Ping.
Ping.
___
Gossip mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@mail-archive.com
http://mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/gossip
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream is releasing a new version of webp soon that has an expanded
API, and therefore will bump soname and package from libwebp4 to
libwebp5. Reverse dependency list appended; I think
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream is releasing a new version of webp soon that has an expanded
API, and therefore will bump soname and package from libwebp4 to
libwebp5. Reverse dependency list appended; I think
Sounds reasonable to me. Checking if upstream has any thoughts
on the matter.
I'm shocked, shocked that someone is forking PIL! Unless they
add CCITT Group4 TIFF support, in which case I'm delighted.
You may have noticed that archiving was suspended at
The Mail Archive recently. Things are fine now, read on
if you want gory details.
We are hosted at a professional datacenter, complete
with building wide uninterruptible power supply (UPS) and
backup generators. About 5 years ago, the
The gossip mailing list has a new name: gossip@mail-archive.com
It's been over fifteen years, but I've finally got around to moving this
list to where it should have been the whole time. All subscribers have
been migrated. If there are any issues, please let me know.
___
Gossip mailing list
Gossip@mail-archive.com
http://mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what
progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly
faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of
rare bugs involving HTML escaping.
What I can't do is reproduce your problem; it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:18:44 -0700
Source: leptonlib
Binary: libleptonica-dev liblept3 leptonica-progs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.69-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Changed
Package: sdl-image1.2
Version: 1.2.12-3
By uploading libwebp 0.3.0-3 to Debian unstable a few weeks ago, I
started a transition since libwebp2 is no longer built and has been
replaced by libwebp4.
This is a request binNMU (or just a regular maintainer upload)
of sdl-image1.2.
Fixed upstream, not yet shipping with Debian.
Individual list search is very important. Thank you for reporting
the problem. This turned out to be a configuration mistake on the
webserver, involving the MultiViews configuration directive.
Search should be working now. Let us know if you see any
anomalies, and in the meantime we're looking
Sounds reasonable to me.
Sorry for the slow reply. I talked with upstream, and I think the
language files are DFSG compliant both in letter and spirit.
The language files are the product of machine learning, against
a few hundred fonts and a bunch of symbolic text. The machine
learning program already ships with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:55:03 -0700
Source: libwebp
Binary: libwebp-dev libwebp4 webp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:24:07 -0700
Source: libwebp
Binary: libwebp-dev libwebp4 webp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jeff
Patched as per upstream bug
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?32987
I've decided to ship hkoba's deprecation patch with Debian as of today.
This will automatically propagate to quite a few Linux distributions with
time. Please speak up if you think this is a terrible idea.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?32987
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:00:46 -0700
Source: mhonarc
Binary: mhonarc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6.18-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Thanks for reminder, I'll have a new package uploaded shortly.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Tomas Forsman st...@cs.umu.se wrote:
Package: mhonarc
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Ran mhonarc
* What exactly did you do (or not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:50:19 +
Source: libwebp
Binary: libwebp-dev libwebp4 webp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jeff
Attaching some files. Everything goes in debian/ except for
Makefile.am which goes in progs/
I think I need to call to ./autobuild in front of ./configre in
debian/rules, but I have not yet gotten this to work.
Makefile.am
Description: Binary data
leptonica-progs.files
Description: Binary
Should be fixed in experimental within 24 hours. Not sure what to do
about Ubuntu / Wheezy / etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks, we will fix this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This is all very helpful. Well get an updated man page with the next
Leptonica release. It almost sounds like you are interested in being a
co-maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Upstream says:
I think this might be a known issue that we have fixed in our
[unreleased] version.
Could do to get the svn repository up to date.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
I don't understand what you mean by hardly trackable. The backtrace
I don't understand what you mean by hardly trackable. The backtrace
is helpful,
thank you. But also having an easy, guaranteed way to reproduce the problem
is also helpful. Is there some reason you do not wish to supply the images?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you for the report. Please supply data and a simple
command that reproduces the problem. The following command
(with the standard tesseract-ocr-deu-frak Debian package
installed) does not segfault for me.
-Jeff
$ while true; do tesseract img028.tif img028.txt -l deu-frak; done
Tesseract
Happy New Year.
As The Mail Archive enters its 15th year of operation, let's take a
quick look back. This year we had a record uptime percentage of
99.69%. That number jumps to 99.96% if you forgive the day we were
deliberately dark in protest of the proposed SOPA law in the United
States. There
Okay, so here's a quick status update. There are have been suggestions about
fonts. Font weight. Line spacing. Typeface. Line spacing is interesting,
a big design goal was to make more information available with less scrolling.
However, we've found several references that suggest 1.4 is good in
Thank you for the feedback, keep it coming.
Interesting screenshots. By the way, my everyday platform is
also Ubuntu (10.04 and 12.04). So far I can't reproduce font
problems with courier.
As for the ordering of font-family, that's a good question. Let
me check with graphic designer.
-Jeff
--
What I dislike is that visited links are indistinguishable from non
visited ones. The difference in color just is way too little.
I didn't notice this until you mentioned it. Now it is driving me crazy.
Thank you for the feedback.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
I can't remember what I did for the libpng dependency.
One used to be able to pull the package out of NEW and
take a look, but maybe that is not possible anymore. I
definitely changed the soname.
Happy to sponsor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
You aren't getting off that easy! Please add your name as an Uploader.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'm not sure why experimental would be faster. In any case,
since you packaged it, why not go ahead and upload? You
have my blessing.
-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Description:
tesseract-ocr-grc - tesseract-ocr language files for ancient Greek
Changes:
tesseract-grc (3.02.02-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release
Checksums-Sha1:
351fc72125c91c9ad8f43fe1ae4dbdfa39b34f19 1117 tesseract-grc_3.02.02-1.dsc
-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Description:
tesseract-ocr-rus - tesseract-ocr language files for Russian
Changes:
tesseract-rus (3.02.02-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
Checksums-Sha1:
bb048c97f808379d1d39d930407c9e76b0288cf4 1117 tesseract-rus_3.02.02-1.dsc
-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Description:
tesseract-ocr-vie - tesseract-ocr language files for Vietnamese
Changes:
tesseract-vie (3.02.02-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
Checksums-Sha1:
2f88d5cf35e2280deca5c04b613d62a5a60562cd 1117 tesseract-vie_3.02.02-1.dsc
Obsolete; Tesseract 3 is shipping with Ubuntu. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565688
Title:
tesseract assert failure: tesseract: unicharset.cpp:76: const
UNICHAR_ID
Obsolete. Tesseract 3.x now uses Leptonica for image i/o. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622021
Title:
tesseract Segmentation fault
To manage notifications about this
Obsolete; Ubuntu now ships Tesseract 3. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461177
Title:
tesseract 2.03 generates empty file
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Obsolete; Tesseract 3 is shipping. Please close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639981
Title:
segfault with tiff
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: leptonlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988112
Title:
histotest is missing its man page in leptonica-progs
To manage
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639981
Title:
segfault with tiff
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461177
Title:
tesseract 2.03 generates empty file
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622021
Title:
tesseract Segmentation fault
To manage notifications about
Also, Ocropus is no longer shipping.
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565688
Title:
tesseract assert failure:
1) There is no longer a need to install manually because Tesseract 3 now
ships with Ubuntu.
2) Manual installation bugs can be reported to upstream. But I recommend
just using the packages.
http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/issues/list
** Changed in: tesseract (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
I wanted to locally build a newer tesseract package of upstreams current
SVN
What's wrong with uupdate? It took me about five minutes to build today's
3.02.02 point release.
May I help you setting up a git repo?
Sounds scary. I'm comfortable with the current setup; will I get confused
going to
Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Description:
libtesseract-dev - Development files for the tesseract command line OCR tool
libtesseract3 - Command line OCR tool
tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool
tesseract-ocr-dev - transitional dummy package
Chromium people can take this up with Release Team directly if interested.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
this is a quick update on what's going on with your package in NEW.
We're holding it due to a library transition which would affect some
Hello all,
The Mail Archive is now 14 years old (that's a long time in dog
years) and we've been thinking about some design updates.
The mockup below is intended for visitors from global search
engines. Direct visitors will continue to have no advertisements.
I hope that the proposed design is
Working on packaging. Hit a small snag, most likely something on my end.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Okay, I worked it out. New files uploaded to Debian. I assume/hope the
chromium folks who filed this bug are on top of any freeze related
issues that are in effect.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: python-pygame
Version: 1.9.1release+dfsg-6
The copyright file says the following:
Files: lib/freesansbold.ttf
Copyright: 2002-2009 Free Software Foundation
License: GPL-3.0+
However, that is incomplete. The actual license is GPL 3+ with
an important exception. Please update the
As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after...
Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA?
Pascal,
libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3.
Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship?
Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land.
Shawn,
I have the package built and ready, awaiting response from
Pascal before submitting.
-Jeff
I'll try to get to it this weekend. NMUs happily accepted also.
Pascal, please comment.
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1053655.html
Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org
Description:
libtesseract-dev - Development files for the tesseract command line OCR tool
libtesseract3 - Command line OCR tool
tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool
tesseract-ocr-dev - transitional dummy package
Looks like an untar problem on my end when I rebuilt the package. Let me
try again.
Okay, root cause was running patch -p0 in the wrong directory. That's
resolved and running a clean build in pbuilder. Let's see if I managed to
do the same thing in Leptonica.
-Jeff
Okay, done. Want to double check this diff.gz file?
tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
I think we are finally in good shape...
$ zcat tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz | grep control
--- tesseract-3.02.01.orig/debian/control
+++ tesseract-3.02.01/debian/control
$ tar tzf tesseract_3.02.01.orig.tar.gz | grep control
tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.h
tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.cpp
Good catch. Running dch without the -i option put in
the [ Jonathan Nieder ] text; it looks like a mechanism
for letting two people collaborate on a single changelog
entry.
Fixing and uploading soon. Fingers crossed.
I did not get the confirmation for the upload...
Still hasn't picked up. Maybe I should try a -6 package release?
Sending in 3.02.01-6
That did the trick.
Hi. I noticed that there are a lot of useful programs in the prog/
subdirectory of the leptonica lib. It would be nice to include more of
those [...]
The author of Leptonica chose the program list. His goal is to
ship the good stuff but not spam us with stuff nobody will
use.
This list can
See also:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/leptonlib/+bug/988112
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Leptonica upload commencing now. Tesseract coming.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Tesseract uploading now. We'll see how this goes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Leptonica upload commencing now. Tesseract coming.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Tesseract uploading now. We'll see how this goes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
It's too early to tell for sure, but we've had good luck with the
Samsung 830 on a busy system that includes an MTA.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gossip@jab.org/msg01425.html
-Jeff
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking
API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream
is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just
adding more stuff.
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the
I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract.
Note that Jakub Wilk was fantastically helpful during the great
Tesseract renaming a few months ago, although I probably
drove him crazy in the process.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Yes, I can sponsor. My goal is to not get in the way of your energy,
but also be careful to keep the level of chaos under control. The
inclusion of Leptonica and Tesseract must not be jeopardized.
Jakub, you are welcome to weigh in on this bug if you wish.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking
API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream
is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just
adding more stuff.
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the
I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract.
Note that Jakub Wilk was fantastically helpful during the great
Tesseract renaming a few months ago, although I probably
drove him crazy in the process.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Yes, I can sponsor. My goal is to not get in the way of your energy,
but also be careful to keep the level of chaos under control. The
inclusion of Leptonica and Tesseract must not be jeopardized.
Jakub, you are welcome to weigh in on this bug if you wish.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello mailman-developers,
I suspect that there are folks who would like to see what Mailman 3
and particularly Postorius without going through the effort of
software installation. Jeff Marshall was kind enough to set up a test
instance that people can look at and play with. This is a temporary
That sure didn't take very long...
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives:
Okay, found the bug.
On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more
than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one
million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific
notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was
flawed and
Fair enough, I found how to have http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html subscribe
something other than the envelope or header from address.
If you think this would be useful for others, please consider sharing either
here, or we can put in the http://mail-archive.com/faq.html if appropriate.
I was a bit
Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion
about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg12770.html
Wow, that's crazy and news to me. I used pbuilder during the upload. Maybe
the compiler got more strict about something. Let me reproduce and consult
with upstream.
The default mailman will allow, on a per list basis, configurable from
posterius:
1) no archive
2) local archiving (e.g. pipermail or whatever replaces it, for example
hyperkitty)
3) cloud archiving (e.g. mail-archive.com, gmane.org, or similar)
These options are expected to be available even
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
Dan Bloomberg, the author of Leptonica removed histotest. I think he
just wanted to separate the wheat from the chaff. Feel free to contact
him directly if you wish to discuss. The source code for histotest still
exists, it just isn't built or shipped by default.
--
You received this bug
histotest got removed with Leptonica 1.69, the version shipping with
Precise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988112
Title:
histotest is missing its man page in leptonica-progs
To
I apologize, the simulation code had a flaw. I'm embarrassed that I
didn't immediately recognize this immediately from intuition. We
could get even more accurate results by computing actual SHA-1 of
actual message-ids, but I'm not sure it is worth the effort. Here is a
revised program and the
Public bug reported:
As discussed, confusion can arise between the archiving module for
mailman, and the manual mechanism of adding the archiving subscriber. Do
something, perhaps involving ban lists, to keep us out of trouble.
(I don't really know what is most sensible. I'd always imagined the
Public bug reported:
The draft for archival hashes for mailman specifies 32 character, base
32 encoding. We can get away with 13 characters which expects the first
collision at around 50 billion messages. The the wikipedia charts in
their birthday attack article. It's not like an occasional
Public bug reported:
Expose mailmans archival booleans as a tristate, either
none/private/public or none/local/cloud.
** Affects: postorius
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: mailman3
** Tags added: mailman3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
501 - 600 of 1614 matches
Mail list logo
