Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#discussion_r56587642
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -231,6 +232,210 @@ def intercept(self):
"""
return
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#discussion_r56587676
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py ---
@@ -223,3 +223,20 @@ def _call_java(self, name, *args):
sc = SparkContext._active_spark_context
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11621#discussion_r56587656
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -151,6 +151,209 @@ def intercept(self):
"""
return self._call_
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r56595822
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStreamCheckpointData.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ class DStreamCheckpointData[T
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r56595611
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStreamCheckpointData.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class DStreamCheckpointData[T
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10739#issuecomment-195090771
@levin-royl it looks like @hhbyyh has a branch with some code that tackles
the same issue (see the jira discussion for more information), you may want to
coordinate
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-195054258
@oliverpierson I was thinking that `relativeError` should be automatically
selected (and not exposed as a param). However, I am fine with exposing it for
the sake
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#issuecomment-194528019
@hhbyyh thanks! I just have some small comments; my main comment being in
the jira ticket regarding the choice of options 1/2/3.
---
If your project is set up
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#discussion_r55597240
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -569,9 +572,46 @@ class
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#discussion_r55595546
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -569,9 +572,46 @@ class
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#discussion_r55592623
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/SparkRWrappers.scala
---
@@ -17,15 +17,41 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.api.r
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#discussion_r55591400
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -51,13 +45,12 @@ setClass("PipelineModel", representation(model =
"jobj"))
#' summary(model)
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11549#discussion_r55563547
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/SparkRWrappers.scala
---
@@ -17,15 +17,41 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.api.r
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-193889292
If you use 0.0 for the relative error, it is going to return the exact
quantiles. However in this case, there will be no data compression and the
algorithm
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9522#issuecomment-193542005
@pravingadakh sorry for the delay. Would you mind resolving the conflicts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11332#issuecomment-187964822
LGTM, thanks @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821901
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/ApproxQuantileSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatSuite.scala ---
@@ -269,3 +291,41 @@ class DataFrameStatSuite extends QueryTest
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +30,312 @@ import
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821725
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +30,312 @@ import
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821685
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.sketch.{BloomFilter
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821749
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +30,312 @@ import
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821735
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +30,312 @@ import
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821700
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +30,312 @@ import
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#discussion_r53821676
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.sketch.{BloomFilter
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11325
[SPARK-6761][SQL][ML] Fixes to API and documentation of approximate
quantiles
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses the remaining comments from @mengxr
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#issuecomment-187774708
@mengxr thanks for the review, will do in another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6042#issuecomment-182958229
@viirya sorry I missed your email, I will look at your PR today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52201810
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ContinuousQuery.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,47 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52202089
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ContinuousQuery.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,47 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9535#discussion_r50163562
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10720#issuecomment-171778898
@sloth2012 this looks good to me, thanks for the fix.
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10146#issuecomment-170949938
@hhbyyh yes, option 3 sounds good.
A caveat, though, about the numbers you posted: micro benchmarks on the JVM
are very hard to get right, and a simple loop
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#discussion_r49143685
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -371,6 +378,103 @@ def test_fit_maximize_metric(self):
self.assertEqual(1.0, bestModelMetric, "
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#discussion_r49143733
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -371,6 +378,103 @@ def test_fit_maximize_metric(self):
self.assertEqual(1.0, bestModelMetric, "
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10186#issuecomment-169840549
LGTM cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49140159
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -38,13 +38,116 @@
from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10150#discussion_r49140117
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -38,13 +38,116 @@
from pyspark.mllib.util import Saveable, Loader, inherit_doc, JavaLoader
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r49139498
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ trait
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r49140273
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -130,15 +133,21 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.1,
maxPatternLength=10, maxLocalProjDBSize=320
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r49140295
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/recommendation.py ---
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ def train(cls, ratings, rank, iterations=5,
lambda_=0.01, blocks=-1, nonnegative
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169828910
@srowen I am confused, did you send me this message for this PR? It somehow
does not show up in github, and I do not see the jenkins run that failed
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#issuecomment-169830444
@vijaykiran thanks for the style fixes.
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#discussion_r48993085
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/BinaryClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -79,13 +79,14 @@ class
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#discussion_r48993376
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/SchemaUtils.scala
---
@@ -44,6 +44,23 @@ private[spark] object SchemaUtils
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-169418377
@BenFradet thanks! Just a small comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10323#issuecomment-169425244
@ericl this looks great, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r48983200
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ trait
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r48983231
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ trait
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169396527
@srowen thanks a lot for the cleanup! Just two comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r48983461
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ abstract class QueryTest extends PlanTest {
val
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r48983495
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ abstract class QueryTest extends PlanTest {
val
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169506325
@BryanCutler it looks great, thanks!
One overall comment about the seeds: it is unclear what `None` means, and
it has a different behavior between `spark.ml
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#discussion_r49028171
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -774,17 +843,32 @@ def train(cls, rdd, k=10, maxIterations=20,
docConcentration=-1.0
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-169483754
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169483568
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9907#discussion_r49002581
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -109,4 +109,55 @@ class RegressionMetricsSuite
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9907#issuecomment-169444237
@Lewuathe thanks for your patch. I think it will require more work in
`RegressionMetrics` to fully implement weighted metrics. We need to do the
following changes
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-169449477
cc @jkbradley
@srowen I have some concerns about the number of files being touched by
this PR, it may be hard to merge without an ever-present conflict
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9907#discussion_r49000659
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -39,16 +51,17 @@ class RegressionMetrics @Since("
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9907#discussion_r49002633
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -109,4 +109,55 @@ class RegressionMetricsSuite
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9986#discussion_r48880089
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ def train(cls, rdd, k, convergenceTol=1e-3,
maxIterations=100, seed=None, initia
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#discussion_r48919311
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/MLUtils.scala ---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ object MLUtils {
val indicesLength
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190994
@robert-dodier thanks for your PR. Can you please fix the style issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9535#issuecomment-168861235
@yu-iskw thanks for fixing this issue. It looks good to me, but can you
please resolve the conflicts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10158#issuecomment-168863404
@vectorijk thanks for the PR, it looks good to me. cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10146#issuecomment-168867750
@hhbyyh thanks for the fix; I just have one small comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9807#issuecomment-168862678
This looks good to me. cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10146#discussion_r48805286
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSqTest.scala ---
@@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ private[stat] object ChiSqTest extends Logging
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10415#issuecomment-168859502
@rnowling thanks for fixing this, I just have some style comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10415#discussion_r48802820
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -353,6 +356,7 @@ class KMeans private (
((r
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10415#discussion_r48802864
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -324,6 +326,7 @@ class KMeans private (
s0
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10235#issuecomment-165206222
This looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47720994
--- Diff: docs/_layouts/global.html ---
@@ -128,19 +128,31 @@
{% if page.url contains "/ml" %}
{% i
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47721217
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -171,24 +202,104 @@ a.anchorjs-link:hover { text-decoration: none; }
* The left navigation bar
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47721302
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -39,13 +39,26 @@
margin-left: 10px;
}
+/*
body .container-wrapper {
position: absolute
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47721444
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -171,24 +202,104 @@ a.anchorjs-link:hover { text-decoration: none; }
* The left navigation bar
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47721419
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -171,24 +202,104 @@ a.anchorjs-link:hover { text-decoration: none; }
* The left navigation bar
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47727256
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -101,6 +98,26 @@ a:hover code {
max-width: 914px;
}
+.content {
+ z-index: 1;
+ position
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#discussion_r47727246
--- Diff: docs/css/main.css ---
@@ -101,6 +98,26 @@ a:hover code {
max-width: 914px;
}
+.content {
+ z-index: 1;
+ position
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297
[SPARK-12324][MLLIB][DOC] Fixes the sidebar in the ML documentation
This fixes the sidebar, using a pure CSS mechanism to hide it when the
browser's viewport is too narrow.
Credit goes
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10297#issuecomment-164556778
@jkbradley can you take a look at this fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234#issuecomment-163723975
@jkbradley done:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/7594753/11725710/e9949f04-9f2f-11e5-8ba5-7f955e8b41fa.png;>
---
If your project is set
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234#issuecomment-163713115
@jkbradley done with changes, let me know what you think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234#discussion_r47262597
--- Diff: docs/mllib-feature-extraction.md ---
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
layout: global
-title: Feature Extraction and Transformation - MLlib
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234#discussion_r47262584
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ displayTitle: Classification and regression in spark.ml
* This will become
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234
[SPARK-12212][ML][DOC] Clarifies the difference between spark.ml,
spark.mllib and mllib in the documentation.
Replaces a number of occurences of `MLlib` in the documentation that were
meant
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10234#issuecomment-163455399
@jkbradley I agree with you. Note that when you use the doc, the current
section appears in bold in the side menu (and the submenu gets expandend). This
is why I did
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207
[SPARK-8517][MLLIB][DOC] Reorganizes the spark.ml user guide
This PR moves pieces of the spark.ml user guide to reflect suggestions in
SPARK-8517. It does not introduce new content, as requested
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207#issuecomment-163009350
@jkbradley no this PR just moves the text around, with little modification.
More substantital changes will be done later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207#discussion_r47043656
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,762 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Classification and regression - spark.ml
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207#discussion_r47018195
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,733 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Classification and regression - spark.ml
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207#discussion_r47018213
--- Diff: docs/_data/menu-ml.yaml ---
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-- text: Feature extraction, transformation, and selection
+- text: "Overview: estim
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10207#discussion_r47017809
--- Diff: docs/mllib-guide.md ---
@@ -66,15 +66,18 @@ We list major functionality from both below, with links
to detailed guides.
# spark.ml
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10048
[SPARK-12000] Fixes compilation issues with java8 and sbt.
Currently, trying to publish spark locally fails when java version is >=
1.8.0:
- a javadoc option has been removed
- java
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10048#discussion_r46210267
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -155,13 +155,15 @@ object SparkBuild extends PomBuild {
if (major.toInt >= 1 && minor.toIn
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826#issuecomment-158541369
@mengxr comment addressed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826#issuecomment-158169615
@mengxr with the fixes, the top menu breaks before the side menu :-)
