he number of active tasks. If a task is launched before
> others and hogs a lot of memory quickly, the other tasks that are launched
> after it might not be able to get enough memory allocation, and thus will
> fail. This is not super ideal, but probably fine because tasks can be
> retried, and
so forcing the ShuffleMemoryManager to assume 32 cores and therefore
calculate a pagesize of 1MB passes the tests.
How can we determine the correct value to use in getPageSize rather than
Runtime.getRuntime.availableProcessors()?
On 16 September 2015 at 10:17, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.
Oops... I meant to say "The page size calculation is NOT the issue here"
On 16 September 2015 at 06:46, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The page size calculation is the issue here as there is plenty of free
> memory, although there is maybe a fair bit of wast
euristics in memory calculation to use
> SparkContext.defaultParallelism if it is local mode.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes and at least there is an override by setting spark.sql.test.master
>> to local[8
than 4MB.
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/ShuffleMemoryManager.scala#L174
>>
>> Maybe there is a place that in the maven tests that we explicitly set the
>> page size (spark.buffer.pageSize) to 4MB? If yes, we need to find it and
&
gt; Yea I think this is where the heuristics is failing -- it uses 8 cores to
> approximate the number of active tasks, but the tests somehow is using 32
> (maybe because it explicitly sets it to that, or you set it yourself? I'm
> not sure which one)
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:06
xplicitly sets it to that, or you set it yourself? I'm
> > not sure which one)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Reynold, thanks for replying.
> >>
> >> getPageSize parameters: maxMemo
) so maybe that should be changed to limit
threads to num cores?
Cheers,
On 15 September 2015 at 08:50, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok so it looks like the max number of active tasks reaches 30. I'm not
> setting anything as it is a clean environment with clean spark
I keep hitting errors running the tests on 1.5 such as
- join31 *** FAILED ***
Failed to execute query using catalyst:
Error: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 9 in stage 3653.0 failed 1
times, most recent failure: Lost task 9.0 in stage 3653.0 (TID 123363,
localhost):
raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10454 and PR
On 4 September 2015 at 21:24, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've also just hit this and was about to raise a JIRA for this if there
> isn't one already. I have a simple fix.
>
> On 4 September 2015
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14731377#comment-14731377
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-10454:
--
This is another case of not waiting for events to drain form
I've also just hit this and was about to raise a JIRA for this if there
isn't one already. I have a simple fix.
On 4 September 2015 at 19:09, Cheolsoo Park wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I noticed this test case fails intermittently in Jenkins.
>
> For eg, see the following builds-
Pete Robbins created SPARK-10454:
Summary: Flaky test: o.a.s.scheduler.DAGSchedulerSuite.late fetch
failures don't cause multiple concurrent attempts for the same map stage
Key: SPARK-10454
URL: https
Pete Robbins created SPARK-10431:
Summary: Intermittent test failure in InputOutputMetricsSuite
Key: SPARK-10431
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10431
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14729024#comment-14729024
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-9869:
-
My pull request build for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14729030#comment-14729030
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-9869:
-
should I add this change to the PR for Spark-10431 or submit PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702705#comment-14702705
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-9644:
-
Thanks. I think this needs to go in to 1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14701202#comment-14701202
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-9644:
-
This change makes assumptions about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14701926#comment-14701926
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-9644:
-
How much slower is the public API? We would
That would be me then ;-)
I'm working on a patch.
Cheers,
On 14 August 2015 at 23:43, Reynold Xin r...@databricks.com wrote:
I pinged the IBM team to submit a patch that would work on IBM JVM.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Pete Robbins robbin...@gmail.com
wrote:
ref: https
ref: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9370
The code to handle BigInteger types in
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRowWriters.java
and
org.apache.spark.unsafe.Platform.java
is dependant on the implementation of java.math.BigInteger
eg:
try {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14647322#comment-14647322
]
Pete Robbins commented on SPARK-6873:
-
We've been trying to get a clean build/test
lresende at apache dot org
- Mark Combellack mcombellack at apache dot org
- Matthieu Riou mriou at apache dot org
- Mike Edwards edwardsmj at apache dot org
- Paul Fremantle pzf at apache dot org
- Pete Robbins robbinspg at apache dot org
- Raymond Feng rfeng at apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins reassigned TUSCANY-2041:
-
Assignee: Pete Robbins
Repeated nill elements of extended type cause Parser found
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567999#action_12567999
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-2041:
---
I checked in a fix
I think the libxml2/iconv libraries are only required by SDO.
Factoring SDO out of SCA implementation would require some substantial
rework as we use SDO for parsing and loading our xml configuration
files. Altering the way we do this would require a new method of
parsing the files which again may
Has the ws extension been built and installed in your runtime? e.g. in
deploy-dir/extensions/ws
This extension should register the WebServiceBinding.
Cheers,
On 10/12/2007, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can somebody help me with this problem:
I've checked a fix for this into the branch. I'll apply it to head later.
Cheers,
On 22/11/2007, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll need to look into this. I can't find any restrictions in the spec
for characters in property names so I'm assuming NCName. So I think
your patch looks
I've applied this patch to the branch. I'll apply it to head later. I
had to change a couple of lines to construct SDOString from a start
and end iterator as this caused compile errors on VC8.
Cheers,
On 30/11/2007, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a proposed patch for
I'll need to look into this. I can't find any restrictions in the spec
for characters in property names so I'm assuming NCName. So I think
your patch looks good.
The usual place where hyphens in names become a problem is when
mapping to programming language label but that is something that code
as it is, cause it will probably be deleted soon when the cpp-tasks
bug is fixed.
Do you have any news about a fix for this bug Brady?
Regards,
Adriano Crestani
On Nov 7, 2007 3:45 AM, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jar files are checked in to svn so should not be deleted I guess
This jar file will have to be part of the Release distributions as
well so we will need to include LICENCE information in a similar way
to our scagen jar
(cpp\sca\runtime\extensions\cpp\tools\scagen\META-INF)
Cheers,
On 07/11/2007, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you're right we
@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Propose] A Tuscany Native release with SCA, SDO and DAS
thanks brady ; )
On Nov 5, 2007 12:43 PM, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good stuff. I'll check it out.
On 05/11/2007, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just submit the first SCA
The jar files are checked in to svn so should not be deleted I guess??
It will be re-built if the java src gets updated.
Cheers,
On 07/11/2007, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All 3 native projects have a tool called TuscanyMSVC8DevStudioCCompiler that
is an adaptor that fixes a bug
Up to now we have tried to keep the distros separate so that we could,
for example, create an SDO release without SCA. I'd like to keep it
like this.
Cheers,
On 04/11/2007, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed ; )
Adriano Crestani
On 11/2/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for that. I'll fix it right away.
On 02/11/2007, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A user has found a vulnerability in XMLHelperImpl::createDocument, the
one with the const char * parameters. The problem being that the root
element name is initialized with the parameter before
I think we should be using ant for everything. The goal is to have a
command line build and ant will give us that. We need to ensure that
the samples can also be built/deployed using an ant script and that
the documentation is updated to reflect this.
While we are at it we should write some ant
On 05/11/2007, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran rat on the entire cpp trunk and got some thoughts about the results:
1-These files have no asf headers, however they have another lincense on it,
so I don't know if the asf headers should be inserted or not:
to include sample
source as well as a zip of the deployed runtime.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:11 AM
Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:34 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Propose] A Tuscany Native release with SCA, SDO and DAS
Up to now we have tried to keep the distros
On 10/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is one for the legal discuss list. This has been
discussed before and I think the conclusion was that because you code
to the cxxtest apis to write your test code it could be considered a
derivative work.
Cheers,
On 23
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Michael to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome!
I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany.
Cheers,
--
Pete
-
To unsubscribe,
(architecture, get started and
user
doc) to help new people come on board faster?
Another thought might be to have an integration story between Native and
Java. Some of this work started for OSCon, for example a sample of a
composite which include C++ and Java components.
On 7/26/07, Pete Robbins
lresende at apache dot org
Mike Edwards edwardsmj at apache dot
org
Pete Robbinsrobbinspg at apache dot
org
Raymond Feng rfeng at apache dot org
Simon Laws slaws
is referencing the SDO, the memory will be released.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:50 PM
To: tuscany-dev
I would imagine we can map the contents of the Operation into an SDO.
Would this cope with pass by reference semantics? Would we be
storing copies of the parameters in the SDO or pointers to them as is
the case now with the Operation class? If so do we still get the same
memory management problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-1529.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Tuscany SDO native for windows is not msvc backwards compatible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-1509.
-
Resolution: Fixed
New Jiras will be raised fr any outstanding problems
Change TuscanySDO
Stansilaw,
I have not seen these patces submitted and we can only accept them if
they are attached to a Jira with the Licence to Apache checkbox
ticked. Please let me know which Jira's these patches belong to. I
don't recall seeing a memory leak defect.
If you want an M3 + several bug fixes
I applied v2 and then v2_b
Cheers,
On 28/08/2007, Michael Yoder (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1370:
Patch applied. Can you resolve/close the Jiras if the work is now
complete on them?
Cheers,
On 28/08/2007, Michael Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1548. If someone could review and
apply it that would be great.
Thanks,
Michael
Rogue Wave Software,
] Software Developer -
HydraSDO
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 3:13 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1548) multi-valued properties
should require indexed xpath
Patch applied
Patch applied.
One thing we need to do is update the NOTICE file to include the
licence from the wsdl schema files.
Cheers,
On 30/08/2007, Michael Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded an addendum patch to TUSCANY-1375. If someone could review
and apply it that would be great.
Hi,
I have applied 1368 and 1374. This patch gets conflicts with the
patches I've applied. They looked reasonably straight forward to
resolve but I must have done something wrong as the sdo tests crash
:-(
Could you do an extract from HEAD and create a new patch for this Jira?
Cheers,
On
to the
spec committee.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:21 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SDO spec compliance/portability: Type enums the num_type
is just a convenient way to know the extent of an enum
Applied now. Another great patch. Thanks!
On 22/08/07, Michael Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1371. If someone could review and apply
it that would be great.
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521534
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-1566:
---
This should be fairly easy to fix. I think it is in the logic where
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-1566.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Cpp-Next
Fixed in HEAD and the branch.
Element
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521605
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-1564:
---
I have applied a patch to the branch only which I believe works. I
to build Tuscany SCA.
Since the SDO spec is separate from SCA, we were thinking this would be
a good goal. That seems to mean making them internal to Tuscany SDO or
taking them to the committee.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Brady,
sorry I haven't had too much time to comment on this but it all looks
sensible and in the right direction to me.
Regarding the schema loading, where you say
sca-implementation-java.xsd (loaded but ignored) I think this means
we will load this schema but as no extension is registered to
On 14/08/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The SCA Java runtime doesn't use the XSD for the assembly or extensions at
runtime to parse the composite file. A StAX-based artifact processor is
plugged into the runtime to handle the extensions such as
implementation.java,
On 13/08/07, David Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 8:33 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] java implementation and interface schema
files
loaded but
I've deleted this. It has been proposed several times to remove this
and I've never seen any objections.
It's gone!
Cheers,
On 13/08/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a JIRA about this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1533
Why don't we just delete it to
I've applied 1529 and 1530.
Cheers,
On 10/08/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I created a JIRA for this compilation issue and have already uploaded a
patch. Can someone submit it please.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1530
Thanks
Another great patch! Thanks!
Should SDO.h only include headers for the public (i.e. spec) APIs? I
think it should so things like DASValue.h should be removed. Anyone
who wants to utilize the internal APIs should have to know they are
doing it!
What do you think?
Cheers,
On 10/08/07, Michael
to bool member function.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 6:16 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: C++ SDO spec portability: RefCountingPointer Michael, I
strongly suspect that the operator T*() ws put
] ruby.include.dir=
/nfs/homes/bjohnson/tuscany_cpp/ruby-1.8.6/deploy/include
[echo]
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 1 second
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sca]$
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:13 PM
To: tuscany-dev
Thanks. I'll get on the case soon.
I really appreciate the effort you have put in to this.
Cheers,
On 07/08/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I just uploaded a patch for JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1509
-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 6:16 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: C++ SDO spec portability: RefCountingPointer Michael, I
strongly suspect that the operator T*() ws put in for a good reason.
It may be a good idea to remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517911
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-1504:
---
Matthew, the speciifcation is available from here:
http
A Jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1504) has been
raised against the SDO C++ implementation which is saying that for a
schema:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
xs:schema xmlns:xs=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema;
xmlns:letter=http://letterSchema;
Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:44 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build
More good stuff. I've applied
and the basedir of the root project/ element.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:15 AM
To: tuscany-dev
and now I've moved the core schema to cpp/sca/runtime/core/xsd
On 27/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK.. done! runtime/core/build.xml replaces runtime/core/src/build.xml
I'll move the xsd dir later.
Cheers,
On 27/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-1448.
---
Resolution: Fixed
patch applied
CppBigBank example windows deploy script deploy.bat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-1423.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I believe this is all applied now
There are no tools to verify
I'm sure this has come up before. I will try and find out what the
resolution was.
On 26/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, the only issue would be if we distribute LPGL
software under the ASF licensing. What if we don't distribute CxxTest
with Tuscany, but
]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:00 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] next release content [was: Tuscany roadmap]
On 12/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to mention another one
More good stuff. I've applied the latest patch but there are some issues.
From a clean build if you just type ant in the top level cpp/sca
directory then the build will fail on tuscany_sca_cpp because it needs
to link against deploy_dir/lib/tuscany_sca.dll which has not yet
been installed as
Works fine on all our linuxes including my RHEL... I've removed the
unnecessary qualifier so you should be fine now.
Cheers,
On 25/07/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to build Native/C++ SDO on Linux RHEL5 gives me this error:
if /bin/sh ../../../../../libtool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-1425.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Cpp-Next
Compile error fixed in branch and head
The fix is in the branch as well. Sorry I did not see that Jira.
On 25/07/07, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Trying to build Native/C++ SDO on Linux RHEL5 gives me this error:
if /bin/sh ../../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
I'm looking at it right now!
On 25/07/07, Michael Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a patch for C++ SDO which fixes its XML serialization to
produce XML valid against schemas with elementFormDefault=true. If
someone could verify and apply it that would be great. This gets the SCA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-1478.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Cpp-Next
Patch applied to HEAD and the sdo-cpp
Sorry for the slow response.
The compiler errors suggest that LIBXML2_INCLUDE is not set??
You could try modifying build_sdocpp.sh adding an env to see what is
set when the script is invoked.
Cheers,
On 20/07/07, brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
by the
individual projects. It would be very similar to the root build.xml for
TuscanySCA.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007
.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:44 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build
as a base for future patches?
Cheers,
On 23/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll give this a go. I should be able to run it on Mac as well.
Cheers,
On 23/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated the jira1438 with update 3, which includes the following:
https
the definition of the
Tuscany-BaseCompiler
Cheers,
On 23/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've applied the patch. How are you creating the patches? I had
trouble applying it on Windows using ToirtoiseSVN.
I've included the changes in the patch to the tools/TuscanyDriver
build. I haven't
/target
Tomorrow I'll have the python, ruby, rest, and maybe php extensions
complete.
Brady Johnson
Lead Software Developer - HydraSCA
Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
inline
---
/* #undef inline */
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:22 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build
yeah I figured that... I did exactly the same when committing changes
earlier
I've taken out the references to tuscany_sca_config.h and patched the
automake for now with setting -DIS_DARWIN on mac. Yet to test it on
Mac as I need to kick the kids off my machine!
On 19/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automake generates a config file with lots of standard
dont have write access to %ANT_HOME%\lib, do the following:
- create ${user.home}\.ant\lib
- place the jars here
Avoid adding optional ant tasks to your classpath, this is problematic.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:24 AM
make sense?
Cheers,
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like some info on what I need to edit in the platform.properties.
Particularly:
platform.compiler-definition=g++m32
platform=rhas4u4_gcc346
One good thing about automake is that it detects your
platform/compiler etc
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into a couple of issues tryingt o run this ant build. Firstly I
got an error with a path
x/cpp/sca/runtime/core/src/runtime/core/src. I trcked this down to
the fact that the property core.dir is set in the top level build.xml
build.xml I added:
property name=tuscanySCA.root.dir location=$env.PWD} /
and then based other properties from this. It seemed to work!
Do these changes make sense?
Cheers,
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like some info on what I need to edit in the platform.properties
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete,
Thanks for trying out the ant build scripts.
Regarding core.dir, you're right, the name will need to change. I can do
that no problem.
As for the tuscanySCA.root.dir : Your
Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:00 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete,
Thanks for trying out the ant
]
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:00 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA Native] preliminary ant build
On 18/07/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/07/07, Brady Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
101 - 200 of 1039 matches
Mail list logo