https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114182
--- Comment #3 from Jan Dubiec ---
Wait a minute, shouldn't the conditions be opposite? I.e.:
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "__(?:gnu_)?divdc3" "optimized" { target {
large_double } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "__(?:gnu_)?divsc3"
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: h8300-elf
Excerpt from gcc.log:
[...]
Executing on host: /home/jdx/testgcc/builddir/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114182
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
Unfortunately, large_double does not work.
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: h8300-elf
Excerpt from gcc.sum:
[...]
PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: h8300-elf
Created attachment 57581
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: h8300-elf
Created attachment 57519
--> https://gcc.gnu.
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf
This is what happened when I tried to build rev. e58beedf for H8:
[...]
CC h8300
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113147
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Don't use `--disable-host-shared` basically.
OK, removal of this option seems to solve the problem, but... I had an
impression that the above set of options
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf, arm-elf
The following error occurs when I try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109289
--- Comment #6 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> Jan, do you actually experience a build failure? The part you quoted only
> shows warnings.
Florian, it used to be just the warnings, but now (commit 1461b431) I
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
CC: costas.argyris at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i686-w64-mingw32 @ Windows XP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109324
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
It seems that msp430-elf has similar problem:
build/genrecog.exe ../../../gcc/gcc/common.md
../../../gcc/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.md \
insn-conditions.md > tmp-recog.cc
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Target: h8300-elf
Unfortunately, I barely understand .md files, but I think genrecog is a bit
overzealous. It would be nice if thes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109293
--- Comment #9 from Jan Dubiec ---
I can confirm that now everything is fine on this issue on Windows/MingW.
: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Created attachment 54763
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 54759
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54759=edit
Proposed patch
For different hosts (Windows/MSYS2, Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109286
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
$ h8300-elf-as --version
GNU assembler (GNU Toolchain for Renesas H8 Family [Built by jdx]) 2.40
Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109286
--- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 54758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54758=edit
crtend.S
: inline-asm, internal-improvement
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf
Created
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf
Created attachment 54756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #13 from Jan Dubiec ---
I have applied the patch posted yesterday on PR108865 and everything seems to
be fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #12 from Jan Dubiec ---
Yes, there is such a snippet in gcc/Makefile.in but I have completely no idea
what you mean.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #10 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Can you change $(COMPILERS) to cc1 in gcc/config/i386/x-mingw32-utf8 and see
> if that helps?
I have changed it and I can confirm that genmodes.exe has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #8 from Jan Dubiec ---
Output of another important command:
$ uname -a
MINGW64_NT-10.0-19045 jdxpc 3.4.6.x86_64 2023-02-15 18:03 UTC x86_64 Msys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #7 from Jan Dubiec ---
Make version is 4.4.1 as comment #2 shows. Usually I call make from my bash
build script using "make 2>&1 | tee buildlog-gcc.txt", but I tried to build
native compiler by simply calling "make" from the bash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #5 from Jan Dubiec ---
I forgot to mention it in the first message – at least h8300-elf and mips-elf
are also affected. I have just even tried to build native compiler and,
strangely, it has the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #3 from Jan Dubiec ---
I have just finished painful "git bisect" and found the offending commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d11e088210a551235d3937f867ee1c8b19d02290.
However I do not know where the bug is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109166
--- Comment #5 from Jan Dubiec ---
I read that thread a few days ago and I understand concerns regarding SWP, in
particular on ARMv6 which has made SWP obsolete (AFAIR it is optional on
ARMv6-A/R, ARMv6-M has neither SWP nor LDREX/STREX).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
jdx@jdxpc MINGW64 /d/works/xcomp
$ make --version
GNU Make 4.4.1
Built for x86_64-pc-msys
Copyright (C) 1988-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109189
--- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec ---
BTW, it would be nice if someone experienced could inspect lines 1547–1553,
1572–1578 and 1751–1757 in that file. These ranges contain code which looks
like this:
case CONST_DOUBLE:
{
: internal-improvement
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf
Created attachment 54704
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: arm-eabi
I get the following error message when I try to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109166
--- Comment #3 from Jan Dubiec ---
I do not get what "but that requires more" means in this context.
Lets assume that two threads test and set the same memory location which
initial value is 0 ("unlocked"/"false"). Now, when the first thread
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: arm-eabi
For the following source code:
bool tas(unsigned char *ptr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
--- Comment #4 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 14734
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14734=edit
Preferred patch
This is my preferred patch. It uses load-time dynamic linking instead of
run-time dynamic linking,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
--- Comment #3 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 14733
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14733=edit
Proposed patch (Yoda style)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 14732
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14732=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30170
Jan Dubiec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
--- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec ---
*** Bug 30170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
I got the following error when I tried to build master (95ebc6fd
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
make[4]: Entering directory '/d/Works/xcomp/binutils-build/gold'
CXX archive.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108662
--- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 54410
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54410=edit
Proposed patch
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108644
--- Comment #7 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
[...]
> as sizeof returns size_t.
>
> Does that make sense now?
Yep, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108644
--- Comment #5 from Jan Dubiec ---
Andrew, as per your wish, preprocessed lto-plugin\lto-plugin.c is in the
attachment. It was produced using the following command:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc/lto-plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108644
--- Comment #4 from Jan Dubiec ---
Created attachment 54406
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54406=edit
Preprocessed lto-plugin\lto-plugin.c
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Build: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Below are three excerpts from my gcc's build log. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #21 from Jan Dubiec ---
Unfortunately, after recent changes compilation for H8 family ends with:
Making all in c++20
make[5]: Entering directory
'/d/Works/xcomp/gcc-build/h8300-elf/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20'
echo 'static const char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #19 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17)
> (but I still get the assembler errors for h8300-elf using
> latest binutils).
This is strange. I have just successfully built binutils edf64cd2 and then gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #18 from Jan Dubiec ---
Thanks Jonathan. I confirm – I have successfully built master (554bb9b6) for
both targets. Although I'm still using binutils 2.39, I haven't tried its
current master yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #13 from Jan Dubiec ---
FYI, Jonathan. This time the target is msp430-elf.
Making all in c++20
make[9]: Entering directory
'/d/Works/xcomp/gcc-build/msp430-elf/large/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag CXX --tag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #11 from Jan Dubiec ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Dubiec from comment #6)
> > Please note -mn -mint32 options –
> > normal mode (aka 16-bit mode) with 32-bit integers.
>
> Has this bizarre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #6 from Jan Dubiec ---
Jonathan, I am not sure to what part of the thread "above" refers to, but build
fails indeed. This time due to a different reason. This is what I got when I
was trying to build f7bd48c6. Please note -mn
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: h8300-elf
Build: x86_64-w64-mingw32
I get following
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #17 from Jan Dubiec ---
Thanks Jonathan. I have also applied g:7b79fa930917da735f02b4f6911dfbb0a91f9714
and finally successfully built libstdc++, however there is a bunch of warnings
for review. There are no assembler errors for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #15 from Jan Dubiec ---
I have applied the patch manually to 12.2 tree and this time got following
error message:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag CXX --tag disable-shared --mode=compile
/d/Works/xcomp/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #9 from Jan Dubiec ---
I think I have found why the static assertion fails as mentioned in my previous
comment. Surprisingly, for H8/300H, H8/S and H8/SX in normal mode 32-bit
integers and floats are aligned on 4-byte boundaries.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107878
--- Comment #2 from Jan Dubiec ---
One more thing – the documentation on the webpage states that -mn "must be used
either with -mh or -ms". It is true for old compilers (e.g. for gcc 4.7 which I
still use) but does not seem to be true for new
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
Documentation on
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/gcc/H8_002f300-Options.html is not
consistent with /gcc/config/h8300/h8300.opt.
E.g. -msx option is not mentioned on the webpage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #7 from Jan Dubiec ---
OK, I have applied the patch manually to my 12.2.0 tree and libstdc++ has been
partially build. "Partially" because everything seems to be fine for H8/300H,
H8S and H8SX in "advanced mode" (let's call it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #5 from jdx at o2 dot pl ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:691012693aaa831e4cd1ab5180195792e32baceb
>
&g
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jdx at o2 dot pl
Target Milestone: ---
I am trying to build under MingW64/Windows 10 the toolchain for H8 using
following steps:
1. build binutils and install
62 matches
Mail list logo
