The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 17329982ba66139c1f4de96bb42d76f4b32e4ac4
Author: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Date: Wed Aug 4 14:47:29 2010 +0200
Do not use lsb_release to determine the distribution, add a a static
assignment
Closes
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit d00ff096cc092719092a886f023d168d48badd6d
Author: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Date: Wed Aug 4 15:48:26 2010 +0200
Do not return error if /etc/dkms/framework.conf is missing (LP: #613407)
Thanks: pasadrul
: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2074-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 21, 2010
: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page
tags 589784 wontfix
thanks
On 07/21/2010 05:24 AM, Vincent Blut wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: SRWare Iron
Version : 5.0.381
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.srware.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++, Assembly
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu chromium-browser_5.0.375.99~r51029-4 . i386 amd64 . -m Rebuild against
libv8 = 2.2.24-2
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
tags 589784 wontfix
thanks
On 07/21/2010 05:24 AM, Vincent Blut wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: SRWare Iron
Version : 5.0.381
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.srware.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++, Assembly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2074-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 21, 2010
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu chromium-browser_5.0.375.99~r51029-4 . i386 amd64 . -m Rebuild against
libv8 = 2.2.24-2
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2072-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 19, 2010
Author: iuculano
Date: 2010-07-19 13:15:44 + (Mon, 19 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 15001
Modified:
data/CVE/list
data/embedded-code-copies
Log:
CVE-2010-2713 fixed in vte 1:0.24.3-1
CVE-2010-2249 and CVE-2010-1205: tuxonice-userui was binNMUed
CVE-2010-2244: fixed in avahi 0.6.26-1
webkit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2072-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 19, 2010
Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
libpng12-0 - PNG library - runtime
libpng12-0-udeb - PNG library - minimal runtime library (udeb)
libpng12-dev - PNG library - development
libpng3- PNG library - runtime
Closes: 587670
Changes:
libpng
tags 589468 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On 07/18/2010 01:30 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
chromium doesn't alert even if user see some phishing sites.
step to rerproduce)
On 06/25/2010 07:44 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
While a given page is loading, the favicon in the tab bar turns into a
flickery blue square.
I only started noticing this recently, but even version
5.0.342.9~r43360-1 displays the same problem. Looks like my
expectations increased.
On 07/18/2010 03:12 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Maybe my ~/.config/chromium/Safe Browsing Bloom* is not updated somehow.
What's the output of ls -la ~/.config/chromium/Safe* ?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/18/2010 03:32 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
henr...@babytalk:~/.config/chromium$ ls -al Safe\ Browsing\ Bloom*
-rw-r--r-- 1 henrich henrich 19012608 2010-07-18 21:28 Safe Browsing Bloom
-rw--- 1 henrich henrich 1425253 2010-06-04 01:40 Safe Browsing Bloom
Filter 2
Can I force to
On 07/18/2010 05:35 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I assume the patch from upstream will work.
Over the last three days I almost[1] have the chromium package built for the
first time (this computer is not very fast) so hopefully I should be
able to start writing and testing patches soon.
I
On 07/18/2010 05:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
I already committed[1] the fix.
Nice. By the way, is there a simple way to rebuild the package after
making a small code change?
I tried “rm debian/stamp-makefile-build” a couple of days ago and the next
“debian
Package: libv8-dev
Version: 2.2.18-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
chromium 6.x requires v8-profiler.h, please install it in the -dev package.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
On 07/17/2010 03:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
You should not specify a `Pre-Depends' entry for a package before this
has been discussed on the `debian-devel' mailing list and a consensus
about doing that has been reached.
Did you do that?
No I didn't, I'm doing that now.
dkms
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
dkms - Dynamic Kernel Module Support Framework
Closes: 586356 586724 588585 589308
Changes:
dkms (2.1.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* [f649aa1] Added coreutils = 7.4 in Depends (Closes: #586356)
* [01c7c14] Remove old modules
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
tags 586356 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:32:33 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Added
tags 586724 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:45:32 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Remove old
On 06/22/2010 01:59 AM, Jan Muszynski wrote:
This shows up, on my system, when trying to build the modules for virtualbox
(PUEL). There are 3 modules, and they need to be built in a specific order
(the others depend on the first to build correctly). If dkms processes the
modules in sorted
tags 588585 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:06:18 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload
tags 589308 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:15:39 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Promote lsb
On 07/17/2010 03:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
You should not specify a `Pre-Depends' entry for a package before this
has been discussed on the `debian-devel' mailing list and a consensus
about doing that has been reached.
Did you do that?
No I didn't, I'm doing that now.
dkms
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
tags 586356 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:32:33 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Added
tags 588585 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:06:18 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload
tags 589308 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:15:39 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Promote lsb
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit f649aa1b33c9ef37dd73cad09f389e759a25f3f3
Author: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Date: Sat Jul 17 12:32:33 2010 +0200
Added coreutils = 7.4 in Depends
Closes: #586356
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 73533c22c534923ec753a3085b92b4cb647ea2b7
Author: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Date: Sat Jul 17 13:15:39 2010 +0200
Promote lsb-release to Pre-Depends
Closes: #589308
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu protobuf-c_0.12-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu protobuf-c_0.12-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu mumble_1.2.2-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu mumble_1.2.2-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:16:54 +0200
Source: smartmontools
Binary: smartmontools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.39.1+svn3124-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Changed
tags 498693 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:18:23 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Install
Hi,
On 07/12/2010 08:54 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
gyp doesn't start on kfreebsd-*:
$ gyp
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/gyp, line 18, in module
sys.exit(gyp.main(sys.argv[1:]))
File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/gyp/__init__.py, line 316, in main
'sunos5':
tags 582158 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:12:20 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Set state
tags 583386 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:32:21 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Don't warn
tags 588134 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:40:55 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
On 07/12/2010 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so you package xulrunner in such a way, and then argument that nothing can be
done about it. interesting.
xulrunner --gre-version should help?
The issue is in icedtea6-plugin linking against libxul
and libxpcom when it doesn't need to.
See
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
libprotobuf-dev - protocol buffers C++ library (development files)
libprotobuf-java - Java bindings for protocol buffers
libprotobuf-lite6 - protocol buffers
On 07/12/2010 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so you package xulrunner in such a way, and then argument that nothing can be
done about it. interesting.
xulrunner --gre-version should help?
The issue is in icedtea6-plugin linking against libxul
and libxpcom when it doesn't need to.
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2068-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 11, 2010
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2068-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Giuseppe Iuculano
July 11, 2010
On 07/11/2010 01:51 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The jdk is *not* used during
the binary build, except for unittests (if present). The jdk *is* used
during the indep build, for the java part. What do you see here as an
abuse?
Sorry, let me rephrase a bit.
On 07/11/2010 11:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:05:49 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
If you put openjdk-6 in b-d-i, protobuf can't be built on those archs
that hasn't openjdk-6, and imho this can be considered an FTBFS even if
the binary build works.
No, it can't
On 07/11/2010 12:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Because there's no requirement anywhere that says arch:all packages need
to be buildable on all architectures.
The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user to build
the binary package(s) produced from this source package.
So I think
On 07/11/2010 12:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Giuseppe, you didn't answer my other question. Can you confirm the
package builds fine and the java parts work with gcj?
Yes I can.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/11/2010 01:51 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The jdk is *not* used during
the binary build, except for unittests (if present). The jdk *is* used
during the indep build, for the java part. What do you see here as an
abuse?
Sorry, let me rephrase a bit.
On 07/11/2010 11:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:05:49 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
If you put openjdk-6 in b-d-i, protobuf can't be built on those archs
that hasn't openjdk-6, and imho this can be considered an FTBFS even if
the binary build works.
No, it can't
On 07/11/2010 12:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Because there's no requirement anywhere that says arch:all packages need
to be buildable on all architectures.
The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user to build
the binary package(s) produced from this source package.
So I think
On 07/11/2010 12:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Giuseppe, you didn't answer my other question. Can you confirm the
package builds fine and the java parts work with gcj?
Yes I can.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Author: iuculano
Date: 2010-07-10 08:16:42 + (Sat, 10 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 14973
Modified:
data/CVE/list
Log:
CVE-2010-1666 fixed in python-cjson 1.0.5-3
Modified: data/CVE/list
===
--- data/CVE/list 2010-07-09
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: security
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu tuxonice-userui_1.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libpng = 1.2.44-1
libpng 1.2.44-1 fixes security issues and
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the PTS shows randomically chromium-browser as not part of any Debian
distribution:
This package is not part of any Debian distribution. Thus you won't find much
information here. The package is either
+1,11 @@
+protobuf (2.3.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build-depends on on default-jdk and set JAVA_HOME to
+/usr/lib/jvm/default-java (Closes: #587732)
+
+ -- Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:37:19 +0200
+
protobuf (2.3.0-2) unstable
Hi Iustin,
On 07/10/2010 08:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I was planning to revert the move of the openjdk-6 from b-d-i to b-d, as
an alternative to depend on default-jdk. The move was done simply to
have 'jar' available during the build time for a few optional unittests
which need it.
I think
+1,11 @@
+protobuf (2.3.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build-depends on on default-jdk and set JAVA_HOME to
+/usr/lib/jvm/default-java (Closes: #587732)
+
+ -- Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:37:19 +0200
+
protobuf (2.3.0-2) unstable
Hi Iustin,
On 07/10/2010 08:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I was planning to revert the move of the openjdk-6 from b-d-i to b-d, as
an alternative to depend on default-jdk. The move was done simply to
have 'jar' available during the build time for a few optional unittests
which need it.
I think
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the PTS shows randomically chromium-browser as not part of any Debian
distribution:
This package is not part of any Debian distribution. Thus you won't find much
information here. The package is either
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: security
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu tuxonice-userui_1.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libpng = 1.2.44-1
libpng 1.2.44-1 fixes security issues and
Author: iuculano
Date: 2010-07-09 22:28:34 + (Fri, 09 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 14972
Modified:
data/CVE/list
data/embedded-code-copies
Log:
added chromium-browser embedded code copies
Modified: data/CVE/list
===
---
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
Well, since the problem is somewhere in Quesoglc, I built a version of glc
with
debug symbols, to see where exactly the error is. And surprise, that version
worked. The locally rebuilt package without debug symbols also works. Not sure
what exactly is the problem, maybe libglc0 was built on
Since openjdk-6-jdk was available before on those arches, I hoped it
will come back. Do you think it won't?
It wasn't available, protobuf was built in those archs because you had
openjdk-6-jdk in Build-Depends-Indep instead of Build-Depends
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description:
reassign 584562 libv8
thanks
Hi Mattia,
On 07/07/2010 09:05 AM, Mattia Monga wrote:
Dear Jonathan,
I attached to this message a minimalistic failure test case. You
should be able to reproduce the failure with the following recipe
$ LANG=C chromium-browser test.html
# select 'inspect
Well, since the problem is somewhere in Quesoglc, I built a version of glc
with
debug symbols, to see where exactly the error is. And surprise, that version
worked. The locally rebuilt package without debug symbols also works. Not sure
what exactly is the problem, maybe libglc0 was built on
Since openjdk-6-jdk was available before on those arches, I hoped it
will come back. Do you think it won't?
It wasn't available, protobuf was built in those archs because you had
openjdk-6-jdk in Build-Depends-Indep instead of Build-Depends
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description:
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
Author: derevko-guest
Date: 2010-07-05 09:01:37 + (Mon, 05 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 14961
Modified:
data/CVE/list
Log:
exim4 issues fixed in unstable
CVE-2009-0374 is unimportant
Modified: data/CVE/list
===
--- data/CVE/list
Author: derevko-guest
Date: 2010-07-05 11:07:13 + (Mon, 05 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 14963
Modified:
data/CVE/list
Log:
CVE-2010-2233, CVE-2010-1632, CVE-2004-1733, CVE-2004-1732, are fixed in
unstable
bug filed for CVE-2010-1625
Modified: data/CVE/list
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows
Package: lxr
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows remote
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows
Package: lxr
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows remote
Author: derevko-guest
Date: 2010-07-04 08:19:20 + (Sun, 04 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 14956
Modified:
data/CVE/list
Log:
chromium/webkit issues
Modified: data/CVE/list
===
--- data/CVE/list 2010-07-03 15:34:42 UTC (rev
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Giacomo,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1448[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lib/LXR/Common.pm in LXR
| Cross
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Giacomo,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1448[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lib/LXR/Common.pm in LXR
| Cross
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
On 06/30/2010 06:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian
GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome
beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux repository. Is this
intentional?
No, we follow the
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
clone 587293 -1
retitle -1 3d patch breaks non-3d video
found -1 5.0.375.86~r49890-3
thanks
On 06/28/2010 10:01 AM, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
After you reported this bug fixed, the videos now plays, but are messed up.
The videos worked fine for me before this stopped working due to this
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:47:40 +0200
Source: wordpress
Binary: wordpress wordpress-l10n
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe
tags 585922 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On 06/14/2010 11:21 PM, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
When I
1) click on the magnifying glass
2) move the mouse cursor over a HTML element so that it lights up blue
3) click
nothing happends. I would expect that it would actually work like
On 06/27/2010 04:08 PM, Sam Morris wrote:
Hm, this is not sufficient to persuade chromium-browser that it is the
default browser. Setting 'Chromium' in
gnome-default-applications-properties makes chromium start prompting to
make it the default browser again!
If I acceed to chromium's
On 06/27/2010 04:36 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
damn, I can't reproduce this anymore on my local installation.
Ok, maybe I got the inspiration.
Could you please edit /usr/share/applications/chromium-browser.desktop
and change the Exec line in:
Exec=/usr/bin/chromium-browser %U
and after
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Chromium Maintainers
pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Description:
chromium-browser - Chromium browser
chromium-browser-dbg - chromium-browser debug symbols
chromium-browser-inspector - page inspector
On 06/25/2010 10:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
For the future: wouldn’t security fixes like this warrant urgency=medium?
with urgency medium or high we speed up the migration to testing.
chromium isn't in testing, so this isn't necessary for now :)
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description:
On 06/26/2010 09:30 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
It also speeds up the passage through buildds afaik
No, I think this doesn't happen.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
701 - 800 of 3350 matches
Mail list logo
