Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2023-02-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.02.23 um 18:30 schrieb Soren Stoutner: I have submitted a merge request to the qt6webengine package that implements what has been discussed. https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt6/qt6-webengine/-/merge_requests/4 Once it is merged, I will prepare a merge request for the

Bug#1031199: liblangtag-common: Bratislava is in wrong timezone, should be cet, not bts

2023-02-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 1031199 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 13. Februar 2023 07:12:24 MEZ schrieb Mato : >Package: liblangtag-common >Version: 0.6.4-2 (...) >Last update You mean the one in August last year? > introduced timezone error, where Bratislava is in wrong >timezone now. tzdata package is correct. It

Bug#1031199: liblangtag-common: Bratislava is in wrong timezone, should be cet, not bts

2023-02-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 1031199 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Am 13. Februar 2023 07:12:24 MEZ schrieb Mato : >Package: liblangtag-common >Version: 0.6.4-2 (...) >Last update You mean the one in August last year? > introduced timezone error, where Bratislava is in wrong >timezone now. tzdata package is correct. It

Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2023-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Soren Stoutner: Seeing as how .bdic files are not exclusive to Qt, qt-convert-dict is probably not the most accurate name, but bdic-convert-dict would make sense. Another option would be to name it convert-bdic. The Chromium upstream names the tool

Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2023-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.02.23 um 18:30 schrieb Soren Stoutner: I have submitted a merge request to the qt6webengine package that implements what has been discussed. https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt6/qt6-webengine/-/merge_requests/4 Once it is merged, I will prepare a merge request for the

Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81

2023-01-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 30.01.23 um 19:28 schrieb Anton Gladky: Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). Results and logs are here: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Just for the record: It definitely misses packages. Probably those which build-depend on boost but

Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81

2023-01-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 30.01.23 um 19:28 schrieb Anton Gladky: Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). Results and logs are here: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Just for the record: It definitely misses packages. Probably those which build-depend on boost but

Re: Can't change the values in the sub-option under, Writing Aids / Available language modules, from English (USA) to English (UK)

2023-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 24.01.23 um 07:24 schrieb Susmita/Rajib: However, the values in the sub-menus under the Libre Office / Options / Language Settings / Writing Aids / Available language modules, can't be changed from English (USA) to English (UK), particularly for the sub-menus as shown in the said

Bug#1029534: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029534 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029534: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029534 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-5-0' - configure.ac

2023-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit bd805279bfa1e952fdc8e4de6014ffda8cfdc29c Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 11:58:41 2023 +0100 Commit: Christian Lohmaier CommitDate: Wed Jan 25 13:54:56 2023 + check

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-5' - configure.ac

2023-01-24 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 07c49eeaee97fbe084205ea2b52e3b4f4b1c4173 Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 20:53:35 2023 +0100 Commit: Caolán McNamara CommitDate: Tue Jan 24 08:51:00 2023 + update hardcoded

Bug#1029534: libreoffice-common: breaks libreoffice-core from the same version

2023-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 23.01.23 um 23:04 schrieb Sven Joachim: The Breaks in libreoffice-common need to be adjusted for the recent epoch bumps. Among others, libreoffice-common Breaks libreoffice-core (>= 1:7.5~), making libreoffice-core 4:7.4.4-7 not installable. Yeah, that one I noticed yesterday already.

Bug#1029534: libreoffice-common: breaks libreoffice-core from the same version

2023-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 23.01.23 um 23:04 schrieb Sven Joachim: The Breaks in libreoffice-common need to be adjusted for the recent epoch bumps. Among others, libreoffice-common Breaks libreoffice-core (>= 1:7.5~), making libreoffice-core 4:7.4.4-7 not installable. Yeah, that one I noticed yesterday already.

Bug#1029534: libreoffice-common: breaks libreoffice-core from the same version

2023-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 23.01.23 um 23:04 schrieb Sven Joachim: The Breaks in libreoffice-common need to be adjusted for the recent epoch bumps. Among others, libreoffice-common Breaks libreoffice-core (>= 1:7.5~), making libreoffice-core 4:7.4.4-7 not installable. Yeah, that one I noticed yesterday already.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

2023-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit f8604f08ed5e07e50a65b5d35f3c0c18bf19044a Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 20:53:35 2023 +0100 Commit: René Engelhard CommitDate: Mon Jan 23 18:22:08 2023 + update hardcoded

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/collabora/co-23.05' - 26 commits - configure.ac cui/source desktop/qa include/svl include/svtools oox/source sc/qa sc/source sd/qa svtools/source svx/sou

2023-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx | 17 writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.hxx |3 97 files changed, 1446 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-) New commits: commit 339b90e9a1c89f8e67aeee94d06878b4e130ac36 Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 11

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-5' - configure.ac

2023-01-22 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 76742388b3dcfe69d8af33137bc51135e58fbfa0 Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 11:58:41 2023 +0100 Commit: René Engelhard CommitDate: Sun Jan 22 11:16:54 2023 + check for harfbuzz

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

2023-01-22 Thread Rene Engelhard (via logerrit)
configure.ac |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit a180a99e2d53a2ca04e8fe31a38f6994e42bf69b Author: Rene Engelhard AuthorDate: Sun Jan 22 11:58:41 2023 +0100 Commit: René Engelhard CommitDate: Sun Jan 22 11:12:01 2023 + check for harfbuzz

Bug#1028459: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#1028459: not metric-compatible anymore

2023-01-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 21.01.23 um 20:36 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am Samstag, dem 21.01.2023 um 18:55 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This upgrade, which now unfortunately already is in testing makes the font NOT metric-compatible with Cambria... Ouch, that's unfortunate! Do we know which glyphs are affected

Bug#1029358: Acknowledgement (not metric-compatible anymore)

2023-01-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, also note that this bug is (probably, just test-building with the mentioned LibreOffice commit the cause of this FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=amd64=1%3A7.5.0%7Erc2-2=1674319650=0 Thankfully it seems to only break the 7.5+ test, not 7.4.4 in sid.

Bug#1029358: not metric-compatible anymore

2023-01-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: fonts-crosextra-caladea Severity: important Version: 20200211-1 Tags: upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/huertatipografica/Caladea/issues/4 Hi, >From https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028459 : Am Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:46:04AM + schrieb Amr Ibrahim: > >

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 19.01.23 um 12:46 schrieb Andreas Henriksson: I'd like to explicitly ask if you still want me to upload any fontconfig change ASAP or if downgrading severity means you think it can/should wait until after release? worked around it in libreoffice for now, so your decision in the end.

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029104: marked as pending in libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1029104 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 1029101 important retitle 1029101 please Enable RGB stripes layout for sub-pixel rendering on KDE only thanks [ sorry for "spamming" ] Hi, Am 17.01.23 um 19:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard: it still fails. Probably it ignores it since it's already set in /etc and that alrea

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 1029101 important retitle 1029101 please Enable RGB stripes layout for sub-pixel rendering on KDE only thanks [ sorry for "spamming" ] Hi, Am 17.01.23 um 19:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard: it still fails. Probably it ignores it since it's already set in /etc and that alrea

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.01.23 um 18:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) LO has already a fc_local.conf: ./instdir/share/fonts/truetype

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.01.23 um 18:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) LO has already a fc_local.conf: ./instdir/share/fonts/truetype

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, addendum: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) For reference,  this is the test:

Bug#1029101: Acknowledgement (fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice)

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, addendum: I tried to adapt the test to expected values but failed. When I adapt some values stuff even further breaks, and at the 50% test I then had no idea what to do.) For reference,  this is the test:

Bug#1029101: fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: fontconfig-config Version: 2.14.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: causes FTBFS Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=amd64=1%3A7.4.4-1=1673962775=0: [_RUN_] VclTextTest::testSimpleText

Bug#1029101: fontconfig-config: 2.14.1 upload breaks testSimpleText of libreoffice

2023-01-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: fontconfig-config Version: 2.14.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: causes FTBFS Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=amd64=1%3A7.4.4-1=1673962775=0: [_RUN_] VclTextTest::testSimpleText

Bug#1028290: libreoffice-impress-nogui cannot convert to PNG

2023-01-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.01.23 um 09:29 schrieb Gábor Németh: make[1]: *** No rule to make target '/lo/external/tarballs/boost_1_79_0.tar.xz', needed by '/lo/workdir/UnpackedTarget/boost_1_79_0.tar.xz'. Stop. Hm, so Boost is not mentioned in the deps? OK, repeat with: Not mentioned because it's the internal

Bug#1028290: libreoffice-impress-nogui cannot convert to PNG

2023-01-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.01.23 um 09:29 schrieb Gábor Németh: make[1]: *** No rule to make target '/lo/external/tarballs/boost_1_79_0.tar.xz', needed by '/lo/workdir/UnpackedTarget/boost_1_79_0.tar.xz'. Stop. Hm, so Boost is not mentioned in the deps? OK, repeat with: Not mentioned because it's the internal

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 19:54 schrieb Gregor Riepl: On the KDE question - does LO really depend on KDE? Isn't there also Gnome support? Yes. *also*. Which means that it builds both and thus build-depends on both (and it ends up in libreoffice-gtk3, libreoffice-qt5, libreoffice-kf5 of what the

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 19:08 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: You may argue that it's okay because it works on x86_64. However, it only works because Intel didn't make use of the upper 16 bits of a 64-bit pointer in the past although these were always reserved. But that has changed now with the

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 15:20 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hi Helge! On 1/11/23 15:03, Helge Deller wrote: Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time for it during the next few months. But it

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 12:41 schrieb Gregor Riepl: - sparc and sparc64 (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) [...] Looking at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice#problem-17 , it

Bug#1028415: libfixmath: powerpc is in the UBSAN_ARCH list despite being unsupported

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 20:30 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: I just noticed that debian/rules adds the powerpc architecture to the UBSAN_ARCH arch list despite powerpc not supporting `__sync_val_compare_and_swap_8 [1]. But libubsan.so exists, which was what was intended with this variable...

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 19:44 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On 1/10/23 19:25, Rene Engelhard wrote: (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) They all have Java support except for hppa, see: I was indeed

Bug#1028130: Bug#1028124: Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 14:43 schrieb Andreas Tille: Since the test to replace the dictionaries shipped with upstream source by the Debian packaged version results in two test suite issues I'm tagging this bug wontfix. I don't buy the reasoning. Then whatever needs to be adapted needs to be

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I know are built for Fedora releases; they go into category 2. Also in Debian Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I presume are built for Debian releases (Rene, correct me if

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*) Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:31:12 +0100 Von:Stephan Bergmann An: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org Kopie (CC): Sakura286 , wjh-la , Rene Engelhard , Tor Lillqvist There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Ho, Am 10. Januar 2023 09:27:16 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille : However, I get two failures >> >when running its test suite: >> > >> > >> >══ Failed tests >> > >> >── Failure ('test-encodings.R:16'): Dictionaries are found >>

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10. Januar 2023 08:01:31 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille : >> The problem per se is that you copy private stuff over. > >I'm aware that this is not a nice solution - I considered a bit better >then keeping a full code copy of hunspell which is shipped by upstream. Oh my... Yeah, it probably

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 09.01.23 um 21:40 schrieb Rene Engelhard: The private headers now are for 1.7.2 - which as of now is in experimental and thus you need to build against 1.7.2 (and probably have a updated runtime dependency.) Which is what my patch does in addition to the headers only. https

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 09.01.23 um 21:18 schrieb Andreas Tille: Control: tags -1 help Erm, no? I think you mean #1028124, not this one (#1028130)? I pushed some changes to git[1] that should fix this bug. You only applied half of the patch in #1028124 so of course it breaks. Unfortunately the package

Bug#1028290: libreoffice-impress-nogui cannot convert to PNG

2023-01-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 9. Januar 2023 11:02:33 MEZ schrieb "Gábor Németh" : >For a sanity check, I compiled the upstream from tag 7.4.4.2 with only >the `--disable-gui` flag, and it worked. Interesting. Also could be our way to populate -nogui which is a bit Jacky > I suspected that maybe omitting >one of

Bug#1028290: libreoffice-impress-nogui cannot convert to PNG

2023-01-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 9. Januar 2023 11:02:33 MEZ schrieb "Gábor Németh" : >For a sanity check, I compiled the upstream from tag 7.4.4.2 with only >the `--disable-gui` flag, and it worked. Interesting. Also could be our way to populate -nogui which is a bit Jacky > I suspected that maybe omitting >one of

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
[CCing hunspell-kos maintainer ] Hi, Am 08.01.23 um 19:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
[CCing hunspell-kos maintainer ] Hi, Am 08.01.23 um 19:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new ones against the old one.) See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1028124: Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new ones against the old one.) See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Re: boost 1.81 breaks libetonyek and gtv-calc-header-bar.cxx

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 08.01.23 um 05:40 schrieb - Etna: 3. Build error about implicit instantiation for gtv-calc-header-bar.cxx and duplicate symbols for libetonyek occur. Please see attachment. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=grep=boost+1.81 libetonyek is

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Blocks: -1 by 1028124 Hi, not a real transition but given that it involves Breaks: and a dependency bump with shlibs.local... hunspell 1.7.2 changed some *internal* headers.

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Blocks: -1 by 1028124 Hi, not a real transition but given that it involves Breaks: and a dependency bump with shlibs.local... hunspell 1.7.2 changed some *internal* headers.

Bug#1028130: r-cran-hunspell: please don't use internal en_US and en_GB dictionaries

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: r-cran-hunspell Version: 3.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, I just noticed /usr/lib/R/site-library/hunspell/dict/en_GB.aff /usr/lib/R/site-library/hunspell/dict/en_GB.dic /usr/lib/R/site-library/hunspell/dict/en_US.aff

Bug#1028124: Acknowledgement (r-cran-hunspell: old copy of internal hunspell headers breaks (autopkg)test with hunspell 1.7.2)

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
to clean up generated files +(closes: #1028123) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:37:01 + + r-cran-hunspell (3.0.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version diff -Nru r-cran-hunspell-3.0.2+dfsg/debian/control r-cran-hunspell-3.0.2+dfsg/debian/control --- r-cran

Bug#1028125: wrong source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary for GB18030-encoded text file

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: important Hi, I get (well, got, it's overriden now) libreoffice source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary on LibreOffices sw/qa/extras/txtimport/data/GB18030.txt Looking at that file gives: rene@frodo:~/LibreOffice/git/master$ cat

Bug#1028125: wrong source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary for GB18030-encoded text file

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: important Hi, I get (well, got, it's overriden now) libreoffice source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary on LibreOffices sw/qa/extras/txtimport/data/GB18030.txt Looking at that file gives: rene@frodo:~/LibreOffice/git/master$ cat

Bug#1028124: r-cran-hunspell: old copy of internal hunspell headers breaks (autopkg)test with hunspell 1.7.2

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
private) htypes.hxx and csutil.hxx to fix build +with hunspell 1.7.2. Bump build-dependency + * add override_dh_auto_clean to clean up generated files + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 07 Jan 2023 14:35:07 +0100 + r-cran-hunspell (3.0.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream vers

Bug#1028123: r-cran-hunspell: fails to build two times in a row

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
-S -i dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package r-cran-hunspell dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 3.0.2+dfsg-1.1 dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Rene Engelhard dpkg-source -i --before-build . debian/rules clean dh clean

Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing

2023-01-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.01.23 um 10:18 schrieb Thomas Goirand: The latest update of boost was in late 2020. Why are we waiting so late in the release cycle to do such a transition? The month of the freeze is *NOT* a good moment to do it. Indeed. Regards, Rene

Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing

2023-01-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.01.23 um 10:37 schrieb Thomas Goirand: On 1/4/23 06:24, Anton Gladky wrote: apt install libboost-dev -t experimental FYI, Ceph FTBFS with it... :/ As did LibreOffice - already fixed by $ cat debian/patches/boost-1.81.diff From 7e61545966c61102aad56bbf10bae2edfbfa9226 Mon Sep 17

Bug#1027417: hunspell-dict-ko: missing test dependecy: python3

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 02.01.23 um 05:05 schrieb Changwoo Ryu: It's correct that the minimal system installed by autopkgtest has always python3. Isn't the test supposed to be run by autopkgtest? You can also just run it manually if it was a script (by running ./tests/foo), also you can just copy the command

Bug#1027417: hunspell-dict-ko: missing test dependecy: python3

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 02.01.23 um 05:05 schrieb Changwoo Ryu: It's correct that the minimal system installed by autopkgtest has always python3. Isn't the test supposed to be run by autopkgtest? You can also just run it manually if it was a script (by running ./tests/foo), also you can just copy the command

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 01.01.23 um 21:25 schrieb Changwoo Ryu: I can't reproduce it myself. I am not sure either what happens... In your test, every word failed to be checked with the same error and the error message came from hunspell, when iconv() conversion on text fails. Probably your chroot environment

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 01.01.23 um 21:25 schrieb Changwoo Ryu: I can't reproduce it myself. I am not sure either what happens... In your test, every word failed to be checked with the same error and the error message came from hunspell, when iconv() conversion on text fails. Probably your chroot environment

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 01.01.23 um 21:25 schrieb Changwoo Ryu: I can't reproduce it myself. I am not sure either what happens... In your test, every word failed to be checked with the same error and the error message came from hunspell, when iconv() conversion on text fails. Probably your chroot environment

Bug#1027678: hunspell: blocking bug to avoid migration of 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell Version: 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 Severity: serious 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 is - as the name says - a reupload of 1.7.1 because 1.7.2 broke autopkgtests and this needs to be investigated. Since there is no change here and there probably (in case it happened we can lift the block) is no

Bug#1027678: hunspell: blocking bug to avoid migration of 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell Version: 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 Severity: serious 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 is - as the name says - a reupload of 1.7.1 because 1.7.2 broke autopkgtests and this needs to be investigated. Since there is no change here and there probably (in case it happened we can lift the block) is no

Bug#1027678: hunspell: blocking bug to avoid migration of 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2

2023-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell Version: 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 Severity: serious 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 is - as the name says - a reupload of 1.7.1 because 1.7.2 broke autopkgtests and this needs to be investigated. Since there is no change here and there probably (in case it happened we can lift the block) is no

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2022-12-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell-dict-ko Version: 0.7.92-1 Severity: serious Hi, while looking at the autopkgtest failure in https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/h/hunspell-dict-ko/29793472/log.gz I tried it here myself. It even fails here locally with 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 which I needed to

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2022-12-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell-dict-ko Version: 0.7.92-1 Severity: serious Hi, while looking at the autopkgtest failure in https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/h/hunspell-dict-ko/29793472/log.gz I tried it here myself. It even fails here locally with 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 which I needed to

Bug#1027418: autopkgtest failure - iconv issue?

2022-12-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell-dict-ko Version: 0.7.92-1 Severity: serious Hi, while looking at the autopkgtest failure in https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/h/hunspell-dict-ko/29793472/log.gz I tried it here myself. It even fails here locally with 1.7.2+really1.7.1-2 which I needed to

Bug#1027417: hunspell-dict-ko: missing test dependecy: python3

2022-12-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell-dict-ko Version: 0.7.92-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I tried to look after the hunspell-dict-ko failure and created a minimal chroot + installing the test dependencies for that. I got: rene@frodo:~/hunspell-dict-ko-0.7.92$ make hosttest

Bug#1027417: hunspell-dict-ko: missing test dependecy: python3

2022-12-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: hunspell-dict-ko Version: 0.7.92-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I tried to look after the hunspell-dict-ko failure and created a minimal chroot + installing the test dependencies for that. I got: rene@frodo:~/hunspell-dict-ko-0.7.92$ make hosttest

Bug#1027298: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5

2022-12-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.diff: default to EUR for .hr + + -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:37:58 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4) bullseye-security; urgency=high * debian/patches/ZDI-CAN

Bug#1027298: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5

2022-12-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.diff: default to EUR for .hr + + -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:37:58 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4) bullseye-security; urgency=high * debian/patches/ZDI-CAN

Bug#1027048: FTBFS with zxing-cpp 1.4 from experimental

2022-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hallo, Am 27.12.22 um 07:46 schrieb Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues: [build CXX] cui/source/dialogs/QrCodeGenDialog.cxx S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/cui/source/dialogs/ $W/Dep/CxxObject/cui/source/dialogs/ && cd /<> && aarch64-linux-gnu-g++

Bug#1027048: FTBFS with zxing-cpp 1.4 from experimental

2022-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hallo, Am 27.12.22 um 07:46 schrieb Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues: [build CXX] cui/source/dialogs/QrCodeGenDialog.cxx S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/cui/source/dialogs/ $W/Dep/CxxObject/cui/source/dialogs/ && cd /<> && aarch64-linux-gnu-g++

Bug#962582: libreoffice: Menu "Tools / Options..." doesn't open; the program freezes

2022-12-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 962582 libreoffice-common forcemerge 962582 955271 thanks Hi, Am 23.12.22 um 15:17 schrieb Teemu Likonen: This bug was closed, possibly because of you not getting answer from me. Sorry, I missed your post in 2022-10-09. A bit more information is below, and it's good news. [...]

Bug#962582: libreoffice: Menu "Tools / Options..." doesn't open; the program freezes

2022-12-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 962582 libreoffice-common forcemerge 962582 955271 thanks Hi, Am 23.12.22 um 15:17 schrieb Teemu Likonen: This bug was closed, possibly because of you not getting answer from me. Sorry, I missed your post in 2022-10-09. A bit more information is below, and it's good news. [...]

Bug#1026316: dpkg: doesn't complain on dpkg -i breaking = dependencies

2022-12-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: dpkg Version: 1.21.12 Severity: important Hi, libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 has Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, uno-libs-private (= ${binary:Version}) which then boils down to (uninteresting stuff stripped): # apt-cache show libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 Package:

Bug#1026316: dpkg: doesn't complain on dpkg -i breaking = dependencies

2022-12-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: dpkg Version: 1.21.12 Severity: important Hi, libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 has Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, uno-libs-private (= ${binary:Version}) which then boils down to (uninteresting stuff stripped): # apt-cache show libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 Package:

Bug#1025748: libreoffice-help-en-us: change depends to www-browser instead of naming particular browsers?

2022-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 08.12.22 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Daley: Right - so I would think any default browser would work in actual use (if someone is using elinks as their default browser, they know what they are getting into). Or just didn't know that LibreOffice helps needs JS and thus it does't work (see my

Bug#1025748: libreoffice-help-en-us: change depends to www-browser instead of naming particular browsers?

2022-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 08.12.22 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Daley: Right - so I would think any default browser would work in actual use (if someone is using elinks as their default browser, they know what they are getting into). Or just didn't know that LibreOffice helps needs JS and thus it does't work (see my

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >