[Bug 1416843] [NEW] Indicator element appears over the panel, not above

2015-02-01 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Release:14.04 $ apt-cache policy xfce4-indicator-plugin xfce4-indicator-plugin: Installed: 2.3.2-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.3.2-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.3.2-0ubuntu2 0 500

[Bug 1414316] [NEW] cut() does not handle unicode properly

2015-01-24 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Hi, $ echo 哈哈 哈哈 $ echo 哈哈 | cut -c 2- ��哈 Apparently, Red Hat patched this in or before FC15. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/15961/coreutils-that-are-utf-aware [patches@holocene ~]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-8.10-2.fc15.x86_64 [patches@holocene ~]$ echo 哈哈 | cut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1414316] [NEW] cut() does not handle unicode properly

2015-01-24 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Hi, $ echo 哈哈 哈哈 $ echo 哈哈 | cut -c 2- ��哈 Apparently, Red Hat patched this in or before FC15. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/15961/coreutils-that-are-utf-aware [patches@holocene ~]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-8.10-2.fc15.x86_64 [patches@holocene ~]$ echo 哈哈 | cut

[Bug 1329128] [NEW] Please package the latest version, 1.5.3

2014-06-11 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Hello, Trusty has v1.2.0, which is 3 1/2 years old. It could have had v1.4.12, from August 2013. Saucy could have had v1.4.6, which was released in January 2013. Sincerely, Ron ** Affects: pv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1274807] [NEW] Segmentation fault on LibreOffice 4.2 x86-64 torrent

2014-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 13.10 Release:13.10 $ apt-cache policy transmission-gtk transmission-gtk: Installed: 2.82-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.82-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.82-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main

[Bug 1274807] [NEW] Segmentation fault on LibreOffice 4.2 x86-64 torrent

2014-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 13.10 Release:13.10 $ apt-cache policy transmission-gtk transmission-gtk: Installed: 2.82-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.82-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.82-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 87220]

2013-07-25 Thread Ron Johnson
Thanks for this feature. It'll simplify some of my tasks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87220 Title: [Upstream] Wishlist: Add rotation of images to writer

[Bug 87220]

2013-07-25 Thread Ron Johnson
Thanks for this feature. It'll simplify some of my tasks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87220 Title: [Upstream] Wishlist: Add rotation of images to writer To manage notifications

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1202899] [NEW] Opening emails can slow down drastically

2013-07-18 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Xubuntu 13.04 xfce 4.10.0 thunderbird-globalmenu 17.0.7+build1-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 courier-imap 4.10.0-20120615-1ubuntu1 When an email has a normal number of addressees in the To: list, emails open rapidly. When there are lots (in my specific example, there are 73 addresses in

[Bug 1202899] [NEW] Opening emails can slow down drastically

2013-07-18 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Xubuntu 13.04 xfce 4.10.0 thunderbird-globalmenu 17.0.7+build1-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 courier-imap 4.10.0-20120615-1ubuntu1 When an email has a normal number of addressees in the To: list, emails open rapidly. When there are lots (in my specific example, there are 73 addresses in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 932177] Re: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not initialise gnome-keyring correctly / WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to PKCS11

2013-07-17 Thread Ron Johnson
Confirmed in xubuntu 13.04. The OnlyShowIn modification works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932177 Title: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not

[Bug 932177] Re: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not initialise gnome-keyring correctly / WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to PKCS11

2013-07-17 Thread Ron Johnson
Confirmed in xubuntu 13.04. The OnlyShowIn modification works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932177 Title: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not

[Bug 932177] Re: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not initialise gnome-keyring correctly / WARNING: gnome-keyring:: couldn't connect to PKCS11

2013-07-17 Thread Ron Johnson
Confirmed in xubuntu 13.04. The OnlyShowIn modification works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-workspace in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932177 Title: XFCE (and other non-GNOME) desktops do not initialise

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1160569] Re: [regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed

2013-06-05 Thread Ron Johnson
I noticed this today on Thunderbird. Xubuntu 13.04 Thunderbird 17.0.6+build1-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 libglib2.0-0 2.36.0-1ubuntu2 kernel 3.8.0-24-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1160569] Re: [regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed

2013-06-05 Thread Ron Johnson
I noticed this today on Thunderbird. Xubuntu 13.04 Thunderbird 17.0.6+build1-0ubuntu0.13.04.1 libglib2.0-0 2.36.0-1ubuntu2 kernel 3.8.0-24-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160569

Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] KX3 Beta firmware rev. 1.44: Easier NR adjustment; DVR message play dropout fixed

2013-04-25 Thread Ron Johnson
Just loaded 1.44/1.16 and tested in cw mode (don't use ssb) and all is working well. The cwt/spot function is perfect again even at 50 Hz bandwidth and the NR is very good with its one knob adjustment. I find a NR setting of 7 to be just about right. Thanks Wayne and the team. 73 de Ron g3xov.  

[Bug 1071434] Re: Turbo Core doesn't work on an AMD Phenom II X6 1045T

2013-02-20 Thread Ron Johnson
If it matters, my system also suffers from this problem. Also, is this a duplicate of #877877 $ uname -a Linux haggis 3.5.0-24-generic #37~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 7 22:09:59 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dmesg | grep powernow [1.298179] powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD FX(tm)-6100

[Pkg-perl-maintainers] [Bug 1082118] Re: clive doesn't work anymore with youtube

2012-11-24 Thread Ron Johnson
I get the same error, and the same http/403 happens for cclive and youtube-dl. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian Perl Group, which is subscribed to clive in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082118 Title: clive doesn't work anymore with youtube

[Bug 1082118] Re: clive doesn't work anymore with youtube

2012-11-24 Thread Ron Johnson
I get the same error, and the same http/403 happens for cclive and youtube-dl. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082118 Title: clive doesn't work anymore with youtube To manage

Bug#642136: Adding nonpriv users to admin or sudo

2012-08-06 Thread Ron Johnson
The problem with #97 is that those privs also control software installation. -- If adults of legally sound mind must be told what foods they are not allowed to buy, then those people are not competent to choose (i.e. vote for) their own leaders. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642136: Adding nonpriv users to admin or sudo

2012-08-06 Thread Ron Johnson
The problem with #97 is that those privs also control software installation. -- If adults of legally sound mind must be told what foods they are not allowed to buy, then those people are not competent to choose (i.e. vote for) their own leaders. ___

[Canonical-partner-dev] [Bug 990761] Re: acroread 9.5.1 is not installable on Ubuntu Precise amd64 system

2012-07-05 Thread Ron Johnson
I this something that Precise users will have to live with? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical Partner Developers, which is subscribed to acroread in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990761 Title: acroread 9.5.1 is not installable on Ubuntu

[Bug 990761] Re: acroread 9.5.1 is not installable on Ubuntu Precise amd64 system

2012-07-05 Thread Ron Johnson
I this something that Precise users will have to live with? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990761 Title: acroread 9.5.1 is not installable on Ubuntu Precise amd64 system To manage

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 998569] [NEW] Embedded MP4 only plays audio in browser window

2012-05-12 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: On this page: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/05/09/redesigning-chkdsk-and-the-new-ntfs-health-model.aspx is this link: http://media.ch9.ms/ch9/4af7/90f9956a-4b4b-404a-9f01-a8f4bcb34af7/CheckDiskImprovementsforWin8_high.mp4 Clicking on it blanks the window except

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 998569] Re: Embedded MP4 only plays audio in browser window

2012-05-12 Thread Ron Johnson
** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2012-05-12 17:41:05.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998569/+attachment/3143418/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-05-12%2017%3A41%3A05.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox

[Bug 998569] [NEW] Embedded MP4 only plays audio in browser window

2012-05-12 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: On this page: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/05/09/redesigning-chkdsk-and-the-new-ntfs-health-model.aspx is this link: http://media.ch9.ms/ch9/4af7/90f9956a-4b4b-404a-9f01-a8f4bcb34af7/CheckDiskImprovementsforWin8_high.mp4 Clicking on it blanks the window except

[Bug 998569] Re: Embedded MP4 only plays audio in browser window

2012-05-12 Thread Ron Johnson
** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2012-05-12 17:41:05.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998569/+attachment/3143418/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-05-12%2017%3A41%3A05.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Pan-users] Bye bye pan 0.14, what's next for pan 0.1xx?

2012-05-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 05/09/2012 11:33 AM, Maurice Batey wrote: On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:11:29 +, Jim Henderson wrote: The new version of Pan is a complete rewrite, and doesn't use the old rules engine or config. Oh, brilliant! Ah well, I'll just stay with 32-bit a while longer then. But what are the

Re: [Pan-users] ANN : Ubuntu package PPA

2012-05-06 Thread Ron Johnson
Telling us that it didn't work without showing us what you did doesn't really help. Anyway, I added the ppa with complete success. On 05/06/2012 05:16 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: Is there something missing from the ppa line on this page? It won't add on my Ubuntu 12.04 system. On Sun, May

Re: [Pan-users] ANN : Ubuntu package PPA

2012-05-06 Thread Ron Johnson
: imported: 1 (RSA: 1) On 05/06/2012 11:07 PM, Jeffrey Needle wrote: The check box that lights up to enable you to add the ppa to the list of software sources remains grayed out. This seems to indicate there's something wrong with the ppa line. On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john

[Bug 992971] Re: libavformat53 Mismatching header version

2012-05-03 Thread Ron Johnson
Followups: 1) this bug does *not* prevent the video from playing successfully. 2) Added the motumedia ppa last night and upgraded mplayer to 1.0~svn34707-1~precise. That mplayer is at libavformat version 54.0.0 and there's no more version mismatch. -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 992895] [NEW] Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: See question #195487, which I think was wrongly assigned to xserver-xorg-video-nv. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+question/195487 To rehash question #195487: I just upgraded from GNOME 2.32 on a PPA- loaded Maverick 10.10 to 12.04 using

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 992895] Re: Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992895 Title: Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10 Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description:

[Bug 992895] [NEW] Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: See question #195487, which I think was wrongly assigned to xserver-xorg-video-nv. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+question/195487 To rehash question #195487: I just upgraded from GNOME 2.32 on a PPA- loaded Maverick 10.10 to 12.04 using

[Bug 992895] Re: Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992895 Title: Window updates are much slower under 12.04 than 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 992971] [NEW] libavformat53 Mismatching header version

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: Version details should be in the auto-loaded Apport file. $ mplayer blah_blah.mov MPlayer svn r34540 (Ubuntu), built with gcc-4.6 (C) 2000-2012 MPlayer Team Playing blah_blah.mov. libavformat version 53.21.0 (external) Mismatching header version 53.19.0 libavformat file

[Bug 992971] Re: libavformat53 Mismatching header version

2012-05-01 Thread Ron Johnson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992971 Title: libavformat53 Mismatching header version To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Canonical-partner-dev] [Bug 967091] Re: Wrong tint with Nvidia after upgrading to 11.2

2012-04-30 Thread Ron Johnson
Precise 12.04 GeForce 210 nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1 Flash 11.2.202.233ubuntu2 libvdpau1 0.4.1-3ubuntu1 Having /etc/adobe/mms.cfg with these lines solves the problem on my system: EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=1 OverrideGPUValidation=true -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 967091] Re: Wrong tint with Nvidia after upgrading to 11.2

2012-04-30 Thread Ron Johnson
Precise 12.04 GeForce 210 nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1 Flash 11.2.202.233ubuntu2 libvdpau1 0.4.1-3ubuntu1 Having /etc/adobe/mms.cfg with these lines solves the problem on my system: EnableLinuxHWVideoDecode=1 OverrideGPUValidation=true -- You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 908479] Re: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2012-04-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 04/19/2012 03:58 PM, smurfzilla wrote: after upgrading to 12.04 using thunderbird 11.01 seeing same behaviour - right click - move works but drag and drop from account to local folders does not Log out and log back in. That cured it for me. -- There is usually only a limited amount of

Re: [Bug 908479] Re: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2012-04-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 04/19/2012 03:58 PM, smurfzilla wrote: after upgrading to 12.04 using thunderbird 11.01 seeing same behaviour - right click - move works but drag and drop from account to local folders does not Log out and log back in. That cured it for me. -- There is usually only a limited amount of

Re: [Pan-users] configure fails on GMIME package check

2012-04-06 Thread Ron Johnson
On 04/06/2012 12:59 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 04/06/2012 10:44 AM, Duncan wrote: You have the runtime half installed but are trying to build something depending on it, so need the dev half as well. As a Fedora user, I can tell you that Duncan is right on, except that you'll probably need to look

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 03/22/2012 03:54 AM, thufir wrote: On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:34:44 +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote: The bug you refer to was probably that pan didn't display text/html mimetype blocks even as plain text, in the buggy versions. It probably treated those mime parts as attachments, instead. That

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 03/22/2012 01:08 PM, David Kelly wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:00:37 -0500 as excerpted: While Tbird puts my cursor at the bottom of the window, more and more I must manually move the cursor to the top because non-geeks have

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.5 - Can't see page margins in Writer

2012-02-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/14/2012 10:34 AM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote: 2012/2/14 noibsnoibs...@me.com: I just upgraded to 3.5 from 3.4.4. There are no page margins visible for my Writer documents last saved in 3.4.4. Am I missing something? I've looked for a preference and can't find one. I'm using Mac OS 10.7.3.

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.5 corrupts DOCX completely

2012-02-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/14/2012 11:20 AM, Philip Gillißen wrote: Hi! I just downloaded and tested LibreOffice 3.5 on Windows 64 Bit and my test result is depressing: LibreOffice 3.5 corrupts my DOCX files completely, so that Microsoft Word 2010 cannot open it anymore! I tried it with simple documents and it

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: database or spreadsheet

2012-02-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/12/2012 01:52 PM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: On 08/02/2012 12:57, James Knott wrote: Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: On 07/02/2012 13:03, e-letter wrote: It is not known from the original poster _why_ the sheets needed to be changed. Jeeze. DOES IT MATTER? No of course it doesn't

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: database or spreadsheet

2012-02-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/12/2012 05:25 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 02/12/2012 06:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] We're not remote-sensing mind-readers. James Knott has a very valid point, one which I myself have suffered through over the decades: power user or newbie developer has skills inadequate to the task

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Write2epub

2012-02-11 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/11/2012 08:14 AM, Calvin Kim wrote: On 02/10/2012 07:03 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 10.02.2012 15:41, Tinkerer wrote: I have found Write2epub. All the extensions are on a disc downloaded from Kracked Press. I thought I would try it for converting Libre User Guides to epub format for the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Write2epub

2012-02-11 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/11/2012 11:20 AM, Pedro wrote: [snip] 1st - if we continue this, and I would not mind at all, how about we kick it over to the discuss list? Unfortunately this is not a Forum, we can not move topics :) We would have to start all over at the Discuss mailing list... Cross-post? It

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Export as PDF in LO 3.5

2012-02-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/10/2012 08:16 AM, Tinkerer wrote: I have tried converting a single page .odt to Pdf and obtained the same result. Write error Re; converting the Libre User Guide I don't see that size mattered when you are talking about 9MB and I have 4 GB of Ram. I also just tried exporting a small

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Export as PDF in LO 3.5

2012-02-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/10/2012 01:52 PM, Tinkerer wrote: I also just tried exporting a small but complex odt (note that I unchecked Create PDF Form) and simple 24 page doc, and both worked perfectly. Where do you find the Create PDF Form? I can only see Export as PDF. I have write permissions to the folder I

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Export as PDF in LO 3.5

2012-02-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/10/2012 03:11 PM, Tinkerer wrote: I am using a Mac, System 10.7.2 I suppose I could try a Log File to see what happened. Maybe dtruss would help. http://www.quora.com/Whats-the-equivalent-of-strace-in-OS-X -- How does being physically handicapped make me Differently-Abled? What

Re: [libreoffice-users] I've repeated a bug from OO writer. Now what?

2012-02-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/08/2012 06:33 AM, Robin Lovelace wrote: Dear Libreoffice user group, I've accidentally (much to my annoyance) replicated this bug, that was identified, but seemingly ignored, back in 2007: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=77782 To replicate, please try opening this file, and

Re: [libreoffice-users] I've repeated a bug from OO writer. Now what?

2012-02-10 Thread Ron Johnson
was able to use a force quit to exit LibreOffice. Don On 02/10/2012 05:46 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/08/2012 06:33 AM, Robin Lovelace wrote: Dear Libreoffice user group, I've accidentally (much to my annoyance) replicated this bug, that was identified, but seemingly ignored, back in 2007: https

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 07:07 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: On 02/09/2012 12:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: I really don't understand the choice of displaying HTML attachments in-line as raw text. It seems to be saying Screw you, I dislike HTML posts and so will deliberately make them as obnoxious and annoying

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 07:34 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: On 02/09/2012 01:24 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: Christ on a stick, people! That war was lost as soon as Windows users with Outlook Express invaded the Intarweb, and *over* when gmail defaulted to top-posting and and html formatting. What war are you

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 08:28 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: On 02/09/2012 01:47 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: The war against bad netiquette in mail and newsgroups, of course. I don't see that war as having been lost. Bottom-posting is still the norm Uh-huh. and HTML isn't used a lot (rarely, if all

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 09:54 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: On 02/09/2012 02:49 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: and HTML isn't used a lot (rarely, if all) in emails Yeah... no. How many HTML emails have been sent to this mailing list? Feel free to comb through the archives. This list is a tiny fraction of a drop

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 10:06 AM, Rui Maciel wrote: On 02/09/2012 04:02 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: This list is a tiny fraction of a drop in a very large ocean. Ok, then. Pick your mailing list. Mailing lists are read (not counting nntp-gateways) using *mail* apps. Most mail I receive is (sadly) html

Re: [libreoffice-users] Default path for templates

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 06:13 AM, Dan Lewis wrote: [snip] The path he needs to use ends in .../template/common because his LO installation is on a server. This permits people from other computers to use LO and the same templates. If templates are placed in the common folder, they will not be

Re: [libreoffice-users] Default path for templates

2012-02-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/09/2012 08:15 AM, Dan Lewis wrote: Comments inline On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 06:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] What I'm perceiving is that LO doesn't follow the standard Unix search hierarchy of first looking locally (~/.libreoffice/3/user/template) and then in /usr/share

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 908479] Re: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2012-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
After logging in/out, problem resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908479 Title: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16 Status in “thunderbird” package in

[Bug 908479] Re: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2012-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
After logging in/out, problem resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908479 Title: Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 765357] Re: Need to be able to suppress configuration output

2012-01-05 Thread Ron Johnson
Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765357 Title: Need to be able to suppress configuration output To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 908479] [NEW] Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2011-12-24 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 $ apt-cache policy thunderbird thunderbird: Installed: 3.1.16+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1 Candidate: 3.1.16+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1 Version table: ***

[Bug 908479] [NEW] Drag-and-drop stopped working in v3.1.16

2011-12-24 Thread Ron Johnson
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 $ apt-cache policy thunderbird thunderbird: Installed: 3.1.16+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1 Candidate: 3.1.16+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1 Version table: ***

Re: [Pan-users] git repo not working ?

2011-12-07 Thread Ron Johnson
On 12/07/2011 01:48 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote: [snip] I left a message in pan-devel, Necessary but insufficient. :) (Not that you're the 50th developer to post a message to $FOO-devel and expect the world to know to look for it...) -- Vegetarians eat vegetables, Humanitarians frighten

Re: [Pan-users] git repo not working ?

2011-12-07 Thread Ron Johnson
On 12/07/2011 07:43 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote: Am 07.12.2011 09:18, schrieb Ron Johnson: On 12/07/2011 01:48 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote: [snip] I left a message in pan-devel, Necessary but insufficient. :) (Not that you're the 50th developer to post a message to $FOO-devel and expect

Re: [Pan-users] looking for help in creating the git version

2011-11-25 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/25/2011 11:21 PM, Bob Davenport wrote: I downloaded the latest version of pan2 this evening and also checked and installed the missing files and such as listed (GTK+, gmime, etc.) in the INSTALL text. As the old saying goes, I'm so lost I don't know where I'm lost from... HELP

Re: [Pan-users] looking for help in creating the git version

2011-11-25 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/25/2011 11:54 PM, Bob Davenport wrote: On 11/25/2011 11:50 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 11/25/2011 11:21 PM, Bob Davenport wrote: I downloaded the latest version of pan2 this evening and also checked and installed the missing files and such as listed (GTK+, gmime, etc.) in the INSTALL text

Bug#616061: Repeatable w/ FF 4.0rc2 and IW 4.0rc2.

2011-11-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 08/07/2011 08:12 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:46:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Found these warnings when running from the CLI: *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 (unknown variable) in NPN_GetValue() *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled

Re: [Pan-users] Automating NZB downloads

2011-11-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/08/2011 01:32 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote: Am 08.11.2011 00:46, schrieb Ron Johnson: [snip] You could also implement it in a loop: cd /home/g/Films tmpfile=$(mktemp -u) QUEUE=~/my_list_of_NZBs.txt while [ -s $QUEUE ]; do NZB=$(head -n1 $QUEUE) pan --no-gui -o . --nzb $NZB sed '1d

Re: [Pan-users] Automating NZB downloads

2011-11-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/08/2011 04:13 PM, Graham Lawrence wrote: Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:15:54 -0600 Excerpted From: Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net That sounds like a weird use of arrays. Its a great convenience. If you have a list of items and you are interested only in one or two of them, using an

[Pan-users] Automating NZB downloads

2011-11-07 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/07/2011 12:22 PM, Graham Lawrence wrote: Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:15:54 -0600 From: Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net pan --no-gui -o /home/g/Films --nzb ${nzb[1]} 2/home/g/pan.debug Slight topic change: are you trying to d/l from a list of nzb files? Yes and no. I download nzbs

Re: [Pan-users] Command line use; download of nzb files does not stop

2011-11-05 Thread Ron Johnson
PLEASE snip the *huge* amounts of redundant verbiage!!! On 11/05/2011 08:48 AM, Graham Lawrence wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:00 AM,pan-users-requ...@nongnu.org wrote: Send Pan-users mailing list submissions to pan-users@nongnu.org [snip] it is. Thank you again for all your

Re: [Pan-users] Pan-users Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3

2011-11-05 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/05/2011 09:27 AM, Graham Lawrence wrote: [snip] And I think, above all a real man would be independent, and entirely unconcerned with Real Men's need for group solidarity and identification. So you'd think... -- Vegetarians eat vegetables, Humanitarians frighten me.

[Pan-users] Synchronous vs asynchronous (was Re: Command line use; download of nzb files does not stop)

2011-11-05 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/05/2011 12:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 11/05/2011 09:23 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: It is common sense really: before pressing Send, consider how your email will appear to the recipient. Will it make sense? Can they understand what you are responding to? Do they have to scroll through 20

Re: [Pan-users] Command line use; download of nzb files does not stop

2011-11-04 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/04/2011 02:57 PM, Zan Lynx wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:47 +, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:34:09 -0500 as excerpted: Anyway... Task Manager (Real Men run top(1) in a separate window...) just reports what the kernel tells it. Meanwhile, if you're

Re: [Pan-users] Command line use; download of nzb files does not stop

2011-11-03 Thread Ron Johnson
I've used pan --no-gui --nzb ${FOO}.nzb -o . on *many* occasions and it always returns to the $ prompt when d/l is complete. Using v0.135. If you want something to run only if a process errors out, then use ||. For example: $ pan --no-gui --nzb ${FOO}.nzb -o . || dem Anyway... Task

Re: [Pan-users] Command line use; download of nzb files does not stop

2011-11-03 Thread Ron Johnson
On 11/03/2011 05:47 PM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:34:09 -0500 as excerpted: Anyway... Task Manager (Real Men run top(1) in a separate window...) just reports what the kernel tells it. I parsed his task manager reference as to pan's TM, not the one in his DE

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 01:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) That's *ancient*. If it's not broken, don't break it by updating. That's only valid if subsequent versions

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 02:40 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/22/2011 01:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) That's *ancient*. If it's not broken

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 12:02 PM, Rhialto wrote: On Sat 22 Oct 2011 at 11:47:54 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: (as opposed to unmaintained, 8yo s/w like nethack) Hey, who says NetHack is unmaintained? The DevTeam thinks of everything! :-) v3.4.3 was released in 2003. Maybe the DevTeam got zapped

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 02:17 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/22/2011 09:47 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: Eventually, though, as apps are rewritten to use GTK3, I'll be left behind. Do what I did: migrate to XFCE. I tried that, but Xfce 4.8 mandates that the panel be at the top of the screen, and I just don't

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 03:16 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/22/2011 01:01 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: I tried that, but Xfce 4.8 mandates that the panel be at the top of the screen, and I just don't like that... It was possible in v4.6 but they removed it. A full-featured (i.e., the way GNOME 2 does it) panel

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/22/2011 03:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/22/2011 01:40 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.8-1.png That's what I want. Either the config windows are using terms that I'm not familiar with, or xbuntu made some changes. Yes, and that's exactly how I have

Re: [Pan-users] Ubuntu 11.10 version of Pan repeating images

2011-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/20/2011 03:25 PM, Scott Pettigrew wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:35 PM, David Shochat david.shoc...@gmail.com mailto:david.shoc...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I upgraded to 11.10 and I'm seeing that too (with pan 0.133). However, with 0.135, the problem does not occur. --

Re: [Pan-users] Ubuntu 11.10 version of Pan repeating images

2011-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/21/2011 01:13 PM, Rick Knight wrote: [massive snippage] Thanks Petr. [snip] Please, people: delete the unneeded cruft!! (Maybe quote auto-hide is actually bad thing...) -- Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification ___ Pan-users

[Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/21/2011 07:32 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/21/2011 01:13 PM, Rick Knight wrote: [massive snippage] Thanks Petr. [snip] Please, people: delete the unneeded cruft!! (Maybe quote auto-hide is actually bad thing...) Maybe User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12

Re: [Pan-users] Someone hasn't upgraded in a while... (was Re: Ubuntu 11.10 version ...)

2011-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) That's *ancient*. If it's not broken, don't break it by updating. That's only valid if subsequent versions are broken. -- Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/18/2011 04:09 AM, Duncan wrote: [snip] But regardless, as I pointed out, the last rewrite was five years ago and we've not seen new code implementing a disk-based pan and/or sqlite backend yet, Or Berkley DB, for that matter. Anything that provides b-trees. and he who

Re: [Pan-users] OS X install instructions

2011-10-14 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/14/2011 01:47 PM, Johan Ovlinger wrote: Is there a web page or somesuch detailing how to install on OS X? I'm migrating off linux after a good 17 years of buidling and maintaining my own box; just don't have the time any more. Not that it answers your question, but that's why I migrated

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-11 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/11/2011 12:33 AM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:19:51 -0500 as excerpted: On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted: [snip] The biggest problem is pan's assumption that it has all

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/10/2011 01:05 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote: Am 10.10.2011 05:15, schrieb Ron Johnson: On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote: Ron Johnsonron.l.johnson@... writes: Having to upgrade to Ubuntu Maverick because Natty sucks, I decided to also migrate to 64 bits now

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted: On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote: Ron Johnsonron.l.johnson@... writes: [64-bit pan] One of the first things that I did was try out Pan on a binary group. Many

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted: [snip] The biggest problem is pan's assumption that it has all the information necessary to maintain its threading structure in memory at all times. In ordered to really allow pan

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/10/2011 10:41 PM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:00:56 -0500 as excerpted: On 10/10/2011 04:55 AM, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:15:24 -0500 as excerpted: It's a fact that 32-bit Pan runs out of *process* address space at around 2GB

[Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-09 Thread Ron Johnson
Having to upgrade to Ubuntu Maverick because Natty sucks, I decided to also migrate to 64 bits now that Adobe has released a 64 bit Flash. One of the first things that I did was try out Pan on a binary group. Many hours later, it had fetched 6 weeks of headers and consumed 6.8GB of RAM. The

Re: [Pan-users] 64 bits fails as solution to large binary groups

2011-10-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/09/2011 09:58 PM, Lacrocivious Acrophosist wrote: Ron Johnsonron.l.johnson@... writes: Having to upgrade to Ubuntu Maverick because Natty sucks, I decided to also migrate to 64 bits now that Adobe has released a 64 bit Flash. One of the first things that I did was try out Pan on a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >