around this sytemd
stuff, if it's not ported? Do they just use chunks of systemd like
Ubuntu?
I know GNOME is fairly sane, I can't imagine they'd break *BSD like
that.
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C
Debian packages,
I'll be sure to forward you data points (if y'all have the same
source/version pair in Fedoraland)
Keep up the great work,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
switched off in libxml2.
\
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
switched off in libxml2.
\
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Scott K
I've not done enough work with jtaylor to avocate him, but I'd like to
express my +1 to his application - he's done really great work, from
what I can tell, and I find him a pleasure to work with.
About time!
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud
talk to DSA?
I have no objections at all to the d-i machine. I trust (if this request
is from who I hope it is) that it will be used 100% for Debian work, and
I trust their ability to use this machine to ensure Debian continues to
run smoothly.
Much love,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
I'm currently waiting on upstream, there are some big changes in the
pipe.
Still active and being worked on. Sorry, interested folks. I'll re-ping
upstream.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
I'm currently waiting on upstream, there are some big changes in the
pipe.
Still active and being worked on. Sorry, interested folks. I'll re-ping
upstream.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Good morning, Niels,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 08:46:36AM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
pgp_put_public_rsa_key seems to throw an assertion error:
Note that the pgp functions in Nettle are undocumented and unfinished.
Yeah, I noticed that in the source; but that never stoped me before! :)
Cool
Howdy folks!
Thanks for working on nettle,
pgp_put_public_rsa_key seems to throw an assertion error:
assert(buffer-size == start + length)
buffer-size is 3 larger than (start + length).
Removing the PGP_LENGTH_TWO_OCTETS works (but this is wrong, since 4880
defines it as it's written, I
CC'ing Luke, since he's dealt with Google Summer of Code, and knows the
step to get auth'd to do it on Ubuntu's behalf.
Good effort, keep it up Diego!
Paul
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Diego Turcios diegoturcio...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I am writing to the following lists, because I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:14:22 -0400
Source: python-firehose
Binary: python-firehose python3-firehose
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
Changed
project areas?
Yeah, I think talking with *mentors* should be fine. We musn't engage
with students with the impression we are a GSoC 14 org only until (and
if) we get accepted.
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92
to free the world from this evil license[2].
He just makes fun of such efforts. All the damn time. It's not worth
feeding the troll.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:32:15PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
On Monday, October 07, 2013 08:06:47 PM Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I met another piece of Software (JSHint [sic!])
They did a rewrite that is no longer subject to his terms.
I'm afraid you might be mistaken here:
https
. We sincerely regret the inconvenience.
Regards,
Bart Martens
Not just this - but tons of OpenGov data is also unreachable; nuts!
Thanks for the pointers!
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
to a debile build setup.
Best,
Michael
Thanks for your interest, mt!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:06:27PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paultag at debian.org writes:
So, the way *I* see this is so long as the GPL code isn't being put into
a combined work with anything (e.g. GPL'd patches), it *should* be OK.
Unfortunately, GPLv3 considers
not too much “magic” in it… and others even think
there should be no magic in it…)
I don't disagree, but I don't think this is inherently an issue.
bye,
//mirabilos
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:18:58AM -0400, Miles Lubin wrote:
Dear debian-legalers,
Yo, Miles!
- The debian directory had no explicit license mentioned in the
copyright file. It was pointed out by Paul Tagliamonte that the
Oh yes, I remember this.
previous maintainer(s) must agree
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:37:12AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
It's a skitch hazy, but I don't think there's an issue with
distributing CC-BY and GPL code in the same tarball -- the only issue is
this *MAY* result in GPL issues if *upstream* is GPL, if you've checked
out some of the CDDL
testing in dev setups, to make sure
your requirements.txt isn't forgetting something that's installed
system-wide :)
+1 for keeping it isolated without global site packages (unless you need
them, in which case, it should be a per-env exception)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul
ii python-dput 1.6
Versions of packages dput-ng recommends:
ii bash-completion 1:2.0-1
dput-ng suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C
On Sep 24, 2013 2:37 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, September 23, 2013 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Did you tag them 'gift'?
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag
This may just be me, as it's very personal, and no offense intended at
you, but I really detest
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than bitesized
or
low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling
about gift
forcemerge -1 723998
thank
See 723998 :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
you think it's OK to distribute this on Debian machines.
C'mon. Really.
For any of them where I was the sole
uploader, please feel free to delete them from our archive.
Please file RoM bugs.
Cheers,
Bye,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian
), without being upstream.
I'm all for allowing native packages, but newbies shouldn't be using
them to package software with an upstream.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Kevin Bortis wrote:
[snip]
BTW: There is an upcomming Debian project which could help
implementing a new parallel, non-official, community driven build
infrastructure called debile (formerly know as debuild.me).
maintainer, and
that the packaging is included? That is the guidance I was given
regarding one of my packages.
--
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien - Voltaire
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:06:57AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
In any case, it sounds like the guidance on this ticket is that either
solution is fineish.
Uh. The guidance is only use a Debian native package iff the software is
*ONLY* for Debian alone.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul
for modification and preferred form for use.
I mean, not really, right?
If I want to use a .so, I want the ELF, but I want to modify it in C
This just means we ship the prefered form for use (this binary kruft)
but ship the preferred form for modification in the source.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 05:04:50PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 20/09/13 15:49, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:47:39PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
It is also impossible to patch the binary format unlike SQL
), without being upstream.
I'm all for allowing native packages, but newbies shouldn't be using
them to package software with an upstream.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
idea for someone to scan back for
bugs tagged json-evil-license, open or closed or archived, and alert the
relevant maintainers of this change.
Thank you for caring about the freeness of our archive :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:05:22AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The lintian tag license-problem-json-evil, added per BTS 692616, should
have its description modified ... because those files have been
relicensed under
maintainer, and
that the packaging is included? That is the guidance I was given
regarding one of my packages.
--
Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien - Voltaire
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:06:57AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
In any case, it sounds like the guidance on this ticket is that either
solution is fineish.
Uh. The guidance is only use a Debian native package iff the software is
*ONLY* for Debian alone.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul
idea for someone to scan back for
bugs tagged json-evil-license, open or closed or archived, and alert the
relevant maintainers of this change.
Thank you for caring about the freeness of our archive :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:05:22AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The lintian tag license-problem-json-evil, added per BTS 692616, should
have its description modified ... because those files have been
relicensed under
Yaroslav Halchenko's excellent work with NeuroDebian).
Thomas
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
idea for someone to scan back for
bugs tagged json-evil-license, open or closed or archived, and alert the
relevant maintainers of this change.
Thank you for caring about the freeness of our archive :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:05:22AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The lintian tag license-problem-json-evil, added per BTS 692616, should
have its description modified ... because those files have been
relicensed under
where you can
upgrade a library without breaking API.
I'm trimming the rest, since I don't want to get dragged into
side-conversations about pip as a package manager.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python
this is a fine middleground and shouldn't be much if a problem.
Donald pung me after, and he's open to working with us.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
. As a result, I have
to use virtualenv.
I don't understand the pip hate. Why don't you guys try and, you know,
figure out *why* these tools were invented. It (for sure) is overly
simplistic, but it's there for a reason.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
.
Samesies.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I get why they exist.
I was talking to the people who were advocating for the removal of pip
from the archive, not you, Scott :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian
to use libraries prepared by
us... and yet they want to force us to use their .eggs and overwrite our
files.
yawn, see point 1
I said pretty clearly I don't advocate for this to be used globally.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
4) Python modules from dpkg are borderline useless for developers. We
package modules so that apps can use them, not so that people can
Sorry, what did you do with that sourceless PDF? I don't see it in the
changelog.
T
Awesome! Thanks for the quick response !
Cheers,
T
On Sep 17, 2013 8:07 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
sorry, I forgot to mention that. I just removed PDF and repacked the
source.
Anton
2013/9/17 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org:
Sorry, what did you do
Sorry, what did you do with that sourceless PDF? I don't see it in the
changelog.
T
Awesome! Thanks for the quick response !
Cheers,
T
On Sep 17, 2013 8:07 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
sorry, I forgot to mention that. I just removed PDF and repacked the
source.
Anton
2013/9/17 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org:
Sorry, what did you do
it either. That would likely make this free enough (tm), but
I'd need to re-read it to be sure.
Cheers,
Paul
[just as a DD, not ftpteam hacker]
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
in your next upload.
Thanks so much!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The license lib/rubygems/LICENSE.txt should be mentioned in
d/copyright
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
through the source :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
:)
best regards
mira
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it either. That would likely make this free enough (tm), but
I'd need to re-read it to be sure.
Cheers,
Paul
[just as a DD, not ftpteam hacker]
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
in your next upload.
Thanks so much!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The license lib/rubygems/LICENSE.txt should be mentioned in
d/copyright
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
through the source :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this is frowned upon without the coordination of the
current maintainer - so that's a pretty needed first step!
Thank you so much for your work! Let's get your changes in the archive!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a patch be backported?
AV
[1]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514
On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote:
Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change
might be retroactive?
They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to
deb
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:25:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Yes please! I was hunting for this last night, could really use it!
The packaging is available at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p
)
- Undocumented licenses:
bin/matlab/laplacianlicense.txt
config/BuildSystem/patch.py:
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:25:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Yes please! I was hunting for this last night, could really use it!
The packaging is available at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p
Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a patch be backported?
AV
[1]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514
On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote:
Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 10:11 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change
might be retroactive?
They are. The meta data can be updated. It's up to Debian if you want to
deb
)
- Undocumented licenses:
bin/matlab/laplacianlicense.txt
config/BuildSystem/patch.py:
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
forward to granting eugecm DMUA :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
advocate this bizarro-eugecm with the same text as other-eugecm.
See 20130914160250.GC4241@leliel
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org
,
but it's resulted in a few REJECTs.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to the work.
Not that reading 4b this way isn't creative ;)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
2.0 as 3.0, don't keep doing it. If it made it through NEW for some crazy
reason, please file a serious bug on your package and CC the ftpteam.
Have a nice weekend,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
,
but it's resulted in a few REJECTs.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Yes please! I was hunting for this last night, could really use it!
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org
* Package name: libevdev
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Peter
Yes please! I was hunting for this last night, could really use it!
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org
* Package name: libevdev
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Peter
the orig.tar.gz on it's own, which
we do)
Thanks for your work,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:20:02PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
There's no upstream license at all in the package. This
Yeah, we discussed this already in the team, but ...
violates both the GPL and MPL.
MPL-1.1
the orig.tar.gz on it's own, which
we do)
Thanks for your work,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:20:02PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
There's no upstream license at all in the package. This
Yeah, we discussed this already in the team, but ...
violates both the GPL and MPL.
MPL-1.1
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:18:36PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 02/09/13 12:56 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:41:58PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Also, is it necessary that I ask them to re-release with the new LICENSE
file included? Thanks,
It'd be very very
)
Thanks
Sylvestre
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address
concerns.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:yeshuxi...@gmail.com
2. http://perl.apache.org/start/LICENSE.txt
3. mailto:ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Changed-By: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
Description:
dput-ng- next generation Debian package upload tool
dput-ng-doc - next generation Debian package upload tool (documentation)
python-dput - next generation Debian package upload tool (Python library)
Closes: 714103 718384 719975
recommends:
ii bash-completion 1:2.0-1
dput-ng suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Thank you for the bug report,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:31:01 -0400
Source: olla
Binary: olla
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
Changed-By: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary.
This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this
by getting upstream to move to GPLv3
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:35:07AM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
I notice there's a mix
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:35:07AM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
I notice there's a mix
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
I notice there's a mix of GPLv2 and Apache2 code in the same binary.
This combined work isn't distributable. It'd be super great to fix this
by getting upstream to move to GPLv3
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:35:07AM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:32:09PM +1000, Russell Sim wrote:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org writes:
I notice there's a mix
901 - 1000 of 2490 matches
Mail list logo
