Re: [Linuxptp-users] ptp4l stack integration via linux OS with least burden on the Firmware and major PTP offload to the hardware

2017-04-14 Thread MSR, CHANDRASEKHAR
you in anticipation, Regards, Chandra © : +60.175508142 (O): +60.4.636.6412 “Knowledge speaks, Wisdom listens” -Original Message- From: Keller, Jacob E Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 12:12 AM To: MSR, CHANDRASEKHAR <chandrasekhar@intel.com>; Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@

Re: [Linuxptp-users] ptp4l stack integration via linux OS with least burden on the Firmware and major PTP offload to the hardware

2017-04-14 Thread MSR, CHANDRASEKHAR
bit that tells whether to copy the time stamp back or not. Just my 2 cents, *** Thanking you in anticipation, Regards, Chandra (c) : +60.175508142 (O): +60.4.636.6412 "Knowledge speaks, Wisdom listens" -Original Message- From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]

[Linuxptp-users] ptp4l stack integration via linux OS with least burden on the Firmware and major PTP offload to the hardware

2017-04-12 Thread MSR, CHANDRASEKHAR
Hi Friends, I am lost in visualizing a proper system with ptp4l on our hardware that supports linux along with hardware timestamping. Could you help bring some clarity on my following question? Please note that I am a systems architect and a linux expert and thus the following flow is a