Postfix port installed?
$ pkg info|grep -i postfix
postfix-2.11.1_4,1 Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail
postfix-base-2.12.20140709_2,4 Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 10:40:18 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
...
Can you ping the maintainer?
...
I have sent him an email
ACK.
--
Sahil Tandon
rejects to src/global/mail_params.c.rej
*** Error code 1
Absent a new SPF patch (from mm@ or another volunteer) that cleanly
applies to the latest Postfix version, I will set the port BROKEN when
the SPF option is toggled.
Thanks for the report.
--
Sahil Tandon
have supported it.
Based on src/util/dict_db.c, the latest supported Berkeley DB major
version is 5.
--
Sahil Tandon
rolled out snapshot 20140507, to
which we will upgrade soon.
Thank you both.
--
Sahil Tandon
:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
transport_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/transport
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/243056
--
Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 03:31:13 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:49:20PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
We are experiencing a problem that seems to manifest *only* when
delivering to MXs that exhibit the SSL problem described by Viktor[1]
AND connection caching
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 23:57:41 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 03:31:13 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:49:20PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
We are experiencing a problem that seems to manifest *only* when
delivering to MXs that exhibit
dmarc_moderation_action and dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action
in Mailman rather than changing Postfix.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 18:40:39 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 14:55:49 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I'm getting local user unknown errors when I try to send email to the
list., but as far as I know, I shouldn't need local aliases
that Postfix
is made aware of valid Mailman addresses. In your follow-up, include the
output of 'postconf -n' rather than snippets from main.cf. See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-install/postfix-integration.html
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#alias_maps
--
Sahil Tandon
ahead and commit.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
not be immediately
clear. :)
Thanks!
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 21:56:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-03-30 21:20, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Some people have asked for TLS to be enabled by default in mail/postfix.
I have been reluctant in order to abide by POLA, and to be consistent
with how Wietse distributes Postfix upstream
, is output after you issue the following commands?
# ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/public{,/pickup}
and
# postfix check
--
Sahil Tandon
of the maildrop queue, pickup(8) sees the new
mail and passes it to cleanup(8), as logged below.
Mar 12 08:00:06 postfix/cleanup[21191]: 5B5A81E01ED:
message-id=20140312130006.5B5A81E01ED@localhost
Mar 12 08:00:06 postfix/qmgr[20944]: 5B5A81E01ED: from=m...@workdomain.com,
...
--
Sahil Tandon
/query-pr.cgi?pr=181994
--
Sahil Tandon
, won't it?
Yes, but remember that transport mapping occurs after address rewriting;
take care to accordingly specify the lookup keys in your transport
table.
--
Sahil Tandon
with the expected results, if you could do
the same and let us know how it goes, that would be great.
Thanks for the patch, which I will test and include in the next update
of the Postfix ports.
--
Sahil Tandon
pgpbB1SgedJc8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
The address horde@ points to has been bogus, it's not a new thing.
And yes, something should probably be done.
Did you, by chance, report this to postmas...@freebsd.org?
We'll look into it.
--
Sahil Tandon
pgptDpMUNgrfO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
years
ago. :-)
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
--
Sahil Tandon
a 550 or something else from postfix/smtp
--- Any ideas what I have done wrong?
[ .. ]
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders reject_unlisted_sender
Instead, try:
# main.cf
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders, reject
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 11:09:33 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
[ .. ]
Instead, try:
# main.cf
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/listed_senders, reject
To be clear, this will not help in your test case (but rather, only when
mail is received via smtpd) as Wietse points out.
--
Sahil
-users
*nod*
It seems the old link stopped working earlier this year; I remember
seeing a mention of this on the SA issues tracker and just found it:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6898
--
Sahil Tandon
to yes.
Correct.
So is it possible to make the installation fully automated, without any
ask ?
Set BATCH=yes.
--
Sahil Tandon
pgpR7N6ZrBbHI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
Use virtual alias mapping to direct mail for user{1,2}@domain.tld to
actual accounts. Then, implement a catch-all which maps *@domain.tld to
an address that, via transport(5), directs mail to the discard(8)
service.
--
Sahil Tandon
fine with LDAP SASL binding.
A different fix has been committed. Please let me know if the problem
persists.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 05:10:09 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
...
In our previous episode (Thursday, 11-Apr-2013), Sahil Tandon said:
As documented, Postfix uses the default Berkeley DB version that ships
with your system, which I am assuming is FreeBSD.
Yes, FreeBSD VeryOld-stable
) output. Or, you can disable
Berkeley DB support entirely by including -DNO_DB in CCARGS.
--
Sahil Tandon
fine with LDAP SASL binding.
Thanks for the report. The logic that handles LDAP SASL bindings was
tweaked when the Postfix ports were updated to use optionsNG. I will
commit a fix once the tree has unfrozen. Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Sahil Tandon
is for others who
might chance upon this chain in the archives, and prefer the alternative
(and IMHO more robust) approach.
--
Sahil Tandon
listed:
/hold-users:
us...@domain.com HOLD
us...@domain.com HOLD
...
The HOLD action affects all recipients; you can be more specific by
using the retry service. See the following thread:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/197989
--
Sahil Tandon
similar statistics. No promises that
it is error-free.
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~sahil/scripts/mailstats.py.txt
--
Sahil Tandon
if you have any
problems.
--
Sahil Tandon
pgpJmhcIpv61k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. Thanks.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/gmane.mail.postfix.user/148887
Read the entire thread before trying to implement the suggestion
solutions.
--
Sahil Tandon
Maildir delivery, use .forward files that
specify a destination mailbox name ending in '/'.
--
Sahil Tandon
this was resolved? Thanks.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 18:02:27 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
...
Obviously, this would result in a lot of pickles that are constantly
opened, edited (and, periodically cleansed), and closed. Is the
performance cost/benefit prohibitive?
Whether the cost is prohibitive
are trying to simultaneously manipulate the same pickle.
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http
the mailing list manager if this is already possible.
Thanks,
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http
, that
would do it. The goal is to check whether a tuple of (message-id,
listname) already exists in the dict and, if it does, raise
Errors.DiscardMessage; otherwise, add the tuple to the dict and do
nothing.
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 19:13:04 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:18:09AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
Some background: upon deinstall, unaltered files installed by a FreeBSD
package are supposed to be deleted. In the context of Postfix
Come
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:01:23 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Sahil Tandon postfix-users@postfix.org:
...
test -n `$POSTCONF -c $config_directory -n smtpd_relay_restrictions`
With this, the forward compatibility shim would only trigger
the FreeBSD port.
--
Sahil Tandon
for the delayed reply; I hope to be quicker in response to
any follow-ups.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
is that a _successful_ refresh probe
updates the timestamp of an address verification result; positive expire
time is measured from that revised timestamp.
--
Sahil Tandon
queue, use the retry service.
/path/to/main.cf:
transport_maps = hash:/path/to/transport
/path/to/transport:
mda.example.com retry:4.2.1 mda.example.com is temporarily disabled
--
Sahil Tandon
:
print('200 DUNNO')
--
Sahil Tandon
svn2cvs 2012-07-16 01:04:17 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
mail/postfix-current Makefile distinfo
Log:
SVN rev 300917 on 2012-07-16 00:47:06Z by sahil
Update to 2.10-20120715 and note an incompatible protocol
change in
sahil 2012-07-07 20:08:05 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
.MOVED
mail Makefile
Removed files:
mail/postfix25 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-install
pkg-message pkg-plist
by '.' only when the former
appears after the latter.
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
the best way to deal with situations like this is to wait for next
release, and from that point use DISTVERSION as appropriate.
+1
--
Sahil Tandon
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org
sahil 2012-06-10 18:58:16 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-postfwd Makefile
mail/postfix-postfwd/files postfwd.in
Log:
- Add OPTION to install postfwd v2 rather than v1 and
convert to new options framework.
- Revise the rc.d script[1]
sahil 2012-06-11 01:36:55 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
security/p5-Filter-Crypto Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.00
PR: ports/168638
Submitted by: Muhammad Moinur Rahman 5u623...@gmail.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +1
!
--
Sahil Tandon
Index: files/postfwd.in
===
RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/mail/postfix-postfwd/files/postfwd.in,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -u -r1.4 postfwd.in
--- files/postfwd.in14 Jan 2012 08:56:01 - 1.4
+++ files
method is unaware that the program is running.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
freebsd-rc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-rc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 00:03:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
On 02/06/12 17:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
...
I've separately engaged our DNS admins in case they could offer some
insight, but it would be interesting to learn if others are experiencing
the same issue /only/ with barracuda.
I see
the same issue /only/ with barracuda.
--
Sahil Tandon
-line code change has no performance
impact for other systems, and eliminates a high-frequency accept()
race on a shared socket that appears to cause trouble on FreeBSD. The
same single_server program driver has proven itself for many years in
smtpd(8). Problem reported by Sahil Tandon.
I've been
.
Thanks for any assistance. I've gone through the virtual and local
readmes, but I am not seeing the solution.
Can we see the output of 'postconf -n'? Absent additional information,
I guess you may find a clue in virtual(5) under TABLE SEARCH ORDER.
--
Sahil Tandon
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:19 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-current Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.10-20120520
Revision ChangesPath
1.278 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix-current/Makefile
1.208 +2 -2
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:21 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.9.3
Revision ChangesPath
1.181 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix/Makefile
1.127 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix/distinfo
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:25 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix27 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.7.10
Revision ChangesPath
1.178 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix27/Makefile
1.121 +4 -4 ports/mail/postfix27/distinfo
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:27 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix26 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.6.16
Revision ChangesPath
1.170 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix26/Makefile
1.119 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix26/distinfo
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:29 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix25 Makefile
Log:
Mark DEPRECATED and set EXPIRATION_DATE; encourage
users to upgrade to a newer release.
Revision ChangesPath
1.170 +3 -0
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:31 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-postfwd Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 1.32
PR: ports/167835
Submitted by: Thomas Vogt tho...@bsdunix.ch
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -1
sahil 2012-05-23 02:29:23 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix28 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.8.11
Revision ChangesPath
1.183 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix28/Makefile
1.128 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix28/distinfo
Just following up to close this discussion.
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:35:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: warning: psc_dnsbl_request:
connect to private/dnsblog service: Connection refused
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 last message
now running postscreen with '-v' and will report back if
the same scenario recurs.
--
Sahil Tandon
469
1609/18263 zen.spamhaus.org 5
UNIQ/TOTAL DNSWLDNSBL
2514/2520list.dnswl.org 510
0/6 swl.spamhaus.org 0
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from
[88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25
May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by
domain bl.spameatingmonkey.net
CONNECTs.
I could not find references to this issue in the archives, and I know
others manage much higher-volume sites, so I suspect it just indicates a
severely borked system (FreeBSD 8.3) on my side.
--
Sahil Tandon
just gets a 4xx after passing
the deep protocol tests. As per design, future connections are passed on
to smtpd(8) which then delivers the mail.
Please let me know if any other portions of the log or a full 'postconf
-n' (I'll just have to sanitize certain portions) would be useful.
--
Sahil
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:42 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-current Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.10-20120423
Revision ChangesPath
1.277 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix-current/Makefile
1.207 +2 -2
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:44 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.9.2
Revision ChangesPath
1.180 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix/Makefile
1.126 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix/distinfo
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:46 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix28 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.8.10
Revision ChangesPath
1.182 +1 -2 ports/mail/postfix28/Makefile
1.127 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix28/distinfo
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:48 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix27 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.7.9
Revision ChangesPath
1.177 +1 -2 ports/mail/postfix27/Makefile
1.120 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix27/distinfo
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:52 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
Add entry about recent Postfix upgrade; make
users aware of availabe workarounds for a TLS
issue introduced with OpenSSL version 1.0.1.
Revision ChangesPath
sahil 2012-04-25 02:44:50 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix26 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.6.15
Revision ChangesPath
1.169 +1 -3 ports/mail/postfix26/Makefile
1.118 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix26/distinfo
sahil 2012-04-23 03:14:53 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-current Makefile distinfo
Log:
Update to 2.10-20120422 and tweak conditional
that sets IS_INTERACTIVE.
Revision ChangesPath
1.276 +2 -2
sahil 2012-04-23 03:14:55 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix Makefile distinfo
mail/postfix28 Makefile distinfo
Log:
Update VDA patch and tweak the conditional that
sets IS_INTERACTIVE.
Revision ChangesPath
1.179 +3
)
35/220 reject (all server ports busy)
3/374 reject (too many connections)
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/224979
[2] http://people.freebsd.org/~sahil/scripts/mailstats.py.txt
--
Sahil Tandon
, to smtpd_reject_footer.
Another option is to extend smtpd_reject_footer's feature set,
so that
smtpd_reject_footer = \c Text to append
Will append the text without starting a new line. All other
smtpd_reject_footer features would work as before.
Elegant. +1 FWIW.
--
Sahil Tandon
. http://rob0.nodns4.us/howto/
--
Sahil Tandon
-test' into two distinct recipients 'gul+1' and
'gul+2'. Then, procmail should receive both copies of the message.
--
Sahil Tandon
parameter (which I had added
according to:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/277428)
might not be available any more. This parameter is no nonger valid?
...
Still used in the code; not documented. Most people should not have to
fiddle with this parameter.
--
Sahil Tandon
decides that me+xmpp and me+sms is the same user, and
leaves only one copy of the message.
Do you have logs of this occurring?
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local
delivery. Messages for me+sms goes
are in /usr/local/openldap/lib64 and belong to LTB v2.4.x
...
/usr/local/openldap/lib != /usr/local/openldap/lib64
--
Sahil Tandon
sahil 2012-03-10 04:11:39 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix-current Makefile distinfo
mail/postfix-current/files patch-makedefs
patch-src__util__sys_defs.h
Log:
- Update to 2.10-20120308
Feature safe: yes
sahil 2012-03-10 04:11:41 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
mail/postfix28 Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 2.8.9
Feature safe: yes
Revision ChangesPath
1.180 +1 -1 ports/mail/postfix28/Makefile
1.125 +2 -2
sahil 2012-03-10 04:11:43 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
devel/p5-Log-Handler Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 0.75
Feature safe: yes
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -1 ports/devel/p5-Log-Handler/Makefile
1.11 +2 -2
sahil 2012-03-10 04:11:45 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
security/p5-Filter-Crypto Makefile distinfo
Log:
- Update to 1.35
Feature safe: yes
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -3 ports/security/p5-Filter-Crypto/Makefile
1.16 +2 -2
='', but with the same above
outcome. Are there any other parameters to pass to disable debug?
...
DEBUG=
--
Sahil Tandon
sahil 2012-02-23 02:13:37 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
net/p5-Net-OAuth Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Log:
- Update to 0.28
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +4 -2 ports/net/p5-Net-OAuth/Makefile
1.19 +2 -2
discussion (and opposing viewpoints) on
freebsd-ports:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073267.html
--
Sahil Tandon
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 16:45:28 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:09:44AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Alexey, I appreciate your perspective on this, but I want to make
sure you are aware of the related discussion (and opposing
viewpoints) on freebsd-ports:
Yes
library numbers in
LIB_DEPENDS. For me, mi@ and dougb@'s arguments are more compelling
than yours.
--
Sahil Tandon
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to cvs-all-unsubscr
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 01:23:36 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:39:38PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 19:11:06 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
So far it seems that my assessments are not being counterargued with
valid technical points and facts
--
Sahil Tandon
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
1 - 100 of 1870 matches
Mail list logo
