Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
I need to add a metronome click sound to the MIDI generated with
lilypond, to allow people sync up a record-from-home session.
Here is a clock ticking: {wbh4 trim4 wbl4 trim4}
Cheers,
Robin
Paolo Prete wrote:
But this is not what I want; I would like to specify font-series and
font-family as a parameter (as I did for \abs-fontsize)...
Well, you could define your own markup command(s).
Have a look at /scm/define-markup-commands.scm for examples,
including \abs-fontsize.
Is there an alternative for it?
It is defaulting to another font.
To avoid this, say
text \markup \normal-text "Some text"
Cheers,
Robin
Michael Winter wrote:
I thought about something like that but I have tied notes that would be
interrupted by that approach. Which is also why I cannot use multiple single
scores.
It also seems like trying to fit a square peg in a round whole. Again, I think
there should be a way to have
On 19.05.2020 09:25, Jacques Menu wrote:
Is there a way to use some equivalent of \voiceOne and \voiceTwo measure-wise
in such a case, using it only in measures that have more than one voice playing?
The rests in measure 1 occurs while another voice is playing. The rests
in measure 2
Jeff Knox wrote:
I chose these locations because the error message i get on compiling a
simple .ly file gives them as "search paths" (among others). Obviously, the
wrong locations as I get a message: "cannot find file: 'lily jazz.ily"
Somewhere near the start of your .ly file you should
Jacques Menu wrote:
What I don’t know is how to have only a single pair of parentheses around the
two harmonies in the attached.
This is discussed here and in the linked threads:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-12/msg2.html
Cheers,
Robin
Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Sandro,
> I'd like to leave some indications (rythmic, mostly)
> for bass and guitar at the start of a piece. Right now
> I'm doing this with a pencil, but I'm wondering how
> to do it with lilypond.
Paolo Prete wrote:
And I really thank you. Offsetting brackets is a *very*, *very* important
feature in professional music engraving.
You're welcome.
I hope you don't run foul of the disadvantages too soon.
See Kieren's last comment in
Paolo Prete wrote:
This is *precious* info. Please, can you tell/confirm if
1) you are referring to \offset command ?
No. That would be premature in this case.
2) is it applicable as a replacement for "\offset Y-offset" for *every*
grob that support Y-offset ?
Well, I have trouble
Paolo Prete wrote:
I simply wanted to understand how to offset a bracket.
And the conclusion is: avoid \offset + X/Y-offset and use
1) extra-offset (if you don't need automatic collision-avoidance)
OR
2) \override X/Y-offset with a ruler (if you need automatic
collision-avoidance)
OR
3)
David Nalesnik wrote:
I'm going to investigate this.
\offset requires a grob property which is assigned a default value in
define-grobs.scm (from which file the IR grob reference pages are
generated).
This value is 0.46, inaccessible at the top of axis-group-interface.cc.
Cheers,
Robin
Paolo Prete wrote:
(A) + (B)
make me suspect that the whole OttavaBracket interface is buggy.
It may not be exactly what you want, but I have the feeling that you
haven't tried outside-staff-padding.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/outside_002dstaff_002dinterface
On 31.12.2019 19:39, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Robert,
Thank you for your solution that works perfectly!
Well, the ties across the barlines are hardly perfectly placed.
When you append a corresponding corrective override to the existing
\stemDown \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift
Robin Bannister wrote:
Use \voiceFour instead of \stemDown?
But using \voiceFour for the middle and \voiceTwo for the bottom makes
it a lot easier to follow the voices.
Cheers,
Robin
Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Please provide some suggestions/alternatives for the positioning of the
first note of the middle voice.
Use \voiceFour instead of \stemDown?
Cheers,
Robin
kupirijo wrote:
Thanks. I am aware of this method but this is not exactly what I want. I
need to output one .pdf file, not many.
The \book blocks I suggested will not produce .pdf files.
They do not contain \layout sections.
To output the .pdf file you need a single additional \book block
Robert Blackstone wrote:
> I’m presently transcribing some piano-scores in which schords,
> sustained with a pedal are notated in a way had not seen before
> (see screenshot).
Referring to that original screenshot, surely there is no pedal here.
The pedal would blur what the right hand is
kupirijo wrote:
I would like to specify the name (or extensions) of the .midi files
exported by the \midi{} command. I have multiple \scores{} in one .ly
file producing one .pdf file and multiple .midi files.
I do something like that by setting up a \book block for each midi
output file.
Robert Blackstone wrote:
Dear all,
I’m presently transcribing some piano-scores in which schords, sustained with a
pedal are notated in a way had not seen before (see screenshot).
I would like to copy it but I have no idea how to do it.
This thread may get you started:
Peter Gentry wrote:
Clearly these other pythons have interfered with Lily somewhere and may have
a bearing on my other recent issues.
Relying on the .py association is asking for these problems.
Get convert-ly to work with a single .ly file first.
My batch file starts with
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;)
Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the
musical moment, right?
Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their
priority order.
David Kastrup wrote:
Try running LilyPond with -ddebug-parser . The output is related to the
printed LilyPond grammar in the LilyPond Notation Reference appendices.
That grammar appendix is still rather garbled.
Attached is a less confusing version for circa 2.19.80.
Cheers,
Robin
Grammar
Thomas Morley wrote:
meanwhile a snippet arrived at LSR caring about indenting individual
lines, reflecting the discussion in this thread.
Now approved as
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1098
Thanks to the author,
You're welcome.
Also, feedback welcome!
Cheers,
Robin
Michael Gerdau wrote:
Could someone please shed some light as to why lilypond behaves the way it does?
The default context for both Mark_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver
is Score. Your overrides are ineffective because you omit 'Score.'
Cheers,
Robin
Stacy Fatemi wrote:
but halfway through notating the song I realized
that I actually need a second melody staff. Maybe a rookie question, but
how do I add one?
Extend your PianoStaff
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \upper
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
>>
to
Peter Toye wrote:
Any ideas on how to get just the tied note showing a repeat
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-03/msg00226.html
Cheers,
Robin
Thomas Morley wrote:
As a workaround I'd enter an altered invisible Note in the inner Voice.
Another way is to apply
\once \override Arpeggio.extra-spacing-height = #(cons -inf.0 +inf.0)
just before the arpeggioed 8
That corresponds to Valentin's workaround in
bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
I've been looking for a solution for scoops.
See
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg01191.html
which draws a line.
That was based on an earlier version which used a glyph.
To get that, replace the last lines with:
(markup
nagymusic wrote:
I attached a screenshot from the ending of my score in which I used
\stopStaff and \startStaff to completely hide staves at the end of the piece
for performance purposes. Would anyone be willing to have a look at the
attached screenshot and explain why there're small segments of
David Kastrup wrote:
A number list counts as not-number?.
So I changed the not- number? predicate to also exclude number-list? but
this was no better. And then I determined all the individually
problematic lilypond-scheme-predicates and also excluded these in the
predicate
David Kastrup wrote:
Could you please post an actual minimal example we
could talk about usefully?
OK. I'm moving, but unsure of the direction.
notnumber.ly is a complete instance of trying to be more specific.
It breaks at 2.19.39.
Cheers,
Robin
% versions 2.18.2 through 2.19.38 ok
%
David Kastrup wrote:
So your examples are much too generic to give advice. It's likely that
you can solve your problem by using a much more specific predicate than
list? unless the form of list that you want to admit really needs to
allow something like a single-element string list.
Well
Hallo all
I'm having unexpected problems with a music function.
It takes several arguments, the first of which expects a list,
and should be optional.
Today it tripped up when run with a late 2.19 version and I narrowed
this down to 2.19.39. It seemed to have trouble with the second
parameter
mdeneufch via lilypond-user wrote:
Not exactly: I would like to display the number of each stanza, for example
after the \leftBrace.
Using \set stanza = "n." after the \skipFour in your solution does not work
directly (the numbers are printed above the brace).
Using \set stanza = "n." after
mdeneufch via lilypond-user wrote:
> Is there a way to do it?
Do you mean something like this?
Cheers,
Robin
\version "2.18.2"
\include "english.ly"
rightBrace = \markup { \null \translate #(cons 2 0.5)
\with-dimensions #(cons 0 0) #(cons 0 0) \right-brace #55 }
leftBrace =
edes wrote:
I'm very close to what I want, but is there a way to tweak the length of
the brackets?
You can override the positions property.
Try
\new DrumStaff \with {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override Arpeggio.thickness = #2.0
\override Arpeggio.positions =
Robin Bannister wrote:
One explanation is that
- concat wants to be given (markup-list?)
- general-align wants to be given (markup?)
So the two should be swapped:
#(markup #:general-align Y UP #:concat ("16" #:teeny "ma"))
This of course implies that your #{
Malte Meyn wrote:
#{ \markup \concat \general-align #Y #UP { "16" \teeny "ma" } #}
works but
(markup #:concat #:general-align Y UP ("16" #:teeny "ma"))
doesn’t and I don’t know why …
One explanation is that
- concat wants to be given (markup-list?)
- general-align wants
Oh dear, that recommendation was for your first code.
The bass clef code needs a LeftEdge.Y-offset of -5
Cheers,
Robin
On 14.07.2019 12:10, Robin Bannister wrote:
Jacques Menu wrote:
Didn’t find a way to hide the empty part of the staff to the left of it,
stopStaff/startStaff didn’t help
Malte Meyn wrote:
How can this made be top- or bottom-aligned (or aligned depending
according to the 'direction property)?
Inside a #(define-markup-command (command-name layout props arg1 arg2 …)
you can collect 'direction as follows:
(let* ((dir-prop (chain-assoc-get 'direction props
Jacques Menu wrote:
Didn’t find a way to hide the empty part of the staff to the left of it,
stopStaff/startStaff didn’t help.
Sorry.
This simplistic pseudoIndent is too fragile for general use.
It needs to be made robust re vertical extents.
In your case you need a LeftEdge.Y-offset of
Jacques Menu wrote:
- how can I ‘push’ the beginning of the seconda volta to the middle of
the line?
You could try a recent hack of mine.
%%
% cheap alternative to \new Score; fragile wrt. Y positioning
pseudoIndent =
#(define-music-function (parser location
Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
Any hint?
Go to the Notation Reference at:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#selecting-notation-font-size
and search for:
% resize a note head
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user
DJF wrote:
In the example below, I need the VoiceFollower line from the left hand to go to
the A half-note in the right hand, not to the quarter rest.
You could replace r4 with << s4 \new Voice r4 >>
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing
Vicente Sanches wrote:
Example in the link bellow just in the 1st seconds of the video, in the 4th
and 5th measures:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEMyj-8I3pw
I would use LSR715 to make the \laissezVibrer starting at the end of the
fourth stretch all the way through the 5th.
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
If I'm not wrong to generate the two variables (myMusic and myFing) from
the previous code should not be that difficult.
1 I duplicate the music expression
2 In the variable where I want to put the music I remove the fingering
3 In the variable where I want to put the
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
But when I finished to enter the fingering, I would definitely prefer
having the fingering instruction separated by the music. Something like
this (NB: it does not work correctly but I hope the idea is clear):
\version "2.21.0"
myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
myFing = {s4-1 s-2
Hallo there
I was looking to revamp my DIY fingering functions in the light of
features available when moving from 2.18 to 2.20, e.g. I can get
tighter positioning via TextScript.parent-alignment-X.
There is a 'ringed' function for fingerings which need highlighting.
Its bulbous \circle
Joseph Srednicki wrote:
Can someone recommend how to implement such marks in Lilypond?
With \bar "||" you may have to suppress the span bar too.
Here is a different method, overriding \breathe:
tramlines =
{
\override BreathingSign.Y-offset = 0
\override BreathingSign.text = \markup
Um, sorry, I got sidetracked.
This is more like your use case:
{ r4 \jib 50 c'4 r4 \jib 50 c''4 < \jib 50 g' \jib 50 d'' >1 }
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Andrew Bernard wrote:
Thanks for this. I came up with the same thing. But, my score is very
tight, and grace notes take up space and tend to push positioning around.
You want a straight bendBefore.
My bends use glyphs, and repeatGliss uses \grace.
But starting from Nathan's version of
Come on, just do it ;-)
Werner Lemberg has just done it.
This thread was never assigned an issue corresponding to its subject.
This code is now riding piggyback on his Issue 5468.
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5468/
Thanks, Werner.
Cheers,
Robin
See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2018-01/msg00010.html
Cheers,
Robin
On 28.01.2019 12:33, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
PS: I'll fix the `yyout2grammar' script.
Done, see
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5468/
You might want to check whether Bison now
Sandro Santilli wrote:
How do I put chord symbols in parenthesis, across
two measures ?
Look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-10/msg00565.html
for some suggestions re turnaround brackets.
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user
Veronika Neumann wrote:
How can I use the "old" layout settings with the current lilypond version?
You can't.
It's not just a matter of tweaking the old values.
The old settings were discarded just after v2.12 - names and effects.
That was so that the vertical spacing could be set up more
Tom Campbell wrote:
I want vertical space to occur after a heading. But it seems that the
following still puts the space before it, or am I going insane?
See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-04/msg00057.html
Cheers,
Robin
On 21.06.2018 09:13, Bernard Meylan wrote:
I try to make a 4 hands partition for piano, with 2 files: Secundo and
Primo, with for each a separate page numbering: 2, 4, 6 and so on for
Secundo and 3, 5, 7 etc. for Primo. Is it possible, and if yes, how?
Issue 902 doesn't look very helpful.
Ursus wrote:
Not quite satisfied yet
I am not sure I understand what you need,
but to get the last bar looking like
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t4044/Image_001.png
I would
- put the stem-down things in the second voice:| f4. e8
- let the first voice tie to just a
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
I have something that kind of works, based on some LSR snippets,
but it moves the chord symbols above marks, rather than below.
Does anyone have any suggestions for keeping the chord symbols in the
same location as normal?
The ChordNames
Brent Annable wrote:
2. I would like to parenthesize a couple of two-note chords in the tenor
part. Has anybody come up with a decent way to put parentheses around
entire chords yet? I've rummaged around the old threads but can't really
find anything that fits the bill.
Maybe you can make do
DJF wrote:
perhaps someone else knows if it’s possible to control the vertical spacing within the staff;
You can splay it out using Y-offset:
1
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user
Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
In rehearsals, at least in the US, going over these markings is called
going over the roadmap.
Well, Diverge and Merge are the terms used by road (freeway) engineers.
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
(new here because gmane is dud)
This is a signpost at a fork in the road.
I propose ForkMark
This concerns junctions where you can diverge off the one-way main road.
I don't experience merging junctions, e.g. Segno, as forks.
So saying DivergeMark would be unneccessarily explict -
unless
Ming Tsang wrote:
However how to make [...] to align with [...] ?
{ "To " \raise #1 \musicglyph #"scripts.coda" }
For \raise and other more powerful methods see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/align
Cheers,
Robin
___
Craig Dabelstein wrote:
Is there a way to put an articulation (a staccatissimo symbol) in square
brackets above a note, such as [ ! ], where ! = a staccatissimo
articulation?
Here is a quick hack, based on the brackets stencil of LSR564.
Warning: it sort of works with staccatissimo but that
Joseph Austin wrote:
When placing chord names on a lead-sheet, sometimes a slash ( / ) is used on
subsequent measures or beats to indicate repeating the previous chord. How can
this be done in lilypond?
Well there was a suggestion in 2012
Wol's lists wrote:
so this is really just a curious enquiry - why is the # required
Compare the docs for 2.18 and 2.19.
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thomas Morley wrote:
I'd use the generic tie-markup.
This is exactly the use-case why I coded tie generic and over/undertie
derived from it.
Well, thanks for these new markups,
which I only noticed a few days ago since I am still on 2.18.2.
But to get something like his 'wanted poster' your
This is with a recent version of lilypond:
\version "2.19.80"
{
e''2.\finger \markup \overtie #"52"
}
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Simon Albrecht wrote:
LilyPond, however, distorts spacing to place the span bar after the
syllable, and I can’t think of an override to change that.
There were two solutions here ...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-08/msg00595.html
Cheers,
Robin
Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Please let us know if you’d be willing to do this.
Thanks for the kind invitation, but I'm surely not as high-powered as
you seem to think I am.
Getting up to a reasonable speed with that CG stuff looks to me like a
steeper learning curve than for LilyPond itself.
nokel81 wrote:
Thank you very much however, my text comes out really weird.
Consider using manual repeat marks, described in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/long-repeats#manual-repeat-marks
The funny letters you are getting are meant for dynamics, which shares
its font
Palmer Ralph wrote:
The issue has been entered as Issue #5245 markuplist not documented well.
Thanks.
And by the way, this was all with split HTML, if that makes a difference.
I kept this purely user-oriented, leaving implementation unconsidered;
that was quite easy, seeing that I still
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I'm a bit OT. I have a piece where I would like to add an "additional"
measure. The notation used to write this measure should make clear that:
- the measure is optional to play
- the measure is not existing in the original score
I know nothing about a standard way.
Phil Holmes wrote:
Incidentally - do check the log file produced. Your music is throwing lots
of warnings.
Mostly re AccidentalSuggestion.avoid-slur.
If the corresponding overrides in \layout are commented back in,
there are no more such warnings (but still no slurs).
Cheers,
Robin
SoundsFromSound wrote:
I'd like to move it down a bit so it's centered with the middle staff line,
like the other names are. Is this possible?
That's the start of the fine tuning. Try:
addOssiaName =
#(define-scheme-function (name padding) (markup? number?)
(let ((adapted
SoundsFromSound wrote:
... how I can get the
"Violin" instrument name to show up next to the topmost staff?
Well, in 2009 Neil Puttock said you can't, and said why.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-03/msg00123.html
If that still applies, you will need a workaround.
The
Vivyan wrote:
I'm not sure why my score at times just prints off the page?
When I insert bar checks at the 'end of [nth] meter' comments
lilypond reports:
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
1.ly:61:3: warning: barcheck failed at: 5/24
| % end of 1st meter
1.ly:73:3: warning: barcheck failed
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
(it writes A
and 1 in two different boxes)
\version "2.19.80"
\mark \markup {* \box \concat {A \sub 1} *}
\box will apply to each item in a subsequent list,
unless you give the list to another command, like \concat, first.
Cheers,
Robin
Thomas Morley wrote:
In the real markup-command there will be no "A", so I can't go for
stencil-extent of it.
.
.
.
> Am I missing something?
I have the feeling it must be me that's missing something,
but can't you keep the "A" and just not print it?
(let* ((ref-stil (interpret-markup
David Wright wrote:
So the question is why your Message-ID:
<2914e16a-e129-19ca-4fc2-b3a552123...@dabble.ch>
didn't arrive on the list. Perhaps the spam scan produced a false
positive. Has this started happening within the past year? I notice
that your postings are submitted slightly
Karlin High wrote:
Curiouser and curiouser. The part that bugs me the worst is when I do
a Reply-All and the message never appears on the list, but then the
other recipients of my message ALSO do a Reply-All, and have their
replies to my message get posted to list, making it seem that my
Brent Annable wrote:
What I want is to get the quarter note positioned to the right of the half
note (as in the top example), but with the large and small quarter-notes
vertically aligned. Any ideas on how to achieve this?
Try replacing
<<\voiceOne {\stemDown g'4 e }
\new Voice
Peter Toye wrote:
In the second one I'm not sure what the "<>" is doing. Is this an empty chord
to put a bit of space there or something?
We have filled the last bar with the spacer s1.
Lilypond errors the decrescendo if we don't stop it, e.g. with \!,
But \! attached to a note works at
Shamus Hammons wrote:
This gets closer, but the flat sign is sitting all by itself, as if it
were a separate word and not part of the chord symbol (like so: "B b
maj7").
OK, sorry. Instead of \line use \concat:
\concat { "B" \chordFlat "maj7" }
Also, doesn't address the issue of the chord
Shamus Hammons wrote:
> > In the example I included, you can see that the text for the
> > Bbmaj7 chord is rendered in pieces, and the chord names are generally
> > farther above the diagrams than they should be.
You are using \center-column to get these two things arranged vertically.
It
Brin Solomon wrote:
I get something that looks like an eighth note instead of a
half tied to an eighth.
It gets closer when you add the line
\set completionUnit = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
If this needs further improvement, try to understand what
completionUnit and completionFactor do. [I
William Zeitler wrote:
It fails to compile:
Processing `C:/Users/william/Documents/Untitled.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `Untitled.ps'...
Converting
Bernhard Kleine wrote:
With respect to the other contributions, I have Frescobaldi/Lilypond on
win 7. I have seen that VLC mediaplayer has to be supplied with
softfonts e.g. fluid-softfonts. The installation proposal, however, does
not state how to supply this softfonts to the actual VLC. I
Peter Crighton wrote:
Hmm, that doesn’t seem to work.
I didn’t know about \strut before, and I’m not sure if I
correctly understand how it works, but doesn’t the size of the box depend
on the whitespace character and not on the tallest character?
I once solved a lyrics spacing problem using a
Knute Snortum wrote:
That's it, thanks!
Here's what I did, just for people searching the mailing list:
Which in turn, reminded me of easyChArp:
{
\easyChArp #-6 \grace e''4 2
}
Cheers,
Robin
\version "2.19.32"
easyChArp = #(define-music-function (grow) (number?)
;%
Peter Toye wrote:
... it was completely hogging one processor
- 24.9% utilisation on a 4-processor machine.
That's quite normal.
It's hard to spread the load, and Lilypond doesn't try.
Maybe this is the first time you have looked this closely.
Cheers,
Robin
On 01.12.2016 01:14, Don Gingrich wrote:
I'd be happy to have brackets, parentheses,
See also this thread from a month ago
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-10/msg00565.html
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I eventually needed to run "locate rehearsal-mark-letter.ly" on my
computer and inspect the contents to arrive to the answer.
I was referring to the regression tests at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/collated-files.html
This links to all the test files
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Is there a way to just set the counter without printing the mark
itself? (I would like to set the counter at the beginning of Coda and
then use \markDefault where appropriate just like everywhere else.)
Documentation points to
John Zeweniuk wrote:
Can anybody give me some suggestions of how I would draw an oval around a
group of notes on the staff?
For the special case of a single chord, see the german thread
http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?topic=378
The 2.18 version of this would read
%%
kringel
Herbert Liechti wrote:
In Jazz notation you find often chords symbol in parenthesis (see the
attached picture for an example). It this case it indicates what to play
when doing a turnaround in other cases it indicates an alternative to the
standard chords.
For a quick pointer to an old
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Now I'm sure to have read something about this situation but I cannot find
it...
(A much simpler solution).
Well, the following technique might be considered _simpler_
but is it acceptable as a _solution_ ?
\relative c' {
\omit TupletBracket
\omit
If the leadsheet needed hi-hat only in a single measure
I wouldn't bother with drum mode:
\version "2.18.2"
\new Voice
\with { \consists "Pitch_squash_engraver" } % for slash chords
{
\key ees \major
\time 6/4
\repeat percent 4 \repeat unfold 2
{ r4. \once \stemUp \tweak style
101 - 200 of 570 matches
Mail list logo