Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826#issuecomment-158229760
@mengxr based on our discussions, here is a slightly updated version:
- menu is fixed
- menu disappears under the page (but it looks half covered
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826#issuecomment-158220169
@andrewor14 this is a different issue: the SIPs show the table of contents
within one document, which we already have with the `{:toc}` directive. This PR
adds
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826
[SPARK-11835] Adds a sidebar menu to MLlib's documentation
This PR adds a sidebar menu when browsing the user guide of MLlib. It uses
a YAML file to describe the structure of the documentation
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697#issuecomment-157523631
Thank you @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697#discussion_r44972401
--- Diff:
tools/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/tools/GenerateMIMAIgnore.scala ---
@@ -72,7 +72,10 @@ object GenerateMIMAIgnore {
val
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697#discussion_r44972207
--- Diff:
tools/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/tools/GenerateMIMAIgnore.scala ---
@@ -72,7 +72,10 @@ object GenerateMIMAIgnore {
val
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697#issuecomment-157149737
@srowen sorry the delay. comments addressed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697
[SPARK-11732] Removes some MiMa false positives
This adds an extra filter for private or protected classes. We only filter
for package private right now.
You can merge this pull request
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9697#issuecomment-156507620
cc @pwendell @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1929#issuecomment-52208640
I believe @mateiz is concerned about compatibility with other scala 2.10.x
versions. We would have to make sure this works for all supported scala
versions
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1929#discussion_r16207973
--- Diff: repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkIMain.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
private var
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1674#issuecomment-50790820
Thanks Matei!
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Matei Zaharia notificati...@github.com
wrote:
Alright, merged this. Thanks!
รข
GitHub user thunterdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1674
SparkILoop - simplify recovery procedure
This pull request is a small refactor so that a partial function (hence a
closure) is not created. Instead, a regular function is used. The behavior
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1674#discussion_r15618694
--- Diff: repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala ---
@@ -557,29 +557,27 @@ class SparkILoop(in0: Option[BufferedReader],
protected val
301 - 314 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
