[Bug c++/109688] SPDLOG build fails with C++20 and -DSPDLOG_USE_STD_FORMAT=1

2023-05-01 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109688 --- Comment #4 from Jamaika --- https://github.com/gabime/spdlog/blob/v1.x/example/example.cpp ``` for %%f in ("example.cpp") do g++.exe -v -std=gnu++20 -march=x86-64-v2 -ftree-vectorize -g0 -O3 -fPIC -mavx -mxsave -mpclmul -maes

[Bug c++/109688] SPDLOG build fails with C++20 and -DSPDLOG_USE_STD_FORMAT=1

2023-05-01 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109688 --- Comment #3 from Jamaika --- SPDLOG claims that MSVC compiles.

[Bug c++/109688] New: Build fail with C++20 and -DSPDLOG_USE_STD_FORMAT=1

2023-05-01 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109688 Bug ID: 109688 Summary: Build fail with C++20 and -DSPDLOG_USE_STD_FORMAT=1 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/109599] Query for merging files in ar.exe

2023-04-22 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109599 --- Comment #3 from Jamaika --- I'm not referring to the GCC 11.3.1 comment itself. I meant why the .a file automatically adds and compiles c files from the avx2 and sse2 directories that I have not added. I was surprised that ar.exe is not a

[Bug c/109599] New: Query for merging files in ar.exe

2023-04-22 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109599 Bug ID: 109599 Summary: Query for merging files in ar.exe Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/108334] Strange message in libgav1

2023-01-11 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108334 --- Comment #5 from Jamaika --- Created attachment 54247 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54247=edit Added zip files

[Bug tree-optimization/108334] Strange message in libgav1

2023-01-08 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108334 --- Comment #3 from Jamaika --- I add preprocessed source `cdef.o`.

[Bug tree-optimization/108334] Strange message in libgav1

2023-01-08 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108334 --- Comment #2 from Jamaika --- Created attachment 54212 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54212=edit preprocessed source

[Bug libstdc++/108326] Question about definitions in c++config.h for gcc13 20221229

2023-01-08 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108326 --- Comment #4 from Jamaika --- Here was my mistake. I tried adding c++config definitions to gcc 11.3.1 with _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS. Unfortunately many more features are changed to native Windows.

[Bug c++/108334] New: Strange message

2023-01-07 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108334 Bug ID: 108334 Summary: Strange message Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/108326] New: Question about definitions in c++config.h for gcc13 20221229

2023-01-06 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108326 Bug ID: 108326 Summary: Question about definitions in c++config.h for gcc13 20221229 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/108319] New: Problem with std::__cxx11::basic_string

2023-01-06 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108319 Bug ID: 108319 Summary: Problem with std::__cxx11::basic_string Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/108062] Test spdlog c++20 std::format

2022-12-12 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062 --- Comment #8 from Jamaika --- Thanks for tips std::formatter Something has improved. GCC notices that there isn't for TIFFFormat.cpp

[Bug libstdc++/108062] Test spdlog c++20 std::format

2022-12-12 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062 --- Comment #6 from Jamaika --- Thanks Jonathan Thanks for the quick fix of the given errors. I realize that there may be other errors not necessarily from gcc. Test new codecs HTJPEG2000 C++20 Grok with spdlog 1.11.0 for Windows 10 In file

[Bug libstdc++/108062] New: Test spdlog c++20 std::format

2022-12-11 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062 Bug ID: 108062 Summary: Test spdlog c++20 std::format Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c/107954] Support -std=c23/gnu23 as aliases of -std=c2x/gnu2x

2022-12-03 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107954 Jamaika changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-28 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #17 from Jamaika --- Testing atomic_wait, errors are still there. Thanks for taking up the topic. ``` In file included from c:\gcc1300\include\c++\13.0.0\mutex:60, from

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-28 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #12 from Jamaika --- with 'latch.h' ``` Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++.exe Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 Configured with: /home/ma/m/source/gcc-g/configure --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --disable-nls

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-28 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #11 from Jamaika --- without #define __cpp_lib_atomic_wait 201907L ``` Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++.exe Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 Configured with: /home/ma/m/source/gcc-g/configure --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-28 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #10 from Jamaika --- ``` Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++.exe Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 Configured with: /home/ma/m/source/gcc-g/configure --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --disable-nls

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-28 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #8 from Jamaika --- First lesson on the page https://www.modernescpp.com/index.php/latches-in-c-20 I use GCC from 11.3.1 to 13.0.0 20221124 ``` // workers.cpp #include #include #include #include std::latch workDone(6);

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-27 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #6 from Jamaika --- I don't understand something. Why _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS works for std::jthread but not for std::latch ``` #if defined _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS || defined _GLIBCXX_HAVE_LINUX_FUTEX # define __cpp_lib_atomic_wait

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-27 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #5 from Jamaika --- I test gcc 13.0.0. No change

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-27 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #4 from Jamaika --- I test gcc 13.0.0. No change

[Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20

2022-11-27 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 --- Comment #3 from Jamaika --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Also it might be the case mingw work is needed to support > __cpp_lib_atomic_wait and all. I test gcc 13.0.0. No change.

[Bug c++/107886] New: Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++2a

2022-11-27 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107886 Bug ID: 107886 Summary: Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++2a Product: gcc Version: 11.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/106962] How to create AOM codec in GCC 12.2 and newer under Windows 64bit?

2022-09-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106962 --- Comment #2 from Jamaika --- For the inquisitive. I am adding open source. GCC 1X.X.0 displays no errors. Can check. Copy include files to gcc 1X.X.0 and run with webp2_nosimd.bat https://www.sendspace.com/file/jqx6ol

[Bug c/106962] New: How to create AOM codec in GCC 12.2 and newer under Windows 64bit?

2022-09-17 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106962 Bug ID: 106962 Summary: How to create AOM codec in GCC 12.2 and newer under Windows 64bit? Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/104593] Problem with va_list

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104593 --- Comment #6 from Jamaika --- https://www.sendspace.com/file/e4n2xj echo off set PATH=C:\MSYS1201\bin;%PATH% rem echo %PATH% rem cd "C:\MSYS1201\bin" cd lib\CommonLib for %%f in ("%~dp1*.cpp") do g++.exe -std=gnu++14 -DNDEBUG

[Bug libstdc++/104592] Problem with std::basic_ostream

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104592 --- Comment #4 from Jamaika --- https://www.sendspace.com/file/ubncby echo off set PATH=C:\msys1201\bin;%PATH% rem echo %PATH% rem cd "C:\msys1201\bin" for %%f in ("%~dp1*.cpp") do g++.exe -std=gnu++14 -ftree-vectorize -g0 -O3 -fPIC

[Bug target/104593] Problem with va_list

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104593 --- Comment #4 from Jamaika --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Can you provide the preprocessed source? http://msystem.waw.pl/x265/mingw-gcc1201-20220206.7z

[Bug libstdc++/104592] Problem with std::basic_ostream

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104592 --- Comment #2 from Jamaika --- http://msystem.waw.pl/x265/mingw-gcc1201-20220206.7z

[Bug c++/104593] New: Problem with va_list

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104593 Bug ID: 104593 Summary: Problem with va_list Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/104592] New: Problem with std::basic_ostream

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104592 Bug ID: 104592 Summary: Problem with std::basic_ostream Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/104591] New: Problem with unary_function

2022-02-18 Thread lukaszcz18 at wp dot pl via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104591 Bug ID: 104591 Summary: Problem with unary_function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++