ok , so on report of 2023-05-01 , java-1.8.0-openjdk was orphaned by
releng , so it looks like in the previous to last report one maintainer
was removed from the packagers groups for inactivity, who was the
maintainer ?
On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:26 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following
On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 23:59 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> As conclusion of comment [1], abipkgdiff between version 8.12.x and
> 8.13.x may have an ABI change, so I will rebuild the 7 packages that
> depend on it, [2] chatty, evolution-data-server, kf5-kitinerary,
> mmsd-
>
Hi,
As conclusion of comment [1], abipkgdiff between version 8.12.x and
8.13.x may have an ABI change, so I will rebuild the 7 packages that
depend on it, [2] chatty, evolution-data-server, kf5-kitinerary, mmsd-
tng, ncid, plasma-dialer and spacebar, since we don't have an soname
bump I will
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 23:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ATF(Automated Testing Framework) is needed by pkgconf and pkgconf is
> need by half of the packages on Fedora ...
> 0.21 was released many year ago but today someone ask me to update
> it.
>
> I will use
Hi,
ATF(Automated Testing Framework) is needed by pkgconf and pkgconf is
need by half of the packages on Fedora ...
0.21 was released many year ago but today ask me to update it.
I will use one side tag to rebuild kyua, lutok, pkgconf
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
> Troy
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 5:02 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Hi Troy,
> >
> > Yesterday , after telling Neal that we already can build kdenlive
> > on
> > EPEL 9, since rttr package was pushed to stable repo.
> >
> > Neal wrote to
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 14:31 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 15-05-2023 14:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 05. 23 14:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I see a lot of new packages , can we have a report what users
> > > have been
> > > removed
Hi,
I see a lot of new packages , can we have a report what users have been
removed ? please
Thank you
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If
Hi Troy,
Yesterday , after telling Neal that we already can build kdenlive on
EPEL 9, since rttr package was pushed to stable repo.
Neal wrote to you (in KDE channel) :
"I was reminded by sergiomb that kdenlive should be upgraded along with
other KDE apps when you're doing the Plasma upgrade for
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 20:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 04. 23 v 11:47 Aurelien Bompard napsal(a):
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of
> > our
> > notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on
> > deploying
> > the new
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 09:44 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:20:30PM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > I tested with Centos Stream 9.
> > xvfb-run have been fixed somehow in Centos Stream first,
>
> CentOS Stream is a preview of the next RHEL mi
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 11:43 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > it builds in copr epel-9 (with RHEL-9) [1] but fail to build on
> > koji
> > [2]
> >
> > the test with xvfb-run seg f
Hi,
it builds in copr epel-9 (with RHEL-9) [1] but fail to build on koji
[2]
the test with xvfb-run seg fault and fails on koji [3] any idea why ?
Thank you
[1]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5901019
[2]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100929278
[3]
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 22:01 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use
> GRUB2
> to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora
> packages
> to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I
> owe a good
Hi,
the best way to contact the packager maintainer is via bugzilla
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/fftw/fftw/ » File a new bug
report »
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=rawhide=fftw
On Fri, 2023-04-28 at 12:20 +0200, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>
On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 01:38 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > ah. I think this is one bug in Fedora review (already reported)
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824526
>
Sorr
On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 09:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:37:55AM +, Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got:
> >
> > Errore: Errore test di transazione:
> > il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so
>
On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 12:18 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> > I've implemented the suggested two line change to .bash_profile:
> >
> > # User specific environment and startup programs
> > shopt -s histappend
>
> This is already in the default /etc/bashrc, at
Ok we need rename it to freeworld
On Fri, 2023-04-07 at 20:55 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> libheif has been retired at rpmfusion due to koji issues.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
> ___
> devel mailing list --
On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 10:19 -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 4/4/23 09:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:49 AM Steven A. Falco
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/4/23 05:58 AM, ser...@serjux.com wrote:
> > > > On 2023-04-03 21:13, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > > > > I'm confused by
On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 10:23 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James
> > >
> ...
> &g
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:09 AM Jerry James
> > wrote:
> > > I see the same with a couple of my packages. A look at
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs
On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 18:24 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 5:59 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > works for me [1] , have you any custom configuration on
> > ~/.config/mock.cfg ?
>
> No, nothing custom there.
>
>
> > [1]
On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 17:27 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 5:23 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > what is you fedora-review version ? and Fedora version ?
>
> It's fedora-review-0.9.0-1 on F37.
works for me [1] , hav
what is you fedora-review version ? and Fedora version ?
On Wed, 2023-03-22 at 17:01 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When running fedora-review on RHBZ#2180243, the program crashes and I
> can't figure out what the problem is. There are a few dependencies of
> the package
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 23:53 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via
> rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
> > EPEL 8
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21708
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
> > EPEL 8
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21708
BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 10:18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week
BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 10:18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week
On Sat, 2023-03-18 at 07:40 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have orphaned libheif at rpmfusion as I have no desire to manage
> another split package.
>
> https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/libheif/
you should orphan only branches that are in Fedora , IMO
>
gies for my late response. I have been swamped with other
> > > > things...
> > > >
> > > > On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
>
On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 23:04 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 6:34 PM Miroslav Suchý
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dne 01. 01. 21 v 12:58 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:07 AM Michael Schwendt
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 31 Dec 2020
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:17 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-
> developers
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
> >
> > So I
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 02:41 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Is anyone using rpm besides dnf and me? It has gotten very noisy:
>
> # rpm -qa | grep intel
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 2
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 81b46521: BAD
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> error:
I think so , see openssl example :
dnf install openssl1.1-devel openssl-devel
Package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-1.fc37.x86_64 is already installed.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-
1.fc37.x86_64
- package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.i686 conflicts with
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
>
> So I have followed
> https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package
>
> But trying rfpkg retire, I got
>
> [kvolny@kvolny
On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 12:22 +0300, Vascom wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As I noticed Fedora change default behaviour at %prep section of
> spec-file.
>
> Now by default executed %{set_build_flags} and added "-p1" parameter
> to %autosetup for applying patches.
>
> Is it really?
> Are there other
On Mon, 2023-02-27 at 23:37 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> 8795 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
Hello,
running [1] the result is [2]
[1]
askalono crawl libcomps-0.1.19
[2]
libcomps-0.1.19/COPYING
License: GPL-2.0-only (original text)
Score: 0.988
but
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 13:38 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > this issue definitely should go to the common bugs , IMO.
> >
>
>
> See the link that I posted ;)
yeah sorry :) common bugs have moved to
https://ask
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 10:34 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:39 AM Ralf Corsépius
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post,
> > there]
> >
> > on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed
> > with a
> >
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
> >
> > Greetings everyone,
> >
> > TL;DR
> > Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in
> > Fedora?
> >
> > A while ago I stumbled upon AVIF files not being supported
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can
> indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38
> enters beta freeze today. Any updates that need to land in the beta
> release will require an
On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 14:02 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers
> that
> have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
> packagers who remain inactive will be
On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:34 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for this. But this is separate. I was wondering how do I
> create a LiveCD without a login display manager?
you got nodm package and maybe could help you this article
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 02:28 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since about Fedora 20 or so, I have been rolling my own Fedora spin
> without a desktop environment, and with openbox and slim (simple
> login manager). All worked well, because I did not need to roll these
> that
//github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-tools/blob/master/mass-rebuild.py#L33
>
> On 19/02/2023 22:41, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
> > branched I got a lot of [1] the
Hi,
I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG-
KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020
For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] .
In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38
Hi,
I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG-
KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020
For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] .
In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 10:54 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:37:08 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > Affected Services:
> > >
> > > s390x koji builders. Jobs will queue up, but not be processed
> > >
>
> On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-
> > > developers
&g
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
> a écrit :
> >
> > Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
> >
> > On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
> rpmfusion.
>
> I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.
I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend
> The Main reason is, we are
-0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I found more 5 with
> > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
&g
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 15:41 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 13:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process,
> > please let me know and we can work together to get
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 12:14 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 02. 23 0:46, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > datamash jhladky
> >
> > I have a build fix ready and
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 00:46 +0100, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > datamash jhladky
>
> I have a build fix ready and volunteer to maintain it such that I can
> apply it.
>
> My FAS
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 10:26 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The python-qt5 package in RHEL 8 does not ship the webkit package.
> I'm
> assuming that this is unlikely to be changed since qt5-qtwebkit isn't
> in
> RHEL but is in EPEL.
>
> I think I'm close to producing a python-qt5-epel package
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 02:40 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to
> leave the system in an unknown state.
>
> How does one recover from this situation?
>
checkdupes:
package-cleanup --dupes
package-cleanup --problems
Hi,
Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
above, that is seen on rhel 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 19:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > > Things still
Hi,
I did a wiki page where have instructions how tunneling matrix user to
access to #rpmfusion on Libera.Chat
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Matrix%20tunneling
the most complicated is register your user on IRC Nickserver because
#rpmfusion channel only accept registered users
Happy hacking !
Hi,
I did a wiki page where have instructions how tunneling matrix user to
access to #rpmfusion on Libera.Chat
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Matrix%20tunneling
the most complicated is register your user on IRC Nickserver because
#rpmfusion channel only accept registered users
Happy hacking !
as wrote on https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1256
> One way to fix this could be extending bcond_with and bcond_without to
> %undefine the with_ macro in the else case. That way the defaults could be
> overwritten by later lines. This sounds a bit like a bad feature to
On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 15:54 -0600, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 22:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > My Rawhide Bodhi updates are stuck in pending, so I've checked
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F38
> >
> > and it seems that everything created
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:34 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +0000, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600,
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> > time and was greeted with the following
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> time and was greeted with the following:
>
> $ rfpkg scratch-build --srpm
>
> setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1673913600
> Wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:54 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2023/01/17 18:29:
> > V Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Dan Horák napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:21:39 -0700
> > > Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > > How the #$@! do I get fedpkg local to not cleanup
I use this patch
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/VirtualBox.git/tree/VirtualBox-lzf.patch
to build with system lzf (since abr 30 2021)
SDK_VBOX_LZF_LIBS="lzf"\
SDK_VBOX_LZF_INCS="/usr/include/liblzf"\
On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 11:55
e rebuild for opencv
also starts to build for eln, is convenient that opencv eln build is
already finished
>
> On 1/15/23 17:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will take care of it, I'm just waiting for opencv-4.7.0-2.eln125
> > finish to build , t
Hi,
I will take care of it, I'm just waiting for opencv-4.7.0-2.eln125
finish to build , to start rebuilds of dependents packages
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 17:43 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Unfortunately, an update to opencv 4.7.0 (with soname update) got got
> up
> in my vtk update build and
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 18:47 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 14. 01. 23 17:31, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 1/9/23 07:43, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > I'm hoping to start updating libharu to 2.4.3, mathgl to 8.0.1,
> > > and vtk to
> > > 9.2.5 at the end of this week. Builds will be done in a
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 11:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27. 10. 22 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > micropython churchyard
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/micropython/pull-request/14
Hi,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xpra/pull-request/1 breaks builds on
epel9
from
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 20:05 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I wonder if some contributors (/endusers) would rely on RPM Fusion
> for
> CentOS Stream ?
I only use CentOS Stream, to my tests, in a vm. I haven't had the need
to use it for my work yet
> Some time ago I did the heavy
On Tue, 2023-01-03 at 21:21 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/3/23 18:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > But isn't missing inst.rescue boot option [2] ?
>
> That's a different thing. The rescue kernel is only to have all
> kernel
> modules available. The "inst.rescue&quo
together.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 12. 12. 22 v 17:43 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 10:57 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
> > >
> > > This document represents a proposed Change. As par
On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 14:37 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Summary--
> Most all Fedora variants (except Cloud) have a GRUB menu entry
> containing the word "rescue". This kernel+initramfs pair are never
> updated for the life of a Fedora installation. And they quickly
> become
> stale as a
Hi,
I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
the package and increase relversion ?
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 15:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> xorg-x11-xdm
X Display Manager with support for XDMCP, host chooser
what are the alternatives of "Display Manager" ? and "with support for
XDMCP" ? only gdm ?
And xdm is not abandoned https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xdm ,
maybe
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 12:08 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 19:45 +, Smith, Stewart via devel wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Miro Hrončok
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > The following packages are orphaned and will be
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 11:27 +, wang_chen wrote:
> Fedora-Robotics-Live 不再发布了吗？
the Respins Sig never have released robotics
https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/robotics/
Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing
1/22 18:11, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 12:03, Sérgio Basto > <mailto:ser...@serjux.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 17:58 +0100, Mark Olesen via devel wrote:
> > > Checking my copr log, it seems that centos-stream-
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 12:11 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 12:03, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 17:58 +0100, Mark Olesen via devel wrote:
> > > Checking my copr log, it seems that centos-stream-8 (and epel-8)
> > has
>
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 17:58 +0100, Mark Olesen via devel wrote:
> Checking my copr log, it seems that centos-stream-8 (and epel-8) has
> this:
>
> ptscotch-openmpi-devel x86_64 6.0.5-3.el8 powertools
> scotch-devel x86_64 6.0.5-3.el8 powertools
>
> I was mistaken about it
Hi,
Dependencies on glib1 and gtk1 are only bubblemon manedit xconvers , I
propose retire it on F38, it's one less burden that we have .
After start working on GConf2 and after maybe gtk2
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 19:45 +, Smith, Stewart via devel wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> >
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> > for sure
> > that
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 12:12 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> gcc -m64 -nostdlib -Wl,-Tsrc/start/svsm.lds -Wl,--build-id=none -o
> svsm.bin.elf src/start/start.o target/x86_64-unknown-
> none/debug/liblinux_svsm.a -Wl,--start-group
> ./external/build/lib/libtpm.a
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 16:43 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> golang-github-mitchellh-cli, golang-github-hanwen-fuse
I took these , because they are needed to docker
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 17:18 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 17/12/2022 15:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2]
> > ?
>
> The same for mesa. That's why I don't like splitting packages bet
Hi,
I saw this update on repology [1]
Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2] ?
[1]
https://repology.org/project/pipewire/versions
[2]
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pipewire/pipewire/
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 12:34 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Summary of
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:57 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Le mer. 14 déc. 2022 à 12:42, Sérgio M. Basto
> > a écrit :
> > >
> > > commit 7faa5ed40864b93ef5fb54e223701856db38ad5f
> > > Author:
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:57 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mer. 14 déc. 2022 à 12:42, Sérgio M. Basto
> a écrit :
> >
> > commit 7faa5ed40864b93ef5fb54e223701856db38ad5f
> > Author: Sérgio M. Basto
> > Date: Wed Dec 14 11:38:33 2022 +
> >
> > we should restart vboxdrv just after
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 09:29 -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I couldn't find any existing reports of this, but it appears that
> > the Debian
> > Package Tracker isn't updating. For example, this package [1] that
> > got
> > accepted on
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 09:36 -0600, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m curious how Upstream Monitoring works; I got a BZ filed that
> Swift 5.7.2 is available, which I’m building now, but what surprised
> me was how fast the new version was detected and brought to my
> attention. Does it use The
posal will only be implemented if
> approved
> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Upgrade {{package|ImageMagick}} to the latest 7.x version.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Sergiomb| Sérgio Basto]],
> [[Use
Hi,
I how solved this ? [1]
Thank you
[1]
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6 && /usr/bin/cmake -E env
CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6/redhat-linux-build
DDNET_TEST_NO_LINK=1 /usr/bin/cargo build --release
Updating crates.io index
warning: spurious network error (2 tries
when this feature will be available on rpm package ?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1929#issuecomment-1340930999
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
is not well explained IMO it should have explicit write without-counterpart
doesn't work
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1929#issuecomment-1340930165
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
201 - 300 of 3743 matches
Mail list logo
