Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:02:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > drpms work by downloading the delta, then using it + the version you > > have installed to recreate the signed rpm (just like you download

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210806.n.0 changes

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:42:48AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 03:38:38PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210805.n.0 > > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210806.n.0 > > Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-4903.fc35 > > Old package:

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Hi all, > > I think deltarpm is not really useful anymore: > - there are very few drpm files in the repository, see for example: > >

Re: Weird glibc recursive stack crash in Rawhide

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 11:15:25AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 07. 08. 21 v 23:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:04 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > > > In unrelat

Re: Weird glibc recursive stack crash in Rawhide

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:04 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > In unrelated news, what happened to the -ow...@fedoraproject.org > > email addresses? They seem to be bouncing for me. > > > Please see the "package maintainer email

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 03:33:18PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > I think changing your key on the new accounts system should be enough. > > If you've checked your ssh_config etc. and all of that is OK, I guess > > you'll need to file a ticket

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 08:50:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Yes, stupidly they updated to the normal kernel before the last reboot. > So, they only see 3GB of their 40GB memory. :( > > I'll fix and reboot them today. I have no idea why this wasn't seen > before now

Re: how to update ssh public key

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 03:14:52PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 04/08/2021 09:58, Xiao Ni wrote: > > So I used thehttps://accounts.fedoraproject.org/ to update > > my public key. > > You need to wait 2-6 hours until your new key with propagated between > servers. This should not

Re: KOJI armv7hl builders out of resources

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > Thank you for the suggestions. > I'll test reducing the debuginfo. > > However I still believe something else is in play, as such errors are > normally very rare. > The package has already been built without issues; it was the F35

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:57:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_c

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and EPEL7: Introduce %py3_check_import - review needed

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import > to EPEL8 and EPEL7: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31 >

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Currently, we are trying to stay away from the compat package and with the > help of other package maintainers trying to fix the failures. We will give > time to react accordingly and see other possible steps in a few weeks time. > >

Re: PSA: partner-bugzilla to be replaced with bugzilla.stage on July 31st

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 07. 21 10:34, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > If any of you uses https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com > > > (e.g. for integration

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 06:43:21AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > So, how about this: Just disable notifications there in #fedora-apps for > > now. > > > > If someone wants them (or a subset back), they can propose re-adding it > > there or in another channel? > > > > Works for me! Thanks!

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed change to bodhi days to stable for epel

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:42:30AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > Currently the default days to stable for EPEL is 14 days. > I believe when it was first put in it was set to that time because we > wanted things more stable and better tested. But experience has found that > if a package is going to

Re: Fedora 35 Mass Rebuild update

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I don't see email notifications about successful and failed builds, > even though they seem to be happening in Koji and from the above > lists. Is it being slow or broken? Yeah, it got stuck. I restarted it this morning and

linux-system-roles/networking, bare metal machines and vm's

So, a while back now we decided to move to using linux-system-roles/networking to setup networking for instances in ansible. For bare metal machines this has been working mostly fine. We install the machine, gather the mac addresses of it's various interfaces and add them to ansible. Since the

Re: Fedora infra backlog refinement

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 07:13:42PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > Hi everyone, > > today on Fedora infra weekly meeting I proposed to start doing a backlog > refinement on https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues > > This should be done in the similar way how the backlog refinement is done

Re: F35 Change: GHC 8.10 and Stackage lts-18 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:20:48PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.10_%26_Stackage_18 > > == Summary == > The GHC Haskell compiler will be updated from major version 8.8 to 8.10, > and Haskell packages will be updated from Stackage LTS 16 to LTS 18

Re: DNS patch to rename ocp4 clusters, and revert vhmost-ocp changes

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:27:37AM +0100, David Kirwan wrote: > okie dokie, ill update that gist now thanks Stephen! Yeah, no need to touch mgmt zone, the rest looks good to me! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

So, how about this: Just disable notifications there in #fedora-apps for now. If someone wants them (or a subset back), they can propose re-adding it there or in another channel? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure

Re: Python package and "vendorize"

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > > > Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out > >

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:45:27AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Yeah I see what you mean. I don't think IRC notifications are useless, but > if they are in a different channel I can set this channel to be silent even > on messages with my nickname. At the moment I get notified of my own >

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:59:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ...snip... Duh, I forgot the thing that made me make this aside: > > A: Hey, can you update foo for new bar? > B: Sorry, I am busy, can you submit a PR? > A: Sure! > ...minutes pass... fm-channelbot: PR#123456 filed

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:33:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I do find the level of messages pretty overwhelming. Especially when > we're getting stuff like "edited the priority fields of ticket blah" > and "assigned ticket blah to blah". It does make it very difficult to > see actual

Re: Permanent Updates Policy exception for PrusaSlicer, Cura, Black, tox, HTTPie and ownCloud Desktop Client

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:30:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly > confident our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 % > "stability" of the user interface and/or results. > > For some of them, I've been

Re: standard branch names in fedora-infra git repos

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:27:47PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > - either "dev", "devel", or "develop" > > > > Had a quick look, and there are over 50 already at "develop" as the > > main branch. -- most of the others are 'main' or 'master' -- so it > > looks like 'develop' is a bit of a

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:30:29PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:23 PM Aurelien Bompard > wrote: > > > > Hey folks! > > > > We currently have messages posted on the #fedora-apps and > > #fedora-infrastructure IRC channels when there's a ticket change or a > >

Re: buildSRPMFromSCM stuck

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:10:05AM +0200, David wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to build git-cola for EPEL8, but the buildSRPMFromSCM > is stuck for over 5 hours: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71779476 > > It is already the second try, the first I have canceled after

Re: DNS patch to enable OCP 4 staging cluster deploy

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 09:18:39PM +0200, darknao wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I remember, ETCD records (A + SRVs) are not needed anymore and can > safely be removed. > And I'm not sure why ocp.stg & apps.ocp.stg are needed ? *.apps.ocp.stg > should be enough, I think, but I may miss something

Re: standard branch names in fedora-infra git repos

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 08:49:22PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Looking through the fedora-infra org on github, there seems to be a > plethora of different branch names that all roughly cover the same > idea. > > Loosley put, there are a bunch of different ways to name branches for: > > * develop

Re: Python package and "vendorize"

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote: > Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out > into separate libraries. I asked if they would be OK with maintaining > these new packages in fedora and they said yes[1]. They followed the > process and asked

Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 02:34:05AM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I am so sorry Kevin, I missed the message for some reason. > > > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > > method? This

Re: Guile & Fesco requiring package maintenance work

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 09:58:56PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_meeting_process > > > > "Make sure to check with and invite stakeholders who may not be CC'd in > > the issue. Consider deferring

Re: FAS email for authentication

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Christopher wrote: ...snip... > I used Bugzilla as an example, but I think it goes beyond Bugzilla. It > also affects OAuth/OpenID authentication to lists.fedoraproject.org, > pagure.io, src.fedoraproject.org, etc. I don't want to share my > forwarding

Re: FAS email for authentication

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:13:19AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > Why does FAS use the email forwarding address when I use it to > authenticate, rather than the permanent @fedoraproject.org alias for > the address? Because only "contributors" (ie, people in at least one non cla group) have

Re: mirrorlist

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 07:18:14AM -0500, Sean Zipperer wrote: > Just to make sure...do you actually mean Fedora 25? That has been EOL for > quite a long time. You can probably configure yum/dnf (I don't remember when > dnf got added) > to use

[EPEL-devel] Re: Planning for EPEL9

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 08:32:27PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > This is very exciting! > > However, question here: At least for the bootstrap for RHEL 9 GA, > couldn't we use the EPEL9 next buildroot to rebuild everything once > instead of rebuilding 5 times? We can then remove the EPEL9 next >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Planning for EPEL9

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 08:28:20PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hello all, > > While we are already working on epel9-next enablement, there was a > discussion about how to handle epel9 when rhel9 goes GA. It is safe to > assume that a lot of the builds that are already in epel9-next at that >

Re: F33 Xorg XFCE4 ALSA => F34 Wayland Gnome PipeWire - Issue #1

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 03:30:41AM +1000, Philip Rhoades via users wrote: > People, > > There doesn't seem to be a dedicated Fedora Gnome list so I am posting here > - I have looked around a lot for info before posting. You could try the desktop list:

Re: Guile & Fesco requiring package maintenance work

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 03:31:21PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Ben Cotton writes: > > > [...] I agree that enabling it for the fesco project would be > > good. It's probably insufficient, though. When the meeting chair sends > > the agenda, adding the owners on cc or bcc so that they get

Re: Build system not supporting -b parameter for autorelease

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:57:15PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > Koji failed to build srpm whose spec uses -b parameter for %autorelease > defined on gpick spec file > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gpick/blob/rawhide/f/gpick.spec) > See

Re: I want to join your team

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 12:19:09PM +0300, vaska vaska wrote: > Hello. > I want to enroll in your team. > I am a telecommunication engineer with management and deployment packet > networks skills. Also have a bit ability to programm on Python and Bash. > My own home computer has been running linux

Re: Setting up ODCS for long-term side-tags in koji

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:52:27PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > We have been discussing using some long-term side tags for testing > new system-wide features that might be added into ELN. Would it be > possible to use ODCS to generate composes from these side-tags and if > so, who can

Re: No Wayland in F34 XFCE4 ?

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:31:30AM +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > It looks like there is still a wait for XFCE4 (v4.18) on Wayland? - ie v4.16 > in F34? There's no timeline or definite Xfce release that will use wayland. See https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/wayland_roadmap but do note

armv7 maintainer test instances back online

Greetings. I'm happy to announce that: armv7-test01.fedorainfracloud.org armv7-test02.fedorainfracloud.org are back online for packager maintainers to use to test and debug packages. They are setup the same as the armv7 koji builders with the same resources and on the same underlying hardware.

armv7 maintainer test instances back online

Greetings. I'm happy to announce that: armv7-test01.fedorainfracloud.org armv7-test02.fedorainfracloud.org are back online for packager maintainers to use to test and debug packages. They are setup the same as the armv7 koji builders with the same resources and on the same underlying hardware.

[EPEL-devel] Re: proposed recommendation - missing devel packages

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 03:05:50PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > I believe this is a recommendation, versus a policy. > I wanted to get people's thoughts on it, and if ya'll like it, put it in > the documentation. > > In Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8, Red Hat decided to not ship all >

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros > > == Summary == > Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's > [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints > memory-constraints]), for

Re: Fedora website - revamp

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:34:05PM +0200, Pawel Zelawski wrote: > Hi Infrastructure team, > it's just a kindly reminder as I didn't get a feedback from you. > I would really appreciate if you can nominate one person, if this is not > possible because of any reason please let me know as well.

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:36:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off > rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues > with this

Re: IRC nicks in account system, FMN and matrix

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > > > > > > On 24. 06. 21 11:51, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > > > > > * Do we want to get noggin to be able to verify nicks first? > > > How will the

Re: Intent to retire python2-setuptools

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:13:03AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:52:02PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > I see that the ansible SR

Re: Intent to retire python2-setuptools

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:52:02PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: ...snip... > > I see that the ansible SRPM in rawhide has already discarded any > support for python2, so that cannot be easily backported to RHEL 7 > with continuing use of python2. Our friends doing EPEL support will > have to

IRC nicks in account system, FMN and matrix

Greetings. In https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10053 Ryan notes that we have a ton of groups that mention irc.freenode.net in their group infromation in the account system. In https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10035 bookware notes that we have irc nick's set in the

Re: package maintainer email aliases, now with more epel

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:00:48PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 06. 21 23:05, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific > > package in private, you can email: > > packagename-maintain.

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing rhel devel packages - another proposal

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:53:05PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > Someone brought this proposal to me, I'd like to get others feedback. > > Proposal: > EPEL would make its own "devel" repo, with the missing RHEL packages, > grabbing the packages from the publicly available centos stream koji >

Re: GNOME on Wayland does not work on latest Rawhide

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a > > ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to > >

Re: GNOME on Wayland does not work on latest Rawhide

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a > > ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to > >

package maintainer email aliases, now with more epel

Greetings. As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific package in private, you can email: packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org You can also now mail: packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the fedora branch(es) maintainer(s). or

package maintainer email aliases, now with more epel

Greetings. As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific package in private, you can email: packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org You can also now mail: packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the fedora branch(es) maintainer(s). or

package maintainer email aliases, now with more epel

Greetings. As a reminder, if you need to reach package maintainers for a specific package in private, you can email: packagename-maintain...@fedoraproject.org You can also now mail: packagename-maintainers-fed...@fedoraproject.org to just reach the fedora branch(es) maintainer(s). or

Re: Forbidden to download EPEL packages?

From what I can recall, the local repo was never intended to be used by epel. It was to allow fedora builds to use the existing koji buildroot, but that would never work for epel as we cannot publish all the rhel rpms in the buildroot. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: ...snip... > > > > Rawhide is still not your CI environment. > > By the way I think we need to reconsider this statement. I think we should turn it around and say:

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake. > We shouldn't have approved a bot that packages snapshot commits for > rawhide. In the discussion, we

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-21) (new time/day!)

Note the new time/day: 19UTC monday's Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-21

Re: x86_64-v2 in Fedora

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:36:47AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Apologies in advance if this is laughable naïveté, but would a possible > solution be to have a different repo for packages compiled against the > latest-n-greatest architectures, and packagers could choose to include their > packages

Re: Can't login with kinit using 2FA

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:00:33AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 07:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 17 2021 at 10:09:26 AM +0100, David Howells > > wrote: > > > What if you're not using gnome? > > > > Then you should install fedora-packager-kerberos? Or

Re: Can't login with kinit using 2FA

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:32:43PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16 2021 at 09:54:02 AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > I think there are plans to improve this use case in krb5 utils. > > I suppose we could also see if GOA could support this case somehow

Re: Can't login with kinit using 2FA

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 07:16:09PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I don't have enrolled my OTP. I am afraid, that once I enroll my OPT, I'd > need to use it every time to refresh my kerberos ticket. That would destroy > the GOA experience. yes, once enrolled you do have to always use it. But

Re: Experience on src.fedoraproject.org as non-packager

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > Interesting, I had not tried that. > > What I used was the clone button. That shows a small dialog with this (as > packager): > >Source Code > > SSH > GIT > > As non-packager it does NOT have the SSH

Re: Can't login with kinit using 2FA

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:24:58PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 15. 06. 21 v 23:26 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jun 15 2021 at 09:18:34 PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > > make sure you have the fedora-packager-kerberos package installed, I > > > suspect the last update of

Re: Can't login with kinit using 2FA

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:51:01PM -, Yaroslav Sidlovsky wrote: > Hello there! > > I've using this guide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos. > When I'm trying to execute command `kinit -n @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG -c > FILE:$HOME/armor.ccache`, I see this error: > ``` >

Re: older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Christoph Karl wrote: > Hi! > > On 04.06.21 at 19:11 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Release engineering has just enabled a cron job to remove koji side tags > > that are older than 30 days or have no builds tagged into them. > > Is

Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 05:03:36PM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello fellow Fedora people, > > Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I > would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The > discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers. Thanks for taking this on! :) > I

Re: Package maintainer docs: Package Retirement: `git rm` all files in the other branches

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:07:27AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Hello, > > As part of the effort to move the Package Maintainer docs to > docs.fedoraproject.org [1], I have been reviewing the existing wiki > documentation. I would like to ask for insight on the following item: > > Page _How

Re: Preventing supply chain attacks via rekor

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:29:50AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 12.06.21 um 02:51 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > > > > Also, not having it available has made it *very* hard to prioritize > > > getting the issues fixed in DNF. So being able to improve this is > &

Re: Preventing supply chain attacks via rekor

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:46:42AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would like repos signed even if we don't enable it in the repo > definitions by default for now. That would make it possible for my Open > Build Service instance to validate Fedora content for package builds > (it can't use

Re: Preventing supply chain attacks via rekor

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 04:11:24PM -0700, Stewart Smith via devel wrote: > Björn Persson writes: > > I believe Yum has a feature to verify signed repository metadata. I > > don't know why it's not used. If that verification would be turned on, > > are there any attacks that would still be

Re: Does anyone know how to contact Ryan Rix (rrix)?

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:02:42PM -, Ryan Rix wrote: > > I sent this thread via direct message to rrix's Twitter account. > > Hi all, > > Thanks to Ben for reaching out on twitter; It's fair to say i'm inactive in > Fedora these days, to say the least. I thought i'd orphaned all my

Re: Preventing supply chain attacks via rekor

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 06:27:18AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > We do not, however, have GPG signatures on repository metadata. Which True. > means that we can't guarantee the repositories aren't tampered with. False. > This is especially problematic for people who use local mirrors or do >

Re: F35 Change: Make btrfs the default file system for Fedora Cloud (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:53:04PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed,

Re: dracut broken in 054 -- bz#1965585

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:32:53PM -, Alexander Scheel wrote: > Hello all, > > I wanted to raise awareness of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965585: this has regressed in > dracut 054 and the pending dracut 055 update >

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:44:20PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:38:27PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > As you might already

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 01:03:24PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > It isn't just EPEL, I see this on all the calendar reminders I get from > Fedora. I wonder if there are two instances of the app running. > > Does anyone know the right place to file a bug for this? fedocal is in the process of

Re: older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:08:05AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 06/06/21 19:53, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 07:40:41AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > >> I thought that deleting a side-tag would delete all its child > >> (*-

fedimg

Hey everyone. We have a application called fedimg that takes our images and uploads them to AWS. We have talked about replacing it, but we haven't done so. However, we now have a request to also upload the ELN images: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9944 Would there be anyone

Re: older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 07:40:41AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > I thought that deleting a side-tag would delete all its child > (*-testing-pending and similar), but it doesn't seem so: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=tag=f35-build-side-40730* > > It seems

Re: older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 08:40:49AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: ...snip... > > I suppose we can safely delete the side-tag, provided that we only > delete it when we're sure the update has been pushed to stable. During > the testing phase, the side-tag should be left available to

Re: older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 01:07:39PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Greetings. > > > > Release engineering has just enabled a cron job to remove koji side tags > > that are older than 30 days or h

Re: New package imath stuck in weird state?

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 06. 21 14:38, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I built the package on 5/29 and it shows it's in "f35" but I can't use > > it in mock or find it with dnf repoquery. Has there not been a rawhide > > compose since then? > > It hasn't. See

older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

Greetings. Release engineering has just enabled a cron job to remove koji side tags that are older than 30 days or have no builds tagged into them. The initial list of side tags just deleted is attached to the end of this email. if you were for some reason still using any of these side tags,

older than 30 days and empty side tag clean up

Greetings. Release engineering has just enabled a cron job to remove koji side tags that are older than 30 days or have no builds tagged into them. The initial list of side tags just deleted is attached to the end of this email. if you were for some reason still using any of these side tags,

Re: Can't login to weblate, mailling list site and bugzilla with Fedora Account after enable OTP on FAS

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:43:55AM +0800, Shixiong Tian wrote: > Hello guys, > Few weeks ago, I add OTP to my account in new FAS. > > Now I found that I can't login to our L10n platform[1], mailing list > site[2] and bugzilla[3] by using my FAS id. All of them will redirect me > to authorisation

Re: best way to get a non-human Fedora account

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:51:25AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > It depends on how it will be used but either a service account that is > > just a "normal" account that would point to an email alias (if it has to > > be shared

Re: unsubscribe

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:37:52PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > unsubscribe I've unsubscribed you. Let me know if you need anything else... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

koji builders and hub upgrades

Greetings everyone. I'd like to let everyone know that koji.fedoraproject.org hubs have been upgraded to 1.25.0 and all builders have been upgraded/reinstalled with fedora 34. As some of you may know, armv7 (32bit arm) builders were stuck on f32 last cycle when everything else moved to f33.

koji builders and hub upgrades

Greetings everyone. I'd like to let everyone know that koji.fedoraproject.org hubs have been upgraded to 1.25.0 and all builders have been upgraded/reinstalled with fedora 34. As some of you may know, armv7 (32bit arm) builders were stuck on f32 last cycle when everything else moved to f33.

Re: Please don't update zchunk to 1.1.14 on servers where createrepo_c is run

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 09:13:30PM +0100, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > A major bug in zchunk-1.1.14 was flagged up to me today. If zchunk- > 1.1.14 (on a system with zstd 1.5.0+) is used to create a zck file with > a zdict, the file will be impossible to decompress. Embarrassingly, > the tests

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >