Re: [PATCH] pagure: allow to delete forks

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:56:57AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1 here. > +1 as well, sorry I forgot to do this before freeze :s Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

[PATCH 2/2] Fix the check-perms.py script/cron

--- roles/git/checks/files/check-perms.py | 41 --- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/git/checks/files/check-perms.py b/roles/git/checks/files/check-perms.py index 7e6501f..8fd8516 100755 ---

[PATCH 1/2] Add pagure's hook to the post-receive hook and point to the main hooks

--- roles/git/hooks/files/post-receive-chained | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/git/hooks/files/post-receive-chained b/roles/git/hooks/files/post-receive-chained index 4718f57..e61cb72 100755 --- a/roles/git/hooks/files/post-receive-chained +++

Restructuring hooks in dist-git

Good Morning Everyone, Looking into fixing the current git hook situation on dist-git I came accross the following architecture and I would like to discuss it with you. Each repo contains: - post-receive pointing to /usr/share/git-core/post-receive-chained - a folder post-receive-chained.d

Re: Plans for Thursday 2017-09-07 Fedora Infrastructure Meeting

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:44:41PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Thursday 2017-09-07 the Fedora Infrastructure team will have a meeting > in #fedora-meeting at 18:00 UTC. The agenda currently looks as follows > on the gobby page. Please add or update as needed. > > = Introduction = > We

[Release] pagure: 3.7.1

Good Morning Everyone, While testing 3.7 we ran into a couple of things we wanted to fix, so here is: 3.7.1 Here is its corresponding changelog: * Tue Sep 05 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.7.1-1 - Update to 3.7.1 - Fix the UPGRADING documentation - Add the API endpoint t

Re: [Release] pagure: 3.5

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 3.6. Here is its corresponding changelog: * Tue Sep 05 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.7-1 - Update to 3.7 - Update link to markdown documentation, fix typo on the way (Till Hofmann) - Add feature allowing to p

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > >> > >> I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: > >> > >>

Re: Congrats to Adam Miller

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:28:48AM -0400, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm happy to announce that We have approved Adam into the sysadmin-main > group. > > This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most > things. Adam has done great work rolling out and maintaining and working >

[release] fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure: 0.21.0

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure: 0.21.0 -- Pull Requests - (@ralphbean) #440 Test and handle output from "modular" compose messages. https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/pull/440 - (@pypingou)

Cleaning up the test-* namespaces

Good Morning Everyone, A while ago we had the question about including tests in dist-git. We considered two options: - Have the tests in the same git repos as the files to generate the artifact - Have the tests in a separate namespace test- While we weren't quite sure what was the best approach,

Re: Bodhi 2.10.1 in production

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:52:31AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > The gating is done in bodhi, so for this we would need to make rawhide go > > through bodhi (which I still think would be a good idea

Re: Bodhi 2.10.1 in production

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:49:22AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 23.8.2017 v 10:40 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 22.8.2017 v 21:42 Jeremy Cline napsal(a): > >>> Hey f

Re: Bodhi 2.10.1 in production

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22.8.2017 v 21:42 Jeremy Cline napsal(a): > > Hey folks, > > > > Bodhi 2.10.1 is now running in production. > > > > The change log: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/docs/release_notes.html > > > > At this time, the Greenwave

Re: src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:44:56AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:34:22 - > "Wolfgang Stoeggl" wrote: > > > Hello, > > is forking projects, PRs etc. already supposed to work at > > src.fedoraproject.org? So far, I am getting the following: > > > > # Source

Re: Could not execute retire

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > fedpkg-1.29 should work with python2-rpkg-1.50 together. Maybe we could make fedpkg-1.29 Requires: python2-rpkg >= 1.50 ? Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: git push fails for new packages

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:10:04PM -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:18:54PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > > I just forked fedpkg minutes ago when writing this mail. I also can't > > push to my forked repo. > > > > I got these fetch and push urls. > > > > mydev

Re: How to request new branch?

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:18:33AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 17.08.2017 um 10:09 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:26:17AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > Still a problem here with libyui-qt-graph for epel7, f25 and f26 branche

Re: How to request new branch?

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:26:17AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Still a problem here with libyui-qt-graph for epel7, f25 and f26 branches: Fix running, give it a few minutes and you should be good to go :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list --

Re: How to request new branch?

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > > "The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using >

Re: Pagure over dist-git: Workflow RFEs

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I have few questions / improvement suggestions: > > 1) Does the PR build? > > It would be **awesome** if we could have some sort of CI for PRs. > > This is the

Re: git push fails for new packages

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:52:59PM -0500, Wart wrote: > On 08/11/2017 09:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:17:59AM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > >> for f27: This is a known problem see: > >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/i

Re: git push fails for new packages

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:17:59AM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > for f27: This is a known problem see: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6236 > They working on it right now. > > f26 works for me now with: > $ git checkout -b f26; git push --set-upstream origin f26; fedpkg build >

Re: pagure-over-dist-git: traceback in receive-hook when pushing to new repo

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:55:34AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > I see the following when pushing to new repo: > > $ fedpkg push > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: > DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use > bodhi.client.bindings

Re: git push fails for new packages

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:35:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:42:26PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > > $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-mixcloud; cd nuvola-app-mixcloud > > $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/nuvola-app-mixcloud-3.2-3.fc26.src.rpm >

Re: git push fails for new packages

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:42:26PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > $ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-mixcloud; cd nuvola-app-mixcloud > $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/nuvola-app-mixcloud-3.2-3.fc26.src.rpm > $ git commit -m "Initial import (#1478067)." > > $[martin@f26 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ git push -v

Re: Duplicates in package owner alias cronjob?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:24:27PM -, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > I'm confused about something. Can any postfix experts help debug? > > > > On Friday I put a new package-owner-alias cronjob in place on bastion > > (that Matt Prahl wrote). It generates the package owner list

[release] fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure: 0.19.0

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure: 0.19.0 -- Pull Requests - (@Metonimie) #427, Correcting the displayed link for ask.stg.* https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/pull/427 - (@ sayanchowdhury) #428, Add

[Release] pagure: 3.5

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new pagure release: 3.5 Here is its changelog: * Tue Aug 08 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.5-1 - Update to 3.5 - Fix login when groups are managed outside - Fix the ordering of the issues by priority using JS and its documentation - In

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:19:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Related thing: Since the Pagure overhaul, e-mails about pushed commits > do not contain commit body (the diff). That makes the e-mail > notificition less helpfull for me. I'm more interrested in what changed > than that something

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:19:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > CC in Bugzilla > > -- > > > > Pagure over dist-git does not offer issue tracking. Issues for > > packages will conti

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:09:51AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > wrote: > > New package and new branch request process > > -- > > > > PkgDB

Re: Broken dependencies messages

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:46:28AM -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > >I bet this is related to the "point of contact in bugzilla" part in > >

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb > > > What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked document has

Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

Good morning everyone, We're now in the final sprint before Pagure over dist-git is a real thing. This is a great time and we're very excited to see it happen. However this change brings other changes with it which are detailed below. Point of contact in bugzilla

Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

Good morning everyone, We're now in the final sprint before Pagure over dist-git is a real thing. This is a great time and we're very excited to see it happen. However this change brings other changes with it which are detailed below. Point of contact in bugzilla

[Release] pagure: 3.4

Good Morning Everyone, I cut a new version of pagure earlier today: 3.4 Here is its changelog: * Mon Jul 31 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.4-1 - Update to 3.4 - Fix layout breakage in the doc - Update the refresh-gitolite action of pagure-admin for the new interface

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:01:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.7.2017 v 10:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > > > As far as I can see this is looking all good but you know the more eyes the > > better :) > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.or

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:13AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:36:29AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 27.7.2017 v 10:05 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > >> 2) The "contributors" list does not appear to be correct. Looking at

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:36:29AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 27.7.2017 v 10:05 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > >> 2) The "contributors" list does not appear to be correct. Looking at > >> "ruby", there is listed "tagoh" user, who is in pk

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:05:40AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:35:46AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 26.7.2017 v 19:41 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:20:38PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: &g

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:35:46AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 26.7.2017 v 19:41 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:20:38PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 24.7.2017 v 22:49 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > >>

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:38:11AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:49:51PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +

Re: OpenShift, Greenwave, and WaiverDB

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/25/2017 12:35 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 21:36 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> I had a chat with Ralph about this a little bit ago and we agreed > >> that if on the > &g

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:20:38PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 24.7.2017 v 22:49 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >&g

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:21:36PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:15:26PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > For the curious ones :) > > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/rpms/fedocal > > > > This looks nice. Where does the code for this live? I had the idea that >

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:15:26PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > For the curious ones :) > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/rpms/fedocal > > This looks nice. Where does the code for t

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:16:55AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:49:51PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Pierre-Yves

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:49:51PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > 3. The default landing page for a package sho

[Release] pagure: 3.3 and 3.3.1

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut two pagure releases: 3.3 and 3.3.1 (because as always I can't make a simple release). Here are their changelogs: * Mon Jul 24 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.3.1-1 - Update to 3.3.1 - Fix typo in the alembic migration present in 3.3 * M

Re: [Release] pagure: 3.2.1

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > Since I can never do a single release, let me introduce you to: 3.2.1 > > With the follow changelog: > * Fri Jul 14 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.2.1-

Re: OpenShift, Greenwave, and WaiverDB

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hello! > > There is some effort right now to make Bodhi gate updates based on > Greenwave. We would like to test Bodhi and Greenwave together in > staging and ultimately use it in production soon. We do have the staging instance of

Re: OpenShift, Greenwave, and WaiverDB

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hello! > > There is some effort right now to make Bodhi gate updates based on > Greenwave. We would like to test Bodhi and Greenwave together in > staging and ultimately use it in production soon. > > However, there is some question

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:32:03PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Owen Taylor wrote: > > As for standard application RPMs, it's really going to be something > > we figure out over time. My vision is something like: > > > > F27: packagers are *able* to create Flatpaks of their application. > >

Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:57:52AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 07/13/2017 07:01 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 07/12/2017 08:10 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> On 07/11/2017 09:48 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>> On 07/11/2017 12:37 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > If we're lucky we can

[Release] mdapi: 2.9

Good Morning Everyone, I cut a new release of mdapi today: 2.9 Here is its changelog: * Wed Jul 12 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 2.9-1 - Update to 2.9 - Add JSONP support to the application for easier integration with other apps It is happily running in stg and prod (

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:39:51PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: > 2017-07-11 20:33 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller : > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> > I think that's fine. The GUI doesn't need to cover every possible use > >> > case, and

Re: [FBR] Retroactive: Temporarily put the s390 cache at the end to prevent failing all builds

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:42:33AM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Our s390 caching builder (buildvm-s390x-07) has suddenly dropped of > the network, failing all primary s390x builds, since Koji seemingly > doesn't (anymore) fall back to secondary urls for topurl. > I applied the

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >Dne 10.7.2017 v 19:31 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:17:04PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 10.7.2017 v 11:23 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jul 07,

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:17:04PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 10.7.2017 v 11:23 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:49:32PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 8.7.2017 v 20:43 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > Nah, most likely stg.fp.o is just some rpi on somebody's desk or a vm > > stuck in the corner of the infrastructure. I don't think you can make > > any conjectures

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

017 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > > >> <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >> >> On Fri,

Re: Using ndb in RPM

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:51:57PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:44:31PM +0300, Alek Paunov wrote: > > > > > If you say: > > > create table col1(key blob prima

Re: Using ndb in RPM

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:51:57PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:44:31PM +0300, Alek Paunov wrote: > > > If you say: > > create table col1(key blob primary key, value blob) without rowid;/ > > > > you physically get no more/no less simple key/value store (given 30 more > >

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > 3. The default landing page for a package shows a message about > >the missing readme. Maybe we could show the %description there in > >such

[Release] pagure: 3.1

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 3.1. Here is its changelog: * Tue Jul 04 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 3.1-1 - Update to 3.1 - Allow project-less API token to create new tickets - Tips/tricks: add info on how to validate local user account w

Re: OpenShift plans

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:51:03AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/03/2017 11:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:12:48PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> So we currently have a staging instance of OpenShift Container > >> Platform -

Re: OpenShift plans

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:12:48PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > So we currently have a staging instance of OpenShift Container > Platform -- what are the next actions needed to get a production > deployment going? My understanding is that we are at least waiting on the wildcard cert for it.

Re: Retroactive FBR: Apply string patch to Pagure

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > Last night I applied the patch from > https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/2385#request_diff to proudction, > which seems to have stabilized it completely. > I just grabbed

Re: Code reviews are hard

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:09:13PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hello fellow Fedorans! > > As you are probably aware, we have a rule (unspoken? Not sure if it's > formally documented or not) that pull requests in the infrastructure > group should be reviewed by another infra member before they

Re: Fedora 26 Final Freeze now in effect

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:45:05AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > we are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 26 > Final release. This is a final-release freeze. > > We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to > release Fedora 26 when it's

Re: FBR: Remove piwik from websites

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:09:29AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I would like to remove Piwik from the wiki and other websites which > use it. Currently the main change would be in the files: > > > roles/mediawiki/files/skins/Fedora.php > roles/mediawiki123/files/skins/Fedora.php > >

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:36:28PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El dom, 04-06-2017 a las 08:52 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió: > > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" <pi

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:42:20PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:10:13PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > On 04/06/17 13:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:15:19PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > > >

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 05:02:39PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > The packager group is currently used for a few things: > > - tracking purpose, it's one of our biggest groups and also one of the most > &

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:31:50PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: >On 3 Jun 2017 8:33 am, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > >I think to abandon the packager group for non-scratch builds would be a >mistake. >The sponsorship to packa

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 03:12:48PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 21:42 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > What do you think? > > Bodhi also currently cares about users being in the packager group to > decide whether they can create buildroot

Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:52:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > With the deprecation of pkgdb2, pagure will make it even easier to give > > someone > > access to a package, if someone wants

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git) > > I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need &g

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git) > > I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need &g

The future of the packager group for dist-git

Good Morning Everyone, With pagure becoming a front-end to dist-git, I have been wondering about the future of the packager group. The packager group is currently used for a few things: - tracking purpose, it's one of our biggest groups and also one of the most active - members of the packager

Re: FBR: add fcaic alias

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:36:47PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > in this ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6094 > > we have been requested to add a fcaic alias. > > +1s? should be a pretty minor change. > > kevin > -- > diff --git

Re: FBR: Add deprecation banner to pkgdb in prod

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:39:26PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > This just got approved in FESCo today. > > I'd like to manually apply this patch to the pkgdb web nodes in prod: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/pull/415 > > It's a template and css change that adds a banner informing

Re: FBR: Add CSS handling to Taskotron artifacts serving

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > The modularity-testing-framework tests use avocado to output nice HTML > reports but due to the way that we store and serve the artifacts, the > css doesn't load properly. An example (that should work post-fix) is: > >

Re: FBR: increase pagure processes

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:15:48PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > With all the work Patrick and Pingou have been doing on pagure lately, it's > much faster and it doesn't have lockups as often. Unfortunately it does still > have them. > > Currently when it does stop processing

Re: FBR: up timeouts on kojipkgs varnish

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:27:33AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Due to issues with slow storage recently we have seen kojipkgs spike in > load and be slow to return packages to download. This makes varnish > return a 503 back to the build or compose and causes them to fail. > > We

[FBR] Make the CI hosts not frozen

Good Morning Everyone, Here is a patch to mark the CI host as not frozen for now. There is currently not release-sensitive application running there and I believe we should be able to mess with it during freeze. +1? Thanks, Pierre ___ infrastructure

Re: FBR: patched libgit2 on pagure.io

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:41:19AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > A while back Patrick made a patch for libgit2 that worked around some of > its performance and locking issues. When we upgraded pagure at the > beginning of the month we upgraded to the epel version without the patch. >

Re: FBR: Add monitoring for Pagure's celery redis queue

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 07:12:11PM -0400, Ricky Elrod wrote: > This is an attempt to add some simple monitoring so if the Pagure task > queue starts backing up, we know about it. +1 for me Pierre > --- > > commit f207778a0e5aceba6c18885be7478317aaeab4b0 > Author: Ricky Elrod

[Upgrade] pagure: 2.90.1

Good Morning Everyone, Shortly after releasing 2.15 we realized the SQL-based locking mechanism we had introduced was causing more problems than solving. So we released 2.15.1 to try to mitigate them but that wasn't satisfactory. Patrick has spent the majority of his time since the end of the

Re: Freeze break request: unset accept-encoding early

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:21:58PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This was debugged and sorted out by dusty and patrick... but I'll put up the > freeze break. > > +1s? > > kevin > -- > commit 21567213544015bba8390c096543d892cf5bb563 > Author: Patrick Uiterwijk > Date: Mon

Re: Freeze Break request: some missed redirects for bind-dyndb project

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:44:12PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings > > In https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5846 > I missed some wiki redirects that the bind-dyndb project wanted in place. ;( > > I'd like to fix them up now. Needs this patch + proxy playbook run. > > +1s? >

Re: Freeze break request: update flock-staff alias (ticket 6073)

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:48:31PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I'd like to apply the following and run the bastion playbooks/fasClient -a. > > +1s? > -- > From b91165b67e930a10ffd2d68c2c9cdcb1cc00fd4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kevin Fenzi > Date: Fri, 19

[release] kerneltest: 1.2 and 1.2.1

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of kerneltest-harness: 1.2 , then realized the alembic files were not getting properly installed so fixed this and cut another release: 1.2.1 Here are the corresponding changelogs: * Fri May 19 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> -

Re: [release] pagure: 2.15.1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:52:18AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > I just cut a new release of pagure: 2.15.1 > > Here is its corresponding changelog: > * Thu May 18 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 2.15.1-1 >

Re: [FBR] Upgrade to pagure 2.15.1 in prod

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > On 05/17/2017 01:31 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Good Morning Everyone, > >> > >> I would like to upgrad

[release] pagure: 2.15.1

Good Morning Everyone, I just cut a new release of pagure: 2.15.1 Here is its corresponding changelog: * Thu May 18 2017 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> - 2.15.1-1 - Update to 2.15.1 - Fix the requirements on straight.plugin in the requirements.txt file (Shengjing Zhu) - Fi

Re: [FBR] Reset the FMN redis cache

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 03:38:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 05/17/2017 03:27 PM, Jeremy Cline wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > People have noticed that they aren't getting some FMN notifications, so > > I spent the afternoon tracking down the issue. It looks as though the > > redis

[FBR] Upgrade to pagure 2.15.1 in prod

Good Morning Everyone, I would like to upgrade pagure in prod to 2.15.1, it's a bug fix release from 2.15 that brings upstream some of the hotfix we had to do. Changelog is something like: - Fix the requirements on straight.plugin in the requirements.txt file (Shengjing Zhu) - Fix typo in the

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >