On Sunday, May 13, 2012 8:46:41 PM UTC-7, ketchers wrote:
Sage returns negative value for the integral of a positive function
x*cos(x^3) on (0,0.5), if I use abs(cos(x^3))*x, then it gets it correct?
This works for me:
sage: numerical_integral(x*cos(x^3), 0, 0.5)
On Friday, May 11, 2012 2:55:19 PM UTC-7, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Yeah, stopgap refers to the other ticket in case the bug is hard to
fix. How about bogus or badmath?
How about blocker? :)
--
John
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Friday, May 11, 2012 12:31:55 PM UTC-7, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I should not that all single-case letters used to be defined, and I
for one was often bitten by this in strange ways.
Wow. Even n and i? I'm glad that was changed.
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:41:07 PM UTC-7, Duc Trung Ha wrote:
Hola,
would anybody be so kind and explain to me the mechanism behind
assume(sth)?
The mechanism seems to be broken. Actually, the mechanism that compares
boolean expressions seems to be broken, which means that assumptions
On Friday, May 4, 2012 12:27:33 PM UTC-7, Henry de Valence wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Please build, test, and report! We'd love to hear about your
experiences with this release.
Running ./sage -testall -long, I get:
What sort of machine, OS, etc.?
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:38:42 PM UTC-7, Simon King wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 2012-05-02, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
You can usually call the underscore methods directly.
I thought (i.e.: I am sure that I was repeatedly told) that calling
magical methods in a doctest is strongly
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:15:59 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
Also, I believe that the Sage coverage script doesn't require an
indication of '# indirect doctest' for doctests for underscore methods; it
is assumed (I guess) that in those cases, you may very well doctest those
On Monday, April 30, 2012 3:24:05 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
The current way how Sage handles CFLAGS is quite bad. There are several
issues:
If we change it, we need it to interact well with upgrades, not just
building from scratch.
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:25:15 PM UTC-7, Rajeev wrote:
I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following
command on terminal -
sage -i git-1.7.9.4
I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on two computers (one
running SuseLinux and another running Debian).
I
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:23:47 PM UTC-7, leif wrote:
On 20 Apr., 05:25, Rajeev Singh rajs2...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that should happen because I'm just giving the following
command on terminal -
sage -i git-1.7.9.4
I am using sage-4.8. I get the same error on
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:11:13 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Please build the following source tarball from source on OS X 10.7:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta13-lion/sage-5.0.beta13-lion.tar
I have included a few fixes, now *hopefully* it should
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:45:01 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 05:03:08PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
I agree that it would be nice if __*__ and _*_ showed up in the
documentation.
David
Then run sage --docbuild -u reference html
On Monday, April 9, 2012 2:14:02 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote:
I agree that it would be nice if __*__ and _*_ showed up in the
documentation.
David
Then run sage --docbuild -u reference html. According to sage
--docbuild help:
-u, --underscoreinclude variables prefixed with '_' in
On Monday, April 9, 2012 1:51:43 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
While we are speaking about documentation for ``._*`` methods it, a
related question. I consider Python's (``.__*__``) and Sage's
(``._*_``) special methods as public, and would be very much in favor
of including them by
On Sunday, April 8, 2012 8:44:47 PM UTC-7, Mark Shimozono wrote:
Suppose I make a new file that looks like
a sage module, replete with doctesting strings.
If I run
sage -t
on it, the functions defined in the new file are not loaded
and errors occur.
What version of Sage is this?
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:11:48 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
On
On Monday, April 2, 2012 8:32:18 AM UTC-7, Emil wrote:
Thanks for everyone's help. I decided to make it a package that can be
installed like:
sage -python setup.py install
My setup.py is as follows (except I changed the name of the package).
I arrived at its contents by trial and error,
On Sunday, April 1, 2012 2:57:46 AM UTC-7, Dan Drake wrote:
One of the main goals will be to implement new command line options
sage -fork
sage -spoon
sage -knife
On behalf of Sage users in Asia, I feel like I should request
sage -chopsticks as well...
Absolutely not! These
On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:41:14 AM UTC-7, Eric Kangas wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to find the values, and locations of those values in a
sequence of numbers. I have written up code that I thought would work, but
it doesn't. Here is the code:
l31 = [len(l3[i]) for i in range(a/len(l))];
On Friday, March 30, 2012 10:14:15 AM UTC-7, Emil wrote:
Hi, I'm working on a Sage package. I'm new to Sage, and learning as I
go along...
My source code is a mixture of .py and .spyx files, that (until now) I
have been attaching() at the sage: prompt. This seems to work quite
well.
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:48:20 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
What version of XCode, GCC, etc.? Did you upgrade anything? This
looks like exactly the sort of bug that one would have with XCode 4.x
but *not* with XCode 3.x.
Along the same lines as William's questions, you could try
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:00:24 AM UTC-7, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:02:45 AM UTC+8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:56:52 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On 2012-03-29, John H Palmieri wrote:
If only there were some way to add explanatory comments to the deps
file...
there is a clean way to handle this: it would involve creating a separate
testing dependencies graph
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:51:42 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-28 17:08, leif wrote:
Simply making CVXOPT depend on matplotlib is certainly easier, but
IMHO not really appropriate since the former *builds* without the
latter.
I don't see the problem. What's the harm
This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
threads, but I'd like to discuss it more officially:
Should we remove MoinMoin as a standard package?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
If yes, I'm assuming we should make it an optional package instead. Or
does anyone support getting rid of it
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:34:12 AM UTC-7, leif wrote:
On 27 Mrz., 19:19, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 12:10 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
This topic has been brought up here before as side notes in various
threads, but I'd like to discuss it more
On Monday, March 26, 2012 9:32:45 AM UTC-7, Keshav Kini wrote:
Simon King writes:
sage: is_Integer(int(5))
False
sage: is_Integer(5/1)
False
sage: int(5) in ZZ
True
sage: 5/1 in ZZ
True
Huh. It seems like this is the opposite of what you'd expect, doesn't
it?
On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:04:32 PM UTC-7, Starx wrote:
So I'm trying to upgrade my beta7 to beta9.
Upgrading from one beta release to another is not supported, so this is not
likely to work. (If you are curious about why, then search through
sage-devel for other threads on upgrading.)
On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:07:21 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote:
Le jeudi 22 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Le jeudi 22 mars, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I noticed that there are many places in sage's sources
(I only
On Friday, March 23, 2012 4:39:02 PM UTC-7, leif wrote:
On 24 Mrz., 00:25, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 23 Mrz., 23:18, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-03-23 22:58, leif wrote: P.S.: What makes *me* wonder since
years btw. is the bizarre python
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:53:07 PM UTC-7, firebird wrote:
Recently installed Sage on Ubuntu 11.10 from tarball source code.
Cant get the show() function to work from command line in sage. Error is
An error occurred. Latex error
First, I assume that view(...) also fails (with the same
Does anyone use the files in the directory SAGE_ROOT/ipython? Would you
object if they were moved elsewhere in the Sage distribution, and if some
of the files were modified or deleted? (In particular, ipythonrc-scipy
might not be long for this world, if I have anything to do with it.) Newer
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:33:39 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote:
Le mercredi 21 mars, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
how can I know which spkg provided a file in sage?
Let's say for example (from sage-4.8) :
I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite correctly:
there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files around, and
those are not visible when you view the attachment.
(This may be just the same as
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:28:02 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
Dear Sage doc compilation fans,
Currently, make doc calls sage -docbuild with the option
--no-pdf-links. I don't have an opinion about this specific option,
but a very anoying consequence is that if you do a
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:11:00 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Monday, 12 March 2012 06:15:35 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I have made a spkg for GCC (GNU compiler collection) version 4.6.3 with
compilers for C, C++ and Fortran, see Trac #12369.
The GCC spkg depends on an MPC
On Monday, March 12, 2012 11:33:09 AM UTC-7, john_perry_usm wrote:
I checked 4.6.2 (I still have a copy!) b/c I was wondering if the
massive patch we recently did might have affected it. Unfortunately,
it doesn't work there, either.
I've tried with 4.4.4 (2010-06-23) and 4.1.2
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:15:35 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
What are your +1/-1 to making GCC and MPC standard packages?
+1 (especially since it allows us to build Sage on Lion without making
other compromises)
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:46:55 PM UTC-7, Starx wrote:
The patchbot is reporting a doctest failure in a patch of mine:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12630#comment:10
The failure itself is completely benign, a + b is being returned
when b + a is expected, but the addition is
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 8:56:13 PM UTC-8, Itamar Gal wrote:
Hey, I'm new to sage and a first time poster to sage-support. I've
just started experimenting with the SimplicialComplex class and I'm
getting unexpected results in H_0 when computing homology; it seems to
be returning 0 when
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:49:12 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
(after having a discussion here:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/17795537)
It's improper use of BLAS by CVXOPT people that triggers errors.
The C code in
On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 4:35:45 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
It seems odd to me that the extcode and sage_scripts spkgs have their
version bumped with every sage release. sage_scripts contains the
version info for sage (in sage-banner), but IMO this is something that
should be stored
On Monday, March 5, 2012 8:40:48 AM UTC-8, Jim wrote:
I am running Sage 4.8 on Mac OS X 10.6.8.
I have been using Safari as my default browser, but I am getting
discouraged because Safari crashes frequently.
All of my bookmarks and ways of browsing the web are in Safari, so I want
to
On Monday, March 5, 2012 8:52:18 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Monday, March 5, 2012 8:40:48 AM UTC-8, Jim wrote:
I am running Sage 4.8 on Mac OS X 10.6.8.
I have been using Safari as my default browser, but I am getting
discouraged because Safari crashes frequently.
All of my
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:01:46 PM UTC-8, Snark wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
(1) when you want to apply a theorem, do you just check for the
hypotheses then go on, or do you re-do the proof down from the
axioms?
Neither. This is a false analogy.
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:45:08 PM UTC-8, Keshav Kini wrote:
William Stein writes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
It's not actually a fallback for b), though. If a file does exist with
the same name as a subcommand, b) makes it impossible to use that
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 5:24:22 AM UTC-8, Laurent Claessens wrote:
Hi all !
I want sage -t to test my docstrings.
[snip]
Is it normal ? With older versions of sage the same docstring was working.
Are you sure it was working before? Is it possible that with earlier
versions of Sage,
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:00:01 PM UTC-8, entropy wrote:
John,
Just to confirm, did this build work for you on Lion 10.7.2, with
Xcode 4.3, and gcc version 4.2.1 (LLVM build 2336.9.00)?
I'm using Lion 10.7.3, not 10.7.2. I agree with the gcc version:
$ gcc --version
On Sunday, February 19, 2012 11:49:23 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-19 06:53, John H Palmieri wrote:
On the plus side, on the laptop where I had problems before, Sage built
and passed all doctests using the default compiler:
You mean 5.0.beta4 worked or do you mean my 5.0
On Monday, February 20, 2012 7:53:05 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Sunday, February 19, 2012 11:49:23 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-19 06:53, John H Palmieri wrote:
On the plus side, on the laptop where I had problems before, Sage built
and passed all doctests using
On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say
that
if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and just
build
We have another small problem with Lion. I just wiped my hard drive and
reinstalled Lion (because of some non-Sage related issues). Then I
reinstalled Xcode: the newly released version 4.3. Two issues:
command-line tools are no longer installed by default, so you have to
install gcc, clang,
On Saturday, February 18, 2012 3:12:19 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
We have another small problem with Lion. I just wiped my hard drive and
reinstalled Lion (because of some non-Sage related issues). Then I
reinstalled Xcode: the newly released version 4.3. Two issues:
command-line
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:21:40 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:59:16 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:50:52 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
John, entropy, Could you try the following:
$ rm spkg/logs/gcc
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:50:52 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
John, entropy, Could you try the following:
$ rm spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
$ MAKE=make -j1 SAGE_CHECK=yes CFLAGS=-O0 ./sage -f
spkg/standard/gcc-4.6.2.spkg
If it fails, send me spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
It failed. Log:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:59:16 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:50:52 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
John, entropy, Could you try the following:
$ rm spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
$ MAKE=make -j1 SAGE_CHECK=yes CFLAGS=-O0 ./sage -f
spkg/standard/gcc
On Monday, February 13, 2012 11:51:50 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-13 19:05, John H Palmieri wrote:
I posted the same failure two days ago to the relevant trac ticket,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12369.
Not the same failure, your failure on #12369
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:14:13 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 14:57, entropy wrote:
Darn, flopped again. The mpir package could not find a working
compiler. Kind of ironic, since this whole thread has been about
building gcc-4.6.2. :) From the log, it
On Monday, February 13, 2012 9:55:43 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:51 AM, entropy wrote:
Hi all,
This is wonderful news. So great, that I tried to compile
sage-5.0beta3 on my OS X 10.7.2 laptop. Sadly, it threw an error while
attempting to compile gcc4.6.2.
On Monday, February 13, 2012 11:16:54 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/13/12 13:51, Ryan wrote:
#this test case will pass
def TestCase1():
r'''
Examples::
sage: ascii()
On Monday, February 13, 2012 11:49:29 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 10:05:56 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
Or is there something about the laptop architecture which is causing the
problem?
It would be useful if people would post the output of uname
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 11:34:21 AM UTC-8, jason wrote:
On 2/11/12 1:27 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, Jason,
On Feb 11, 2012, at 06:08 , Jason Grout wrote:
I'm upgrading sagenb.org to sage 4.8 and I get some errors when trying
to install the p_group_cohomology package. If
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:39:32 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point, but I can go back and clean
up specific ideas now with less overhead.
I've also added a link and a few
On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 2:49:36 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
What is the correct way to fix the following doctest failure? Here, G
is the result of a gram_schmidt() computation, hence the sign shouldn't
matter mathematically.
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx
On Tuesday, February 7, 2012 3:06:14 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I came across the following in the Sage Developer guide:
- If your package depends on another package, say boehmgc, then you
should check that this other package has been installed. Your
``spkg-install``
Various aspects of building Sage might be cleaner if we used autoconf:
./configure OPTIONS
make
OPTIONS could include a location to install Sage, various flags for
building ATLAS, and other options which we currently control by setting
environment variables. For typical users, we should
Are these workshops all going to be in Seattle?
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Friday, February 3, 2012 8:33:53 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Just to clarify, does gcc-4.2 *not* come with the latex XCode 4.x, but
it came with earlier XCode 4.x's?I have gcc-4.2 on my laptop, and
I've never installed anything but XCode 4.x on it.
Just curious.
I think that it came
If you preface this by
sage: I = CC.0
then you will be working with the complex square root of -1, rather than
the symbolic one. Computations should be much faster. With this change
and your code,
sage: z.subs(K1=3, K2=12).real()
is pretty fast. I get
sage:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:17:51 PM UTC-8, JStarx wrote:
Hi, I am running OS X 10.6.8 and I just upgraded to 4.8 from 4.7.2.
Some code I've been working on all of a sudden started failing it's
doctests. Most of the failures have been easy to track down and fix,
I only have one left to
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote
On Friday, January 27, 2012 2:19:59 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-01-27 11:17, David Roe wrote:
Why? So that things like sage -i can work without python?
Exactly.
And also for speed issues, as William brought up a year or two ago when we
discussed this sort of thing. If you
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:07:16 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote:
Hi!
On 24 Jan., 08:22, tvn nguyent...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this file 'myclass.py' that contains the following
class MyClass(object):
@staticmethod
def myt(l):
sage: from
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:10:17 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try out #3052, which is Kini's code for converting .hg
repos to JSON and back. So I took a Sage-4.8 binary, and started
looking for his code. I just wanted to run the script on a sample .hg
repo, etc. The
On Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:28:35 AM UTC-8, jason wrote:
I'm trying to track down this error:
/Users/grout/sage-trees/sage-5.0.prealpha1/devel/sagenb-git/sagenb/notebook/cell.py:docstring
of sagenb.notebook.cell.Cell:4: WARNING: Block quote ends without a
blank line; unexpected
On Saturday, January 21, 2012 12:01:07 PM UTC-8, jason wrote:
It turns out that the error is indeed in a completely different
function. One of the functions has a docstring that has this line:
sage:
W.edit_save('foo\n{{{\n2+3\n///\n5\n}}}bar\n{{{\n2+8\n///\n10\n}}}')
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Hi,
Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues
worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David,
etc., for their persistence.
I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and noticed
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:06:18 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
Here is a probably dumb question.
Currently (as far as I am aware), most spkgs should pass with
SAGE_CHECK set, though it does depend on the platform and specific
machine. Python is somewhat notorious for not doing so.
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:19:03 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
I consider it a bug that Python's testsuite fails on many systems even
though the resulting python install is perfectly usable for our purposes.
The Python spkg-check should be changed to not call the whole python
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:45:37 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
On Jan 17, 1:15 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:06:18 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
Here is a probably dumb question.
Currently (as far as I am aware), most spkgs
On Monday, January 16, 2012 7:42:49 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Hi,
A major blocker for Sage-5.0 is supporting OS X (version 10.7 -- the
version that has been out for months now).
Fortunately, it is now relatively easy to build sage-5.0.beta1 on OS
X 10.7 with XCode 4.x, and have it start
On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:07:08 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, Dr David Kirkby drki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Very few people actually use the notebook in secure=True mode. For
those that do, I think
On Friday, January 13, 2012 2:07:00 PM UTC-8, Raymond N. Greenwell wrote:
Hello! I posted this on sage-support, but I should have posted it
here.
I tried using the HasseDiagram and rank features of Sage as described
on
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 2:03:23 PM UTC-8, LFS wrote:
Hi
I looked around quite a bit but probably not in the right places?
I found I can define a vector function and how to get its derivative
vector function.
Is there a way to get at the component functions and/or a way to
On Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:21:37 PM UTC-8, john.hoebing wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:22 am, John Cremona john.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Will this procedure work? Surely ./sage -i will not work with a
half-built system? Well, I am trying...
No that won't work, as some others have already
On Monday, December 5, 2011 6:07:56 PM UTC-8, Felix Breuer wrote:
Here is a first implementation of the cup product.
[snip]
If there is interest, I would be willing to put in the additional work to
add this function to Sage. But for that I would need to learn about the all
the other
On Sunday, January 1, 2012 7:18:20 AM UTC-8, daveloeffler wrote:
I get an error when doing a parallel build with SAGE_CHECK set. See
below for the relevant part of the output. The problem seems to be
that the M4RIE test suite requires NTL and Givaro to have already been
built, but that
On Sunday, January 1, 2012 8:52:24 AM UTC-8, daveloeffler wrote:
Here's *yet another* SAGE_CHECK issue. The sagetex package doesn't
work:
[snip]
Output written on example.dvi (7 pages, 23380 bytes).
Transcript written on example.log.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Friday, December 23, 2011 4:54:53 PM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
I copied the latest version of TikZ / PGF (using a shared folder)
to the VM and installed it. I was able to compile the .tex file using
the VM's latex compiler and view the output .pdf from my host OS
(Windows
On Saturday, December 24, 2011 8:08:19 AM UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
This is similar to the situation with the optional elliptic curve
database, since the default database is changed as of 4.8 (uses a
different database engine) so the optional spkg has also been updated,
so we have one
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:48:00 AM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:55:11AM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote:
Formidable! This installed dot2tex. Thanks so much!! One last
question. When I went back to the notebook and ran a view command (I just
copied the
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 3:00:15 PM UTC-8, Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Maarten,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Maarten Derickx m.derick...@gmail.com wrote:
I was merging my new ipython spkg wich needed review for some time
already at
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:28:25 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
How can I typeset arbitrary LaTeX code?
I.e. If s is the string $x^2+1$, how can I get a nicely typeset x^2+1
out of this? That is, I dont want to typeset \verb|$x^2 + 1$| but I
want to typeset $x^2 + 1$. This
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:56:34 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:28:25 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
How can I typeset arbitrary LaTeX code?
I.e. If s is the string $x^2+1$, how can I get a nicely typeset x^2+1
out of this? That is, I dont
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:51:19 PM UTC-8, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I have been contacted by an enlightened colleague who planned to teach a
bit of Sage at the local university, instead of Magma and Mathematica as it
was formerly done. Now, enthusiasm is a wonderful
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 3:51:19 PM UTC-8, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I have been contacted by an enlightened colleague who planned to teach a
bit of Sage at the local university, instead of Magma and Mathematica as it
was formerly done. Now, enthusiasm is a wonderful
On Monday, December 12, 2011 5:13:00 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Is there an easy way to print a symbolic expression so that it's valid
python code? E.g.
2*x^2 -- QQ(2) * x**QQ(2)
How about
sage: preparse('2*x^2')
'Integer(2)*x**Integer(2)'
--
John
--
To post to
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 7:47:13 PM UTC-8, Felix Breuer wrote:
Hello again!
I have followed your instructions and come up with the following:
X = simplicial_complexes.Torus()
C = X.chain_complex(cochain=True)
print C._chomp_repr_()
H = C.homology(generators=True)
gen1 = H[1][1][0]
On Saturday, December 3, 2011 6:15:03 PM UTC-8, Felix Breuer wrote:
Hello everyone!
I would like to compute the cup-product of two chains in the cohomology of
a simplicial complex.
Me too.
What I have so far, is that I have the simplicial complex realized as a
SimplicialComplex in
1301 - 1400 of 2203 matches
Mail list logo
