On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 8:51 AM Terry Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 3:45 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 7/19/23 09:52, Felix Huettner via discuss wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > i noticed that the latest release of the ovs library on pypi is for
> > > 2.17.1 [1]. Would it
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 3:45 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 7/19/23 09:52, Felix Huettner via discuss wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > i noticed that the latest release of the ovs library on pypi is for
> > 2.17.1 [1]. Would it be possible to pushlish newer versions of the ovs
> > python lib there
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:59 AM Terry Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:09 PM Han Zhou via discuss
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:26 AM Felix Huettner via discuss
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ilya,
> > >
> > > thank you for the detailed reply
> > >
> > > On Tue, May
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:09 PM Han Zhou via discuss
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:26 AM Felix Huettner via discuss
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > thank you for the detailed reply
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:25:49PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > > On 5/23/23 15:59, Felix
A performance issue that has always bothered me:
OVSDB has a set data type that matches up with Python's set data type (an
unordered collection of unique items). The in-tree Python library
represents this set type as a list. Not only does it do that, but every
time you call Row.__getattr__()
