Hi, Mitch
I've tested the 118a45d63. Failed (multiple-drivers). The f6890f22 is good, but only for XG build. HG option generates another type of error (4 missing pin LOC constraints). My OS is Ubuntu 16.04. Regards, Roberto ________________________________ De: Mitch Davis <mi...@silverblocksystems.net> Enviado: quarta-feira, 19 de junho de 2019 10:13:52 Para: Roberto Michio Marques Kagami Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com Assunto: Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC multi-driven nets Roberto, Just to clarify, the commit that I used that resulted in successful build is f6890f227b40687b356c1e6c10d9eec2184691d0 This requires Vivado 2017.4 Did you try f6890f22 or 118a45d63? I don't have the bandwidth to spare with any bisection to determine what the actual fault may be. I've found f6890f22 to yield satisfactory results. This is built in a CentOS 7 native install (with EPEL and some other extra repos enabled). Regards, Mitch On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 17:08 +0000, Roberto Michio Marques Kagami wrote: > Hello, Mitch! > > I've faced the same problem. > I've tried the first commit after f6890f22 including Vivado version > 2018.3 and the error is the same. > Did you received any reply for this failure? > I would appreciate any information. > Thanks! > > Regards, > Roberto Kagami > De: USRP-users <usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com> em nome de Mitch > Davis via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> > Enviado: segunda-feira, 17 de junho de 2019 15:44:07 > Para: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com > Assunto: Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC multi-driven nets > > My apologies for not connecting this message to the OP, I didn't > register this email account to the list until after the post. > However, > Peter had posted that he was having issues building the latest X310 > RFNOC image (with an RFNOC block) with an error of multiple-drivers > on > two nets (ce_clk and ce_rst): > > http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2019-June/060013.html > > I too encountered this same error. > > On a hunch, I reverted the repo to the commit just before the Vivado > 2018.3 update: f6890f227b40687b356c1e6c10d9eec2184691d0 > > I was able to build the X310 RFNOC image with an RFNOC block using > that > commit without failure. > > I haven't attempted a bisection yet. Is there anyone else that has > observed similar build failures? > > > Regards, > > Mitch Davis > > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
