Re: [leaf-user] raspberry pi serial console

Am Samstag, 14. März 2015, 17:06:40 schrieb Jim Munro: Hi, I am having some problems logging into the the serial console of a raspberry pi. I have connected a usb to serial dongle to the raspberry pi gpio pins. I have a hyperterm session running at 115200 8 n 1 on my laptop. I have

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015, 19:15:02 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 12.03.2015 um 17:59 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Look for https://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/master/tree/stable/ does that help you? AP# sh upgrade -v upgrade: checking web access by retrieving

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

HI Erich; Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015, 19:27:00 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 11.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; .. It is part of the release work to put the files into the git repositories (package/5_1 etc), and it's me who does the work currently. All archs

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015, 17:02:29 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 12.03.2015 um 16:17 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: HI Erich; Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015, 19:27:00 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 11.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; .. It is part

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015, 18:55:37 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 12.03.2015 um 17:59 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... It seems one of us has a misconception of the SF features we can use. It is my understanding that we only have limited access/space to/on the SF shell

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF UPGRADE

Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015, 21:28:25 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 10.03.2015 um 19:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Don't think so, they generate the same links as proposed. Yes, they _generate_ it. That must be the CMS underneath. I guess they use http://git-scm.com/docs/git-http

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015, 14:50:52 schrieb Erich Titl: Yves Am 11.03.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 11 mars 2015 à 09:39, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Hi Yves Am 11.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Yves Blusseau: ... I guess with your tool we

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF UPGRADE

HI Erich; Am Montag, 9. März 2015, 22:46:19 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 09.03.2015 um 18:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: HI Erich; ... Don't know about symlinks, maybe Yves can help. But thats how I'd do it; clone the packages repository: git clone ssh://yoursfusern

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade and pata-acpi

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015, 11:39:21 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I upgraded my WLAN repeater LEAF box today and found a little problem I would like to discuss. The previous release was ~5.1.1 and pata-acpi was loaded, probably from initrd. The current 5.1.3 modules tarball

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF UPGRADE

Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015, 17:41:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 10.03.2015 um 17:27 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: HI Erich; Am Montag, 9. März 2015, 22:46:19 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 09.03.2015 um 18:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: HI Erich; ... Don't know about symlinks

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF UPGRADE

HI Erich; Am Montag, 9. März 2015, 11:40:09 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 07.03.2015 um 00:34 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: HI Erich; I'll try to give it a test, but I have to prepare a machine with 5.0 to upgarde. Do you really have geode arch? I haven't seen one at a first glance

Re: [leaf-user] Raspberry Pi files

Am Samstag, 7. März 2015, 01:53:29 schrieb Jim Munro: Hi The only raspberry pi set of files I can get to work is Bering-uClibc-5.1-alpha1. Looks good so far but I am still waiting for a usb to ethernet adapter to arrive in order to test further. The other releases since then seem appear to

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF UPGRADE

HI Erich; I'll try to give it a test, but I have to prepare a machine with 5.0 to upgarde. Do you really have geode arch? I haven't seen one at a first glance. But your results sounds awesome; good work, we should find a solution! Am Freitag, 6. März 2015, 14:25:03 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi

Re: [leaf-user] temporarily allowing connections

Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2015, 16:39:02 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I need to temporarily allow HTTP connections from my shorewall based LEAF box, preferrably without having to touch the shorewall files and be able to stop this functionality again. I looked a bit at the very extensive

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Am Dienstag, 3. März 2015, 22:49:19 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 03.03.2015 um 17:09 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Erich; will something like that in a file help you? zbxagent.lrp https:/sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/786d2c9d66decc4c2d8409362f1180d9 446f0271/tree/5_1/X86_64/zbxagent.lrp

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

kirchdoerfer: Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 15:44:01 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 02.03.2015 um 14:13 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... The page I got the URL from is generated from a parser. Will it be any help if we add one or more flatfiles with the architecture, packages and links to git repo? Sure

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 00:52:15 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 01.03.2015 um 16:52 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; .. What exactly is different from the sourceforge pages? The Packages 5.x page is available. For whatever reason we can't this page to SF, it will not have

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 15:44:01 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 02.03.2015 um 14:13 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; ... Sure, and it might be possible to rearrange the links, so they would be more simple. For example the GIT hash does not help here at all. It's the download link

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; just a short note - I'll look into your previous mail later... Am Sonntag, 1. März 2015, 15:48:55 schrieb Erich Titl: Yves Am 01.03.2015 um 12:10 schrieb Yves Blusseau: You may have a look into leaf.zetam.org What exactly is different from the sourceforge pages? The

Re: [leaf-user] alix2d3 + v5.1.{1,2} Intermittent Boots

Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2015, 08:16:18 schrieb Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.: Is there a way to send email (log file) from Leaf while using an SMTP server that requires authentication? - Bob Look for sendmail options (#: sendmail --help) sendmail -f SENDER

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Sounds like an interesting and useful task. Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 12:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am investigating into an upgrade function for LEAF, I did not grok the stuff Andrew wrote, so I am looking for easy and easily understandable ways to get there.

Re: [leaf-devel] nslookup

HI Erich; Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 13:04:04 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP I was bit by an old issue nslookup: can't resolve '(null)': Name or service not known which you circumvented for webconf I believe the issue should be sorted out completely as the proposed solution requires

Re: [leaf-user] searching for help with webconf

Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, 11:16:22 schrieb n22e113: I'll send you off-list the files as well and I'd like to help with coordinatination with the users that contacted you. Hi, Kp, Unable to send mail to you (off-list) at kap...@users.sourceforge.net? Help? Pls try again, maybe an

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf cleanup

Hi Erich; Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2015, 10:59:45 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP did you get updated/rewritten text for the webconf packages and if so, have you been able to add them to the repository somewhere? Yes Sam Lander provided reworked text - see commit

Re: [leaf-devel] b43 firmware

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2015, 12:14:45 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 17.02.2015 um 20:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi; Am Montag, 16. Februar 2015, 00:06:15 schrieb Mega: Hi KP Am 15.02.2015 um 14:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; ... IMHO it should

[leaf-devel] isohybrid images

Hi Andrew; I saw your commit to branch maint to create *isohybrid* images. Can you give me a short description about the expected improvements? thx kp -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg changes

Am Freitag, 13. Februar 2015, 15:00:00 schrieb Mega: Hi KP It looks like neither che changes to apkg made by Jorge Contreras nor mine made it to maint. Actually this is not a surprise as mine still live in the config branch. I intend to add it to the maint branch as I have not found any

Re: [leaf-user] searching for help with webconf

Am Freitag, 6. Februar 2015, 09:13:31 schrieb n22e113: No takers? Not a native nor fluent English person but with a good command of the written English language. Please contact me off-list! :) Hello, kp, Simon, Bob and Robert had contacted me off-list. Please reply to this message. I was

Re: [leaf-devel] config.cgi keyboard.cgi

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, 09:56:14 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP I suggest to drop config.cgi and keyboard.cgi completely, for the following reasons. The only use for config.cgi is in interaction with lrcfg.backup. There is no effect on the backup operation in webconf. It is

[leaf-user] searching for help with webconf

Hi all; Erich put a lot of work to polish webconf and he claimed on leaf-devel list that some paragraphs/explanations/texts/wording are just not understandable. Therefor we are searching for native-english or fluent-english speakers who want's to help us to improve webconf. It requires no

Re: [leaf-user] Leaf Bering Uclibc version 5.x : pptpd not working

Hi; Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, 19:49:41 schrieb Ecran Total: Hi and thank you for this good project, I'm leaf user's since version 2.x. on Openbrick and Soekris hardware. I use it as Firewall, pptp server, ipsec point-to-point, dhcp server. I migrated to 3.x and to 4.x without any

Re: [leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 26. Januar 2015, 00:26:51 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 25.01.2015 um 15:36 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... it works! Good job detecting my vlans!! That is standard in the LEAF implementation, I only needed to adapt the representation scheme. I don't know if you

Re: [leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 26. Januar 2015, 18:17:29 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 26.01.2015 um 17:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; Am Montag, 26. Januar 2015, 00:26:51 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 25.01.2015 um 15:36 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... ... Yes I use the ethx.y scheme

Re: [leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Hi Erich; Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2015, 23:28:27 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 24.01.2015 um 12:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Bloody Android mailer lost your last message concerning interfaces.cgi. Yes I have an idea, intertwining effects between the wpasupplicant stuff and interfaces.cgi

Re: [leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Hi Erich; Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2015, 11:53:51 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 24.01.2015 um 01:29 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; unfortunately I get two errors when building from scratch with your latest commits. The first one in package lwp: make: *** Keine Regel

Re: [leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Titl: Hi KP Am 24.01.2015 um 01:29 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; unfortunately I get two errors when building from scratch with your latest commits. The first one in package lwp: make: *** Keine Regel vorhanden, um das Target »wpasupp/var/webconf/lib/wpa.funcÂ

[leaf-devel] errors with latest commits in maint

Hi Erich; unfortunately I get two errors when building from scratch with your latest commits. The first one in package lwp: make: *** Keine Regel vorhanden, um das Target »wpasupp/var/webconf/lib/wpa.func«, benötigt von »wpasupp.tgz«, zu erstellen. Schluss. The second in

Re: [leaf-user] Small shorewall issue in 5.1.3-rc1

Hi; I've read a little in the extensive shorewall documentation and think it's a special, though maybe not uncommon use case. I think we do not need to change dhcpcd defaults (yet). IMHO it's up to Timothy to either live with the drawbacks Andrew outlined or to look for a proper solution,

Re: [leaf-user] Small shorewall issue in 5.1.3-rc1

Am Montag, 19. Januar 2015, 18:56:00 schrieb Timothy Wegner: I have encountered a small Shorewall issue after upgrading from Bering-uClibc_5.1.3-beta1 to 5.1.3-rc1. I'm using my Bering Soekris box as a firewall/router that gets it's IP from Comcast via DHCP. I am running the

[leaf-devel] Support boot from ext2/3/4 devices (esp APU)

Hi all; the last days (better said weeks:)) I worked on supporting the APU platform from pcengines. with a 16GB mSATA msata16d module and and a wle200nx wireless module (see: http://pcengines.ch/apu1c.htm). (see also the wiki:

Re: [leaf-devel] perf failing with 3.14.

toolchain. kp 01.01.2015 19:45, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Happy new year to all! Hi Andrew maybe you can help? perf fails in the x86_64 toolchain with kernel version 3.14.26 (in git repo) and 3.14.27. /opt/buildtool-master-old/source/x86_64-unknown-linux- uclibc/perf/perf

Re: [leaf-user] Leaf 5.1.2 Shorewall Blacklist File Misnamed

Am Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015, 01:34:26 schrieb n22e113: Hello, Leaf version 5.1.2 package shorwall.lrp: File '/etc/shorewall/blules' should be named '/etc/shorewall/blrules', no? Thanks! You are right; has been fixed in 5.1.3-beta1. kp

Re: [leaf-devel] wpasupplicant

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 18:39:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 06.01.2015 um 18:05 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: I hoped Yves will respond with much more experience about git than I have. ... Looking at your git commits in config branch I'm curious if works as expected

Re: [leaf-devel] perf failing with 3.14.

Am Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015, 18:35:37 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Strange, after rebuild from scratch master branch I have no errors. Ok - indeed strange; we'll see what happens with next build... thx for testing. kp 01.01.2015 19:45, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Happy new year to all! Hi Andrew

Re: [leaf-devel] wpasupplicant

Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2015, 00:00:57 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi I made a commit to include the nl80211 in the config branch. I don't really want to merga all that stuff there into maint as it is not yet ready, but having nl80211 instead of wext only in wpasupplicant would be fine. Should I

[leaf-devel] perf failing with 3.14.

Happy new year to all! Hi Andrew maybe you can help? perf fails in the x86_64 toolchain with kernel version 3.14.26 (in git repo) and 3.14.27. /opt/buildtool-master-old/source/x86_64-unknown-linux- uclibc/perf/perf/builtin-timechart.o: In Funktion `cat_backtrace':

Re: [leaf-devel] images and valgrind

only from the images. kp 29.12.2014 20:09, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi all; as you mave seen; I've released beta1 for Bering-uClibc 5.1.3 today. With the addition of valgrind.lrp the images are about 110MB, where valgrind.lrp with 13MB is more then 10% of the image size

[leaf-devel] images and valgrind

Hi all; as you mave seen; I've released beta1 for Bering-uClibc 5.1.3 today. With the addition of valgrind.lrp the images are about 110MB, where valgrind.lrp with 13MB is more then 10% of the image size. As valgrind is only useful for developers, I thought about restrictions for images, where

[leaf-devel] commits for 5.1.3

Hi David - nice to see you! If you want to see your commits in 5.13, and I bet you will, you have to commit to the maint branch instead of the master branch. maint is for 5.1. master for 5.2 - based on a new kernel and so on kp btw. interesting reading your new wiki additions

Re: [leaf-devel] configdb

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, 09:30:53 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks We have in /var/lib/lrpkg *.local files which list files to preserve in configdb for each package. I believe we should be able to add/remove files and directories there, so the backup behaviour is controlable.

Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall logging on BuC 5.x

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014, 17:26:44 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks Has anyone gotten shorewall to log anything using NFLOG? Documentation is scarce as shorewall.net appears to be down. Try www.shorewall.net, that works. And yes, I use NFLOG. # grep NFLOG /etc/shorewall/*

Re: [leaf-devel] wpasupplicant with nl80211

Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2014, 17:33:14 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I would like to add the nl80211 driver to wpasupplicant but apparently libnl is missing. I faintly recall there used to be a problem with -lnl in the past ans was wonderin what solution was taken. Here is the error showing

Re: [leaf-devel] lwp

Hi Erich; Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2014, 22:13:01 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP I have not been able to understand why the lwp generation is so different in every aspect from the generation of 'normal' packages. Where is the logic for the lwp generation hidden, it definitely does not have a

[leaf-devel] git error

Hi all; I'm trying to push a commit to our maint branch, but I do get an error: Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 791.30 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 7 (delta 5), reused 0 (delta 0) error: insufficient permission for

Re: [leaf-devel] git error

Am Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014, 18:06:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi all; I'm trying to push a commit to our maint branch, but I do get an error: Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 791.30 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done

Re: [leaf-user] General Protection Fault in iptables.

Hi Stirling; see shorewall FAQ 67 http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#TC From the lsmod output you sent me off-list, it looks like you are missing cls_basic. Just add it /etc/modules and run hwdetect. kp Am Sonntag, 23. November 2014, 17:35:50 schrieb Stirling Westrup: I've recently set up a

Re: [leaf-devel] update version to 5.1.2

Hi Erich; glad you raised these questions. Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 22:51:39 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Just for my understandig, what is the numbering related to? The numbering scheme hasn't changed since outlined ten years ago.

Re: [leaf-user] send_arp

Hi; Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 14:14:46 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov: Hello! Could you tell me is send_arp available in leaf packages, and, if yes, in which of them? It isn't available. Does it help, if you use arping instead? kp

Re: [leaf-devel] libusb-1.0/libusb-compat and usbhid-ups

Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 18:34:18 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. It seems like NUT doesn't work with libusb-compat correctly. When it's runned as nut user - it fails with permissions error; when it runs at root - it can't detach hid driver so fails with i/o error. Anybody

Re: [leaf-devel] libusb-1.0/libusb-compat and usbhid-ups

Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 19:16:50 schrieb Andrew: 21.11.2014 19:05, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 18:34:18 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. It seems like NUT doesn't work with libusb-compat correctly. When it's runned as nut user

Re: [leaf-devel] libusb-1.0/libusb-compat and usbhid-ups

Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 19:10:22 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Andrew; while looking at nut I saw that libupsc is not packaged. It seems that the version of libuspc has changed from libupsclient.so.1.1.0 to libupsclient.so.4.0.0 This should be fixed in buildtool.cfg. kp Hi Andrew

Re: [leaf-user] Busybox sendmail

Am Freitag, 14. November 2014, 11:06:06 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi at 11.11.2014 13:37, Andrew wrote: Hi. I've reproduced it. Actually sendmail works as expected. Yue can see paswd file in raw view - mailserver treats passwd lines as header lines because they have same structure

Re: [leaf-user] ipsec setup

Am Montag, 10. November 2014, 22:56:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Adam at 19.07.2007 00:57, Adam Niedzwiedzki wrote: Hi guys, insmod /lib/modules/ipsec.o has no issues (no errors) but I can't find af_key.o anywhere in the modules download. Any help appreciated Paul Wouters

Re: [leaf-devel] webconf for wlan

HI Erich; Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, 20:08:13 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi folks I believe I recall that there was a webconf interface for WiFi. Am I mistaken or has it just been dropped. looked into git log for webconf and it looks it hasn't dropped, just never made it into the repository

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] [2bdcfd] - Jorge Contreras: Backup symlinks, empty dirs and other improvements

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 3. November 2014, 18:09:01 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 03.11.2014 um 16:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; I assume you wanted to post to leaf-devel list, but you've sent privately, you may repost if that was your intention :) Thanks :-) Not really

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] [2bdcfd] - Jorge Contreras: Backup symlinks, empty dirs and other improvements

Hi Erich; Am Sonntag, 2. November 2014, 10:01:36 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Could anyone cleanly backport this to maint please? I guess there must be a better way to do this than copy between branches. I don't think we should make such a change in maint without further testing. maint is the

Re: [leaf-user] local file backup

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2014, 11:07:38 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I have seen that local files are not backed up anymore as of at least 5.1.1. It used to be that files and directories defined in /var/lib/lrpkg/local.local are written to configdb.lrp. It appears this

Re: [leaf-user] local file backup [SOLVED]

Am 29.10.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi I found the culprit looking in the mirror ;-) I did not have a local.lrp in my packages. The system worked flawlessly without it except for the backup function. Yes, local.lrp was missing from leaf.cfg generated for the images. It's fixed in

Re: [leaf-devel] Proposal to extend leaf management

Hi; Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, 07:46:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks now that I have finally grasped the finer detals of building LEAF, I can head for a few things that IMHO are missing in LEAF - simple backup and restore - simple upgrade So I did some brainstorming over a glass

Re: [leaf-devel] Need a 5.1.1 branch to backport my kernel hack

Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 22:58:56 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks As maint is already down the road I need a branch that corresponds to 5.1.1, so I can reboot my WRAP _and_ either rebase my ath-regdomain branch to that point in time to be able to compile corresponding kernel modules. My

Re: [leaf-devel] uboot disturbs the build process

HI Erich; Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 09:11:17 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP How do you deal with uboot? My compile always crashes there, which is a nuisance. When I remove uboot in my environment git is always complaining when trying to switch branches. You'll have three options IMHO. Just

Re: [leaf-devel] dhcpcd

Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 18:21:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks Anyone knows why we have the upstream_resolv_conf_dir.patch in the dhcpcd build. At least in my case this make dhcpcd pretty useless before I patch that away with a local version. Why does it make dhcpcd useless for you?

[leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: accel (pptpd) not working, pppd 2.4.7 is wrong version

Sorry replied to cpumemhd only... -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Betreff: Re: [leaf-devel] accel (pptpd) not working, pppd 2.4.7 is wrong version Datum: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 16:33:45 Von: kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net An: cpu memhd cpume...@yahoo.com

Re: [leaf-devel] uboot disturbs the build process

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014, 19:45:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP on 15.10.2014 15:58, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: HI Erich; ... I believe uboot should be removed from the build environment unless it is not disturbing. I'd like to let it as is as reminder :) Yes

Re: [leaf-devel] dhcpcd

Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 18:21:28 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks Anyone knows why we have the upstream_resolv_conf_dir.patch in the dhcpcd build. At least in my case this make dhcpcd pretty useless before I patch that away with a local version. cheers Erich Hi Erich; the

Re: [leaf-user] Bering 5.1.2B1 486 syslinux serial

Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 15:33:26 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Andrew on 13.10.2014 10:32, Andrew wrote: Hi. 13.10.2014 09:47, Victor McAllister пишет: I tried this on an old WRAP board. Everything worked except the find modules for hardware. lrcfg complained about unavailability

Re: [leaf-devel] iw vs. iwconfig

Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2014, 13:33:23 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am about to work on a wireless gateway with mutliple radioes. From the Linux Wireless I see that iwconfig has been superseded by the iw command similar to the ip commamd. Should we consider to add this? Erich; I've

Re: [leaf-devel] iw vs. iwconfig

Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, 17:07:14 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP on 13.10.2014 14:52, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2014, 13:33:23 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am about to work on a wireless gateway with mutliple radioes. From the Linux Wireless I see that iwconfig

Re: [leaf-user] ulogd load_plugin File not found (Bering-uClibc 5.2-beta1 Rev 1)

RELATED_LOG_LEVEL= RPFILTER_LOG_LEVEL=$LOG SFILTER_LOG_LEVEL=$LOG SMURF_LOG_LEVEL=$LOG STARTUP_LOG=/var/log/shorewall-init.log TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL=$LOG UNTRACKED_LOG_LEVEL= My shorewall version is now 4.6.3.4. On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 5:09 AM, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net

Re: [leaf-user] Masquerade helper modules

Hi Art; Am Montag, 6. Oktober 2014, 12:28:01 schrieb Art Mandler -- Skyrunner: In LEAF 4 these modules were included by default in the boot up config: # Masquerading 'helper' modules # Don't remove anything here, unless you know what you are doing # Other modules available in

[leaf-user] Fwd: Re: ulogd load_plugin File not found (Bering-uClibc 5.2-beta1 Rev 1)

Hi; Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2014, 13:12:40 schrieb cpu memhd: Okay, I figured out the problem. I didn't realize this was ulogd v2, which apparently has more dependencies. But now shorewall isn't logging. Just to be clear - are you really using 5.2-beta1? I'm pretty shure there is no 5.2-beta1

Re: [leaf-user] Bash Shellshock vulnerability

Hello Trev; Am Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2014, 09:17:08 schrieb Trev Peterson: Hello, I can confirm that on my LEAF bering uclibc 4.3.3 routers the bash shellshock vulnerability exists. I have the bash.lrp package installed and the vulnerability lives there from my understanding (busybox is

Re: [leaf-user] anyone tried LEAF on this from PC-engines

Hi Victor; Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 19:06:26 schrieb Victor McAllister: http://www.pcengines.ch/apucool.htm Looks like it fits in the standard PC-Engines case with the addition of a heat sink. Victor I've got one, up and running now for a few days (WAN, LAN and WLAN). Yes

[leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

at 19.09.2014 10:35, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: ... Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It is needed with the newer kernel in 5.1. You may add it grom the modules tarball to initmod.lrp

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

Am Samstag, 20. September 2014, 21:51:47 schrieb Andrew: 20.09.2014 21:40, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I've moved the thread to leaf-devel - IMHO that's where it belongs to. I almost second Andrew - no surprise :) - it's been a lot easier to testdrive new kernels with the splitted

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

Am Samstag, 20. September 2014, 21:19:47 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi at 20.09.2014 21:16, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: ... This will blow up the kernel... Or we can try to use module auto-probing on mounting fs. Last way seems to me more likely. That would be a great solution

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

Hi Erich; (moved to leaf-devel, where it IMHO belongs to) Am Samstag, 20. September 2014, 21:16:32 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Andrew at 20.09.2014 20:13, Andrew wrote: 20.09.2014 14:07, Erich Titl пишет: ... Right. Modules aren't userland. So modules are splitted from userland initrd.

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 18:59:40 schrieb Timothy Wegner: David wrote: I guess take a look at the output from 'lsmod' on your working system and compare with what you get after the press Enter prompt. lsmod of course reports a boatload of modules that are loaded later after

Re: [leaf-user] Can anyone run Bering 5.1.x on Soekris net6501?

Am Freitag, 19. September 2014, 11:12:09 schrieb Timothy Wegner: kp wrote: Most probably it's the ehci-pci module (ehci-pci.ko.gz) which is missing. It This worked with Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1! Thanks! My Soekris net6501 now runs Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1 like a champ! While I am

Re: [leaf-user] libsnmp missing in 5.1.1 tarball

Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014, 21:32:14 schrieb Mark Berndt: libsnmp is missing in Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1_i686_syslinux_vga.tar.gz and Bering-uClibc_5.1.1-rc1_x86_64_syslinux_vga.tar.gz I haven't checked the others. Copying from previous install works fine. Cheers Marko

[leaf-devel] accel-pptp fails to build

Hi; accel-pptp still continus to fail - even in the maint branch. Any idea? thx kp checking build environment trace support not enabled in configfile make: Gehe in Verzeichnis '/opt/buildtool-maint/source/i486-unknown-linux- uclibc/accel-pptp' (cd accel-pptp-0.8.5/pptpd-1.3.3; libtoolize

[leaf-devel] Packages failing to build with kernel 3.14

Hi all; I've once again did a full rebuild for kernel 3.14 (arch=386) and the usual suspects fail to build (see attachements). Any help to fix is welcome. thx kp (just in case attaching fails, the packages affected are: iscsi, perf, accel- ppp and accel-pptp)

Re: [leaf-devel] annex pb after updating distro

Am Sonntag, 17. August 2014, 19:02:27 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 17 août 2014 à 15:49, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi Yves; I've tried to get into annex etc again today. As you may have seen I have updated my build host to ubuntu 14.04 and it seems

[leaf-devel] annex and .gitignore

Hi Yves; I think we should add conf/buildtool.local to .gitignore. It is my understanding that in a common git repo, this can be done with editing .gitignore and committing it. With annex, I'll have the sources as well in .gitignore - it seems wrong to me to edit that file and commit it...?

[leaf-devel] annex new pb

Hi Yves; it might be my distro, cause AFAIR it worked before: git branch first #git clone g...@github.com:LEAF-Bering-uClibc/bering-uclibc.git Klone nach 'bering-uclibc'... remote: Counting objects: 17328, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (5550/5550), done. remote: Total 17328 (delta

[leaf-devel] annex pb after updating distro

Hi Yves; I've tried to get into annex etc again today. As you may have seen I have updated my build host to ubuntu 14.04 and it seems something has changed, which breaks annex. Running annex status I get the error: /opt/leafgit/bering-uclibc/tools/utils.lib: Zeile 174: outp (is not set).

[leaf-devel] build failure with patch version 2.7.1

Hi all; David noticed me some time ago that patch 2.7.1 leads to build failures. I've updated yesterday my build host to (k)ubuntu 14.04LTS and patch was updated to 2.7.1 - and no surprise I see the same error: File Bering-3.4.75.config is not a regular file -- refusing to patch

Re: [leaf-devel] Git Repository without binaries

Hi Yves; Am Sonntag, 10. August 2014, 10:21:08 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, i have clone our leaf repository to github without any binaries in it. So the repository has a size of 7MB. You can checkout it with: git clone g...@github.com:LEAF-Bering-uClibc/bering-uclibc.git The purpose of

[leaf-devel] moving git branches

Hi Yves; Hi all; I remember I failed last time, so I'd like to ask you to do the job :) As you may have seen I've added the final 5.1 images to the SF FRS. Now that we do have a new major stable release (5.1) - we may move maint to maint-5.0 (for evt further fixes) master to maint - to

Re: [leaf-devel] moving git branches

Am Sonntag, 10. August 2014, 13:41:24 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 10 août 2014 à 12:02, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi Yves; Hi all; I remember I failed last time, so I'd like to ask you to do the job :) As you may have seen I've added the final 5.1 images

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >