Merged #588 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/588#event-1935214928___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Thanks for contribution!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/588#issuecomment-434322246___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Hello folks,
It is the release towards 1.0 (yes, after more than 10 years) which is out
for 4 days now.
I'm going to investigate whether it will affect libdnf and push into the
rawhide within few days.
Version 0.7.0
- soname bump to "1"
- incompatible API changes:
* bindings: Selection.flags
Please provide a reproducer.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/580#issuecomment-433619350___
Rpm-maint mailing
How can I enable cgroups2 on my laptop?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 17:27 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 19.10.18 09:12, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > >> (cross-posting to devel and desktop lists, ideally reply to both)
> > >
> > > Coincidentally, at All Systems Go! in Berlin
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 18:30 Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
> >> > This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
> >> >
> >> >
> Unfortunately I've just seen another similar package wants to use the info in
> the shipped macros to ExclusiveArch itself so that rules out using a %prep
> method.
This won't work at all. The ExclusiveArch goes to SRPM headers so by the time
%prep is executed, it is already too late.
--
Merged #575 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/575#event-1908990455___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #502 via #575.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/502#event-1908990458___
Rpm-maint mailing list
> Dunno why dependency generators would need summary
Well, who knows what they would be doing. Should I basically do same for EVR
stuff or you would prefer doing it in some other way?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Ideally we would need to expose summary, version and all that stuff, but it
would require more work and I don't have enough free time to do so.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Fixes: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/502
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/575
-- Commit Summary --
* rpmfc: push %{name} macro before invoking depgens
NOTABUG.
> %systemd_preun rtkit-daemon.service
This is already expanded form. This is the missing BuildRequries in rtkit
package. which was fixed in latest version. You can compare output with fc30
version (which will have already expanded macro in scriptlet).
--
You are receiving this
Closed #574.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/574#event-1903452018___
Rpm-maint mailing list
doesn't it work if you add more percent signs?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/569#issuecomment-427668704___
an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.o
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
%__pythondist_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/pythondistdeps.py --provides
--majorver-provides
%__pythondist_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/pythondistdeps.py --requires
-%__pythondist_path
oticed those
> senders have in common is that they use Gmail.
>
> So, a plea to Gmail users: please stop sending HTML e-mail to Fedora
> mailing lists.
>
I'm sending you this HTML email because Google dropped possibility to send
plaintext emails. Sorry =(
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
```
+/usr/local/lib/rpm/brp-compress: line 8: 1: /usr: syntax error: operand
expected (error token is "/usr")
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:24 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> > > If you find any error or wou
/packaging-guidelines/
[1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
/packaging-guidelines/
[1] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
If I understand correctly, when installing anything with setuptools which has
entrypoints, it will use `pkg_resources` to lokate library. And since python
doesn't depend on setuptools, this breaks.
This has been reported somewhere over IRC to me.
--
You are receiving this because you are
Closed #552.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/552#event-1865274954___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Sorry, not the RPM business. Use dnf/yum.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/552#issuecomment-424282260___
update
because of this incompatibility, but if you need it for building updates --
let me know and I will consider pushing it even there.
Thanks for attention!
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Release notes:https://pywavelets.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release.1.0.0.html
There are some incompatible changes so I'm building it only for Rawhide.
Just wanted to let you know yet another software reaching 1.0 milestone.
Enjoy ;)
--
-Igor Gnatenko
o
>python-cma
>python-deltasigma
>python-librosa
>
python-mne
>
Drop py2 subpkg.
python-moss
>
Same.
python-music21
>python-nb2plots
>python-pyriemann
>
And here.
python-sphinx-gallery
>
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
>
xample:
> > %__info_requires%{_rpmconfigdir}/mageia/info-file.req
> > %__info_scriptlet posttrans
> > %__info_path^%{_datadir}/info/.*\\.info.*$
> >
> > See you
>
> Can you consider this one for inclusion?
> ___
project.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
__
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> @@ -11,12 +11,8 @@ cd "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"
COMPRESS=${COMPRESS:-gzip -9 -n}
COMPRESS_EXT=${COMPRESS_EXT:-.gz}
-for d in ./usr/man/man* ./usr/man/*/man* ./usr/info \
- ./usr/share/man/man* ./usr/share/man/*/man* ./usr/share/info \
-
All tests are failing with:
```
+find: './usr': No such file or directory
+find: './app': No such file or directory
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
SL 1.1
> compatibility on the 8.x LTS stream and I can switch back to using that...
> I had to building against 1.0 because 1.1 broke a bunch of things.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send a
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ if $run_dwz \
&& [ -d "${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/debug" ]; then
readarray dwz_files < <(cd "${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/debug"; find -type f
-name \*.debug | LC_ALL=C sort)
if [ ${#dwz_files[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
+
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/537
-- Commit Summary --
* mailmap: invert emails for Igor Gnatenko
-- File Changes --
M .mailmap (2)
-- Patch Links --
https
-installation.html 643(2.82%)582(3.07%)
> 00:04:04
> /tech/languages/python/multiple-pythons.html 543(2.38%)505(2.66%)
> 00:03:11
> /tech/languages/ruby/ror-installation.html 523(2.29%)399(2.10%)
> 00:03:04
> ___
s point
> if f29 thereby goes one build ahead of master.
> If needed later, we can still bump master's release number..
>
This is wrong, rawhide version should be always newer. You can either bump
release in rawhide and do no changes there or bump re
repos.
If not, what are the limitations?
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List
___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> @@ -126,3 +126,24 @@ def dsSingle(TagN, N, EVR="", Flags=RPMSENSE_ANY):
dsSingle(RPMTAG_CONFLICTNAME, "rpm") corresponds to "Conflicts: rpm"
"""
return ds((N, Flags, EVR), TagN)
+
+def parse_evr(evr_string):
note that there is
I would probably keep this, but make this change for Group tag (since that one
is deprecated and does nothing).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@pavlinamv but this is exactly what this bug is about ;)
-a1 -a2 unpacks both S:1 and S:2, but -T -a0 -a1 unpacks only S:1 (and not S:0).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@pavlinamv but if you use -a1 -a2 -a3, it unpacks all of those sources, why is
the -T -a0 is special?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
this package, I am happy
> to
> give the ownership if someone willing to maintain it.
>
Feel free to assign it to me.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
oraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SSQ634I5RTHBXC6UU32SSAP4HHILOEWW/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:51 AM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 08/15/2018 08:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30.
> >
> > If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you
> > can use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to di
It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30.
If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you can
use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to disable it.
Thanks for attention!
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Those belong to python, not RPM.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/508
-- Commit Summary --
* macros: drop python macro
-- File Changes --
M macros.in (8)
M scripts
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet <
dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200:
> > I've submitted
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
>
> I can/will point you to the 20-30 lines of code in rpm5 and tell you where to
> put them in rpm4 rpmio/macro.c if you wish to "play".
So point me to.
> before in rpm.org issues in the past year
Sorry, you are opening so many of them so I just can't keep up with reading all
of them ;)
--
well, you already have `Provides: pkgconfig(foo)`, so we could do something
like `Requires: (pkgconfig(bar) if pkgconfig-static(foo))`. It might be not
perfect, but it is doable even today.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
@n3npq imagine that you split -devel into -devel + -static packages. My idea
was to add pkg-config file to both packages, but make sure that -devel depends
on Requires stuff while -static depends on both Requires and Requires.private.
There are more use-cases in Python / Rust worlds, but this
I've submitted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
to improve the situation.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:57 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM Robert Marcano
> wrote:
>
>
> >>> ___
> >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https:
PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Whoops,
>
> I was dropping py2 subpackages from packages I maintain. I definitely
> checked what depends on it, but seems I missed this. I will revert it.
>
> Sorry for this.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018, 2
> From ed22a57478396f5e82a92f80f88e0cb98ac16fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Igor Gnatenko
> > Date: Aug 12 2018 14:53:14 +
> > Subject: Drop python2 subpackage
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
>
> Whoa, whoa, whoa!!! The python 2 version of Theano is still needed
crypto), but for others projects I really need openssl-devel (not
> compat*) and both, openssl-devel and compat-openssl10-devel conflicts
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613852
>
--
-Igor Gnaten
@n3npq if you have patch, please send a PR. This is something what would be
interesting to see.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #461.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/461#event-1784164849___
Rpm-maint mailing list
This is pretty much useless.
Requires: (annobin if gcc) is not same as `Recommends: annobin`. Requires:
annobin sounds a bit better, but not enough.
Solving forward-compatibility is out of scope. CLOSING.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
@pavlinamv have time to look at this?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/462#issuecomment-412347029___
Rpm-maint
the unsolvable problem here is that it won't have necessary permissions to
install RPMs. And this doesn't help because it doesn't know runtime provides
before build. And if it does, it's stupid to build-seewhatcanbebuilt-build-etc.
In any case, this should not be in RPM.
--
You are receiving
Closed #465.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/465#event-1784164042___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #468.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/468#event-1784163260___
Rpm-maint mailing list
This sounds useful, although no one requested this in last 6 years as far as I
know. Because all this handled in higher-level tools.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
IMO this should be done in high-level tools (like dnf) instead.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Pull Request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/487#issuecomment-412346672___
Rpm-maint mailing list
This sounds interesting, do you have patch to play with?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
If you have patch - please submit PR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/493#issuecomment-412346540___
Rpm-maint
I wonder what this RFE is about. I mean what's the use-case for those
exceptions?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@n3npq that's implementation detail (envvar vs macro).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
As I stated above, I'm interested to see patch and play a bit with it. So if
you have one -- feel free to open PR and I will test it out.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Do you have patch handy? This would definitely solve some issues.
Also, will it solve issue when %{summary} gets redefined for subpackages?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
What's the problem with having one domain? Apart from mo files containing more
than just lib translations.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Other people rely on popt so moving it back to RPM is bad idea. GNOME doesn't
use POPT.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #506.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/506#event-1784160164___
Rpm-maint mailing list
subsurface
pwaltergitg libgit2-glib python-pygit2
qulogicR-git2r
rdieterkf5-ktexteditor
tdawsonrubygem-rugged
than kf5-ktexteditor
ttomecek rust-pretty-git-prompt
waltersgit-evtag
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Well, send a PR. Submitting gazillions of RFEs doesn't help without patches.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #501 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/501#event-1777681597___
Rpm-maint mailing list
After offline discussion with @ffesti and @Conan-Kudo, it seems that RPM runs
depgens per package and seems that rpmfc has information on which package it
runs depgen. So we can just export some environment variables which would
represent a package so depgens can take advantage of knowing this
What about any other such subdirectories?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/499#issuecomment-411138295___
Closed #498.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/498#event-1774506498___
Rpm-maint mailing list
There was bug in RHBZ about this not so long time ago, but I can't find it.
Definitely it is fixed in upstream.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Well, if you could provide more info.. Like configure.log.. Would be helpful.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
uct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L3Y3PPOF33WNTZBGO64YKJARAQSC3O7Q/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
_
@pmatilai that's kinda 2-sided problem. On one side if you have your binary
with compressed ELF sections, then find-debuginfo would not find anything and
just fail your build... On the other side, just tests fail if you have old
elfutils.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607044
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@pmatilai update elfutils.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/473#issuecomment-409132047___
Rpm-maint mailing list
gt; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NQY6UH3PVKYTVCATNM6JCC33BS4PSIBP/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
d
Yeah, so you break case `echo "foo" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{testdir}/weird%%name`.
This is HUGE regression.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
```
checking libelf.h usability... no
checking libelf.h presence... no
checking for libelf.h... no
checking gelf.h usability... no
checking gelf.h presence... no
checking for gelf.h... no
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
@ascherer you need to show full log in order to me to answer question.
```
rpmlibexec_PROGRAMS += elfdeps
elfdeps_SOURCES = tools/elfdeps.c
elfdeps_LDADD = rpmio/librpmio.la
elfdeps_LDADD +=@WITH_LIBELF_LIB@ @WITH_POPT_LIB@
```
--
You are receiving this because you are
that's tools/elfdeps.c
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/480#issuecomment-408678041___
Rpm-maint mailing list
I would prefer @ffesti to review this before.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/482#issuecomment-408634722___
Merged #483.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/483#event-1758666738___
Rpm-maint mailing list
I have verified this and it works perfectly fine in Fedora Rawhide (and
actually rawhide is now using generators with these patches).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
ignatenkobrain approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
Should not we modify original python.attr to actually NOT run on those files?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
ML: r...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Feel free to stop by and don't hesitate to ping me ;)
P.S. I'm going to Flock this year, so let me know if you would like to meet
and work on.
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
ling_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RFLLWLFFPAJON5UX7ORXJOZXRBFMIIBV/
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
601 - 700 of 1994 matches
Mail list logo
