On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 10:41, Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
> We are not disabling root access entirely, you can log on local console or
> use su after loging with a normal user.
>
>
So a lot of sites have set up that you remotely kickstart a system and then
ansible in as root with the rest of the
On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 09:23, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 10:31:48 -0400
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:48, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 15 May 2019 18:06:21 -0400
> > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
&
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:59, Chris Adams wrote:
> So, I don't have a handle on the whole modularity thing... still trying
> to understand what's what with that. But this caught my eye in your
> "Open Questions":
>
> - Some normally leaf packages like screen are inside of the Red Hat
> hidden
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:48, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 18:06:21 -0400
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > In trying to get resources allocated, I have been working on the
> > project plans for 8. The original one was at
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
May 2019 at 18:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> In trying to get resources allocated, I have been working on the project
> plans for 8. The original one was at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_2020/EPEL-8
>
> As of today an updated one is at
>
> https:/
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 01:51, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dear Jerry,
>
> Although I have no idea what xindy is, I enjoyed reading your analysis.
> Thx for your insightful post.
>
>
>
I want to say ++ to this. I have found every one of Mr James articles
explaining all the things he has done to work on,
In trying to get resources allocated, I have been working on the project
plans for 8. The original one was at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_2020/EPEL-8
As of today an updated one is at
https://smooge.fedorapeople.org/EPEL-8/
which I will translate to wiki for better editing this
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 07:11, wrote:
> Hi
>
> is it OK that i can see no traces of epel 8 on src.fedoraproject.org.
> if i assume a release date of 06.2019 i would expect to see some beta-code
> here.
>
>
I will update the release date as that is too optimistic now. Please join
the epel-devel
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 08:28, Bee.Lists wrote:
> Hi folks. Just wondering how I can implement an automatic .bash_profile
> for root. I have to load my user .bash_profile every time I get into root,
> and I would like a better solution. There is no /home/ for root, so I’m a
> bit confused if
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 23:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [...]
> > This is not a zero cost on our side to keep this going, and its benefits
> > are currently to 90 sy
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 16:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 18:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > With Fedora soon to no longer build for the PPC64 platform, the ability
> for
> > EPEL to continue support o
With Fedora soon to no longer build for the PPC64 platform, the ability for
EPEL to continue support of this platform is going to get much harder.
As such, it would be good to look at ending support for this platform in
our build system when RHEL-7.7 happens.
What could be done is the following:
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote:
> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
>
> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far
> less work to get out than a point-zero.
>
>
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:48, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-08 15:05, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark wrote:
>
> >>
> > Yep. Minimum for that is going to be about the same as your RESCUE. The
> > other would ju
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark wrote:
> Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I still use the following kickstart partition scheme for C7 installations
> > (via virt-install):
> > Briefly, fixed size for /root and /boot, and the rest is filled up for
> > /srv.
> >
> > The
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:00, wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-05-09 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 07:08, Peter wrote:
> On 8/05/19 12:22 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
The >> are from me.
> >> Many CentOS-7 packages will not install because they will need
> dependencies
> >> that the EL-6 does not have.
>
> Correct, and different versions of dependencies, and files go in
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 11:17, James Gamei wrote:
> Hi
>
> I’m looking for an older version of a package (specifically qt5-qtwebkit
> 5.6.1 for CentOS 7). Does anyone know if there is an archive like the
> CentOS vault for EPEL packages?
>
>
EPEL has been in the past built like a rawhide where
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 04:06, wuzhouhui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, I encountered a interesting phenomenon that CentOS 6.3
> running as normal even if I (my colleague, actually) installed a
> kernel that build for CentOS 7.x (e.g. kernel-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64.rpm).
>
> I found kernel is mismatch
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 09:26, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 5/6/19 1:40 PM, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
>
> > We found this bug before releasing, but it is not a release blocking bug
> (the upgrade criteria just cover clean n and n-1 upgrading to n+1 and this
> bug just happens whith continously
On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 15:26, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:22 AM David Howells wrote:
>
> > "umount /afs" or "systemctl stop afs.mount" will unmount the kafs (the
> > in-kernel afs filesystem) dynroot and all its automounts. Note that kafs
> > works differently to, say,
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 04:48, wrote:
> Can you give me a documentation?
>
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/playbooks_filters_ipaddr.html
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52291149/ansible-to-get-the-netmask-in-cidr
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:01, Sean wrote:
> Hello CentOS / RedHat / IBM folks!
>
> I am wondering if I can get a communication channel opened with
> someone who can affect changes win upstream RHEL? I don't have
>
File a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com.
> support accounts with RHEL, and use
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 07:01, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:10 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > And I think we have covered all the talking points from every previous
> argument.
> > For: We have been doing this since the early 1980's
&g
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 03:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 5/1/19 2:24 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> >>> On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 13:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
> systemd
> > >service (also
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 08:11, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral
> wrote:
>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:51, Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm co-maintaining a C++ library that has been continuously updated in
> CentOS 7 but a recent change made it incompatible with the default GCC
> version available in el7. I.e. the next release (scheduled for the end
> of 2019) will
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which
> would
> > > replace checks performed by
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 14:37, Doug wrote:
>
> On 04/28/2019 12:53 AM, Doug wrote:
> >
> > On 04/27/2019 09:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:18:40 -0400
> >> Doug wrote:
> >>> I have tried 4 or 5 times to install Centos 7,* and it seems to
> >>> install,
> >>> but it won't boot
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 01:22, wuzhouhui
wrote:
> > -Original Messages-
> > From: "Steven Tardy"
> > Sent Time: 2019-04-28 13:02:18 (Sunday)
> > To: "CentOS mailing list"
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Who is responsible to load NIC driver when boot up
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at
+1
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 16:12, Tim Flink wrote:
> It turns out that we've been getting rpmlintrc files from the cgit
> interface over dist-git which went away earlier this week. As a
> consequence, package-specific rpmlintrc files are not being used
> anymore.
>
> The fix itself is simple:
>
Thanks for the bump. I missed that this had not been reviewed.
Mizdebsk +1
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 23:51, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> bump - can we get some votes on this? I would vote but my vote doesn't
> count :)
>
> On 4/16/19 5:10 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > Problem: tag2distrepo fails to
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 20:01, Christopher
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:39 PM Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On 25/04/2019 19:29, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
> > > mailto:nicola
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 13:35, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 04. 19 18:38, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:27 AM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25. 04. 19 9:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>> Dne 24. 04. 19 v 23:04 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> Removed packages that would
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 04:23, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 à 16:14 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
> >
> > FWIW, things should *not* be getting harder. Some folks just jumped
> > the gun and made changes they weren't supposed to (yet) and now the
> > Modularity team has
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:30, Björn Persson wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >As mentioned before: systemd itself already needs entropy itself (it
> >assigns a random 128bit id to each service invocation, dubbed the
> >"invocation ID" of it, and it generates the machine ID and seeds its
>
don't have any
clues.. as far as I can tell it should have worked. Could you put a log
before the REJECT to see if something else stands out?
> Likun
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] 代表 Stephen John Smoogen
> 发送时间: 2019年4月24日 18:35
> 收件人: Cen
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 09:32, Andrew Holway wrote:
> > What OS are your k8s clusters running on? How about your cloud
> > providers? Mine are on RHEL and CentOS.
> >
>
> I don't know. We use fully managed services from Google. I think its
> coreOS.
>
>
>
If its old coreOS then it is a rebuild
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 08:26, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 24.04.19 06:40, Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > > As mentioned before: systemd itself already needs entropy itself (it
> > > assigns a random 128bit id to each service invocation, dubb
I am retitleing as I should have said what the patch was for and make sure
it had agreed upon subject FBR for filtering
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 07:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> This patch reorders two sections of nrpe files for datanommer so a 1:1
> comparison of entries ca
This patch reorders two sections of nrpe files for datanommer so a 1:1
comparison of entries can be done. It probably needs other fixes also and
may not be useful. Please review and let me know
Problem 1 is that nrpe.cfg in one place is a template and the other it is
not. They both need to be
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 06:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey,
>
> since the plan is to have some python3-... packages in RHEL proper, should
> we
> adapt the %python_provide macro to provide python3-... when it gets
> python36-...?
>
> %{python_provide python36-foo} currently does nothing.
> I
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 06:24, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 24.04.19 12:02, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos (n...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:23 AM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > Sure, you can invoke rngd before systemd, in which case it would have
> > > to be able to
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 06:01, likun wrote:
> Hi，guys.
>
> There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help
> me.
>
> I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days,
> disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very
>
Running.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 05:25, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Thanks, this is now pushed.
>
> Can someone run the groups/resultsdb.yml playbook ?
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:04, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 0
Looks good. +!
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 03:52, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently don't monitor that resultsdb sends messages on the bus.
> This patch will make nagios trigger an alert if we don't see a message
> in 2 days.
>
> +1s ?
>
> Thanks
> Clément
>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 02:48, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently resultsdb in production is not configured properly to send
> messages using fedora-messaging which in turns causes greenwave to not
> send messages (greenwaves publishes messages when it receives new
> results).
>
> The
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 12:50, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> It is not mentioned anywhere in the official packager documentation,
> but the modulemd format for packages includes a default[1] for the
> `ref:` attribute of RPM components. Essentially, if you leave the
> `ref:` out of the YAML, the
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 08:04, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 13:49, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 02:26, Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 17:30, Kevin Fenzi wrot
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 06:09, Sayan Chowdhury wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Autocloud[1] has been part of the early stages of the 2-week Atomic
> release process. AFAIK, it was built as a quick solution until
> taskotron was not ready. Autocloud has served us well but over the
> last year, we haven't
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 11:37, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:15 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On 4/16/19 11:43 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > Also, pertinent to the main topic... Any chance of getting a EL 8 test
>> > instance?
>>
>> I'd prefer not to put up a beta instance that
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:40, MRob wrote:
> I know there's a couple third party repos offering PHP 7 for Centos. I
> prefer not to add too much third party that I don't have to and PHP 7
> has been mainstream for some time now, I thought maybe it would be in
> EPEL by now.
>
>
EPEL tries not
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 14:15, Stefanie Leisestreichler <
stefanie.leisestreich...@peter-speer.de> wrote:
> Hi.
> I try to install openvpn at my centos 7 server (CentOS Linux release
> 7.6.1810 (Core)).
>
> According to many tutorials at the internet, I was using
> yum install epel-release -y to
Have reviewed. +1
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 14:15, Clement Verna
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found out that the freezelist script did not work with ansible
> 2.7.10. Once the script changed to use the new api, it complained
> about 2 non valid yaml file (errorsyntax error: found character
> '\t'
= Preamble =
The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow,
2019-04-18 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network.
We have a gobby document at
https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next
which can be edited for the
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:23, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:49 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers,
> > sorry for a slightly off-topic post, but I've noticed that a significant
> > number of posters is sending HTML e-mail to this list (not to
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 13:22, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Sérgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :
> >>>
> >>> I though it was just one person which decide orphan his 259 packages
> >>
> >>
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 15:10, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le dimanche 14 avril 2019 à 19:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to bootstrap all Golang packages to be able to detect
> > whatever cyclic
> > dependencies we have introduced over the years.
> > Basically
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 21:06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If devtoolset is available for EPEL6 (which I think it is?)
>
> I don't believe devtoolset was enabled for el6 in koji.
> When it was added to the mock configs for el6/el7, the
> consensus on the epel list was that it
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:04, Danny Smit wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in
> postgis-2.0.7-2.el7.
>
> However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618
= Preamble =
The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow,
2019-04-11 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network.
We have a gobby document at
https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next
which can be edited for the
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 13:13, Leon Fauster via CentOS
wrote:
> Am 10.04.2019 um 19:00 schrieb mark :
> >
>
> >> Thank you. Gonna roll with 6 for a few more years then.
> >>
> > As much as I *hate* systemd, you should be aware that C 6 is EOL next
> > year, and then there will be *no* updates to
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 11:44, Benjamin Smith
wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> > > I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have
> to do
> > > an OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 11:29, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> On 2019-04-10 5:06 a.m., Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> >> From looking at it quickly, it seems like you've updated the .spec for
> >> version 19.17 but have only uploaded sources for 19.16. > > If he's not
> the maintainer he probably doesn't
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:07, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya,
>
> today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new
> laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?)
> crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda
> again, just because I
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 17:01, Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
> I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do an
> OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server under
> my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to see if I can
>
Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC ,
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-04-10
Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC ,
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-04-10
Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC ,
which will last approximately 5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-04-10
Planned Outage - Fedora Staging/Proxies Updates/Reboots - 2019-04-09 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
Planned Outage - Fedora Staging/Proxies Updates/Reboots - 2019-04-09 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 04:12, Stelian Iancu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jyrki Tikka wrote:
...
> Hi,
>
> Many thanks for your answer. I did like you suggested and removed
> xapps. With it cinnamon got removed and a couple of other packages
> that I don't actually need (IT
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 13:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 4/5/19 10:34 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 13:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > So I was leaving the definitions vague as some build boxes are high
> > priority (no redundancy or major outage
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 06:09, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> I'm getting errors about soname bumps (I think) in epel7 branch:
>
> (only ppc64)
> 'nothing provides libmspack.so.0()(64bit) needed by wxGTK3-3.0.2-15.el7.ppc64'
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34024222
>
> (ppc64,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 13:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 4/5/19 8:59 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Clement brought up that spring cleaning of our ansible playbooks would
> > be a good idea. This is painfully obvious during our previous
> > update/reboot cycles wh
Clement brought up that spring cleaning of our ansible playbooks would
be a good idea. This is painfully obvious during our previous
update/reboot cycles where we have had services not updated or
restarted correctly so that systems did not come up well when we
rebooted.
I have opened
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 10:14, David Dykstra wrote:
>
> The Fedora fuse package currently builds rpms called fuse/fuse-libs and
> fuse3/fuse3-libs, the former for fuse-2 versions and the latter for
> fuse-3. The community I support has a need for fuse3/fuse3-libs on
> EPEL, so I would like to
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 04:01, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > Well, why can't we have LUKS1-encrypted /boot and enter the encryption
> > password by hand? That's still better than unencrypted /boot.
> >
> What's the point of encrypting /boot? All the executed bits from /boot
> (grub, kernel, and
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:17, Jay Greguske wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for download rates for specific bits of RPM content, is this the
> right forum to ask, or is there another group/name to direct this?
>
The answer would be "we don't know". The only information that yum/dnf
talk to us
The infrastructure team will be having its weekly meeting tomorrow,
2019-04-04 at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on the freenode network.
We have a gobby document at
https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next
which can be edited for the agenda (see:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 18:29, David Dykstra wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> singularity-3.1.1 was just released upstream, and I think it is at this
> point compatible enough with singularity-2 to upgrade it in EPEL6 and
> EPEL7. I have had singularity-3 releases in Fedora for over 3 months,
> but have been
+1
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 05:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> This just makes pagure accept to generate project-less API tokens
> with these two ACLs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon
> ---
> roles/distgit/pagure/templates/pagure.cfg | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff
Tomorrow's agenda:
Python34 -> 36 push
* Why so few testers?
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 14:00, wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Co on 2019-04-03 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
>At freenode@fedora-meeting
>
> The meeting will be about:
> This is the
+1
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 11:29, Randy Barlow wrote:
>
> FEDORA-CONTAINER-2019-3e42a55b54[0] references a container that has
> been deleted from the candidate registry. As a result, the compose has
> failed. Since the update is locked, it cannot be edited to replace it
> with a build that exists.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 11:27, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> > If you could make sure there aren't any links for 29_Beta and that the
> > 27 is pointing to archives that would be great.
>
> MirrorManager points to archive for primary and secondary architectures.
> From my point of view 27 can be
OKie dokie
+1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 14:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 3/30/19 11:20 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > I am a bit confused. You have 2 hosts on the 38.145.48.51 and 1 with
> > 209.132.184.157.. shouldn't they all be on the 38?
>
> Nope, because the f30
I am a bit confused. You have 2 hosts on the 38.145.48.51 and 1 with
209.132.184.157.. shouldn't they all be on the 38?
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I'd like to apply the following to ansible, then run maintainer-test
> playbook (not frozen) and then noc
+1
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 13:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 3/29/19 1:33 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 20:23 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 11:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>> On 3/11/19 12:26 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> This adds zchunk
+1
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 20:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> +1 here.
>
> I can apply and push it out if we get another +1.
>
> kevin
>
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
+1
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 06:48 Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Can I get +1s for the patch to the "dns" repo underneath?
> This should make "rabbitmq.fp.o" resolve to proxy101/proxy110 internally.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> diff --git a/fedoraproject.org.template b/fedoraproject.org.template
> index
What architectures are you using? 3.4 gb is a common failure size for 32
bit processors
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 19:55 Sindhuja Koneru
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone come across this Memory error? It occurs when running
> backup.yml script which is to backup DB and SECRET KEY.
> Script is
The lines broke in my email but if the real patch doesn’t have that problem
then I think it can be applied
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:50 AM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Core OS folks wanted to have a separate koji tag to build and tag their
> Core OS continuous builds. This has been discussed in the
+1 thanks
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1
>
> sorry we missed this.
>
> kevin
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
>
+1
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 13:42 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Back a long time ago we setup a repospanner cluster for our ansible
> repo. We used repospanner01, batcave01 and pagure01 in this cluster.
>
> However, there were some things that needed fixing up before we could
> use it, so we
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 09:39, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> same error !
>
No it is a different error. Your cert was used, but you can't ssh into
that server as it has no shells for users.
debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
Authenticated to pkgs.fedoraproject.org ([209.132.181.4]:22).
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 02:02, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Mohan filled MBS issue https://pagure.io/fm-orchestrator/issue/1184 and asked
> us to fix and deploy that during the freeze to unblock him. I therefore want
> to ask for +1 to deploy this small patch (already merged upstream):
>
+1 here
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:50, Rick Elrod wrote:
>
> +1 with saving the old ones off (and probably keeping them around until
> after freeze so we can revert if we notice something wrong but not right
> away).
>
> -re
>
> On 3/26/19 4:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'd like to reinstall
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 14:00, wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Co on 2019-03-27 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
>At freenode@fedora-meeting
>
I will not be able to run this meeting so would vote to cancel as Troy
and others are out also.
--
1101 - 1200 of 4485 matches
Mail list logo
