[(FBR):] pagure: Turn off debug mode on pagure.io

This leads to some exception being raised instead of by-pass safely. It was useful at some point because pagure would not log error to its logs otherwise but Patrick has since fixed it and I believe it may be triggering some errors now. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon --- roles/pagure

Re: tracebacks while "git push"ing to Fedora's git

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > when "git push"ing updates to Fedora's git, I am currently encountering this > kind of tracebacks: > > $ git push > Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) > remote: Emitting a message to the fedmsg bus. > remote: *

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] pagure.io: Increase upload size from 60MB to 100MB for virt-viewer

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 01:45:14AM +, ke...@scrye.com wrote: > From: Kevin Fenzi > > See ticket https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7612 > virt-viewer folks need to upload larger than 60MB content. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi > --- > roles/pagure/frontend/templates/pagure.cfg

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:11:27AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > >> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned? > > > > Just as anyone would: b

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:45:31AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 03. 19 22:19, Ben Cotton wrote: > > '''The CI system, the tests and the decision on which tests are used > > to gate upon are out of scope for the present document.''' > > This is both good (specifying explicitly what is this

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

t; >> > >> This proposal is about the phase 1 of this project. > >> > >> == Owner == > >> * Name: [[User:pingou|Pierre-Yves Chibon]] > >> * Email: pingou - pingoured.fr > >> > >> People who are/will be involved in this: >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 3/1/19 1:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates > > > ...snip... > > > # Add tests to a package you maintain in Fedora using the [[ > > CI/Quick_Start_Guide ]]

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 03:05:56PM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: >On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 3:20 PM Ben Cotton <[1]bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > ** infrastructure: deploy the new version of bodhi and the new koji > plugin > >What's the new Koji plugin? Good catch, this is a left over

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 10:12:00AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:09:48PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] > > > * Single package update > > > ** We will need to write a message-bus listener that will > > > automatically create a

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

This project will be split in two phases, at first only single package > > updates will be supported, in a second stage, we will add support for > > multi-packages updates. > > > > This proposal is about the phase 1 of this project. > > > > == Owner == &g

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:57:48PM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 03/01/2019 01:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates > > > > == Summary == > > We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in > > rawhide. This will

Re: [ansible] [distgit/pagure] Drop --autoreload from our systemd service file

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:41:51PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > Pierre-YvesChibon wrote: > > [distgit/pagure] Drop --autoreload from our systemd service file > > I noticed a few recent commits using this bracket prefix > style and I wanted to give a heads-up about how this can >

Re: Future of fedora-packages

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:38:30PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > fedora-packages [0] code base is showing its age. The code base and > the technology stack (Turbogears2 [1] web framework and the Moksha > [2] middleware) is currently not ready for Python3 and I am not > planning to do

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 3:51 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:37 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > > > Right. > > > > > > Yes, I'm trying to test the installation from the mirrors. There will > > > be a delay. >

Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:13:47AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > It happened to me almost dozen times now, so here's my rage :D > > I want to send a pull request to a Fedora project*, I clone it, fork it, > push to the fork, open a PR and there it goes: ... > benefit, just pain. I've signed the

Re: Organizing a "packager experience" objective and working group

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:58:17PM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote: > Hello, > > We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other > things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1]. > > I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which > have

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 02:28:38PM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: >Thanks Kevin. The build worked! >Sorry about not opening a ticket. That's done here, right? >https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure Correct :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list

[Release] pagure-dist-git 1.1

Good Morning Everyone, I have just released pagure-dist-git version 1.1. Here is the corresponding changelog: * Wed Dec 19 2018 Pierre-Yves Chibon - 1.1-1 - Include contributors and groups in the people watching bugs in bugzilla - Make it so SIGs don't require a dash It is currently happily

[Design-team] Re: users design-team and more

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:15:10AM -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote: >2. 3. I'm sorry, but I still don't understand. The Fedora logo is a >trademark, yes, and we have trademark language around its usage. What is >the point you are trying to make about that relative to ticket 620? I'm also

Re: 404 in git email notifications (Was: pagure pushed to git (master). "Updated pull-request 16f37409e293432fb406e514cd649b66: Move git instaweb to a subpackage")

On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:58:27PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >Looks like in all email notifications like below URL points to 404. Could you forward me one of these emails entirely (so I can check headers and all)? Also, does it happen with all and every notifications or just some? Thanks

Re: prevent accidentally creating branches in dist-git

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:31:34AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:26 AM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > I've certainly made the mistake of accidentally creating branches > > in dist-git and now being stuck with them because we can't delete > > them. Now that

Planned Outage - src.fedoraproject.org - 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC

Planned Outage - src.fedoraproject.org - 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-11-20

Planned Outage - src.fedoraproject.org - 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC

Planned Outage - src.fedoraproject.org - 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-11-20 08:30 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-11-20

Re: attention brno folks: testing wanted

This is one where I do see a pretty big difference: $ time curl https://pagure.io/static/vendor/emojione/emojione.sprites.png -o /dev/null % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft

Re: Container updates available in bodhi

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:10:37AM -, Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:05:44PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > This is a great news! > > > > Just to clarify for those like me who aren't playing with containers much. > > What happened before? There was no updates of

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:36:44AM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion, Matthew! > > A few notes: > > * My personal long-term dream is that all Fedora users are running > Silverblue, we do great automated QA testing, and upgrading from one > Fedora to the next is a

Re: Container updates available in bodhi

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:05:44PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: >Dear all, >It is now possible to use bodhi to release a new container build. >Currently it is following the same flow as packages. >After a successful OSBS build, a bodhi update can be created. Fedpkg does >not yet

Re: Introducing Luiz Carvalho

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:35:55PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > Hi all, > > Just an FYI - I've moved off of the Factory 2 team inside Red Hat to > take a different role in the internal devops organization there. Good luck with your new adventures :) > Luiz Carvalho (lucarval in both FAS and irc)

Re: attention brno folks: testing wanted

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:20:28PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey everyone. > > A while back we had reports from folks particularly in Brno that > operations to pagure.io were very slow. We put in place a workaround > while we worked on the issue with network providers and tried various >

Re: Statistics. Stats for installled or downloaded packages

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 09:49:00PM -, Anatoli Babenia wrote: > I need only package info like https://popcon.debian.org/ but getting stats > about Fedora hardware similar to https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/ is > interesting. > > I can not find the source code for Smolt. The first

Re: Fedora should replace mailing lists with Discourse

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:33:56PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 10/21/18 6:12 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > > > > Huh. The only person I know of from Fedora at least that was > > > working on it was abompard. While he's working on other things now, > > > as far

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:53:06AM -, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:27:02PM -, Ray Strode wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, all is not rosy there. See this thread on the users' list > > from this fall about confusion with hyperkitty quoting: > >

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] Also install the username/pass for pushing to the stg candidate registery.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:05:59PM +, ke...@scrye.com wrote: > From: Kevin Fenzi > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi > --- > playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml > b/playbooks/groups/releng-compose.yml

[After the fact Freeze Break Request]: restarting loopabull

the following patch: """ From 865436dbdb8f5d1387af1e630c1b9adc01a44ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre-Yves Chibon Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:12:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Ensure the loopabull server is running and enabled Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon --- roles/loopabull

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] More logging on pkgs02

Good Morning, While applying this FBR, I think I found the root cause for the emailing on commits in dist-git, here is, I suspect this is the patch needed to fix this: """" From 1b661f2c5f217470111aa91fb502b21255f9fa37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre-Yves Chibon Date:

Re: [Freeze Break Request: ] Upgrade pagure.io to pagure 5.1.2

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:32:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 10/10/18 6:35 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > Today people started to indicate some issues with merging, accessing or > > delete > > branches in some projects. All

Re: FAS & openid application development

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:36:57AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:24 AM Radka Janekova wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > please excuse me if this information is somewhere and I failed to find it... > > > > I'm looking for a way to add an application / get an id, to be used in a >

[Freeze Break Request: ] Upgrade pagure.io to pagure 5.1.2

Good Morning Everyone, Today people started to indicate some issues with merging, accessing or delete branches in some projects. All what these persons had in common, they had access to the project via a group. It turns out, in 5.1 the logic to determine if a person is a committer to a project

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon na

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > &g

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > >> "BP" == Björn Persson writes: > > BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the > > BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other

[Release] pagure 5.0

Good Morning Everyone, On Monday, I released a new version of pagure: 5.0. Here is its changelog: 5.0 (2018-09-24) .. warning:: This release contains backward incompatible changes and fixes a CVE - Pagure supports now python2 and python3 simultaneously (Thanks to Aurélien

FBR: upgrading pagure to 5.0

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 5.0, the formal announce is pending polishing things with mailman so we can include in the announce the new mailing lists to discuss/follow pagure. Pending this, I'd like to request a Freeze Break Request for upgrading pagure to 5.0.

Re: FBR: Add proxy101/proxy110 to the OSBS whitelsit

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:36:32PM -, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s for the patch underneath? > This adds proxy101/proxy110 to the whitelist for OSBS for candidate-registry > pushing. > > Patrick > > > commit ef9fa10389a6a60843c96e4855dbdcb604583baa

FBR: upgrading pagure to 5.0

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 5.0, the formal announce is pending polishing things with mailman so we can include in the announce the new mailing lists to discuss/follow pagure. Pending this, I'd like to request a Freeze Break Request for upgrading pagure to 5.0.

Re: FBR: add lists.pagure.io to our mailing-lists

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:46:00PM +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: >On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:40 PM Aurelien Bompard >wrote: > > Hey folks! > > Pingou would like to announce the availability of mailing-lists on > lists.pagure.io with the 5.0 release. The following

Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 12:26:31PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > So I see only 2 alternatives: > > a) keep comps as it is now, including optional packages, OR > > b) undeprecate the RPM Group tag, readd it to all Fedora packages,

Re: a few more changes for lists.pagure.io

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:03:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I had to make a few more changes to get lists.pagure.io working. > > I haven't pushed these to all the proxies yet, will wait until I get > +1's or revert. > > commit 2359610fd4298fd9e54fbb49bdf809ff387639e5 > Author: Kevin Fenzi >

Re: FBR: add lists.pagure.io to our mailing-lists

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:33:19PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hey folks! > > Pingou would like to announce the availability of mailing-lists on > lists.pagure.io with the 5.0 release. The following patch should add > the new domain to our mailing list server. > Affected services are the

Re: FBR: Add key for f29 modular

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:58:01PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I get +1s to merge the following, which should allow us to > actually push out f29 module updates? > > Patrick > > > commit b39a70e1f58bd3f7e9960499f23717bda7d01b06 (HEAD -> master) > Author: Patrick Uiterwijk

Re: Freeze break request: backup pagure / src.fedoraproject.org db

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 02:29:40PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > While I was doing a sync of production src.fedoraproject.org to staging > today I found out that we are not actually backing up the production > database. ;( > > Can I get +1s for the following and running the

Re: FBR: Remove containers.fedoraproject.org subdomain

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:54:21PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml > b/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml > index 50ba745..8d35a5f 100644 > --- a/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml > +++

Re: FBR: Add favicon for communityblog

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-rewrites.yml > b/playbooks/include/proxies-rewrites.yml > index 6d0417a..648ce9a 100644 > --- a/playbooks/include/proxies-rewrites.yml > +++ b/playbooks/include/proxies-rewrites.yml > @@

Re: Post-FBR: Force openvpn to use tun1

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 06:12:10AM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > For compatibility with openshift, we need openvpn to use tun1 on the > openshift nodes. > While this does happen automatically if openvpn starts after the openshift > SDN pod, > this is not always the case. > Can I

Re: Package orphaned (python-flask-wtf, python-html5lib, gnome-pie, transgui)

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 05:19:29PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I am not able to maintain some of the packages and now ready to take > by a different package maintainer. > > - python-flask-wtf I'm taking this one :) Pierre ___ devel mailing

Re: Linking commits to builds on dist-git

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:16:13AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > Since koji 1.15 released last December, koji has a dedicated field for each > > build > &

Re: Linking commits to builds on dist-git

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 10.8.2018 11:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > Since koji 1.15 released last December, koji has a dedicated field for each > > build > > storing the enti

Linking commits to builds on dist-git

Good Morning Everyone, Since koji 1.15 released last December, koji has a dedicated field for each build storing the entire source URL with git hash, regardless of how the build was started. This allows us to know for each build the exact git hash that was used. We've implemented a small

PDC status

Good Morning Everyone, With flock next week I figured you may want to discuss there the future of PDC. So here is a little status update of where things stand now. We had a meeting a little while back that resulted in the following summary email:

Re: Intent to retire python-svgwrite

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:25:49PM -0400, Robert Brown wrote: >Got it. Thanks. I'm not sure what to do at this point. Log out and log back into src.fp.o, groups are synced upon login :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list --

[Release] pagure 4.0.4

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 4.0.4 This is a bug and security fix release. Here is its changelog: 4.0.4 (2018-07-19) -- .. note:: This release fixes CVE-2018-1002155, CVE-2018-1002156, CVE-2018-1002157, CVE-2018-1002153 - Ensure the

Updating R-qvalue and R-xtable

Good Morning Everyone, A few days ago, I sent this to the r-sig-fed...@r-project.org list but without reactions, so I'm sending it here as well in case there are more people interested here :) Thanks, Pierre -- Good Morning Everyone, I was going through my list of FTBFS packages today

Orphaning metamorphose2

Good Morning Everyone, metamorphose2 is a small wxPython (GUI) app allowing to mass-rename files. The last commit upstream is from July 22nd 2016, so almost 2 years ago. It fails to build from source now. I'm intending to orphan it. If someone is interested in picking it up, let me know and

Re: Fedora and PDC, road forward

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:39:25AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > >> https://github.com/noirbizarre/flask-restplus > > Actually, I haven't tried that one. It seems pretty good (from the > docs), has anybody tried it? Seen it but not tried it :( Pierre

Re: Fedora and PDC, road forward

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 08:35:54AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 01:13, Aurelien Bompard > wrote: > > > > > Within limits. It should be a version thats supported and gets at least > > > security updates. Hopefully the one(s) in Fedora follow this. > > > > Yeah it's 1.11 now

Re: FESCo Elections - May 2018 : Results announcement

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > Greetings, all! > > The elections for FESCo - May 2018 have concluded, and the results > are shown below. > > FESCo is electing 4 seats this time. A total of 86 ballots were cast, > meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 430 votes

Fedora and PDC, road forward

Good Morning Everyone, So yesterday we held a meeting on #fedora-apps about the future of PDC in Fedora. We kept notes in etherpad at: http://etherpad.osuosl.org/pdc_fedora Here is the gist of it: What do we currently store in PDC: * modules data - the list of what modules have been built, what

Re: Fedora and PDC

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 06:20:43PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > So there has been a number of person who expressed in this topic. > The list I have so far is: > - Clime > - bowlofeggs > - cverna > - nirik > - lsedlar > - a

[release] fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure: 0.26.0

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure: 0.26.0 Here is its changelog: 0.26.0 -- Pull Requests - (@pypingou) #487 Add support for fedmsg message from pagure about PR assignee

Re: Fedora and PDC

Good Morning Everyone, So there has been a number of person who expressed in this topic. The list I have so far is: - Clime - bowlofeggs - cverna - nirik - lsedlar - abompard - cqi - Ken Dreyer - ralphbean - mboddu I propose that we meet up next week on Monday at 14:00 UTC. What do you

Re: Can't fork in src.fedoraproject.org

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:07:03PM -0400, Christopher wrote: >On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon >wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > >    When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message:Ã*Â

Re: Can't fork in src.fedoraproject.org

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote: >When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message: Repo >"forks/ctubbsii/thrift" already exists. > >However, it clearly does not exist. It is not listed >at https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ctubbsii , which

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate package

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:56:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > However, for *package builds*, Recommends/Supplements are not > installed. So *package builds* which only BuildRequire python2 or > whatever would not get /usr/bin/python , and would thus fail. The > packager could always just add

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate

> > Couldn't we accomplish the same > > thing by doing a side build against a modified python2 package but not > > propagate that out to the users? > > How does that force the maintainers to fix the packages? We tried to check > what packages use /usr/bin/python during build. There is a huge

Re: Factory2/Infra sync up meeting - May 2018

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:21:44PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 05/17/2018 05:02 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > I don't > > think it's reasonable to state that it's the only valid means. > > After re-reading your message, I realized that I may have misinterpreted > your words a bit more strongly

Factory2/Infra sync up meeting - May 2018

Greeting, Last Monday Ralph and I had our monthly meeting for Factory2/Infra sync up. We went over the event that lead to disabling gating in bodhi last week (see fesco ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1872) If this situation happens again we encourage a stronger reach out for help from the

Re: Fedora and PDC

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:09:21AM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > Hi, is it too late? I want to help as well. No it's not too late, PDC is currently a little bit on the back fire due to other priorities but we'll need to get back to it (I expect around early June). I will gather all parties who

Re: Modularity WG + f2 + Infra

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:08:14AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > At the hackathon we did recently, we talked about the need for one of us > to attend the Modularity WG meetings so we could be more aware of what > work is coming our way before it's a surprise, and I volunteered to be

[Release] pagure 4.0.2 and 4.0.3

Good Morning Everyone, Yesterday I cut two new releases of pagure: 4.0.2 and 4.0.3. These are important releases, 4.0.2 addresses a CVE that was reported earlier in the day, it's not a "sky is falling" type of CVE but still nicer to have it fixed. Basically, anyone with an API key that allowed

Re: Slow Pagure.io

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:29:20PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > Pagure.io is so slow for me to that point that I simple can't open > ticket to report it. IOW, I am trying to load > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues in my browser and it does > not work, it just waits for

Re: fedora infrastructure problems?

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:34:48AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote: >Hi everybody, > >Is anybody else experiencing problems with the fedora infrastructure right >now? > >- I was barely able to build a package with koji due to src.fp.org errors >- fedmsg messages seem to be

Re: FBR: Make bodhi openshift logs a bit more sane

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > This should remove the filename headers in Bodhi's tail of logs. > > Any +1s? +1 for me Pierre > commit dd27d5bd55573c039f2cd809b1f0e124eb051cce (HEAD -> master) > Author: Patrick Uiterwijk > Date:

Re: [Release] pagure 4.0 and 4.0.1

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:46:02AM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > Hi, congrats Pagure team for a new major release!! This is awesome news! > > Has anyone considered writing a summary Community Blog article about the > new major release? > > I believe there is significant interest in something

Re: FBR - Fixing OSBS build

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > Currently OSBS builds are failing because of the kerberos > configuration not been up-to-date. > > I would like to add the following to the osbs-playbook, this will make > sure that the buildroot container is rebuild using the

[Release] pagure 4.0 and 4.0.1

it to the v2 API (Clément Verna, Pierre-Yves Chibon) - Deduplicate list of contributors to a project (Lubomír Sedlář) - Remove repo from gitolite cache when it gets deleted (Slavek Kabrda) - Make the hooks use the new architecture (Clément Verna) - Switch to comments on PR page when url fragment is reset

Re: [FBR] fix the alternativearch git hook

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:17:39AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > While testing something in dist-git two days ago, we found out that there > > is a > > piece of code

[FBR] fix the alternativearch git hook

Good Morning Everyone, While testing something in dist-git two days ago, we found out that there is a piece of code missing to the alternativearch git hook. Here is the error we saw: Counting objects: 3, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.

Re: FBR: no CI requirements for modules

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:28:19AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I re-wrote last week the script fixing the git hooks in dist-git, but its work > is getting overridden by the old script running in a cron (that Kevin fixed > this > week-en

Fix cron job fixing/adjusting the git hooks in dist-git

Good Morning Everyone, I re-wrote last week the script fixing the git hooks in dist-git, but its work is getting overridden by the old script running in a cron (that Kevin fixed this week-end). So I would like to replace the cron running the old script with a cron running the new script: Here

Re: FBR: no CI requirements for modules

Good Morning Everyone, I re-wrote last week the script fixing the git hooks in dist-git, but its work is getting overridden by the old script running in a cron (that Kevin fixed this week-end). So I would like to replace the cron running the old script with a cron running the new script: Here

Fedora and PDC

Good Morning Everyone, We have been informed thst week at the upstream devs working on the product-definition-center (PDC) are moving away from the project and are going to leave it without a maintainer. Since we adopted PDC for a variety of data flows, this puts us in an awkward position. :(

Re: FBR: no CI requirements for modules

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03:15AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > Modules are configure to require some test cases that never actually > get run for them. This patch should treat them instead like we do > epel: no CI requirements. > > Any +1s? > > diff --git

Re: FBR - Adding myself to nagios permission

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:33:28AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > I would like to add myself to the nagios permission, so that I can > acknowledge problems (mostly packages03 and OSBS). > > I pushed this commit --> >

Re: FBR: Fix the metadata handling for Rawhide messages

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:12:53PM +0530, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > From 1bf3db45c8154d0a6a0f29836ec14ce24fa404c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Sayan Chowdhury > Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:07:12 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fedimg: Add the patch for the PR#103, fix

Re: Moving meeting time?

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:31:31PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > It was noted recently that our current meeting time (thursdays at 18UTC) > is a bit late/poorly timed for several of our European colleagues. > > Additionally, we sometimes have the go/no-go meeting at the same time >

Re: Freeze Break Request: re-enable fedmsg hook on src

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 02:17:00AM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: >This only removes the commented out line. We should actually fully revert > > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=dc86b22f9054bdcefd51e46db90433c03d54410c, +1 to this, it'll be just as easy

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > [...] > > Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are > > still > > investigating th

Decommissioning summershum

Good Morning Everyone, The Fedora Infrastructure has been running a small service named summershum [1] for a few years. This service exploded all the archives uploaded in our lookaside cache, calculated the md5, sha1, sha256 and sha512 hash of every files in these archives and stored them in a

Decommissioning Darkserver

Good Morning Everyone, As announced earlier [1] and after some discussion on the fedora devel list [2], we are decommissioning the darkserver service. Based on the discussion on the devel list, there is an use-case for such a tool and potentially interest for it, but no-one has stepped up to fix

Decommissioning Darkserver

Good Morning Everyone, As announced earlier [1] and after some discussion on the fedora devel list [2], we are decommissioning the darkserver service. Based on the discussion on the devel list, there is an use-case for such a tool and potentially interest for it, but no-one has stepped up to fix

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >