On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
Unblocked by luk
Neil
--
* stockholm calls netapp
* stockholm calls someone else
Ganneff you are typing random numbers on your phone?
stockholm yes. my newest attempt to close our budget
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:59:12PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I think it's your point of view and I don't agree with you here.
I have a good relation with the upstream author and don't
think it is necessary for me to understand the code.
Umm, sorry again but I'd like to know if you can add
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Ok, please upload.
Changes committed to git, but I will wait and see whether #591975
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Ok, please upload.
Changes committed to git, but I will wait and see whether #591975
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:25:29PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Sorry...
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:59:07AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi.
On 08/21/2010 02:39 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:08:04PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
...
Please upload and then re-prod us
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
their comments.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
their comments.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
their comments.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific
problems. Could you highlight them for me?
Having these features available for developers,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin into a separate package (with a clear warning about what
it does) in order to avoid the risk of delving into the code and
making
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:54:36PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:04:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The request is, therefore, not for an advance freeze exception (since
I know you'll want to look at the package as uploaded), but for an
indication of whether such a new release has a reasonable chance of being
accepted if it is
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64 and i386.
gcc-4.5.1 was released a week ago, the first bug and regression fix
release after the initial gcc-4.5.0
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin into a separate package (with a clear warning about what
it does) in order to avoid the risk of delving into the code and
making
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64 and i386.
gcc-4.5.1 was released a week ago, the first bug and regression fix
release after the initial gcc-4.5.0
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:04:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The request is, therefore, not for an advance freeze exception (since
I know you'll want to look at the package as uploaded), but for an
indication of whether such a new release has a reasonable chance of being
accepted if it is
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:54:36PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:33:08PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
The cure for #581940 (gorm.app) depends on -base/-gui from
experimental. The specific fix can be backported easily if a new
upstream gorm.app release is not acceptable at this point. Gürkan is
the de-facto maintainer, so he can
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:33:08PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
The cure for #581940 (gorm.app) depends on -base/-gui from
experimental. The specific fix can be backported easily if a new
upstream gorm.app release is not acceptable at this point. Gürkan is
the de-facto maintainer, so he can
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler issue fixed via NMU as soon as possible,
which will let 3.02-9 enter testing (that should be automatic?), then
we will need your OK to upload 3.02-10.
Hrm,
maul...@cheshire:/home/repos/xpdf$ git
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:52:18AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Attached is the debdiff. A couple of the longer differences are the
copyright file rewrite and dropping the update-xpdfrc script and its
manpage.
Hi,
Please upload and then re-prod us when it hits unstable for an unblock.
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:56:04AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:31:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
Hi Joey,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 07:23:12AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
My plan for v8 was to put in as many good things as possible before
the freeze, and call it finished when the freeze happened. This will
avoid needing to backport debhelper when backporting packages that use
v8, after the
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler issue fixed via NMU as soon as possible,
which will let 3.02-9 enter testing (that should be automatic?), then
we will need your OK to upload 3.02-10.
Hrm,
maul...@cheshire:/home/repos/xpdf$ git
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:00:09AM -0400, Chris Butler wrote:
Can you please unblock libdatetimex-easy-perl to go into testing. It
removes the dependency on libdatetime-format-datemanip-perl, which is
RC buggy and has been removed from unstable.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:52:18AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Attached is the debdiff. A couple of the longer differences are the
copyright file rewrite and dropping the update-xpdfrc script and its
manpage.
Hi,
Please upload and then re-prod us when it hits unstable for an unblock.
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:56:04AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:31:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:00:00PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
transitions are completed or being handled.
I sincerely hope you haven't forgetten #561944, and that ditching
GNUstep packages out of squeeze
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze.
(Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering
to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not
think enough about that before squeeze
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze.
(Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering
to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not
think enough about that before squeeze
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:00:00PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
transitions are completed or being handled.
I sincerely hope you haven't forgetten #561944, and that ditching
GNUstep packages out of squeeze
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Our proposal would therefore be that we look again at the number and
severity of outstanding issues related to moving to Perl 5.12 once the
Python transition has finished and evaluate at that point whether it
would be feasible to
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:12:05AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I like to see these three packages migrating to testing:
Hi,
As you can potentially see from running grep-excuses, or reading the
mail I sent to d-d-a carfully, it's already unblocked.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
mhy enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Debian Science team,
I was wondering what your plans were with regard to Atlas and bug
#588280?
I don't particularly want to remove atlas and all its rdeps, but there
hasn't been any activity or reply to that RC bug in a month now.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Maulkin Damned Inselaffen. Oh, wait, that's
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
mhy enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:2.8.1
Severity: normal
Hi, seems that there's a bug in the Libraries used by
libflashplayer.so looker-upper.
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586273#73 for an
example.
Neil
--
I've just won one million euros! Now I can spend it on
severity #567588 important
thanks
Hi,
This a) has worked for me on i386 and b) seems only to affect one area
of functionality, so it's not RC. Hence, downgrading.
Neil
--
MadCoder and right now I'm wearing a tutu and am doing dance steps
Maulkin I'm scared by the French cabal in tutus.
HE
severity 586037 important
thanks
As discussed, this is non-rc, thus downgrading.
Neil
--
I am not the wireless plague - Harmoney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi there,
Is there any plans to fix this bug?
Thanks,
Neil
--
* DrFairlyEvil kills himself.
Werefern DrFairlyEvil: Wait, you should give me your computer first!
DrFairlyEvil Werefern: Bite me. It's coming with me.
Werefern How selfish, you won't need it where you're going!
DrFairlyEvil If
severity 512915 important
thanks
Looks like the consensus is that this isn't RC, though not desirable.
Thus downgrading.
--
+Mulligan Your folk tale is inconsistent and confusing.
+Mulligan I shall round up your local population and tell them good CHRISTIAN
folk tales.
+Mulligan Then build
Hi there,
Is there any plans to fix this bug?
Thanks,
Neil
--
* DrFairlyEvil kills himself.
Werefern DrFairlyEvil: Wait, you should give me your computer first!
DrFairlyEvil Werefern: Bite me. It's coming with me.
Werefern How selfish, you won't need it where you're going!
DrFairlyEvil If
Hi Debian Science team,
I was wondering what your plans were with regard to Atlas and bug
#588280?
I don't particularly want to remove atlas and all its rdeps, but there
hasn't been any activity or reply to that RC bug in a month now.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Maulkin Damned Inselaffen. Oh, wait, that's
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
mhy enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi there,
Is there any plans to fix this bug?
Thanks,
Neil
--
* DrFairlyEvil kills himself.
Werefern DrFairlyEvil: Wait, you should give me your computer first!
DrFairlyEvil Werefern: Bite me. It's coming with me.
Werefern How selfish, you won't need it where you're going!
DrFairlyEvil If
severity 512915 important
thanks
Looks like the consensus is that this isn't RC, though not desirable.
Thus downgrading.
--
+Mulligan Your folk tale is inconsistent and confusing.
+Mulligan I shall round up your local population and tell them good CHRISTIAN
folk tales.
+Mulligan Then build
Hi Debian Science team,
I was wondering what your plans were with regard to Atlas and bug
#588280?
I don't particularly want to remove atlas and all its rdeps, but there
hasn't been any activity or reply to that RC bug in a month now.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Maulkin Damned Inselaffen. Oh, wait, that's
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
mhy enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:29:50PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/07/2010 11:15, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Is it okay to upload?
Yes, please do.
Hi Patrick,
I'm sorry to mess you about, but it now seems that we're not going to
have space in the transition queue for this one. My
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it
pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to
pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to
Hia,
I'd advise against just multiple retries, that won't fly from a release
point of view as it'll need to be built reliably for security updates.
Neil
--
Sp3ct0L|ZcC dou you speak frensh ?
-!- Sp3ct0L|ZcC [~spec...@86.211.34.66] has quit [autokilled: This host
violated network policy. If you
Hia,
I'd advise against just multiple retries, that won't fly from a release
point of view as it'll need to be built reliably for security updates.
Neil
--
Sp3ct0L|ZcC dou you speak frensh ?
-!- Sp3ct0L|ZcC [~spec...@86.211.34.66] has quit [autokilled: This host
violated network policy. If you
pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to
pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to
This has a patch upstream, could this be included?
Neil
--
@nurn Paedophile Glitter arrives in UK
@nurn is it me or does that sound like a very inappropriate brand name?
@sooB the sort that would only be advertised in the run-up to christmas
@nurn it's like a twisted my little pony name
--
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:04:47AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Actually, the US is the only country in the world with such a
ridiculous requirement. Prevent someone from becoming president if
they happen not to hold US citizenship, sure. But because you weren't
_born_ there? Come on!
bootloaders (RedBoot, grub etc)
3) btrfs still does not handle all out-of-space conditions gracefully
4) lvm useage requires write-caching turned off, but if it's not, it
can't handle the corruption
5) Failed checksums will not in any way initiate a repair
Hope this helps,
Neil
--
Neil McGovern
be subject to a popularity contest. They're subject to a
technical evaluation.
Neil
--
Neil McGovern
Software Development Team Leader - Amino Communications
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
yet.
Neil
--
Neil McGovern
Software Development Team Leader, Intel:Core - Amino Communications
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:45:46PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:10:23PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
At the risk of repeating myself (I already said it in an answer to
Charles' GR proposal), these core values are also what all DDs agreed to
abide by. If Charles doesn't
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:16:33PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
That not withstanding, there is still a legitimate point here. What
happens when an amendment is proposed which has different majority
requirements to the others? What happens when the secretary and the
proposer disagree about
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:36:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Lastly, for the meaning of ‘accusatory’, perhaps I could have found a
better word? But I am not a native speaker. What I mean is that if in
one message, somebody writes ‘you want this [bad thing]’ or ‘you did
not do that [good
Package: mysql-server
Version: 5.0.51a-24+lenny2
Severity: important
Hi,
When upgrading to the latest security fix, I noticed that it was taking
a *long* time to upgrade, and my disk was thrashing. It seems that the
the preinst scans for .ISM files. However, the lines two above which
sets
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
~/Intel\:MeeGo/libsatsolver/satsolver-0.14.14.tar.bz2
Can I download this from somewhere?
Hia,
Sorry for the delay, you can grab it from
http://www.halon.org.uk/tmp/satsolver-0.14.14.tar.bz2
Cheers,
Neil
Package: pristine-tar
Version: 0.17
Severity: normal
nmcgov...@nmcgovern:~/git/meego$ pristine-tar -v commit
~/Intel\:MeeGo/libsatsolver/satsolver-0.14.14.tar.bz2
2f3571f35d121b95b119aa54fae67453495b9c16
pristine-tar: git archive --format=tar
2f3571f35d121b95b119aa54fae67453495b9c16 | (cd
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Description : advanced Python shell
This Python shell permits to work in a more productive way with Python
interpreter providing features not yet implemented in standard IDLE.
This short and long description need quite a
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Description : advanced Python shell
This Python shell permits to work in a more productive way with Python
interpreter providing features not yet implemented in standard IDLE.
This short and long description need quite a
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Description : advanced Python shell
This Python shell permits to work in a more productive way with Python
interpreter providing features not yet implemented in standard IDLE.
This short and long description need quite a
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:36:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
package will be built in a clean chroot; among other
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Would it be time to start looking at LVM snapshops + sbuild perhaps?
we already have two or three buildds doing that... The buildd team (esp.
HE) working on that and if it works out to be stable enough, we can see
if we can
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
software explicitly does not guarantee that all packages will be removed.
Would it be
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:46:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
doesn't matter. GCC-4.5 won't be the default for squeeze. if the GCC-4.5
release is done before the squeeze freeze, then it will be uploaded to
unstable and enabled to build for architectures where it doesn't show
regressions
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Full ack, and I even like /usr/share/www. It's easy to understand and
pretty unprobable that we'd have a package called www in the archive
some day needing this location.
Sorry, I have to disagree with this approach. We would
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Full ack, and I even like /usr/share/www. It's easy to understand and
pretty unprobable that we'd have a package called www in the archive
some day needing this location.
Sorry, I have to disagree with this approach. We would
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0100, Penny Leach wrote:
The problem we've come across is how to handle migrations. If we have a
moodle package, that depends on moodle-mysql | moodle-pgsql, then package
managers that just install the first dependency, could cause a situation,
for example,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Should the web configuration be enabled by default? Assume apache2, and
add configuration to /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin.conf?
Have a read of
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ch-httpd.html
Neil
--
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:34:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Would you like to take a crack at pulling out the normative
parts of that manual, perhaps with a wee bit of rationale, and see
where we stand?
That would be great, thanks!
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:42:46PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
[...] but Debian could support companies started by its developers
to make a living of their Debian-related activities, by contributing to
their capital.
701 - 800 of 1882 matches
Mail list logo
