FBR: To enable 29 container and cloud composes

Please review the following patch to enable F29 container and cloud composes diff --git a/roles/releng/files/docker-updates b/roles/releng/files/docker-updates index f23ac64..c7b3f8d 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/docker-updates +++ b/roles/releng/files/docker-updates @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#Fedora 28

Re: [PATCH] new-updates-sync: no longer sync stable refs for ostrees

LGTM +1 On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 2:44 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sure. +1 > > kevin > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora

FBR: Disable F29 branched compose

This is to disable F29 branched composes since we got F29 GA gold compose diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index 561b8e0..cbcafff 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++ b/roles/releng/files/branched @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ # branched compose

FBR: F29 is now GA and no need of special policy changes

commit 6bbd8c072381561a664290a7ded3871173e5eab2 Author: Mohan Boddu Date: Fri Oct 26 14:31:08 2018 + F29 is now GA and no need of any policy changes This change is to just disable roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2#n580 roles/bodhi2/base/templates

[fedora-websites] Issue #888: F-29 Beta checksums are missing for ppc64le and s390x

mohanboddu reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Info at https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7883 Also, I can see the checksums on the mirrors: For ex:

Re: Note on ansible release variables

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 10/15/18 12:21 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > Then I think we should use another variable (probably RelengFreeze) > > to indicate releng freeze, as they dont actually end on the same day. > > Also, we are using it for

Re: Freeze Break Request: fix up registry

LGTM +1 On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:12 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to >

Re: Note on ansible release variables

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > I thought I would send a short note on something I put in place before > the freeze. Basically it seems, even though we have SOPs and docs, we > spend a lot of time around release milestones changing files in ansible, >

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] Also install the username/pass for pushing to the stg candidate registery.

+1 On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:06 PM wrote: > From: Kevin Fenzi > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi > --- > playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml > b/playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml > index

Re: Automating bodhi daily pushes

Okay, fixed. And as Randy mentioned, we can use this without fixing @2579. diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/bodhi-automated-pushes.py b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/bodhi-auto new file mode 100644 index 000..aacc81c --- /dev/null +++

Fedora 29 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

Automating bodhi daily pushes

Please review this change: diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/bodhi-automated-pushes.cron b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/bodhi-au new file mode 100644 index 000..7e12cfd --- /dev/null +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/bodhi-automated-pushes.cron @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +59 23 * * * apache

Re: The trouble with torrents

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, Fedora 29 Beta is out the door and mostly that went very smoothly as > always. With one exception: torrents. > > Right now we are (were) using the last opensource version of > 'bittorrent' python client to seed our torrents. However, I

Re: 3 days vs 7 days

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22.9.2018 22:47, Jerry James wrote: > > Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it > > be requiring 3 days at this point? > > > I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7741 ~3 weeks ago, but I've > got no

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > little late and then only due to a drop-everything effort (thanks, > stickster!). We have a proposal to add

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > little late and then only due to a drop-everything effort (thanks, > stickster!). We have a proposal to add

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta Release Announcement

or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering. ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta Release Announcement

or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering. ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce

Fedora 29 Beta Release Announcement

or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering. ___ announce mailing list -- announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Manually delete the Fedora 29 compose that is failed in Bodhi's DB

Based on Randy's explanation +1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > On 08/29/2018 03:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Can you give me more information on what this will due, what could go > > wrong and how to recover? If not I don't think I can give an answer. > > Bodhi

Re: Freeze Break: some more bodhi config for f29

LGTM +1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:24 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > +1 after review > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 14:07, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 >> b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 >> > index 37d8608..a44ffab 100644

Re: FBR: hotfix - Don't clean old mashes

LGTM +1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1 and we can think about this and revisit after freeze. > > kevin > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to >

Re: FBR : To fix rawhide sync location

o we can get our rawhide out of rawhide > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 10:09, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > > > > Fix for https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7731. > > > > > > This can be a temporary fix or permanent fix > > > depends on which way we choose to

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 29. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

FBR : To fix rawhide sync location

Fix for https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7731. This can be a temporary fix or permanent fix depends on which way we choose to proceed. If you think we should go back and revert the changes we made to this script and just sync them as part of nightly.sh, please -1 this. diff --git

Re: FBR: Set up docs.teamsilverblue.org

LGTM +1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:10 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > +1 > > On 08/29/2018 01:06 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Hi all, > > > > So, teamsilverblue pointed their DNS to us without informing us, can I > get +1s to add a

FBR: Autosigning for post bodhi activation of F29

--- a/roles/robosignatory/files/robosignatory.production.py +++ b/roles/robosignatory/files/robosignatory.production.py @@ -132,28 +132,21 @@ config = { "keyid": "cfc659b9", "type": "modular" }, -{ -

Re: FBR: Fix for new-updates-sync

Aug 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > LGTM - one comment below > > On 08/28/2018 12:59 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Better wording of the comment: > > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sy

Re: FBR: Fix for new-updates-sync

('Release %s, repo %s, target %s', release, repo, target) RELEASES[release]['repos'][repo]['from'] = target return target On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:51 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync &

FBR: Fix for new-updates-sync

diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync index 3619e6c..5f00b29 100755 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync @@ -367,10 +367,13 @@ def determine_last_link(release, repo):

Re: FBR: Greenwave config update for F29

ora-29 - fedora-28 - fedora-27 - fedora-26 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:10 AM Ralph Bean wrote: > LGTM. Easy to roll back if it is incorrect. +1 > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:05:08AM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > diff --git a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/t

FBR: Greenwave config update for F29

diff --git a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/configmap.yml b/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templ index dd297c4..694ca3c 100644 --- a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/configmap.yml +++ b/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/configmap.yml @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ data: ---

Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 29. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 29. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

Re: [PATCH] rawhide ostree sync as part of new-updates-sync script

8/27/2018 04:07 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Dusty, how about this: > > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > > index 9ddc591..194e2bd 100755 > > --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-syn

Re: [PATCH] rawhide ostree sync as part of new-updates-sync script

, 2018 at 4:02 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > mostly looks good a few nits inline > > On 08/27/2018 03:57 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > > index 9ddc591..4537f0b 100755 > > --

[PATCH] rawhide ostree sync as part of new-updates-sync script

diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync index 3bcfbea..1cb22c2 100755 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync @@ -20,7 +20,23 @@ FEDORAALTDEST =

Re: [PATCH] robosig: rename atomic workstation to silverblue

LGTM +1 On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:50 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > --- > roles/robosignatory/files/robosignatory.production.py | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/roles/robosignatory/files/robosignatory.production.py >

Re: [PATCH] twoweek-nightly: Stop building F28 AH twoweek nightly composes

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 9:11 AM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/16/2018 01:59 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > We are building Fedora 28 AH nightly artifacts during F28 bodhi-updates > run > > which produces same media name what we get during twoweek nightly [1] > compose > > run. > > > > This patch

Fedora 29 Mass Branching

nabled in couple of weeks time when we hit Beta change freeze point in the Fedora 29 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Fedora 29 Mass Branching

nabled in couple of weeks time when we hit Beta change freeze point in the Fedora 29 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html. Thanks Mohan Boddu. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:19 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be st

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

. Thanks, Fedora Release Engineering. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:55 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > We are delaying the mass rebuild as people are still working on > binutils 2.31 change (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231). > > At this point, we want to re-eval

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

. Thanks, Fedora Release Engineering. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:55 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > We are delaying the mass rebuild as people are still working on > binutils 2.31 change (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231). > > At this point, we want to re-eval

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all > the changes listed in > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480 > > we will start the

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all > the changes listed in > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480 > > we will start the

Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html Things still needing rebuilt https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f29-need-rebuild.html Regards Mohan Boddu ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce

Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html Things still needing rebuilt https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f29-need-rebuild.html Regards Mohan Boddu ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 End Of Life

schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: Updates for AtomicHost artifacts in bodhi pungi runs

LGTM +1 But, can we add a branched release variable, so that we dont need to add the branch release version multiple times at different places? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:06 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 06/01/2018 06:58 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > [PATCH 1/5] bodhi-pungi: f29 will be new branched

Fedora 26 End Of Life

schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Fedora 26 End Of Life

schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: Fedora Media Writer for macOS, is not signed?

We know about the issue and hoping to fix it soon. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:50 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 05. 2018 v 16:42 -0600: > > Hi, > > > > The Fedora Media Writer for macOS at getfedora.org is not signed. I > > filed this bug a couple

Re: FBR: Make new-updates-sync resync on re-stage without need for state deletion

LGTM +1 On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > So, for now (until https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1986 gets > finished and merged), it might happen that Bodhi stages a repo a second > time (if it crashed while waiting

[fedora-websites] Issue #818: Fedora Media Writer 4.1.1 Released

mohanboddu reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Hello, A new update of Fedora Media Writer is built and signed and available on sundries01.phx2.fp.o > $ ssh sundries01.phx2.fedoraproject.org ls /srv/web/fmw | grep 4.1.1

Re: Fedora 28 Final status is GO

Wow, that is some serious digging, and good to know that we are on time :) Hope we continue it for future releases. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:03 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is

Re: Freeze Break Request: update new-updates-sync to sync f28 stable updates

LGTM +1 On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We kinda need to sync f28 stable updates too: > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > > index 7cfe15e..21600c7 100755 > > ---

Re: FBR: Fix new-updates-sync typo

LGTM +1 On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:57 PM Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get +1s for the following fix to my last version of the script? > > Patrick > > > diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync > b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync >

Re: FBR : Disable F28 branched compose and enable two week atomic, cloud and container nightlies

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:55 PM Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > > > On 04/26/2018 04:39 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Now that we got a F28 RC final compose, we dont need branched composes > anymore and also we should enable two week atomic, cloud and container

FBR : Disable F28 branched compose and enable two week atomic, cloud and container nightlies

Now that we got a F28 RC final compose, we dont need branched composes anymore and also we should enable two week atomic, cloud and container nightlies diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched index e303942..b560be1 100644 --- a/roles/releng/files/branched +++

Re: FBR: Make new-updates-sync print what it did and email to releng-cron

+1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FBR for Bodhi F28 release status update

Now that we got a gold compose, we would like to change bodhi configs to reflect F28 GA changes. There are some duplicates which doesn't make sense and hence removing them. diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 index

Re: [FBR] fix the alternativearch git hook

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR $arch vs $basearch fixups for bodhi AH artifacts

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: Add AtomicHost variant

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR fixes to bodhi-pungi configs for atomichost artifacts

I agree with Kevin, but also it seems that patch should be working So, +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, April 17th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, April 17th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

[fedora-websites] Issue #792: path changes in output compose artifacts

mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Also, I updated my staging script and the commits list for that PR will help you as well https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7415#commit_list `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[fedora-websites] Issue #792: path changes in output compose artifacts

mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @robyduck Two things that I noticed here 1. Do we want to advertise/publish about Modular variant on our websites? (Its just a repo enabled only for Server) 2. aarch64 for some variants is primary and for some its alternate

Re: FBR: Update fedmsg on compose-x86-01

+1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

I didn't want to update it since pungi had so many issues with modular support. Hence I waited this long. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Freeze Break Request: Change oz.cfg on power builders to just use 1 cpu for now

LGTM, +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

We updated pungi on branched and rawhide composer a lot during this freeze, here's the list of the FBR and why we updated pungi https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TPAIGZ5WNTBLDNHBX47X5SH6S4Q4PB3O/

FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

pungi-4.1.22-10 should finally fix the issue with modular rpms getting into Everything repo Pungi Bug: https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/862 Fix: https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/862#comment-499692 Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1059055

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

> Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate > packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place > for the Fedora 29 timeframe. > > As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could > use Bodhi

FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-9.fc27

This will fix the issue with empty module variant and also skipping buildinstall phase on variants. Koji build - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1058071 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: FBR: Update Bodhi tree filenames for atomic-workstation

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [PATCH] bodhi pungi ostree: point to different repos for f28

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

Correcting the statement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora... created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib *builds* from Everything repo, this should be fixed in pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27 ___ infrastructure

FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PQUO2BPFYAOHT4DPICFSUMSSQEXO6UT3/ created an issue of skipping the noarch and multilib arches from Everything repo, this should be fixed in pungi-4.1.22-8.fc27 koji build:

FBR: To update pungi on branched-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org and rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-7.fc27

We were having issues with modular rpms ending up in Everything repo and also missing Container variant, which should be fixed by pungi-4.1.22-7.fc27 update. koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1055890 Fixes: https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/862

Fedora 28 Bodhi Activation Point

Hi all, Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Bodhi Activation Point

Hi all, Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

in the Fedora 28 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

in the Fedora 28 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 End Of Life

. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 End Of Life

. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 End Of Life

. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

I dont want to reduce the time between branching and bodhi enablement. The gap is for any short comings from branching, but if you guys think it is absolutely necessary then I am okay with reducing it to a week. Also, I want to point out that traditionally Alpha freeze and Bodhi enablement

Re: FBR: Enable multi-arch ostree composes for F27+

LGTM +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [PATCH] add syncing for f27-u-t ostree ref

+1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR for 0-day release actions

As per Dusty comment, new patch: diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 index 1629e2d..5b22659 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/base/templates/production.ini.j2 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@

<    1   2   3   4   5   >