Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 4.0.0 available

Hello. (one of) the Fedora spamassassin maintainers here. I thought I'd chime in with some information... On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:48:13AM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 12/19/2022 7:59 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154501 > > > >

Re: Pyramid 2.0 update proposal for F38

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > As you may have read in the announcement on the devel mailing list, I've > started a change proposal about bumping Pyramid to version 2.0 for F38. > I cross-announce here because Pyramid and its dependencies are mostly > maintained by

Re: How to Join the SIG? I seen the Wiki, but seems the communication done through mailing list?

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 02:37:57AM -, Benyamin Limanto wrote: > Hello, I'm new to XFCE Fedora Spins... I'm interested in joining the SIG, Welcome! > is there any specific reqs that required for folk like me to joining? There's no complex process. :) Just join the mailing list, put your

Re: Unable to install 3rd party rpm with current Rawhide DNF

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:17:22PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > In testing and playing with Rawhide 20221217.n.0 I found I was unable to > install the 3rd party program bcompare (Beyond Compare) for which I am > licensed. > > With their repo installed "sudo dnf install bcompare" produces the error:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:47:52PM +, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote: > >> > >> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active. > >> I am also the upstream maintainer. > > > >

Holiday Reminder

Just a gentle reminder that the holiday season is coming up. Many contributors have more time to work on things, others are spending time away with friends and family. When you push changes during the holidays be extra aware of anything that might cause outages or breakage that might pull

Re: orphaned packages with infra-sig listed as co-maintaner

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:38:16AM +, Mattia Verga wrote: > Looking at the most recent list of orphaned packages, I see there are a > few with infra-sig listed as co-maintainer: Thanks for looking at these. > - python-cornice-sphinx: it was once required by Bodhi to generate docs > about

Re: Delete another account that is no longer used

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:59:28PM -, Ivan Font wrote: > Hi, > > How do I go about deleting another account that is not used? I do not see any > delete, disable or similar button. Please advise. > > To clarify specifically, I'm looking to delete a different account for the > mailing lists

Re: Some reasons I really dislike buildroot overrides and would like us to get rid of them soon

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 12:04:18PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 02/12/2022 22:30, Adam Williamson wrote: > > 1. Packages that have been pushed stable since the last time a compose > > succeeded (for Rawhide that's a Rawhide compose, for Branched it's a > > Branched compose, for

Re: Need help with disappeared update from repository

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:51:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 13:21 +0800, yanq...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It seems update fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 from [1] somehow did not make > > it to stable repository while other package in same update did. This >

Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-11-30 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-11-30 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Re: Rethinking fedora websites deployment

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 02:24:14PM +0100, darknao wrote: > > > On 2022-11-28 01:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Some more I have thought on: > > > > E) a twist on A. We build and serve in openshift, but we stick > > cloudfront in front of it. This would solve the sp

Re: Shared Redis instance

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:49:28AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > - You'll need to share the same redis password across several projects. > > Redis does have users and permissions, at least from a quick look at > their docs: >

Re: Rethinking fedora websites deployment

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:07:50PM +0100, darknao wrote: > I like C too. > Currently, when something breaks on the websites (the most common issue is > outdated content), the websites team needs to reach out to infra to > understand what's happening and ask them to check the build logs. > Using

Re: Rethinking fedora websites deployment

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 05:28:22PM -, Francois Andrieu wrote: > Hi everyone! Hello. > The Websites & Apps team is currently working on rewriting all major Fedora > websites (such as getfedora, spins & alt) and I believe this is a good > opportunity to revisit the current deployment

Re: Shared Redis instance

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hey folks! > > The new version of FMN will run in OpenShift and will use Redis as a > cache backends (we chose it over memcached because it can do native > "is-this-string-in-this-set" operations). > > I can deploy redis inside

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 05:27:30PM -, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > @kevin I've announced on Bodhi matrix channel that I was planning to draft > the new release, but since I received no response I've pushed out Bodhi 7.0.0. > > I have followed the SOP at [1] and bodhi-* RPMs are now

Re: Should the policy documents better reflect real package maintenance practice?

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:20:10AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:40 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > I have to make confession. I am breaking this guidelines too. With > > releasing of new version of Mock and fedora-license-data. The problem for > > me is that the

Re: Should the policy documents better reflect real package maintenance practice?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 01:42:20PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Thinking it over some more - I think Gordon's right that I hadn't > considered all the language - I think my personal opinion would be that > the policy should be adjusted to be less opinionated on this idea of > "introducing

Re: spin-kickstarts package

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:33:48PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Is there a reason we couldn't just automatically update the package > once we're in freeze so that it has what we're shipping? By the time > we're down to the wire for final freeze, we're not changing the > kickstarts that often.

Re: Fedora XFCE Spin Improvements

Just my thoughts... would love to hear from more folks on these... On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:05:23PM +, exDragon945 wrote: > Description of problem: > > Default interface needs to be more usable. The following improvements > should be made. > > 1) Change the default menu from

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > The mitigation/successor strategy is to have comaintainers for every > package. > > Unfortunately our tools enforce the notion of a "main admin" and > if that person leaves that role has to be given to another > comaintainer

spin-kickstarts package

Greetings everyone. So, we used to have a release requirement that we package up and release along side the release a spin-kickstarts rpm package with the current kickstarts used for that release. This resulted in a bunch of last minute scrambling and blockers, and even then, we often pushed

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:10:56AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 17/11/22 18:10, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 17:37 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > >> Kevin, the PR for Bodhi is nearly finished, it will add support for > >> using the 'frozen' release

Re: koji down?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:37:43AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:32 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Everything should be back up now... > > > > I'm watching it for a bit before I declare things are back fully to > > normal though. ;) >

Fedora 37 Final freeze now over!

With the successfull release of Fedora 37 yesterday we are now out of freeze. Our next planned freeze is 2023-02-21 for Fedora 38 Beta. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:09:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi is currently a member of FESCo (see > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/) and has been in that role for > years. So pushing the blame off to "someone else" is not going to

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:37:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Kevin, the PR for Bodhi is nearly finished, it will add support for > using the 'frozen' release state to avoid pausing the push cron job and > avoid direct pending to stable push of updates when the release is frozen.

Re: koji down?

Everything should be back up now... I'm watching it for a bit before I declare things are back fully to normal though. ;) Do note that mailing list threads aren't a great place to report outages. Please report them to the infrastructure ticket tracker: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54:32PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: ...snip... I think we are going to just have to agree to disagree here. I think we have had this discussion a number of times now and aren't going to convince the other. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Freeze break request: update/reboot armv7 builders

Thanks for the +1s. This is now done. kevin -- On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote: > +1 > > On 14. 11. 22 20:43, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Hey folks. > > > > I'd like to update/reboot our buildvm-a32* builders. > > > > I'm hopi

Freeze break request: update/reboot armv7 builders

Hey folks. I'd like to update/reboot our buildvm-a32* builders. I'm hoping that the 6.0.x kernel will make them happier building python packages. See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11095 So, this means applying updates on them and rebooting them all. I don't see how this could affect the

fate/plans for fedmsg-irc

Greetings everyone. I thought I would open a discussion about fedmsg-irc and what we want to do with it moving forward. First some background on what it is. ;) fedmg-irc is part of fedmsg (Our old zmq message bus). It's a small irc client that listens to the fedmsg bus and sends messages to a

Re: Pull-request related question.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 08:29:17PM -, Sergey Mende wrote: > Hi, > during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is already > fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet. > I did a backport and ready to submit a PR. What is the right way to proceed: > > a) just file a

Re: Direct to stable updates

For a few years I was keeping track of updates that caused big problems: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Lessons The orig "very bad" update was a dbus update that broke everything. In any case I have seen our current updates system working and blocking tons of harmfull updates over the

Re: Direct to stable updates

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:16:44PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 10/11/22 01:58, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto: > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > >> Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > >>> with the current workflow, Bodhi doesn't know when a release is freezed. > >>> There is

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:26:23AM +, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, 19:22 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel, < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On 08/11/2022 19:53, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > > > Has there been any consideration to turn on frame pointers for atleast > > > dev

Re: Help understanding Fedora CI failure wrt RPM Sequoia

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:39:27AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > So, overnight somebody updated the koji package in > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/ to the current unsigned > rawhide build, which makes the issue go away. Nothing should have updated the koji package. The

Re: F38 proposal: MobilityPhoshImage (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:35:36AM -, Scott Anecito via devel wrote: > What is the driver for choosing Phosh over GNOME Shell? There's no choosing something over something else. This isn't a Fedora Mobility Edition, but rather a first look at a Phosh based setup. Phosh has been around a

Re: F38 proposal: MobilityPhoshImage (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:09:46PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Yeah, was going to try and work it out with them (which I have not yet > > done). Where's the best place to engage with them these days? > > I'd sta

Re: F38 proposal: MobilityPhoshImage (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 10:21:43AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 10:10 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > Initial images are produced for x86_64 and aarch64 mobile devices > > using the Phosh desktop. > > Is the plan to add these images to an existing website or a new one? The new

Re: How do I rebuild Grub/Boot/initramfs from a Live USB?

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:59:52AM -, Jake D wrote: > I am still getting emails. Unsure if you have actioned this yet. I have, I can confirm you are not subscribed anymore. So, you should likely not get this (or any other emails from the list). If you still do, can you forward directly to

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Hau idatzi du Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 uzt. > 9, lr. (20:11)): > > > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > > > On S

Re: How do I rebuild Grub/Boot/initramfs from a Live USB?

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:23:00AM -, Jake D wrote: ...snip... > > Now, can anyone tell me how to close a HyperKitty account? Or is that also > too much to ask? Theres no seperate HyperKitty account, it's just a Fedora account used to login there. I've gone ahead and unsubscribed you from

Re: FMN / notifications status

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:48:31PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 02. 11. 22 v 16:10 Michal Konecny napsal(a): > > I looked into it and found out that this is not possible, but I was able > > to make it run 5 times faster. So it should start catching up soon :-) > > > This sounds as much

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:51:28PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Now who will be motivated enough to at least open the Koji ticket as > suggested in the other place of this thread? :D > > Actually, for my purposes, it would be much better if there was something > like `koji download-url --signed

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 08:15:00PM +0200, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 2.11.2022 klo 16.18: > > > > Dne 01. 11. 22 v 18:59 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Please push them out to testing

Re: Fwd: Your message to devel@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits moderator approval

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 08:02:07AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > U... Isn't it considered a good practice to CC maintainers of affected > packages? Should I have done it as BCC instead? You could do BCC instead, but then if there's some feedback that someone wants to send to everyone, you

Re: systemd 252 feature: SUPPORT_END in /etc/os-release

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:02:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > See: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-October/048519.html > >Systemd will set the taint flag 'support-ended' if it detects that >the OS image is past its end-of-support date. This date is

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 02:55:34PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 11/1/22 11:16 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > That said, the packages *are* signed in Koji, because as soon as it's > > submitted to Bodhi, the packages are signed in-place in Koji. > > Is that really in-place? Bodhi says these are

Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:50:07PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > > I can't force the list to do this. Your domain would need to enable > > DMARC and set reject or quarantine > > Pretty sure it's not "his" domain. I believe

Freeze Break: openssl update

Greetings. I don't think we are particularly vulnerable to the openssl issue(s) that came out today, but just to be carefull I would like to apply the update to all our Fedora machines and RHEL9 machines (when that update is available). Also, I would want to restart at least httpd on the

Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]

ine, and not if it doesn't detect that. ;( > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:48:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > By now the list management - provided there is one -

Re: FMN / notifications status

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 06:43:08PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 19. 10. 22 v 14:45 Michal Konecny napsal(a): > > 1) I noticed that the queue is still growing, so I added 3 more workers. > > Hopefully this will be enough to catch up. > > > Not really :( I am receiving 9 days old

Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: ...snip... > > By now the list management - provided there is one - should know about > the problem. If they can't fix it I will by sending those DSNs to > /dev/null - or I just unsubscribe. > > Thanks a lot for your time - goes

Re: F40 proposal: Porting Fedora to Modern C (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:23:40AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:05:52AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: ...snip... > >> == How To Test == > > > > As discussed by others, this needs to explain how to opt-in for early > > testing, and

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:55:44PM +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Koji devs forwarded me to releng pagure, so there is a new issue for this > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11093 . So, it turns out that koji upstream added a 'inactivity' check. ie, no builds tagged in or out in a timeperiod. We

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Sasha Karcz

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 07:56:03PM +, Sasha Karcz wrote: > Hello there! > I am a systems administrator at Google, and long term Fedora user. I want to > become involved with Fedora, and it seems like this is the correct place to > start. I look forward to attending IRC meetings -- my IRC

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction David Lefever

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 11:08:04AM +0200, Lefever David wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm David Lefever, 35 years old, from Braine-le-comte in Belgium. > I have an 8-year-old boy and 5-year-old daughter. > > My IRC handle is ledvd. Welcome! Hope to see you at an upcoming meeting and/or on our

Re: mailman on Fedora

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:48:01PM +0200, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: ...snip... > > Question is, how to proceed? Since there are so many updated packages, who > can I contact? You might drop an email to Michel Alexandre Salim, Email: mic...@michel-slm.name He's been working lately on bringing the

Freeze break request: update *.apps.ocp.fedoraproject.org cert

It's renewed and checked into ansible-private. Can I get some +1's to push out the new cert to proxies? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: FMN / notifications status

current status: We have the backend processing it's queue. The only tracebacks left are due to changes in format of fedora-messaging messages vs what it's fedmsg-meta says, which were present before on the python2 version as well. :) It's taking about 4seconds per message to find recipients,

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 08:08:32AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Oh, also I forgot to mention... > > > > If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old > > builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could > > be anoying if you told people a

Re: [EMERGENCY FREEZE BREAK] Temporarily fix fedorapeople.org SSL cert

On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 03:50:35PM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 07/10/2022 21:25, Nick Bebout wrote: > > DNS validation needs someone (or a DNS plugin for Certbot) to add a DNS > > record each time the certificate renews (by default Certbot renews 30 > > days before expiration.  This works

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:27, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 > > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > It seems

Re: FMN / notifications status

So, I managed to get it to where it's taking about 2.2-2.5 seconds per message. Thats still not great, but it's sure a lot better than 600+ seconds. There's still tracebacks dealing with the caching. it get a response from fasjson and then tries to get the ircnick and email out of it but blows

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

Oh, also I forgot to mention... If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could be anoying if you told people a specific one and then had to make a new one, but it's not like those builds are lost.

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

So, just to add some data... sidetags are cleaned up via a cron job that calls: /usr/sbin/koji-sidetag-cleanup --empty-delay=14 --old-delay=30 So, it should have only deleted it if it was empty after 14 days, but it looks like it deleted it with things tagged into it. ;( Would you be willing

Re: FMN / notifications status

Todays update: The python3 version is up and running, but processing super duper slowly still and haven't been able to track down why. ;( So, if we can't get it going soon, I will revert back to the python2 one. I am not sure I can copy the rabbitmq queue from the current one back, but if I

Re: FMN / notifications status

Updates. :) Last night I reinstalled the new python3 version. I saved the old f27 version off. It's lv is named notifs-backend01.iad2.fedoraproject.org-20221004-f27 and it's virt xml is in /root also in case anyone needs/wants to put it back. Pingou graciously looked at it this morning and

Re: SRPM macros, EPEL, and side tags

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 08:40:12PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > Hi all, > > some time ago I've built the Free Pascal Compiler [0] for EPEL9, > and recently I got the idea it might be good to do the same with > the Lazarus IDE [1]. Testing things locally with mock, > I realized that

Re: Replacing GNOME Disks with Blivet GUI in comps' admin-tools?

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:22:52PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > In going through the bugs against comps, I came across > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971338 > > The "admin-tools" group in comps includes GNOME Disks, which is a > surprise for KDE Plasma users. We can swap it out for

Fedora 37 Final freeze now in effect!

Greetings. we are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 37 Final release. This is a final release freeze. We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to release Fedora 37 when it's available. You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out

FMN / notifications status

So, yesterday we managed to get the python3 version of fmn working in staging seemingly well, so I stupidly decided to try and migrate production to it. This has been fraught with peril. ;( First, only the notifs-backend01 ip is allowed to reach out to IRC, so after saving off the

Re: Upcoming update in Bodhi but no "how to install" section

On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 10:08:13PM +0300, Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > Hello > > I wanted to try installing an update[1] to help test it, because it > fixes a bug that affects me. I remember once before going to Bodhi and > seeing an upcoming update there which had a "how to install" section > with a

aarch64 builders upgrade

Greetings. I thought I would let everyone know that I have moved all the buildvm-a64 instances from some older hardware (lenovo emags) to newer hardware (altra Mt. Snow). This should result in a noticable speed increase along with allowing us to increase density of vm's per host. If you notice

aarch64 builders upgrade

Greetings. I thought I would let everyone know that I have moved all the buildvm-a64 instances from some older hardware (lenovo emags) to newer hardware (altra Mt. Snow). This should result in a noticable speed increase along with allowing us to increase density of vm's per host. If you notice

Re: RHEL9 migration

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 05:03:49PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 02:56:18PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Some of them need applications/packages built for rhel9 and we can't do > > them until > > that is sorted out: > > > > badges (h

Re: How do I "unstick" koji?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:10:34AM -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 9/28/22 09:59 AM, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 09:53, Steven A. Falco > > wrote: > > > > Yesterday, I had a build that failed.  The task ID is 92381483. > > >

Re: RHEL9 migration

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:54:14PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 09:00 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > > > > > > We have 188 RH

Re: RHEL9 migration

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 04:04:41PM +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenz

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Sorry for the delay in my reply here. ;( Some questions: > * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issues #Releng issue number] no releng ticket? :( releng depends on dnf4 for a LOT of scripts. We will need a lot of help moving those to dnf5 I am sure. A porting guide for the

RHEL9 migration

Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare hardware). Some of them I think we can reinstall anytime: backup01.iad2.fedoraproject.org batcave13.iad2.fedoraproject.org cloud-noc-os01.rdu-cc.fedoraproject.org dl01.iad2.fedoraproject.org

Planned Outage - networking work - 2022-09-26 21:00 UTC and 2022-09-27 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-09-26/2022-09-27 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours on 2022-09-26 and 5 hours on 2022-09-27. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-09-26 21:00UTC' date

Planned Outage - networking work - 2022-09-26 21:00 UTC and 2022-09-27 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-09-26/2022-09-27 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours on 2022-09-26 and 5 hours on 2022-09-27. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-09-26 21:00UTC' date

Planned Outage - networking work - 2022-09-26 21:00 UTC and 2022-09-27 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-09-26/2022-09-27 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours on 2022-09-26 and 5 hours on 2022-09-27. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-09-26 21:00UTC' date

Re: mailman on Fedora

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: > What's the deal with maintaining mailing lists on Fedora these days? > > For years I've used mailman (first mailman2, now mailman3) on Fedora to > administer mailing lists. In mailman3, you also need postorius to provide a > web

Planned Outage - networking work - 2022-09-26 21:00 UTC and 2022-09-27 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2022-09-26/2022-09-27 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours on 2022-09-26 and 5 hours on 2022-09-27. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-09-26 21:00UTC' date

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Erol Keskin

Welcome! I'm sure you have seen the gettingstarted doc, but if not: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2022-09-20)

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 02:47:21AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > >* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/JdkInTreeLibsAndStdclibStatic > > was submitted as an Fedora 37 update after it was deferred to Fedora > > 38. We need to decide what to do.

Re: Proposal: disable comps component in Bugzilla

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > comps, the system of XML files used to put packages into functional > groups is hosted on a Pagure repo[1] but also has a Bugzilla > component. In the interests of simplicity, I propose to disable the > comps component and use the

[olsaj...@gmail.com: Re: unannounced soname bump in libbpf]

14:36:13 +0200 > From: Jiri Olsa > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Kevin Fenzi > Cc: jo...@fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: unannounced soname bump in libbpf > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Seems

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:58:36PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 16. 09. 22 v 19:03 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also > > >

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220917.n.0 changes

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:15:40AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220916.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220917.n.0 On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:51:42PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-37-20220916.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-37-20220917.n.0 I'd like to note that

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We could also > require signed commits I guess. I think it would slow things down quite a lot to require peer review of every commit. I'd personally like to avoid anything

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:29:17AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > One thing I want to get properly implemented in SSSD in upcoming FIDO2 > support is to allow admins to filter out certain types of public SSH > keys associated with the user account. E.g. get a way for administrator > to say

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 04:34:08PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 9/15/22 13:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > >> > >> Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers > >&

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 10:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > > > > > Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >