[Bug 1577927] Re: After upgrade, can no longer set tab titles

2017-11-15 Thread Ken Sharp
This should be fixed in gnome-terminal 3.20 but we're stuck with this broken version. ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1160184 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160184 ** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160184

[Bug 1732494] [NEW] Impossible to manage package after Trusty --> Xenial upgrade

2017-11-15 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: Following an upgrade from Trusty to Xenial, it is now impossible for me to do anything with the snapd package: $ sudo apt install snapd Preparing to unpack .../archives/snapd_2.28.5_i386.deb ... Failed to stop snapd.service: Unit snapd.service not loaded. dpkg: warning:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1732489] [NEW] TMPTIME is not honoured

2017-11-15 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: TMPTIME is incorrectly migrated on an upgrade from Trusty to Xenial. tmp.conf uses D where it should be d. This also has the effect of wiping /tmp no matter what. This is fixed in Debian. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795269 This could result in data

[Bug 1732489] [NEW] TMPTIME is not honoured

2017-11-15 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: TMPTIME is incorrectly migrated on an upgrade from Trusty to Xenial. tmp.conf uses D where it should be d. This also has the effect of wiping /tmp no matter what. This is fixed in Debian. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795269 This could result in data

[Bug 1732489] [NEW] TMPTIME is not honoured

2017-11-15 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: TMPTIME is incorrectly migrated on an upgrade from Trusty to Xenial. tmp.conf uses D where it should be d. This also has the effect of wiping /tmp no matter what. This is fixed in Debian. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795269 This could result in data

[Bug 1727861] Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-IJy1zi/linux-hwe-4.10.0/fs/cachefiles/namei.c:164!

2017-11-06 Thread Ken Sharp
A Debian user has reported this upstream. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194639 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727861 Title: kernel BUG at

[Bug 1727861] Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-IJy1zi/linux-hwe-4.10.0/fs/cachefiles/namei.c:164!

2017-11-06 Thread Ken Sharp
A Debian user has reported this upstream. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751933 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #751933 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751933 ** Also affects: cachefilesd (Debian) via

[Bug 671919] Re: apt-get install fonty-rg is missing dependency console-tools

2017-11-06 Thread Ken Sharp
console-tools appears to have been dropped after Wheezy, though it's not clear why. https://packages.debian.org/console-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671919 Title: apt-get

[Bug 671919] Re: apt-get install fonty-rg is missing dependency console-tools

2017-11-06 Thread Ken Sharp
It's more than minor. The script /usr/bin/utf8 fails entirely. $ utf8 unicode_start skipped on /dev/pts/0 /usr/bin/utf8: 14: /usr/bin/utf8: consolechars: not found ** Tags added: artful bionic unmetdeps xenial zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

bug#28811: 11.90.2.2017-07-25; preview-at-point

2017-11-06 Thread Ken Sharp
At 21:59 05/11/2017 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Given the rather acrimonious past history of our discussions, I think >> it may be better if I hand this to a colleague. I'll speak to someone >> tomorrow and see if they are willing to take it on. I am not sure that having to start over

bug#28811: 11.90.2.2017-07-25; preview-at-point

2017-11-05 Thread Ken Sharp
At 19:24 05/11/2017 +0100, you wrote: > Make *what* safe ? .runandhide wasn't (directly) an aspect of SAFER or > DELAYSAFER, its perfectly possible to have, and write PostScript which > is not compatible with SAFER (and which therefore needs to be run > before SAFER) but which doesn't require

bug#28811: 11.90.2.2017-07-25; preview-at-point

2017-11-05 Thread Ken Sharp
At 20:45 04/11/2017 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Also WRITESYSTEMDICT and other things. > > In any event, DELAYSAFER hasn't changed. It's pretty pointless unless one can use .runandhide to temporarily be safe. Make *what* safe ? .runandhide wasn't (directly) an aspect of SAFER or

bug#28811: 11.90.2.2017-07-25; preview-at-point

2017-11-04 Thread Ken Sharp
At 18:16 04/11/2017 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Well the obvious suggestion is simply 'don't use SAFER and DELAYSAFER' > because then you don't need .runandhide :-) They are there for a reason, aren't they? Yes, though I would (and have) argued against them. The interpreter is intended to

[Bug 1463840] Re: debootstrap --variant=fakechroot --arch=i386 impossible on Trusty amd64

2017-10-27 Thread Ken Sharp
Two years. Nobody cares. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1463840 Title: debootstrap --variant=fakechroot --arch=i386 impossible on Trusty amd64 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1727861] [NEW] kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-IJy1zi/linux-hwe-4.10.0/fs/cachefiles/namei.c:164!

2017-10-26 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: I have just installed cachefilesd and rebooted. The only change I made was the location of the cache - everything else is set to default. The cache location exists and is writable. I thought I'd test so first attempt: $ cat /mnt/server/share/file > /dev/null No problem.

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-26 Thread Ken Sharp
At 18:05 26/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer a showstopper for you ? We do not need PDFDontUseFontObjectNum any longer. It's removal is not a showstopper. Thanks for the confirmation! We've run across a

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-26 Thread Ken Sharp
At 11:24 25/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: Thanks to the ghostscript community for your great tool and your patience! Just to be absolutely certain; the lack of PDFDontUseFontObjectNum is no longer a showstopper for you ? We're planning to do a second release candidate 'real soon now'

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-25 Thread Ken Sharp
At 19:12 23/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: For a recent ghostscript without the PDFDontUseFontObjectNum only the combination of lilyponds --bigpdfs with -dgs-never-embed-fonts gives the desired result. The necessity for the extractpdfmark utility has not changed - use it if you link to

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-23 Thread Ken Sharp
At 02:35 23/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: > Converting to TeX format would probably work, but apparently there > were problems with that. > > Is there some other approach available ? There is a method of using font non-embedded PDF. In my experiment, it seems to work fine except

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-22 Thread Ken Sharp
At 10:12 22/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: Well, if we could delay the embedding, I'd not be particularly sad: "make doc" currently(?) eats up more than 3Gb which is sort of ridiculous. The intermediate PDFs for lilypond-book are arranged in some "database" and not really externalized,

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-22 Thread Ken Sharp
At 10:23 22/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: If it's a conceivable part of a good longterm strategy: I think our fonts are generated via Fontforge starting with a METAFONT (or METAPOST?) font description, so it's conceivable that if other font formats would generally be better supported by

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-22 Thread Ken Sharp
At 00:41 22/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Or, even so, should we take other methods (e.g. using non-embedded PDFs)? If we figure out a working alternative, we should take it. The current set of Ghostscript bugs in 9.22 is still a bit in flux, so it's not clear yet which alternative

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-22 Thread Ken Sharp
At 07:01 22/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: If there is a full font embedded (non-subset) PDF, does the bigpdfs trick work effectively? Its still, in my opinion, a risky thing to do. However, if the font were fully embedded, you wouldn't need to use Ghostscript and the

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-21 Thread Ken Sharp
At 21:43 21/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: We use the following command to convert from EPS to PDF. $ gs -dSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -dSubsetFonts=false -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dAutoRotatePages=/None -sOutputFile=filename.pdf -c.setpdfwrite

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-21 Thread Ken Sharp
At 14:43 21/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: The fonts in the pdfs are identical fonts constructed by ghostscript on the fly, I think it was Ken Sharp who explained to me some years ago that the term "subset" is wrong ;-) Well, sort of, they aren't identical though, they are all

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-21 Thread Ken Sharp
At 18:50 20/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: Did you get to see the PostScript files before conversion with pstopdf? Would being able to generate those differently make a difference? I'm pretty sure Knut sent me everything, really everything. Not that I can use it all, but its nice to

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-20 Thread Ken Sharp
At 14:57 20/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: I sent a collection of files to Ken. Well, my idea doesn't work with your font, because (I think) its an OTF font. I had hoped it would be possible to create the PDF files with *no* fonts embedded at all, then have Ghostscript embed them just

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-20 Thread Ken Sharp
At 22:30 19/09/2017 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: What happens if you include several "final" pdfs in a *TeX document? If you include several pdfs generated as described above in a *TeX-generated pdf, all fonts from the lilypond pdfs are included. Probably all are different. If you feed

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 17:35 19/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: TeX is designed for the problem of creating documents and all current TeX engines offer ways of including externally created inclusions in a graphic format. And Ghostscript, far from being a general purpose program, is designed for executing

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 15:11 19/09/2017 +, William Bader wrote: >It would be possible to write a tool which could reliably detect identical fonts in a PDF file, There are already libraries that can read PDFs into a data structure and then write a new PDF, for example, pdfsizeopt in python, poppler

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 16:29 19/09/2017 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: This is next to impossible. lilypond has knowledge for good music typography, while TeX has knowledge for good text typography. I read your suggestion that lilypond should do everything, i.e., both text and music layout, but this won't happen,

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 15:44 19/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: Are there any example documents with thousands of pages and ten thousands of PDF inclusions one could look at? I would suggest that the fact you want to 'include' tens of thousands of PDF files to be the problem, really. I appreciate you are

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 13:42 19/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: So the mechanisms mostly out of our own control are Ghostscript in its ps2pdf facility, various TeX engines when including lots of ps2pdf-generated PDF files into a main document. To me this is where the problem lies, PDF is good as a terminal

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 11:33 19/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: The question is what the complaint should be, namely what LilyPond does wrong. Producing large comprehensive manuals using TeX including lots of example images generated using the same fonts? Ah, you need to be careful talking about 'images'

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
do feel that creating the pages in this fashion is less than ideal and you would probably be well advised to seek a different way of working. As I have said (repeatedly now) I will discuss this with the other developers, and the input (especially from Knut's mail) will be taken into account.

Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
would discuss it internally right from the start. Ken Sharp ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 17:27 18/09/2017 -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote: Masamichi Hosoda wrote: > >>It seems that `-dPDFDontUseFontObjectNum` option does not work. ... > There is a tool for using this method of removing duplicate fonts. > https://www.ctan.org/pkg/extractpdfmark >

Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-19 Thread Ken Sharp
At 20:38 18/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: I think "slightly smaller" was something like a factor of 10. We are talking about files including literally thousands if not ten thousands of graphics (manuals close to a thousand pages with lots of graphic output included). Then maybe you

Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1

2017-09-18 Thread Ken Sharp
At 00:31 19/09/2017 +0900, Masamichi Hosoda wrote: When you create a PDF document using something like a TeX system you may include many small PDF files in the main PDF file. It is common for each of the small PDF files to use the same fonts. If the small PDF files contain embedded full font

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1028543] Re: Invisible Unity bars

2017-06-29 Thread Ken Sharp
I have not seen this seen moving from Precise to Trusty. Also not seen this on Xenial. I can think of no reason for going backwards to Precise so you can close this unless someone else is still seeing this on Precise (and Precise is still supported). -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1028543] Re: Invisible Unity bars

2017-06-29 Thread Ken Sharp
I have not seen this seen moving from Precise to Trusty. Also not seen this on Xenial. I can think of no reason for going backwards to Precise so you can close this unless someone else is still seeing this on Precise (and Precise is still supported). -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1028543] Re: Invisible Unity bars

2017-06-29 Thread Ken Sharp
I have not seen this seen moving from Precise to Trusty. Also not seen this on Xenial. I can think of no reason for going backwards to Precise so you can close this unless someone else is still seeing this on Precise (and Precise is still supported). -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1369216] Re: gpu-manager: /etc/modprobe.d is not a file

2017-03-11 Thread Ken Sharp
I installed DKMS and it went away. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1369216 Title: gpu-manager: /etc/modprobe.d is not a file To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1369216] Re: gpu-manager: /etc/modprobe.d is not a file

2017-03-11 Thread Ken Sharp
I installed DKMS and it went away. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1369216 Title: gpu-manager: /etc/modprobe.d is not a file Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1670315] Re: Ubuntu 17.04: Guest does not reflect all the cpus hotplugged

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670315 Title: Ubuntu 17.04: Guest does not reflect all the cpus hotplugged Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New

[Bug 1670315] Re: Ubuntu 17.04: Guest does not reflect all the cpus hotplugged

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670315 Title: Ubuntu 17.04: Guest does not reflect all the cpus hotplugged To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1252909] Re: Nautilus takes no notice of my selection in File --> Properties

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
The file menu, as well as all the others, have been removed from Nautilus, which is marvellous. Nemo, a fork of Nautilus which doesn't adore Unity, doesn't have this issue in Trusty or Xenial. There is no Nemo for Precise but then it wasn't needed. -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1252909] Re: Nautilus takes no notice of my selection in File --> Properties

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
The file menu, as well as all the others, have been removed from Nautilus, which is marvellous. Nemo, a fork of Nautilus which doesn't adore Unity, doesn't have this issue in Trusty or Xenial. There is no Nemo for Precise but then it wasn't needed. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1252909] Re: Nautilus takes no notice of my selection in File --> Properties

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
The file menu, as well as all the others, have been removed from Nautilus, which is marvellous. Nemo, a fork of Nautilus which doesn't adore Unity, doesn't have this issue in Trusty or Xenial. There is no Nemo for Precise but then it wasn't needed. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 347646] Re: Wine associated program loads too slow

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
** Changed in: wine (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347646 Title: Wine associated program loads too slow To manage notifications about

[Touch-packages] [Bug 349913] Re: sftp: cannot enter umlauts like ä, ö, ü

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Still broken in Trusty, but fixed in Xenial. Trusty: Version: 1:6.6p1-2ubuntu2.8 Xenial: Version: 1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.1 ** Tags added: trusty ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Bug 349913] Re: sftp: cannot enter umlauts like ä, ö, ü

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Still broken in Trusty, but fixed in Xenial. Trusty: Version: 1:6.6p1-2ubuntu2.8 Xenial: Version: 1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.1 ** Tags added: trusty ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1115607] Re: boincmgr unable to launch a second instance

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
I'm guessing that nobody is interested in this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1115607 Title: boincmgr unable to launch a second instance To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1232928] Re: crda defaults file not honoured on wireless association

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Anybody aware of a work around? Presumably NM uses scripts to ignore the default file. ** Tags added: xenial ** Tags added: amd64 raring trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232928

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1232928] Re: crda defaults file not honoured on wireless association

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Anybody aware of a work around? Presumably NM uses scripts to ignore the default file. ** Tags added: xenial ** Tags added: amd64 raring trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1232928] Re: crda defaults file not honoured on wireless association

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Anybody aware of a work around? Presumably NM uses scripts to ignore the default file. ** Tags added: xenial ** Tags added: amd64 raring trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1670325] [NEW] NetworkManager resets regulatory domain to incorrect value

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1232928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232928 Public bug reported: I have added COUNTRY=GB to /etc/default/crda. During boot the RD is correctly set: [ 28.766534] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 28.766541] cfg80211: DFS Master

[Bug 1670325] [NEW] NetworkManager resets regulatory domain to incorrect value

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1232928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232928 Public bug reported: I have added COUNTRY=GB to /etc/default/crda. During boot the RD is correctly set: [ 28.766534] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 28.766541] cfg80211: DFS Master

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1670325] [NEW] NetworkManager resets regulatory domain to incorrect value

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1232928 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232928 Public bug reported: I have added COUNTRY=GB to /etc/default/crda. During boot the RD is correctly set: [ 28.766534] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated: [ 28.766541] cfg80211: DFS Master

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 365049] Re: NM applet should allow to set the CRDA domain

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
This is an upstream issue as clearly stated in the kernel wiki. “Using Network Manager to change regulatory domains This needs to be implemented, but since Network Manager uses wpa_supplicant it should just be a matter of adding a user interface option to let a user select an alpha2 and then

[Bug 365049] Re: NM applet should allow to set the CRDA domain

2017-03-06 Thread Ken Sharp
This is an upstream issue as clearly stated in the kernel wiki. “Using Network Manager to change regulatory domains This needs to be implemented, but since Network Manager uses wpa_supplicant it should just be a matter of adding a user interface option to let a user select an alpha2 and then

[Bug 912153] Re: cannot unmount sshfs mounts when ssh connection is lost

2017-02-27 Thread Ken Sharp
What versions are being used? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912153 Title: cannot unmount sshfs mounts when ssh connection is lost To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1037500] Re: sshfs mounts could not be remounted

2017-02-27 Thread Ken Sharp
Do you still see this behaviour? ** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037500 Title: sshfs mounts could not be

[Bug 137514] Re: sshfs locks up randomly

2017-02-27 Thread Ken Sharp
Are you still seeing this? ** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137514 Title: sshfs locks up randomly To manage

[Bug 877912] Re: sshfs 2.2-1.1 depends on non-existing packet fuse

2017-02-27 Thread Ken Sharp
Has this been fixed yet? ** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877912 Title: sshfs 2.2-1.1 depends on non-existing

[Bug 1531958] Re: mosh doesnt allow cryptfs-mount-home

2017-02-10 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: precise trusty ** Bug watch added: Mosh on GitHub #529 https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/529 ** Also affects: mosh via https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/529 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: mosh (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1399064] Re: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves

2017-01-23 Thread Ken Sharp
LXC displays similar behavious in Xenial. The "solution" was to set the MTUs for all the slave interfaces, and all the interfaces within the guests, then finally set the bridge MTU, otherwise it will simply refuse. Worked fine. Haven't yet looked into the configs to see if I can do this

[Bug 1399064] Re: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves

2017-01-23 Thread Ken Sharp
LXC displays similar behavious in Xenial. The "solution" was to set the MTUs for all the slave interfaces, and all the interfaces within the guests, then finally set the bridge MTU, otherwise it will simply refuse. Worked fine. Haven't yet looked into the configs to see if I can do this

[Bug 1399064] Re: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves

2017-01-23 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399064 Title: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1399064] Re: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves

2017-01-23 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399064 Title: bridges cannot have a mtu > 1500 by themselves Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug

[Bug 1300426] Re: frei0r-plugins-doc common file in frei0r-plugins

2017-01-15 Thread Ken Sharp
Where did you get 1.4.0+git20130403.245bb387-0ubuntu0~sunab~precise1 from? It doesn't look like it's an official package and so not a bug. ** Changed in: frei0r (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1265786] Re: ntfs-3g does not terminate at computer shutdown

2017-01-13 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265786 Title: ntfs-3g does not terminate at computer shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 640418] Re: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit

2017-01-12 Thread Ken Sharp
There's POSIX shell highlighting but no bash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640418 Title: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit Status in gedit package in

[Bug 640418] Re: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit

2017-01-12 Thread Ken Sharp
There's POSIX shell highlighting but no bash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640418 Title: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit To manage notifications

[Bug 640418] Re: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit

2017-01-12 Thread Ken Sharp
There's POSIX shell highlighting but no bash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640418 Title: Please add support for bash highlight in gedit To manage notifications about this bug go

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1504659] Re: Duplicate line for path "/var/log" warning is shown when rsyslog is installed

2016-11-14 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: amd64 xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504659 Title: Duplicate line for path "/var/log" warning is shown when rsyslog is installed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1530610] Re: tmpfiles.d conflicting rules to manage /var/log

2016-11-14 Thread Ken Sharp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1504659 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530610 Title: tmpfiles.d conflicting rules to manage

[Bug 1530610] Re: tmpfiles.d conflicting rules to manage /var/log

2016-11-14 Thread Ken Sharp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1504659 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530610 Title: tmpfiles.d conflicting rules to manage /var/log To manage notifications

[Bug 1504659] Re: Duplicate line for path "/var/log" warning is shown when rsyslog is installed

2016-11-14 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: amd64 xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504659 Title: Duplicate line for path "/var/log" warning is shown when rsyslog is installed To manage notifications

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1025973] Re: ureadahead appears to violate Apple patent 7607000

2016-09-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ureadahead in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025973 Title: ureadahead appears to violate Apple

[Bug 1025973] Re: ureadahead appears to violate Apple patent 7607000

2016-09-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025973 Title: ureadahead appears to violate Apple patent 7607000 To manage

[Bug 1537471] Re: upnpapi.c:3390 GetHandleInfo: HandleTable[2] is NULL

2016-08-05 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: amd64 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537471 Title: upnpapi.c:3390 GetHandleInfo: HandleTable[2] is NULL To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [ft-devel] "Inside the fastest font renderer in the world"

2016-08-05 Thread Ken Sharp
At 09:09 05/08/2016 +0100, Graham Asher wrote: I see your point, but I think that adding obfuscation (the extra complexity introduced by using C) to the code to support a tiny and vanishing minority of systems without C++ is not worth the bother; such systems would very probably not be able

[Bug 1271531] Re: Specifying cgset -r multiple times fails

2016-02-23 Thread Ken Sharp
Of course it's not fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271531 Title: Specifying cgset -r multiple times fails To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1271531] Re: Specifying cgset -r multiple times fails

2016-02-23 Thread Ken Sharp
Of course it's not fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271531 Title: Specifying cgset -r multiple times fails To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1542619] [NEW] cgget -h insane typos

2016-02-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: Typing 'cgget -h' outputs some blatant typos: -gController which info should be displaied -g :Control group whih info should be displaied ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: cgroup-bin 0.38-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 1542619] [NEW] cgget -h insane typos

2016-02-06 Thread Ken Sharp
Public bug reported: Typing 'cgget -h' outputs some blatant typos: -gController which info should be displaied -g :Control group whih info should be displaied ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: cgroup-bin 0.38-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 1445449] Re: xpra Precise client --> Trusty server fails badly

2016-02-06 Thread Ken Sharp
I've moved all the machines to Trusty now. I'll leave this to expire just in case anyone else is interested in the backport. Workaround (for reference): http://kennystechtalk.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04 /xpra-failing-on-localhost.html ** Changed in: xpra (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1239540] Re: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/var/lib/lightdm/.config/pulse/cookie': No such file or directory

2016-01-05 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: i386 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239540 Title: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file

[Bug 1239540] Re: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/var/lib/lightdm/.config/pulse/cookie': No such file or directory

2016-01-05 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: i386 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239540 Title: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/var/lib/lightdm/.config/pulse/cookie': No such file

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1239540] Re: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/var/lib/lightdm/.config/pulse/cookie': No such file or directory

2016-01-05 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: i386 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239540 Title: [pulseaudio] authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2015-12-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068756 Title: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default Status in cloud-init

[Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2015-12-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068756 Title: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default To manage notifications about

[Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2015-12-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068756 Title: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1253445] Re: Applet fails to load if pid file present in /tmp

2015-12-19 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253445 Title: Applet fails to load if pid file present in /tmp To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1253445] Re: Applet fails to load if pid file present in /tmp

2015-12-19 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to indicator-weather in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253445 Title: Applet fails to load if pid file present in /tmp Status in indicator-weather package in

Bug#313413: (no subject)

2015-12-13 Thread Ken Sharp
What possible use is this? This is what /etc/hosts is for.

Bug#313413: (no subject)

2015-12-13 Thread Ken Sharp
What possible use is this? This is what /etc/hosts is for.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1313042] Re: console-kit-daemon Glib-CRITICAL warning

2015-12-09 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags removed: consolekit libglib2 ssh ** Tags added: amd64 i386 saucy trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to consolekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313042 Title: console-kit-daemon

[Bug 1313042] Re: console-kit-daemon Glib-CRITICAL warning

2015-12-09 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags removed: consolekit libglib2 ssh ** Tags added: amd64 i386 saucy trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313042 Title: console-kit-daemon Glib-CRITICAL warning To manage

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >