, Apache httpd 2.4, and devtoolset-6 available for testing

I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and 7. There are the following packages updates available in centos-sclo-rh-testing: devtoolset-6 httpd24 rh-nodejs4 rh-nodejs6 rh-ruby24 For installing them, run

Re: [scl.org] Setting SCL RPM build options in COPR?

On 09/18/2017 07:29 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: Using RPM List Builder, I have a recipe for bootstrapping the initial set of sclo-python RPMs locally in mock: https://github.com/ncoghlan/pyscl-devel/ Before building that in the CentOS build system, I'm aiming to first do a preview build in COPR:

Re: [scl.org] Introduction from me.

Hey Steve, that all sounds great to me, so welcome on board! On 09/15/2017 09:35 AM, Steve Traylen wrote: Hi, I've requested to join the Software Collections SIG. Initially I wanted to build and add rh-pythonXX-matplotlib against Just a small correction here -- such packages should be

Re: [scl.org] SCL devtoolset on arm64/aarch64

Christoph, I'm afraid this request was kinda forgotten without proper feedback, sorry for that.. Anyway, I expect you talk about devtoolset-6 SCL, right? Have you tried to use the aarch64 packages from buildlogs (testing repository)? $ yum install centos-release-scl-rh $

Re: [scl.org] Update to rh-git29-git-2.9.3-3

I've just started the scripts and it should be in repos in couple of next days, once the publishing scripts notice the change. Honza On 08/30/2017 12:05 PM, Thomas Gerbet wrote: Hello all, Sorry for the noise (or if it's the wrong place to ask such question) but I was wondering about the

Re: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS?

On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Janež wrote: Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version. In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is

Re: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?

On 07/26/2017 06:20 PM, Jarek Polok wrote: On 07/17/2017 04:41 PM, Pavel Valena wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jarek Polok" To: sclorg@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:40:00 PM Subject: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?

Re: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS?

On 07/19/2017 04:34 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: Hi! I have a fleet of CentOS and RHEL machines which use rh-postgresql94 SCL. I saw that RHEL machines got an update to version 9.4.12-1.el7, but the CentOS machines didn't. Hi Tadej, I've just started the builds, so they should get to the repos in

Re: [scl.org] New pythonXXmore collection(s) ?

I'm +1 as well. Honza On 07/17/2017 05:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/07/2017 à 18:36, Jarek Polok a écrit : Hello all. For the needs of other project we did rebuild few more packages for python27 SCLo: python27-Cython python27-python-chardet python27-python-flask python27-python-requests

Re: [scl.org] Python "latest" SCLo

On 07/12/2017 08:22 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com> wrote: On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: 1. Create a new sclo-python metapackage, using https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/rh-python35/tree/master as a starting p

Re: [scl.org] Python "latest" SCLo

On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I wanted to bring myself up to date.

Re: [scl.org] Self-introduction

Welcome on board! Honza On 06/29/2017 04:56 PM, Augusto Caringi wrote: Hi everyone, My name is Augusto Caringi, I'm a Software Engineer working at Red Hat in the Core Services/Databases team and I would like to become member of sclo-sig to help with packaging of Apache Cassandra.

Re: [scl.org] New SCLo collection: cassandra3 ?

I definitely agree and the suggested name sclo-cassandra3 looks very good to me. Let's wait couple of days for other ideas, but if there are no objections we can ask for tags later next week.. Honza On 06/14/2017 08:44 AM, Tomas Repik wrote: Good news everyone! Past year or so I've been

[atomic-wg] Issue #276: Set architecture label in the base container image

hhorak reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` I believe that setting the architecture label in every layered Dockerfile is not necessary, it might be even problematic once we'll have containers on non-intel platforms, because then we'd need to either

[atomic-wg] Issue #249: The build system should provide an automatically populated VERSION label

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` For images like mariadb, I'd like to set the version to major version (e.g. 10.1), which is what users care (take a look how tags look like on docker hub). Such major version is different than RPM version (e.g. 10.1.23) and also does

[atomic-wg] Issue #256: atomic command changes: prefer file over label

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > ad 3: I expect that OSBS in Fedora uses atomic-reactor that is able to > convert and add the README.md from dist-git to help.1 and add the COPY > command into the Dockerfile. Why not use this feature? It would limit the >

[atomic-wg] Issue #256: atomic command changes: prefer file over label

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Example of multi-line description is here: https://hhorak.fedorapeople.org/httpd-docker/Dockerfile I think it works still quite well and looks better in the Dockerfile than one long line IMO. Anyway, the New requirements seem fine to

Re: [scl.org] Python 3.6 availability

On 04/11/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 AM, meson wrote: Hi, is there any estimate on when Python 3.6 will be available as SCL? Our devs are asking about it. If it's

[atomic-wg] Issue #267: Label 'help' in the guidelines and in atomic tool

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Cool, but I don't think it helps here, since the real problem is not during build time (how to get the help.1 file into the image), but during run time, that help label is used for two different things now. `` To reply, visit the

[atomic-wg] Issue #267: Label 'help' in the guidelines and in atomic tool

hhorak reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` One issue with the Fedora Containers Guidelines I've realized -- the 'help' LABEL has different semantic in `atomic` tool than in the guidelines. The description of the 'help' label in the container

[atomic-wg] Issue #248: Container Guidelines: Layered Images used as a base for other Layered Builds

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks for the quick turn-around, it looks like resolved now. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/248 ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: [scl.org] New git package

Yes, they do, if there is good enough reason (security or very important fix). We definitely don't include all fixes. Anyway, if there are reasons to have a newer git SCL, I'm totally not against, we can have sclo-git212.. the changes in Fedora SPEC are not that big.. Honza On 03/10/2017

Re: [scl.org] Asking questions via StackOverflow

Hi, we track this request at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844 and just need to find a person eligible (Evolution seems to be the right person) for changing the page. So far I don't see any reason why adding links to keys should be problem.. except it takes time, which I'm sorry

Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemons Made System-wide

it ourself. -Original Message- From: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Griffin, Wesley (Fed) Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:49 AM To: Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com>; sclorg@redhat.com Subject: Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemon

[scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemons Made System-wide

This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea shared at http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html. Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them. But even the beloved ones have some issues. And what we hear

Re: Updated Container Guidelines

On 03/09/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Miller wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi Adam & co., I think the container guidelines should include a section about the Layered Images used as a base for other Layered Builds. I've created an updated draft

[atomic-wg] Issue #248 `Container Guidelines: Layered Images used as a base for other Layered Builds`

hhorak reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` I think the container guidelines should include a section about the Layered Images used as a base for other Layered Builds. I've created an updated draft that also fixes label names to use the lower-case

Updated Container Guidelines

Hi Adam & co., I think the container guidelines should include a section about the Layered Images used as a base for other Layered Builds. I've created an updated draft that also fixes label names to use the lower-case convention:

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This is a good point, thanks for that. It think the guidelines don't cover the case where we have FROM fedora:25 for image A and then FROM A for image B. In my opinion this will be quite common case and we should have it covered in

[atomic-wg] Issue #215 `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'd like to take this, since we already have nicely working containers based on CentOS and RHEL RPMs [1], so having a similar image based on Fedora image (working fine in OpenShift) will be easy for us.. [1]

[atomic-wg] Issue #216 `Move nodejs container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

hhorak added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'd like to take this, since we already have nicely working containers based on CentOS and RHEL RPMs [1], so having a similar image based on Fedora image (working fine in OpenShift) will be easy for us.. [1]

Re: [scl.org] your cert expired.

Hi Nick, I see 04/29/2017 to be the expire date for the current cert. Your wget also works for me. In any case, getting the RPM files from softwarecollections.org (your link) for devtoolset-3 is the obsolete way, please, install the packages using the directions available at

Re: [scl.org] Broken URLs

I'm sorry for having those troubles before notifying before, it was simply an error. However, since we haven't got more feedback, it looks like majority of users already switched to the current way of installing packages, which is on CentOS: yum install centos-release-scl-rh and on RHEL:

Re: [scl.org] Bootstrapping devtoolset?

On 12/08/2016 11:06 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 12/06/2016 02:48 PM, Stefan Ring wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Java collections were typically bootstrapped by using older packages from other collections or from RHEL. Specifically,

Re: [scl.org] [CentOS-devel] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

On 11/22/2016 10:53 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Honza Horak <hho...@redhat.com <mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote: We still haven't finished rebuilding of the following two new SCLs that are part of RHSCL 2.3: rh-thermostat16

[scl.org] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

RHSCL 2.3, which was released recently [1], includes several new collections. SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG group. The packages are now available in the testing repositories via e.g.: sudo yum install centos-release-scl sudo yum-config-manager

[marketing] Minor edits needed in an article (PostgreSQL 9.5)

hey, there are some minor things to fix in the article [1], I'd like to kindly ask any editor to fix those.. First is reported as a comment: "link wiki (/https//fedoraproject.org/wiki/PostgreSQL) is incorrect" But there are two other typos: $ sudo dnf install docker # systemctl start

[marketing] Re: Postgresql 9.5 features article

Hi Paul, I actually planed to make some more adjustments in the "PostgreSQL quick start" article [1], but I just made them and now it should really be ready for review. And the same for the second one (PostgreSQL 9.5 news and upgrade [2]) -- that one should be ready for review as well (just

[Marketing] Pitch/Draft: Article about PostgreSQL (News and Basics)

Hey, I admit I haven't follow the steps on https://fedoramagazine.org/writing-an-article-for-the-fedora-magazine in every detail, because I already wrote an article before consulting the pitch. The article [1] is called "PostgreSQL in Fedora: News and Basics" (now in draft) and I realize

[Marketing] Self-introduction: Honza Horak

Hey guys, I'm Honza from Brno, Czech Republic and except my packaging contribution that I've been doing for last 5+ years, I'd like to write some articles for the Fedora Magazine. Since I focus on databases and containers recently, I plan to write mostly about those topics. Maybe I'm

Re: [scl.org] rh-python35 package files

The packages have never been there, right? That's because users should just install the packages either from RHSCL repos or CentOS mirrors directly, depending on the system they use. It should be hopefully clear from the information on this page:

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of MariaDB 10.1 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of MariaDB in version 10.1 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of MariaDB 10.1 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of MariaDB in version 10.1 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of PostgreSQL 9.5 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of version 9.5 of the PostgreSQL server on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of PostgreSQL 9.5 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of version 9.5 of the PostgreSQL server on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of Ruby on Rails 4.2 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Ruby on Rails in version 4.2 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of Ruby 2.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Ruby in version 2.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three easy

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of Maven 3.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Maven in version 3.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three easy

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of Maven 3.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Maven in version 3.3 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three easy

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release of NodeJS 4 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of NodeJS in version 4 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three easy

[Maria-discuss] Key lengths for file_key_management plugin

I've asked directly in the documentation page, but maybe someone will know answer here: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/data-at-rest-encryption/#comment_2346 In that article it is said that 128, 192 or 256-bit keys are supported, but later AES_CTR and AES_CBC modes talk only about 128bit

[scl.org] New SCL packages for CentOS available for testing

RHSCL 2.2 was released recently [1] and this release includes several new collections: rh-mariadb101 rh-postgresql95 rh-maven33 rh-mongodb30upg rh-mongodb32 rh-python35 rh-nodejs4 rh-ruby23 rh-ror42 SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG

Re: [scl.org] [CentOS-devel] CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-05-17)

On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote: Also, adding some of the packages available in php5x-more to the official php scls, like the mcrypt and imap modules for example? I have started adding some in centos-sclo-sclo repository See:

[scl.org] CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-04-20)

The meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 18:00 Brno, 12:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. No specific agenda for today, but will be available today for discussion if necessary. Except that, I'd like to look for a new timeslot for the meeting, we

[CentOS-announce] Announcing release for Developer Toolset 4 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64 SCL

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Developer Toolset 4 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart -- You can get started in three easy

Re: [scl.org] Software collections on RHEL

Hi Noah, thank you for reporting, the issue with wrong redirection link was caused by mistake and we're already fixing the redirection, so the old links will work again soon. Now, for the question about supported CentOS and RHSCL builds -- we're now working on updating information for all

Re: proposal to put env-and-stacks on hold

On 03/12/2016 03:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: Hey everyone! Please see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UTNLVDK6TPGWKZHANSFAPJQLZFYLSI3X/ and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Prototype_Phase As part of

  1   2   3   4   5   >