On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:10 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Could be any of a thousand ways to implement this.
Maybe it checks the BIOS to determine whether some
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:10 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 01:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:52 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:52 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote
On it. If someone else is also, let me know and I'll stop.
-J
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Heiko Adams heiko.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
can anyone start building pidgin 2.10.4, which is a security update
since the package maintainer seems to be unresponsive?
--
Grüße aus Coburg
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On it. If someone else is also, let me know and I'll stop.
Out for rawhide, bodhi updates created for f15-17. Please test and give karma.
-J
-J
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Heiko Adams heiko.ad...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:57 +0200, SC (Simone) wrote:
Hello,
I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
p7zip-devel
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. Much
of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small number of
pieces still remain under GPLv3+.
IMO:
License: GPLv3+ and
If anyone would be so kind, I'd be happy to review one of yours if you
review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
still the case or if I can fill a Review Request for the
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/14/2012 10:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in Fedora.
It is not my intention to start a flame, I'm simply asking if that's
still the case or
I recently updated Io-language to the current release. Finally.
Anyway, TnL, which requires it, had been unable to run, at least for
me, and now I can't even get it to build. So unless someone else
wants to take a crack at it and fix it up, I'm going to retire it in a
few days. I'll be happy
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jayson Rowe jayson.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw a blog post this morning from Kevin Fenzi
(http://scrye.com/wordpress-mu/nirik/2012/05/09/fedora-17-prerelease-and-updates-testing/)
about how the updates-testing repo is now disabled, and I should do a
'yum
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Pedro Francisco
pedrogfranci...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jurgen Kramer gtmkra...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I am getting frequent kernel panics when shutting down my laptop. It is
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips
johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
actually happened.
I'll take a look.
-J
I could of course apply
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Lips
johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
Hello all!
I need to close this bug report asap:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816926
Since I have few more packages in the pipe and the
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:27:22AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
The Messaging SIG has been working on building a messaging bus for
Fedora Infrastructure and the main obstacle to testing stuff in our
staging environment is a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
nushio, the rabbitvcs maintainer has not been answering one of his bug
reports [1]. I have prepared an updated package that works with the new
nautilus, but is still has not been committed.
Does anyone know what
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 2012-05-01 15:23, Jon Ciesla pisze:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Julian Sikorskibeleg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
nushio, the rabbitvcs maintainer has not been answering one of his bug
reports [1]. I have
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-04-30)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 17:01:21 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-30/fesco.2012-04-30-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #839 Proposal for revitalizing the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to publicly thank Jon Ciesla for helping me out and saving me lots
of time here. I had been requesting EPEL builds of rabbitvcs and
nautilus-python for many many months, but no one was responding to me
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/26/2012 01:18 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 01:08, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com escreveu:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 22:43 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Why not just drop the
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:32:17 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
OT? The question here isn't really what submitters do or don't, isn't
it what we could do to improve the process?.
The point is that not all submitters are
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Kévin Raymond
shai...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
It would be nice to have a third option:
-Change release names to release theme.
We don't really need
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Sergio Pascual sergi...@fis.ucm.es wrote:
Hi, a new cfistio package (3.300) as landed in rawhide. Packages
depending on cfitsio should be rebuilt.
soname bumps should be announced in advance, ideally.
-J
--
Sergio Pascual http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/04/12 19:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
I...no, I was referring to cows. You know. The things which have four
legs, go moo, and dispense tasty, tasty milk.
Ah right, we call it the fridge.
Goes rrr every so
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 04/25/2012 07:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Martinktm...@gmail.com said:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin from install of
google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:33 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
because upstart was in fedora 15 replaced by systemd, I don't see any
use for it. Almost no package provides job file for it and classical
init
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 07:36 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:33 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
because
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 02:08, schrieb Oron Peled:
Looks like this transition (as is currently planned) is going to
break many setups. I want to show the three following use-cases
which may be severely broken by this
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed. If you're
using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with
Kickstart. You can set up anything you like
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:34 AM, goe...@uddeborg.se wrote:
When I reported a bug on Armangil's podcatcher the other day, I
noticed that the package had been orphaned. (Some time ago, actually,
but I missed it at the time.) I still use it, so I decided to take
over.
This is the first time
2012/4/23 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
Just for the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of
Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide. The current situation is that
there are three of them:
compat-db - shipping old libdbs for
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
So the plan is:
1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
2) put 4.8 to compat-db
3)
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
push updates of the same EVR to
Infrastructure is aware of the issue.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
another package I'd like to submit.
Pivy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
zipios++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I have got the following error message from the build system:
dist-f15-updates f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
Unforunately,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:59 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
I recently release libffi 3.0.11, and ABI changes are mandating a .so
number change. Despite the ABI change, I suspect that simple rebuilds
are all that will be required
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Greetings,
I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
If your package meets the following criteria you MUST enable the PIE
compiler flags:
Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:37:12PM +0200, Mattia Verga wrote:
Greetings,
I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
/If your package meets the following criteria you *MUST* enable the
PIE compiler
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com wrote:
ajax wrote:
[...]
If this is meant to cover administrative binaries that have no
privilege escalation pieces of their own, merely run by root, then
what makes them different from any other /bin/* program that a root
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
There's a BZ open, I'll look into getting n update out ASAP.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, yersinia yersinia.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com
wrote
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:20 AM, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com
wrote:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
this is really scary
CentOS pushed
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 12.04.2012 03:24, schrieb Bojan Smojver:
Anyone knows what's the holdup
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL.
However, I am unable
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to call your attention to the following bug
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com wrote:
Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
python-wokkel
I took this.
-J
They're all low-maintenance packages with a release maybe once or twice a
year.
Kind regards,
Ruben
--
devel
This affects the following:
libnids
suricata
syslog-ng
Whose owners are CCd and which I'll handle rebuilding unless the
owners would rather.
Thanks,
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:15:12 +0200
Jan Horak jho...@redhat.com wrote:
Why it takes 12-20 hours to submit critical security update to
updates-testing repository? Do we have such long queue or is the push
done regularly in
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:58:58 -0500
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly OT, will it be much longer before the next f17 push, or are
we waiting on Beta?
Stable f17 push? yes, thats waiting until after we have
Bug already filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807767
Might not be cups-specific, as the corresponding f17 cups-libs does
provide libcups.so.2.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz sasad...@umbc.edu wrote:
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build anymore
because of libcups.so.2().
Here is part of the root.log.
Getting requirements for jboss-web-7.0.13-3.fc18.src
DEBUG util.py:257: --
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:27:57 -0500
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Sasadeusz
sasad...@umbc.edu wrote:
A package that was just building yesterday doesn't seem to build
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
JO == Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com writes:
JO Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
JO mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
JO that.
This is good news, because even if we
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
kind of thing
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Could I suggest
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:33 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those
issues.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/163885.html
I'd
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the
following:
FAIL] f18
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can
ignore
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
Hi,
Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Jon, Brendan,
In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think the current proposal fails
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:19 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
4) All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
kernel SRPM and enabled by
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Matthew, can you add your initial list to the ticket as well, so we
have these starting places to refer to?
I was planning to after we'd had some
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2012 08:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I think the speed of the build hardware should be also part of the
criteria,
as all primary architectures are built synchronously. GCC on x86_64/i686
currently builds often
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi again,
I want to thank you, and everyone else in FESCo for talking with us
yesterday, and for looking over the proposal. Bear in mind, it's a work
in progress. We intend to have broader conversations over the coming
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Brendan Conoboy wrote:
Our current build systems can turn GCC 4.7 around in about 24 hours.
The enterprise hardware we anticipate using will take that down to about
12 hours. If speed of build hardware is a
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Only if you assume that high clock speed workloads are the only
important workloads. For highly parallellizable tasks, an ARM system
with tons of slower cores is a powerhouse. Think a db server
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:25:38AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
/me gave the mail a subject
Thanks! :)
Jon Ciesla wrote on 18.03.2012 23:33:
= New business =
[...]
#topic #822 F18 Feature: AE1000 USB
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804698
I'll be building this shortly, and I'll handle rebuilding the only
packages I found that require it, fife, manaworld and sear.
Thanks,
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-19/fesco.2012-03-19-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jan Klepek jan.kle...@brandforge.sk wrote:
Hi,
I have relased ownership of Argus package for Fedora branches due to lack
of free time to take care about it.
EPEL branches already have owner.
What this will require from new maintainer?
Argus is not
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
* #830 F18 Feature: ARM as Primary Arch --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraARM (limburgher,
18:44:13)
* LINK:
http
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #699 Proposal to remove the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Perhaps and stupid question:
After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs:
Uploaded and added to .gitignore:
Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file
2012/3/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 03/14/2012 07:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEYkkeit...@redhat.com
wrote:
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a
bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to
find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real
pain.
Typically the link to the Bodhi update is provided in the BZ. I
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
Thanks!
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08
301 - 400 of 745 matches
Mail list logo
