-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:40:20 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
The X needs a real ip address but otherwise the patch should work.
ack with what Smooge said
On 2 September 2014 10:30, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:26:56 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
+1 from me.
I'd really like us to apply this when lots of folks are around so we
can make sure and test everything it touches to make sure nothing was
broken.
kevin
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:03:41 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a lot of old apprentice accounts with old data in it.
Cleaning out these accounts would lower our disk usage and hopefully
drop the number of 'we ran out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:53:06 +0200
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Le 28/08/2014 23:26, Dennis Gilmore a écrit :
Hi All,
Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta, as of a few hours
ago builds require bodhi updates to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:15:08 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:09:43 -0600
Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote:
I submitted a pull request to bodhi to get things working with the
new EPEL7 tagging schema. I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta, as of a few hours ago
builds require bodhi updates to get pushed out. you can now me sure
that all packages are signed. we are cleaning up the broken deps in the
repo and moving everything that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:42:36 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
Good morning everyone,
I just manually hotfix pkgdb2 for this fix:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/commit/e5ca8bcb2a1b8fed2a68c50ed959f3ed0a654dd1
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:47:02 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
As the Fedora 21 schedule[1] states the Alpha change freeze is upon
us and we have a confidence in delivering RC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:47:02 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
As the Fedora 21 schedule[1] states the Alpha change freeze is upon
us and we have a confidence in delivering RC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
As the Fedora 21 schedule[1] states the Alpha change freeze is upon
us and we have a confidence in delivering RC composes. As we are now at
the change freeze bodhi will be enabled for f21 tomorrow morning US
Time. It means all builds will now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
As the Fedora 21 schedule[1] states the Alpha change freeze is upon
us and we have a confidence in delivering RC composes. As we are now at
the change freeze bodhi will be enabled for f21 tomorrow morning US
Time. It means all builds will now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:02:23 -0400 (EDT)
Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
- Original Message -
As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
snip
(a) The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:44:01 -0500
Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
The attached patch has been working well in the development of
Scientific Linux 7. Since the attached patch allows for overriding a
hard coded value, I'm hopeful that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:37:58 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:30:01 +0200
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
I have applied patches 1-4 there is alread a ppc64le
worry about or file a report
against? Thanks,
Dave
If you have fixed it then it should be fine. if its repeatable then you
should look into whats broken and file bugs as appropriate
Dennis
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:35:47 -0400 (EDT)
Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
To: David Gay d...@redhat.com
Cc: Fedora Infrastructure
infrastructure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:20:31 -0400
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 08/19/2014 08:43 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
First, I have gotten tigervnc-server working on the Fedora20 remix
for my cubieboard2, so I have the steps down. At
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:18:29 -0400
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have a couple SATA drives I would like to test booting from. Is
there anything special I need to do, or can I 'just' attach with a
USB/SATA adapter, run the install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
David Gay d...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
As per our cloud meeting today, here are the credentials I need in
order to work with Rackspace, GCE, and HP, as far as I know:
Rackspace: user, API key
GCE:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5962
that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 and 22 of all archful packages
This is due to an ABI issue on s390/x and some gcc issues.
we will start the mass rebuild on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5962
that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 and 22 of all archful packages
This is due to an ABI issue on s390/x and some gcc issues.
we will start the mass rebuild on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:43:07 -0400
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 08/14/2014 09:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Gordan Bobic wrote:
You could just mount tmpfs on /tmp. Then you can be sure it gets
cleared by
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:49:14 +0200
Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
Orion built zabbix22 (2.2.5) in EPEL 7 yesterday.
Volker
Hi Volker,
I just wanted to test the packages, but the zabbix22 rpms are not
signed. Could you please push signed rpms?
Thx a lot for
Hi all,
The default environment for the wandboard does not specify the speed
for the console. I have an open bug in Fedora[1] I am curious if there
was a particular reason why the speed is not set, or if i should just
send in a patch to change it? I really do not want to carry a patch
around
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:00:43 -0300
Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
Hi all,
The default environment for the wandboard does not specify the speed
for the console. I have an open bug in Fedora[1] I am curious
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:33:43 -0300
Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
must have changed recentlyish we are using 2014.04 and it's
console=ttymxc0 im in the process of updating to 2014.10 so i
guess its a non
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:05:07 +0200
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop on what was labeled
EPEL.Next. At that we went over a bit of what EPEL has done in the
past, what its current challenges are, and what could be its future.
Toshio
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:29:02 +0200
Jeroen Hofstee jer...@myspectrum.nl wrote:
Hello Stephan,
On 11-08-14 20:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
snip
No, Linux distros need to be able to install a single bootloader
configuration file to tell the bootloader how to boot.
Don't understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:41:07 -0400
Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got F21 branched installed on an alternate partition on
my system, and I noticed this nonsense. On F21 I get this:
enp5s0: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:01:09 -0600
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 07/30/2014 04:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
This generic $bootcmd, and associated support macros, automatically
searches a defined set of storage devices (or network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:33:07 +0200
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
---
src/fedpkg/__init__.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/fedpkg/__init__.py b/src/fedpkg/__init__.py
index 0837120..9f2ce49 100644
---
: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
This generic $bootcmd, and associated support macros,
automatically searches a defined set of storage devices (or
network protocols) for an extlinux configuration file or U-Boot
boot script in various standardized locations. Distros that
install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:20:19 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/31/2014 02:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:16:00 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/30/2014 10:48 AM
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:57:31 -0600
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/01/2014 01:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Automatic booting using an extlinux.conf file requires various
environment variables to be set.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
I'd personally be
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:22:40 -0600
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/01/2014 02:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:57:31 -0600
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/01/2014 01:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Automatic booting using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:16:00 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/30/2014 10:48 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Dennis et al,
As you may have heard Ian Campbell and I have become u-boot
custodians for sunxi boards.
I'm in Brno all week. Early morning us would work best
On Jul 29, 2014 10:36 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Is there a good time for us to sync on infrHi Dennis,
Is there a good time for us to sync on infra issues for Atomic this Thursday or
Friday? Most important
Should be good for me.
On Jul 29, 2014 10:51 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
Colin, Dennis - can you do Friday 9 a.m. Eastern?
BestColin, Dennis - can you do Friday 9 a.m. Eastern?
Best,
jzb
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Gilmore dgilm...@redhat.com
To: Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:23:46 -0400
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
OK. Some more information. I should have read the known issues that
video was not supported yet and not waste time when I forgot my
console serial usb adapter.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:48:20 +0200
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Looking at
http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-21/f-21-releng-tasks.html
I could not guess from this document when packages for F21 will be
signed. When it will happen?
I'm asking because of
Hi all,
per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Create_release_signing_key#Web_team_SOP I
am sending this email to get the f21 and f22 gpg keys added to
https://fedoraproject.org/keys
the keys can be found at
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-repos.git/tree/?h=f21
Thanks
Dennis
--
websites
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
.src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
Currently this involves completely building a mock buildroot
containing all the BuildRequires, and
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:58:49 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a
.src.rpm file is built from the git repo.
Currently this involves
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:42:00 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
yum update
...
Package fedora-kickstarts-0.21.7-1.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
I guess, it doesn't need bzz?
Its known and expected, we can not guarantee that everything is signed
until we enable bodhi for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:58:54 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 19:50:59 +0200,
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
After 21 gets released, due to the use of 'updates-testing', do we
need to yum
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 10:12:45 +0100
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
When it finished, I popped it out and re-inserted it so that it
would mount the partitions. I read the instructions for the
CubieTruck on the ARM Rawhide Installation page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Fedora 21 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to
pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f22 has had
inheritance cut off from previous releases, so this means that
anything you do for f21 you also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:45:50 -0500
Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
On 07/02/2014 02:40 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 11:21:13 -0500
Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:00:48 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote:
Good afternoon,
For those using rawhide there is a bug in rpm which will prevent
further updates (arch detection will be 'arm' vs 'armhfp'). This can
be resolved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:35:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:04 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Why?
My understanding of the process as it exists:
Download drpm.
Take drpm contents + old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:01:04 -0500
Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Personally I would just say don't make delta-rpms for i386 and arm
or just have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 05:05:36 -0700
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014, at 01:49 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The issue is we are trying to build one image to run in all clouds,
so cloud provider specific tools are out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:19:55 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
f20:
*filelists.sqlite.bz2 3.5 M
*filelists.xml.gz 3.3 M
*primary.sqlite.bz22.7 M
*primary.xml.gz1.3 M
*other.sqlite.bz2
In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf update
purely because I found most of the time dnfs metadata was out of date. To me
dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work right. But I'm
not sure that me or rawhide fits into the experience dnf is
++---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 71
insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Series:
Tested-by Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
These are needed to allow X to just work on arm platforms for Fedora.
Other distros will have the same issue with X not starting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:20:05 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@google.com wrote:
Hi Renich,
I'd like to volunteer with this project of building an official Fedora
image for GCE.
Right now I have an image that I use for myself, I built it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:15:03 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really
close to the time when we _need_ it. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110764... as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:55:02 -0500
Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really
close to the time when we _need_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:26:19 -0500
Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
we build all images for Fedora in koji using imagefactory/oz, your
best bet is to take
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:54:09 -0400
Mark C. Allman mcall...@allmanpc.com wrote:
Where is the documentation for upgrading to a newer kernel once you
have a server set up and running? You can't just run yum upgrade
or dnf upgrade. I've googled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:52:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
* package 'dnf-yum-compat-command' is installed by default. It
obsoletes Yum and provides its own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:37:32 -0400
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:40:45PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:52:34 -0400
Matthew Miller mat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 15:35:24 +0200
Pavel Zhukov pavel.y.zhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Ada support has been added to Fedora's GCC. This is good news.
For some reasons koji passes
armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnu as target in configure option and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:48:10 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:01:19 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:39:00 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Of the ones I know about ...
avgtime
Written in the 'D' language which doesn't have support for ARM
upstream.
grub2
ARM (32 bit) boots using u-boot.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:39:00 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Of the ones I know about ...
avgtime
Written in the 'D' language which doesn't have support for ARM
upstream.
grub2
ARM (32 bit) boots using u-boot.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:49:05 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:03:35 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:07:23AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 20:01:19 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I resolved the issue with ODB not building with gcc 4.9, but it
appears that there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:48:36 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:22:57PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a Fedora 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:43:37 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a local problem, but currently I'm unable
to upload the SRPM to do a scratch build:
$ fedpkg srpm
Wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-need-rebuild.html
Mass rebuild stopped ? or script stopped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400
Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon.
If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS,
or is it too late to remove the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:00:49 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Just in case anyone was wondering - I've rejected today's Rawhide
report mail because it's 3MB(!) in size, which is a bit crazy. I
believe it's due to fallout from the
... there is a
very large number of failures[1]. There seems to be a very large number
of java and ruby failures. so people interested in those stacks please
get onto them and fix them quickly
Regards,
Dennis
[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 08:51:06 -0500
Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
commit 179a6239a08721c7591dbfe1d7120fa0038ea8cf
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 01:15:54 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Lingua-Preferred.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 4254f00080bcdae9661d254c5164a471ee5465cf
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 01:32:09 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Log-TraceMessages.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions
commit 29dfcdf6504e82789ec65fdc1b7a2be2cf059ebc
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 02:50:53 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Net-CIDR.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 5481b18e4bb8f90ffea5561869a272ce26ddda50
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 03:53:38 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-PatchReader.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 6e3f923a095475d3ace725512c3d05b96a8a15c4
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 04:52:32 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Socket-GetAddrInfo.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions
commit 6a264f9620c59a69287adc4e1aa02ec13c9ce176
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 06:07:26 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Test-Refcount.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit c8e6c4804830a31d245a365da6a91e0d09658639
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 06:54:09 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Tk-TableMatrix.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit f60336a0bfee71253653efd267f4df7f51cfb6ef
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Sat Jun 7 07:36:38 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-XML-Writer.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the
mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at
commit d973bad3d7b74b651f7e819bf3898900d94755c5
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Fri Jun 6 19:17:10 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-AnyEvent.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 6d909a1802df621a9aa4c9dada9da13177603264
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Fri Jun 6 23:58:36 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Guard.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 6e3bba25ff83079117dc24723f7323257f871336
Author: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Fri Jun 6 18:28:23 2014 -0500
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
paktype-naskh-basic-fonts.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions
as we publish the raw files on the mirrors we want to be able to request
xz compressed versions of theraw image.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
---
builder/kojid| 25 -
cli/koji | 4 ++--
docs/schema-upgrade-1.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:27:58 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Createrepo in rawhide now has parallel drpm creation, this patch
should hopefully enable it in mash (with 8 workers).
Note that it's missing a createrepo version check right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:44:54 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
This came up in a different venue and pingou and I have continued to
talk about it. Seemed that this was the right place to bring the
discussion though.
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 31 May 2014 12:53:21 -0400
Gene Czarcinski gczarcin...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, it is a bit difficult to do any testing which involves
doing an install.
First, the gui is broken because of a gtk3 problem so you cannot do a
gui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 May 2014 15:41:55 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
Are we going to stay with 2014.04, or are we going to move to
2014.07 ?
The main reason I'm asking is because of Allwinner support. Currently
we (the linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 May 2014 13:13:19 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
So, I wish we'd noticed this sooner, but hacking at the release
criteria today I happened to notice a bit of a problem in the Fedora
Server product planning.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:35:20 -0500
Mark Hamzy ha...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Add support for the ppc64le architecture in mash.
---
mash/arch.py | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mash/arch.py b/mash/arch.py
index a2b0f79..cbeb24b
moving the workdir is needed as /tmp can be quite small with /tmp on tmpfs
Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
---
builder/kojid | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builder/kojid b/builder/kojid
index f101e0f..14309bb 100755
--- a/builder/kojid
+++ b
901 - 1000 of 10959 matches
Mail list logo
