On 07/19/2010 08:19 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
It is all listed at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TillMaas
Rahul
Thanks mate.
Chris
I found the following more immediately useful:
On 07/13/2010 07:55 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
If you are changing the locate of an executable or libraries the
executables write to, please make sure SELinux labels are still
consistant or contact the selinux developers for help. IF you update a
package in a released version of Fedora and
On 07/12/2010 06:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle the
included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The hope that
somebody would step up and claim wordpress in the FESCO ticket [1] did
not fulfill itself and therefore I
On 07/09/2010 01:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings Fedora developers...
c) Just leave them open and let people pick pick pick away at them a
On 07/06/2010 05:59 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Sad to hear that ... It was close :/
I didn't expect to be that hard to contribute to Fedora...
Good luck with your new job.
Regards,
Sylvestre
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 21:54 -0700, Henrique de Castro a écrit :
Hello, my
On 07/01/2010 09:58 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:54:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl
returns nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else,
though it may have value to developers
On 07/01/2010 11:17 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:14 +0100, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl returns
nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, though
On 06/26/2010 07:03 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
is there someone interested in lzip? It is a lmza compression tool, that
was for a short time used by upstream of one other package of mine.
Upstream of lzip is very responsive, but since I do not use it at all, I
have a lack of interest in
On 06/28/2010 07:36 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I maintain upx, from which I'm in the process of unbundling lzma-sdk, so
while this isn't necessarily directly related, I might as well try to
maintain some consistency if possible.
So
On 06/09/2010 06:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 09/06/10 11:39, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Hi all,
On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
life from the original submitter.
The question is then, can I do the
On 06/03/2010 01:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
Yes please. This is why I
On 05/12/2010 11:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 16:22:13 -0500,
Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
My understanding was that we would still open a rel-eng ticket for a
freeze exception. Which I didn't do for Wesnoth. Because the outcry
for it was
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
(jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
point on wiki.
So:
On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
(jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency
On 05/13/2010 12:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote
On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
I have just taken ownership of the recently orphaned package
'diveintopython' in pkgdb as announced on this thread [1].
Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the instructions
given there.
If a package was last updated more than
On 05/12/2010 04:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
the maintainers requesting the games.
I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the
updates?
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good
On 05/11/2010 01:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora
On 05/11/2010 02:10 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and peek at it every
On 05/06/2010 07:28 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Rudolf Kastlche...@gmail.com wrote:
one of the questions raised in the meeting posted by mcepl was... why
dont those people leave if they are unhappy. simple... they put alot
sweat blood and tears into a project,
On 05/07/2010 08:56 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Totally off-topic, but I think Spiralling Downward Towards a CapsLock
Doomsday would be a fantastic band name.
Or possibly a Cory Doctrow book.
-sv
That totally skipped my mind
On 04/29/2010 03:27 AM, Rafał Psota wrote:
Hello
I don't have enough time to maintain my packages so i need to orphan
them. Some of them are a little bit outdated, so they need some love.
I would like to keep one small package - wklej. You can take any other
package. Here's the full list:
On 04/29/2010 09:12 AM, Rafał Psota wrote:
2010/4/29 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net:
I'll take angrydd, biloba, monsterz, penguin-command, and pingus once
orphaned.
Thanks for your work on all of these.
-J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/22/2010 01:51 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 13:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I ran it for a long time before switching to Bacula. It's still great
software. I like the option of multiple full-featured backup suites.
I think the RHT support staff might not like
On 04/14/2010 05:20 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Why would it need to be rebuilt manually?
You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update
is available there's no need to rebuild.
Hey, this pkg hasn't been
Denis Leroy wrote:
After maintaining the gtkmm stack for 7 years or so, as well as a number
of other packages, I am now orphaning the remaining packages that were
still under my care. I do find that contributing to Fedora is not as fun
as it once was, and as such find it more and more
Neil Horman wrote:
Anyone interested in swapping reviews? I'de like to get this put to bed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570166
If someone has something they want reviewed, let me know.
Thanks!
Neil
I'll have a go. I have
Allisson Azevedo wrote:
I am orphaning the following packages.
==
amora -- A mobile remote assistant
couchdb -- A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
eina -- A classic player
Does anyone else see anything odd about this update?
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
---BeginMessage---
Fedora Update Notification
FEDORA-2010-4212
2010-03-11 07:03:40
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/3/26 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net:
Does anyone else see anything odd about this update?
I didn't know that maniadrive shares code with php...
AFAICT, it doesn't. This update looks like PHP itself. . .
Regards,
Michal
-J
--
in your fear
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Does anyone else see anything odd about this update?
Maniadrive uses libphp (probably for the Dedicated server with HTTP
interface advertised on its About page) and therefore had to be rebuilt for
the PHP security update.
Kevin
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Hello, all:
I've been doing a poor job maintaining these. I'm sure someone else
can do a better job maintaining them and keeping them current.
diction
pylint
python-logilab-common
python-logilab-astng
uqm
Have been orphaned and are up for grabs.
Regards,
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/barrage/Fedora/13,
500, Unknown HTTP Server Response)
This is while creating an update.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/barrage/Fedora/
13, 500, Unknown HTTP Server Response)
This is while creating an update
Luke Macken wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/barrage/Fedora/
13, 500, Unknown HTTP Server Response)
This is while creating an update
Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/barrage/Fed
ora/ 13, 500, Unknown HTTP
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/18/2010 02:01 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
I am orphaning the following packages. Two look pretty important for
someone else to save.
NEWLY ORPHANED PACKAGES
=
dash (critical path, used by dracut)
scponly
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/18/2010 02:01 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
I am
Warren Togami wrote:
I am orphaning the following packages. Two look pretty important for
someone else to save.
NEWLY ORPHANED PACKAGES
=
dash (critical path, used by dracut)
scponly (pretty important!)
Trying to take scponly, I keep getting Request Failed.
I'll
Christopher Stone wrote:
Can someone update pygame for me? I don't have time and several people
have been complaining.
TIA
Done.
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
M A Young wrote:
I don't know if this has already been raised but I notice on the
package-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org list that several Fedora 13
packages keep getting announced, for example, by checking the archives I
see that fedora-release-13-0.6 has been announced 6 times in March
pierre.casen...@almerys.com wrote:
Hello list,
Currently, openvpn 2.1.0 RC15 is included in EPEL 5. Final version 2.1.1
(adding official support for windows 7) has been released on 2009-12-11.
the RPM are already available for FC 12 and FC 13.
What is the process to have it in EPEL for RHEL 5?
Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for
Henrique Junior wrote:
Hello folks,
Due to an increasing lack of time I'm leaving my packages orphaned.
Even if I want, I will not be able to devote the attention they deserve.
I would like to thank all the kind help I received over time in the
task of maintaining these packages.
bkchem
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You
haven't
listed any problems
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
listed any problems with the current
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am working on getting squashfs-tools 4.1 in rawhide. It has wrapper
functions that are set up to use streaming compression/uncompression
from the LZMA SDK 4.65 library.
Currently the LZMA SDK 4.32 library is in Fedora, but is no longer supported
upstream and is not
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:36:59PM +0530, Vivek Shah wrote:
Hi,
Trying to take biniax and bastet, same problems.
Tried taking up peppy (successful on the devel branch) but the same
problem occurred on the other branches and for xpad as well.
If
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/12/21, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
I tried to push the Take ownership button on python-rabbyt's devel
branch and it worked. Then I pushed Release Ownership. That worked
too. Do you get an error message when you use those buttons? Are you
logged in?
Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
Hi,
I'm packaging a software that requires :
/usr/bin/jpegtran (provided by libjpeg) and /usr/bin/tiffinfo (provided
by libtiff).
If I explicitely put libjpeg and libtiff in Requires, rpmlint complains
because I don't let RPM find the libs.
Is there a way to include
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 18:12 +0100, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
My question is :
is it good to provide a -cli package that does not provides a separate
script or executable file, and that will work only if the user is
carefull to not launch it in a way that it does not require
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a
maximum of 864 votes (4*216).
Results:
1. Adam Jackson (ajax) 1028
I think there's a discrepency here
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:19 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Information:
At close of voting there were:
216 valid ballots
Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a
maximum of 864 votes (4*216).
Results:
1. Adam Jackson (ajax)
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 19:38:55 Jeff Spaleta wrote:
For F13 you probably want to push latest versions of the both scipy
and matplotlib together. So if you take scipy* sign up for matplotlib*
as well.
Not only those but also:
python-basemap -- Plots data on
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Good Alaskan Morning!
In two weeks I'm going to be in Antarctica for a month+ and I'm
looking for other packagers to step in for me and maintain my packages
and prepare them for F13. I'm not exactly sure what my time and
bandwidth access will be so I'm planning for the
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I no longer wish to maintain dblatex. Any takers?
I can if none of the co-maintainers want it.
-J
Ping?
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
configure when you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me, or
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
look when searching for packages manually
Neal Becker wrote:
I no longer wish to maintain dblatex. Any takers?
I can if none of the co-maintainers want it.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
repo-font-audit wrote:
Dear packager,
At 20091122T202901Z, your “gnu-free-fonts” package failed one or more of the
tests
I was performing on the “fedora-devel” repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-f13-build-current/x86_64/
There are three different reasons
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
With a little delay here are the font audit results for Fedora 12 and
snip
Special mention goes to jussilehtola for xine-ui: not only he
managed to add 27 font files not packaged according to Fedora guidelines
during the F-12 cycle, but 14 are copies of the same
Jon Stanley wrote:
The message will contain the
name of the file, the package
concerned, the md5sum, and the
user that uploaded it. An example is
below:
File upload.cgi for package sportrop-fonts has
been uploaded to the
lookaside cache with md5sum
26489f9e92601f0f84cfbb278c2b98e1 by
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
This is horrible!
Just to elaborate:
A local user is allowed to install software on the machine without
being
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
This is horrible!
Just to elaborate:
A local user
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
nodata wrote:
Am 2009-11-18 18:08, schrieb nodata:
Yikes! When was it decided that non-root users get to play root?
Ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
-sv
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll remove it.
Maybe you and I have a different concept of
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
-sv
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:45:10 +0100
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is a follow-up to my mail from October 9th [1]
As per unresponsive package maintainer policy, Claudio is now
officially considered missing in action and his packages [2] will
King InuYasha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal
binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this
Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2009/10/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
the end goal
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:13 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Rawhide is still based on dist-f12. We have no cute name for
dist-f13.
Futurehide
I expect that to be the name of a scifi book published by ToR
-sv
Yeah, but a movie then
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:57:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Aloas,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:01:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
I want to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Krzysztof
Kurzawski, because youtube-dl was not updated for several
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
Hello:
I am starting another job in a few days, and there's a bunch of
packages that I won't be using any longer, and thus won't be a very
good choice for maintainer. Please, someone pick them up:
atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game Scorched Earth
I'll take
Tony Nelson wrote:
I've noticed that F12 will require a CPU with i686 architecture, and
that my Athlon 1.2GHz won't qualify. I accept that F11 is the last
Fedora release that I'll be able to use. My concern is that many
present Fedora users will be unpleasantly surprised that a new
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/8/10 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
a) remove the explicit Requires: numpy from pygtk2, require apps that
actually want this function to Require it themselves
b) fake the numpy data type ABI in pygtk2 itself by cult-and-pasting it
from numpy
c) declare that
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 07:12 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:40 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Since pygtk2 does actually use numpy, isn't d) the best (albeit most
annoying) option?
Internally? Or just to implement
Adam Jackson wrote:
pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which
returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and
dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself
linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single
Jesse Keating wrote:
I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages.
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html
I will try to keep these updated multiple times a day.
In the case of the needed rebuilds
wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I would
like to broach a subject. My apologies if this is
Rex Dieter wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does
anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking?
One common issue for at least 2 packages (jasper being one), was that
freeglut no longer links libGLU, so if your package
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I need a sponsor for this. An RPM has been built on several systems
(including FC8 and FC9 and Centos5) and tested on all of those.
The ticket has been languishing now unassigned for almost a year.
Martin Dubuc wrote:
I would like to build boost 1.39 on RHEL 5.3. In the past, I have been
successful building boost library found in rawhide for RHEL 5.x
distributions. However, I have not been susccessful building boost
1.39 using boost-1.39.0-2.fc12.src.rpm. I saw a message earlier this
Dodji Seketeli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit :
(Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...)
Trying to do a routine yum update on an F-11 x86 machine is not
working today. It successfully downloaded a bunch of
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:21:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Dodji Seketeli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13/07/2009 20:36, Tom Lane a écrit :
(Not sure if this is the right list to complain on, but ...)
Trying to do a routine yum
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 16 July 2009 20:25:36 Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:11 PM, John
Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi
FESCo,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XZRpmPayloads
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
If this is the case, which is what I was hoping I remembered, then I
agree with you that we don't *really* need it. Bill, can you clarify
the sse2 or no sse2 distinction, and possibly on the wiki page as well,
since
Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/07/2009 03:17, Jon Ciesla a écrit :
- php-mhash (not maintained)
Is it possible to keep this? I have a package that depends on it, and
there may be others, though I have not checked.
$ repoquery --whatrequires php-mhash
php-pear-Net-DNS-0:1.0.0-3
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:22:35PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
ocaml-pa-do-0.8.9-2.fc12 (build/make) rjones
I checked your logfiles and it seems to have built fine on
both architectures ...
Rich.
Yeah, some of mine built and some didn't. Not sure. . .
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I meant to post this a while back.
This is the current list of orphaned packages in EPEL.
Some of them were retired for good reason, see the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Retired_packages
page to find out if thats the case.
Some of them simply need new maintainers to
Links from the Wiki (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) into EPEL's
Repoview (http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/repoview/
et. al.) are broken. Has this moved, is it broken, am I just not worthy
. . .
-J
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d.
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 11:35:03 am Jon Ciesla wrote:
Links from the Wiki (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) into EPEL's
Repoview (http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/repoview/
et. al.) are broken. Has this moved, is it broken, am I just not worthy
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-08 12:30:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
Thanks,
Ricky
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek
Sven Lankes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:41:56PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at axel.th...@atrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about i...@fedoraproject.org?
That is Andreas Thienemann
Ville Skyttä wrote:
I have released ownership of the following packages I haven't used in a while
and don't feel like maintaining just for the fun of it. They're all simple,
very low maintenance ones, in good shape (no open bugs and otherwise), and up
to date with latest upstream versions.
601 - 700 of 745 matches
Mail list logo
