On 12/07/2011 04:14 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:55:55PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:41:39PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
tags 633034 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100,
[Stefano Zacchiroli]
Installation of console-common 0.7.86 has failed in unstable for me
with the following insserv error:
Since bellini.debian.org stopped having a compiler installed, my
archive wide consistency check of the init.d script dependencies have
not been operational. I thus
[Stefano Zacchiroli]
Installation of console-common 0.7.86 has failed in unstable for me
with the following insserv error:
Since bellini.debian.org stopped having a compiler installed, my
archive wide consistency check of the init.d script dependencies have
not been operational. I thus
On 12/01/2011 08:28 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 12/01/2011 06:20 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org):
It looks like there is already a configure test. So, if we up the
dependency on libkrb5-dev to make sure that we get a version that will
not contain the symbol
On 12/01/2011 08:28 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 12/01/2011 06:20 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org):
It looks like there is already a configure test. So, if we up the
dependency on libkrb5-dev to make sure that we get a version that will
not contain the symbol
On 12/01/2011 06:20 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org):
It looks like there is already a configure test. So, if we up the
dependency on libkrb5-dev to make sure that we get a version that will
not contain the symbol and rebuild, it looks like it will all be
On 12/01/2011 06:20 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org):
It looks like there is already a configure test. So, if we up the
dependency on libkrb5-dev to make sure that we get a version that will
not contain the symbol and rebuild, it looks like it will all be
On 11/27/2011 06:22 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
Hey,
Hi Marga
Recently [1], dpatch's maintainer uploaded a new version indicating
that dpatch is now deprecated. Following that, he filed a bug [2] so
that lintian might warn that dpatch's makefile has been deprecated
since 2003, and that
Hi
This should be easily fixable by removing the libpng12-0, libgif4,
libwebp0 (and possibly libtiff4) dependencies for libleptonica, so the
Depends field would become:
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Lintian Maintainers
Is yada added to the obsolete packages? The package is orphaned and
should probably be removed. So it would be good if it would also be
added to the obsolete packages within lintian.
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Lintian ERROR saying dpatch is
Hi
This should be easily fixable by removing the libpng12-0, libgif4,
libwebp0 (and possibly libtiff4) dependencies for libleptonica, so the
Depends field would become:
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 11/25/2011 07:22 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Note: libtirpc.so.1 is now in /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/ so the demaons
can start before /usr is mounted.
Sure like now, though not everything is available at that time:
kerberised access or NFSv4 idmapping for instance. So it still needs to
On 11/25/2011 07:22 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Note: libtirpc.so.1 is now in /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/ so the demaons
can start before /usr is mounted.
Sure like now, though not everything is available at that time:
kerberised access or NFSv4 idmapping for instance. So it still needs to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove the mipsel binary for libtokyocabinet-perl package as it seems to
be a longstanding problem to get it built there. The alternative would be a
complete removal from testing.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 11/19/2011 02:26 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
As I understand, winbind is a package to help integrate a machine into a
Windows network. Documentation in Integrating MS Windows Networks with Samba
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/integrate-ms-networks.html
is a good
Hi
The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing
removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed:
* ifeffit (#648839)
* uwsgi (#640347)
* libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857)
* libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598)
* prima (#628500)
* nginx (#649061)
* libsignatures-perl
Hi
You requested to remove the source package, though it was not what you
were after. You'd should have asked the removel of the i386 and mips
binary packages (which also kept the old source in the archive).
Note that versioned removals are not implemented, one either requests to
remove a
Hi
The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing
removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed:
* ifeffit (#648839)
* uwsgi (#640347)
* libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857)
* libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598)
* prima (#628500)
* nginx (#649061)
* libsignatures-perl
Hi
The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing
removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed:
* ifeffit (#648839)
* uwsgi (#640347)
* libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857)
* libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598)
* prima (#628500)
* nginx (#649061)
* libsignatures-perl
Hi
The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing
removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed:
* ifeffit (#648839)
* uwsgi (#640347)
* libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857)
* libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598)
* prima (#628500)
* nginx (#649061)
* libsignatures-perl
On 11/18/2011 08:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 20:52:48 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
* genders (#646286): patch ready, maybe NMU?
Uploaded in the meantime.
Uploaded, but still broken.
Maybe the patch was applied without running the autotools?
Cheers
Luk
--
To
On 11/16/2011 05:23 PM, Nick Leverton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:48:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
There is no one way to deal with this, we should only deal with this
on a case-by-case basis and use a number of strategies. ...
encourage our upstreams to rename and or work it out
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Apart from that the package looks quite complete, could someone
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011
On 11/15/2011 07:12 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Apart from that the package looks quite complete, could someone
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011
On 11/15/2011 07:12 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/15/2011 05:40 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
On 11/13/2011 10:05 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011
On 11/14/2011 04:57 PM, Mc.Sim wrote:
Hello!
Hi
I have Win2k8 R2 as a domain controller (as KDC for NFS).
There is an NFS client on Debian wheezy: hostname - debian:
I tried to uncomment
# default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1
# default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1
#
On 11/14/2011 04:57 PM, Mc.Sim wrote:
Hello!
Hi
I have Win2k8 R2 as a domain controller (as KDC for NFS).
There is an NFS client on Debian wheezy: hostname - debian:
I tried to uncomment
# default_tgs_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1
# default_tkt_enctypes = des3-hmac-sha1
#
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Apart from that the package looks quite complete, could someone please have
an in depth look at it?
Did anyone have a look at the new version yet? We don't need to forward
On 11/11/2011 08:56 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Apart from that the package looks quite complete, could someone please have
an in depth look at it?
Did anyone have a look at the new version yet? We don't need to forward
On 11/09/2011 03:01 PM, John Hughes wrote:
This seems to be Ubuntu bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/794112
There it is suggested that updating nfs-utils could fix the problem. I
don't see how, and anyway, is there a more recent version than what's in
sid?
Not really, there are
On 11/09/2011 03:01 PM, John Hughes wrote:
This seems to be Ubuntu bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/794112
There it is suggested that updating nfs-utils could fix the problem. I
don't see how, and anyway, is there a more recent version than what's in
sid?
Not really, there are
package.
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Luk Claes l...@debian.org.
Thank you for the notification. I presume this means that there is no
bug in nfs-common, and that the inability to mount Kerberized
filesystems from my Solaris server is intended behaviour
package.
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Luk Claes l...@debian.org.
Thank you for the notification. I presume this means that there is no
bug in nfs-common, and that the inability to mount Kerberized
filesystems from my Solaris server is intended behaviour
On 11/04/2011 08:45 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:29:24PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Most of the work was in updating the patches, and I have also cleaned
d/control a bit. There is some more work I'd like to do (e.g. fixing all the
lintian Info tags and
On 11/04/2011 08:45 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:29:24PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Most of the work was in updating the patches, and I have also cleaned
d/control a bit. There is some more work I'd like to do (e.g. fixing all the
lintian Info tags and
On 11/03/2011 07:20 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Bill Allombert (bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr):
What about moving the su-to-root binary to a different binary package ?
Bill what's your PoV about spliting it ?
I am not very keen creating a new Debian package for a 3kB script.
On 11/02/2011 10:53 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:40 PM +0100 Rolf Kutz r...@vzsze.de
wrote:
README.Debian.gz mentions obsolete note about GnuTLS and OpenSSL:
Finally, note that the Debian OpenLDAP packages have been compiled
against GnuTLS instead
On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 13:10 +, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:49:01PM +0200, Frank lin Piat wrote:
Specious depends relationship [AFAICT]:
backintime-gnome - GNOME front-end for backintime
On 11/01/2011 01:31 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Josselin Mouette writes (Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome):
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 16:37 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
I agree with the original submitter of this bug that network-manager
needs to be optional. In particular, gnome-core should
On 11/01/2011 01:31 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Josselin Mouette writes (Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome):
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 16:37 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
I agree with the original submitter of this bug that network-manager
needs to be optional. In particular, gnome-core should
On 11/01/2011 09:54 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I am a bit tied up with real life and would like someone to take the
maintainance of curl. There is a new upstream version but otherwise the
package is in good shape. The packaging is versioned controlled using
git on alioth
On 11/01/2011 10:29 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:08:57PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
Alessandro, would you mind looking at the new upstream release? One of
us (myself or Ian) can
On 11/01/2011 09:54 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I am a bit tied up with real life and would like someone to take the
maintainance of curl. There is a new upstream version but otherwise the
package is in good shape. The packaging is versioned controlled using
git on alioth
On 11/01/2011 10:29 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:08:57PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
Alessandro, would you mind looking at the new upstream release? One of
us (myself or Ian) can
...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 622146
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.2-4squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
.
* Build with patch
On 09/12/2011 08:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 09/12/2011 08:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 10/13/2011 05:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Marco wrote:
On Oct 13, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
Some systems have quite a small /boot partition, I've had some problems
with a
/boot partitions nowadays are mostly useless, unless e.g. you are doing
something stupid like a
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
cifs-utils - Common Internet File System utilities
smbfs - Common Internet File System utilities - compatibility package
Changes:
cifs-utils (2:5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Install getcifsacl
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 457095 632457 636278 637660 638607 639691 640105 642797
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/18-dont-use-PAGE_SIZE.patch
Checksums-Sha1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:49:10 +0200
Source: ipmitool
Binary: ipmitool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.11-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
On 09/22/2011 07:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tag 642390 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 07:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:42:49 +0200
Source: ipmitool
Binary: ipmitool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.11-2+squeeze1
Distribution: stable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
On 09/22/2011 07:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tag 642390 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 07:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
--- ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/pa
tches/series
--- ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series
On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Hi
Policy is clear on packages in main aren't allowed to depend on
packages outside of main. Now in a fair amount of cases this has been
worked around by having the package outside of main as alternative
dependency and a package in
On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Hi
Policy is clear on packages in main aren't allowed to depend on
packages outside of main. Now in a fair amount of cases this has been
worked around by having the package outside of main as alternative
dependency and a package in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:35:04 +0200
Source: ipmitool
Binary: ipmitool
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
On 09/13/2011 03:14 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
- enable people to subscribe to bug traffic only if it matches specific
tags (the idea being of forwarding upstream only the traffic for
confirmed bugs)
- add a DELAYED-like mechanism where upstream is notified of a bug only
if the
On 08/30/2011 06:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 08/30/2011 01:25 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
libnfsidmap-dev = 0.24 to ease backporting.
I'm hoping to prepare nfs-utils 1.2.4
On 08/30/2011 06:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 08/30/2011 01:25 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
libnfsidmap-dev = 0.24 to ease backporting.
I'm hoping to prepare nfs-utils 1.2.4
On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
libnfsidmap-dev = 0.24 to ease backporting.
I'm hoping to prepare nfs-utils 1.2.4 as a backport for squeeze, and
it'd be nice to modify the source package as minimally as
On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
On 08/30/2011 06:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I concur with Sean Finney that nfs-utils should Build-Depend on
libnfsidmap-dev = 0.24 to ease backporting.
I'm hoping to prepare nfs-utils 1.2.4 as a backport for squeeze, and
it'd be nice to modify the source package as minimally as
the line unsubscribe linux-cifs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Luk Claese-mail: luk.cl...@ugent.be
On 08/21/2011 02:49 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
severity 638717 normal
tags 638717 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 13:33, yellow yellowprot...@gmail.com wrote:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.10
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily unavailable
This is most surely a problem with your
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 08/20/2011 02:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Committed.
Thanks.
While at it, I wonder if it is really a good idea to recommend
SWAT
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 08/20/2011 02:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Committed.
Thanks.
While at it, I wonder if it is really a good idea to recommend
SWAT
On 08/19/2011 02:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:17 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
alias nfs-layouttype4-1 nfs_layout_nfsv41_files
alias nfs-layouttype4-2 nfs_layout_osd2_objects
alias nfs-layouttype4-3 off
[...]
No, the aliases should be *in the modules*, like
On 08/19/2011 02:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:17 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
alias nfs-layouttype4-1 nfs_layout_nfsv41_files
alias nfs-layouttype4-2 nfs_layout_osd2_objects
alias nfs-layouttype4-3 off
[...]
No, the aliases should be *in the modules*, like
Package: libpam-mount
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed in the near future, please suggest cifs-utils instead.
If libpam-mount has code which references smbfs, please tell me, so I can have
a look to update it to the new syntax.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: python-moinmoin
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed, please suggest cifs-utils instead.
If python-moinmoin references smbfs explicitly, then please tell me so I can
have a look to update it to the new syntax.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: pyneighborhood
Severity: important
Hi
smbfs will be removed, please depend on cifs-utils instead.
It seems the code is already updated to use cifs instead of smbfs, so all that
is needed is to replace smbfs with cifs-utils in the dependencies.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: smb4k
Severity: important
Hi
The smbfs wrapper around cifs-utils will be removed. Please depend on
cifs-utils instead.
smbfs is gone, only the mount.smbfs wrapper around mount.cifs remains till the
package smbfs will be removed.
Please replace all references to smbfs to cifs and
Package: smb4k
Severity: important
Hi
The smbfs wrapper around cifs-utils will be removed. Please depend on
cifs-utils instead.
smbfs is gone, only the mount.smbfs wrapper around mount.cifs remains till the
package smbfs will be removed.
Please replace all references to smbfs to cifs and
On 08/13/2011 09:59 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org, 2011-08-01, 22:07:
As noted in our previous mail [0DAY:DDA], bug #625449 has been opened
against developers-reference. This now seems to be drawing itself to a
conclusion. We would still welcome use of delayed queues
Hi
On 08/06/2011 05:53 PM, Tim Retout wrote:
yada was recently orphaned: http://bugs.debian.org/636735 - I would
like to propose it for removal. I believe it is unlikely to find a
maintainer.
There is a serious bug affecting all packages built using yada - yada
modifies the
Hi
Including full quote as submitter was not Cc-ed.
Is there some particular reason why the simple
while loop tests
while (count-- 0) {
fprintf(stderr, =);
}
and
while (width-- 0) {
fprintf(stderr, );
}
would not work properly? The insertions 0 are
Hi
Including full quote as submitter was not Cc-ed.
Is there some particular reason why the simple
while loop tests
while (count-- 0) {
fprintf(stderr, =);
}
and
while (width-- 0) {
fprintf(stderr, );
}
would not work properly? The insertions 0 are
Hi Scott
On 08/02/2011 05:39 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As the drafter of the proposed release goal for Python [1], I will confess
some surprise when I read on d-d-a [2] that this had been dropped for Wheezy
without being involved any discussion or at least notification. Regardless,
On 08/02/2011 10:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch
where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats?
Maybe they try to tackle the binNMU arch: all packages problem
On 08/01/2011 09:31 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:38:13AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
* Package name: apt-clone
Version : 0.7.9nexenta28
* URL : see below
* License : CDDL
You may want to run this by debian-legal. Last I checked,
On 08/01/2011 08:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus
way to handle it.
Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to handle it at
all.
Why could wb not
On 08/01/2011 08:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus
way to handle it.
Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to handle it at
all.
Why could wb not
On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio
During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to
debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review
and comments.
Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
Installer release process and it would be
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
Installer release process and it would be
On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
Hi Otavio
During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to
debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review
and comments.
Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
Installer release process and it would be
601 - 700 of 9511 matches
Mail list logo
