Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

2009-06-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote: Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote: BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable? Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386

Push?

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the dependency issues around

Re: Push?

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I *Sigh* assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: Way back when in February [1], FESCo decided that for Fedora 11, i586 would be the default architecture, and for Fedora 12, it would be some variant of i686. It's time to follow through on that action item. I've submitted

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: PLEASE do not do this. If we stop supporting Pentium II and Pentium III, I have to buy a whole lot of new hardware. Dead serious. Could we do i686 as a secondary arch, and swap with i386 further in the future? While

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: What CPUs do we lose that F11 supports? - Intel i586 (all) - Intel Pentium Pro - Intel Pentium II - Intel Pentium III - 32-bit AMD Athlon - AMD Geode - VIA C3 - Transmeta Crusoe Oh I didn't know my old `2001 PIII

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

2009-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote: BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable? Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only

Re: Too eager?

2009-06-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Given you are trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum

Too eager?

2009-06-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever and basearch in fedora.repo for basearch and mirrorlist make no difference.

Re: Too eager?

2009-06-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. This is a fully updated F-10 system. Manually filling in releasever

Re: Too eager?

2009-06-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
James Antill wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp

Re: Too eager?

2009-06-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: James Antill wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all ; yum update I got YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs

Re: Too eager?

2009-06-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Jon Ciesla wrote: James Antill wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:37 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:17 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: I installed F-11 fedora-release* and did yum clean all

Re: Question about web applications

2009-06-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
David Nalley wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:00 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I submitted ampache (http://ampache.org/)

Re: Question about web applications

2009-06-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net mailto:l...@jcomserv.net wrote: David Nalley wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com mailto:pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

2009-06-03 Thread Jon Ciesla
Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 06/03/2009 05:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first

Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)

2009-06-03 Thread Jon Ciesla
Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my

Re: chkrootkit looking for new maintainer

2009-06-03 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Schwendt wrote: I'm looking for somebody to become the chkrootkit package owner, preferably not anyone who just wants to increase the list of owned packages for some doubtful metrics. There are no open tickets for chkrootkit in Fedora. Last upstream release has been in Dec 2007.

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #12810] Please use fontconfig for system fonts

2009-01-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?12810 Summary: Please use fontconfig for system fonts Project: Battle for Wesnoth Submitted by: limburgher Submitted on: Friday 01/02/2009 at 16:27 Category: Bug Severity: 3 -

Re: Informal survey

2008-11-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hey guys, completely voluntary but I thought I'd ask because I'm curious For personal use, how many of you use something like linode or slicehost or an individual provider? Nope. I run my stuff out of my basement. :) If you do use a provider which one is it? For me, I do use one and I

Introduction

2008-11-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
on this sort of thing. I'm not sure which FIGs to apply to, other than sysadmin, obviously. If this goes well, not only will I stop bitching and start helping on mirror issues, but I'd be eager to take a crack at anything else in Trac that I might be able to assist with. Thanks, Jon Ciesla

Re: Introduction

2008-11-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jon Ciesla wrote: Hi all; I've been a Fedora maintainer for nearly two years, and have been running Fedora as my primary OS since RH7.1. I've also been running servers for a small business on it since RH9, as well as a local yum mirror. In my professional life, I

Re: Introduction

2008-11-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jon Ciesla wrote: Hi all; I've been a Fedora maintainer for nearly two years, and have been running Fedora as my primary OS since RH7.1. I've also been running servers for a small business on it since RH9, as well as a local yum mirror. In my professional life

Re: Temporary Leave of absence

2008-11-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Due to a recent death of a co-worker/manager, my time available to EPEL is going to be curtailed for the next 2 weeks as we begin to rebuild things. Could someone run the next 2 EPEL meetings? Thanks. An item that needs to be looked at is if we need to have elections or change of board

Re: Temporary Leave of absence

2008-11-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Due to a recent death of a co-worker/manager, my time available to EPEL is going to be curtailed for the next 2 weeks as we begin to rebuild things. Could someone run the next 2 EPEL meetings? Thanks. An item that needs

Re: Supporting other repositories.

2008-11-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ok loaded term but I was wondering if we could work with spacewalk, ipa, ds, etc to support their work by including at least a spacewalk-release or similar item. This would allow us to 'test' the waters of working closer with the other layered upstreams. Basically instead of having to hunt

[Fwd: Build Error (Job 396): wesnoth-1_2_8-1_el5 on fedora-5-epel]

2008-10-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi all, got a problem I can't seem to find an answer to. Trying to build wesnoth for EPEL-5. Had the branch created, copied the bits from FC-6, and built. The failure is below. The crucial part is in the job.log: ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for fribidi-devel. Exiting. Except that

[Fwd: Build Error (Job 39725): drupal-5_9-1_el5 on fedora-5-epel]

2008-07-31 Thread Jon Ciesla
Buildsys issues for EL-5? Tried it twice. This built fine on F-8 koji and EL-4 plague. Original Message Subject: Build Error (Job 39725): drupal-5_9-1_el5 on fedora-5-epel From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, July 31, 2008 7:48 am

Re: [Fwd: Build Error (Job 39725): drupal-5_9-1_el5 on fedora-5-epel]

2008-07-31 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ah. Makes sense. Build succeeded. Beauty. Thanks! This was related to our outage last night. A drive didn't get re-mounted correctly after the netapp crashed. Please try it again. -Mike On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jon Ciesla wrote: Buildsys issues for EL-5? Tried it twice

Re: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-20

2008-07-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by owner): devrim AT gunduz.org postgresql-dbi-link -

Re: Stupid question

2008-07-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: FC3 - RHEL4. FC6 - RHEL5. Presumably, F9 - RHEL6. With me so far? [Not speaking for Red Hat here. Just my understanding of the process] The RHEL 6 time schedule isn't that strict and RHEL release schedules are not public information and probably won't be till close

Re: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-05-15

2008-05-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
FYI, I'm chasing the roundcubemail ones with the relevant maintainers. == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages

[Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-04-06]

2008-04-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: moodle -

[Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-04-03]

2008-04-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
I've submitted a bug for an EL-4 branch, with myself as owner. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639 Wasn't able to set the cvs flag. Original Message Subject: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-04-03 From:Fedora Extras

Re: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-02-27

2008-02-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by owner): Jochen AT herr-schmitt.de kyum -

[Fwd: Build Result: 38171 - roundcubemail on fedora-5-epel]

2008-02-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Original Message Subject: Build Result: 38171 - roundcubemail on fedora-5-epel From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Fri, February 1, 2008 2:27 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fwd: Build Result: 38171 - roundcubemail on fedora-5-epel]

2008-02-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 04.02.2008 14:52, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:46:45 -0600 (CST), Jon Ciesla wrote: Original Message Subject: Build Result: 38171 - roundcubemail on fedora-5-epel From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Fri, February 1

Re: Broken deps in EPEL 4

2008-01-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 14.01.2008 17:06, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 14.01.2008 13:59, Jon Ciesla wrote: pcapdiff - 0.1-2.el4.noarch Needs pcapy, which won't built due to lack of libpcap-devel on ppc. Is there a remedy, or set ExcludeArch? I'd say ExcludeArch is fine in this case. Ok, great. Thanks. Do I need to do

Re: Broken deps in EPEL 4

2008-01-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: On 14.01.2008 17:06, Jon Ciesla wrote: On 14.01.2008 13:59, Jon Ciesla wrote: pcapdiff - 0.1-2.el4.noarch Needs pcapy, which won't built due to lack of libpcap-devel on ppc. Is there a remedy, or set ExcludeArch? I'd say ExcludeArch is fine in this case. Ok, great

Re: Faster builds

2008-01-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Jan 3, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: but it will be incredible for build-jobs with a larger number of pkgs (e.g. try moodle or nagios-plugins which are in EPEL already). That means, such packagers get the build-results and the mail notification much faster. The Moodle

Re: BUG: clamav packages badly broken

2007-12-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:47:31 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: Just a few quick observations: Funny. The differerent design of the Fedora clamav packages has been a topic on various lists long ago. Actually, there's some rationale behind the complexity of the Fedora clamav packages: packager's

[SM-USERS] Bug Report

2006-05-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list. [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying [X] False - Please CC me when replying This bug occurs when I ... ... view a particular message ... use a specific plugin/function .X. try to do/view/use Folder creation The

Re: Table Support

2001-10-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
I have to agree. As a fellow user, I think it behooves us to comment on things we'd like to see. I just didn't post about it because I saw that it was the #1 voted feature to include, so I figured the developers were aware of that fact. I'd LOVE table support, but for me the need is not

Re: Slowdown

2001-09-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
I havn't run into this problem, but I used to see it on WordPerfect 6.1 on my old 486DX2-66. What version of Windows and what processor are you using? Jon --- Kosta K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DIVFONT face=Arial size=2Every time i use Abiword (in WNX and Windows), It seems to start

uPOW 2001.17

2001-09-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi My name is Jon Ciesla, and I'd like to claim the Where to send Abiword announcements uPOW. I've already got a preliminary list together and begun contacting publications/sites, and have a few responses, all positive. To what address should I send updates/info? Jon == Be Bert. Be Ernie

<    3   4   5   6   7   8