Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-30 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 10:55:44 + Mark Hindley wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:58:15PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 17:33:26 +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > > #921012 is about changing network-manager to Depend upon "default-logind | > > > logind" rather than

Bug#976133: Please ship sotruss-lib.so in a different package

2020-11-29 Thread Josh Triplett
d in libc6, and is thus installed on every system. Please consider moving sotruss-lib.so to a package that isn't installed on every system. Thank you, Josh Triplett

Bug#976133: Please ship sotruss-lib.so in a different package

2020-11-29 Thread Josh Triplett
d in libc6, and is thus installed on every system. Please consider moving sotruss-lib.so to a package that isn't installed on every system. Thank you, Josh Triplett

Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
st/Cargo hats on, I would love to work with you and others on questions of what software packaging could look like, and how to maintain the quality and curation *and* package availability of Debian in collaboration with other ecosystems of package and dependency management. Other potentially interesting questions: what are the assumptions that go into our current tradeoffs about shared libraries vs static libraries, and are those still the correct tradeoffs in all cases? Josh Triplett

Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
st/Cargo hats on, I would love to work with you and others on questions of what software packaging could look like, and how to maintain the quality and curation *and* package availability of Debian in collaboration with other ecosystems of package and dependency management. Other potentially interesting questions: what are the assumptions that go into our current tradeoffs about shared libraries vs static libraries, and are those still the correct tradeoffs in all cases? Josh Triplett

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:04:56 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote: > > First, as a point of order (for which some authoritative guidance from > > the Secretary, CCed, would potentially prove useful): while the > > technical c

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:04:56 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote: > > First, as a point of order (for which some authoritative guidance from > > the Secretary, CCed, would potentially prove useful): while the > > technical c

Bug#975075:

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
.] On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:40:20 + Ian Jackson wrote: > Josh Triplett writes: > > I do not believe it falls within the scope of the technical > > committee to override a decision already decided by a project-wide > > GR, > > No-one is asking the TC to override the GR. I

Bug#975075:

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
.] On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:40:20 + Ian Jackson wrote: > Josh Triplett writes: > > I do not believe it falls within the scope of the technical > > committee to override a decision already decided by a project-wide > > GR, > > No-one is asking the TC to override the GR. I

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:00:45 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I'd also like to address one other issue here. It would be easy to > > hypothesize, at this point, that some additional communication

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:00:45 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 11:18PM -08, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I'd also like to address one other issue here. It would be easy to > > hypothesize, at this point, that some additional communication

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-18 Thread Josh Triplett
ional change. > I'm afraid the effect of this is that the maintainers of this package > are making it impossible for other developers to enable support of > sysvinit. This is not the case. If the maintainers of this package decline to *integrate such support in the package*, that does not close off all paths to providing such support. Other paths to enablement would include separate packages, other network management software, or alternative distributions. I'm sure there are other potential alternatives as well. - Josh Triplett

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-11-18 Thread Josh Triplett
ional change. > I'm afraid the effect of this is that the maintainers of this package > are making it impossible for other developers to enable support of > sysvinit. This is not the case. If the maintainers of this package decline to *integrate such support in the package*, that does not close off all paths to providing such support. Other paths to enablement would include separate packages, other network management software, or alternative distributions. I'm sure there are other potential alternatives as well. - Josh Triplett

Bug#943037: Status of this bug?

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
needs to be updated. You can download a .deb built from the > source from here if you can't wait: > https://bintray.com/sociomantic-tsunami/tools/git-hub > > On 14 November 2020 22:41:02 GMT+01:00, Josh Triplett > wrote: > >What's the current status of this bug? I'd love to h

Bug#943037: Status of this bug?

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
needs to be updated. You can download a .deb built from the > source from here if you can't wait: > https://bintray.com/sociomantic-tsunami/tools/git-hub > > On 14 November 2020 22:41:02 GMT+01:00, Josh Triplett > wrote: > >What's the current status of this bug? I'd love to h

Bug#974785: Please add neovim as an alternative to the vim dependency

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: vim-fugitive Version: 3.2-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org vim-fugitive declares a dependency on vim. This prevents it from being installed on a system that has neovim installed but does not have vim installed. Please consider adding neovim as an alternative to this

Bug#974786: Please use dh-vim-addon

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: vim-fugitive Version: 3.2-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org Please consider migrating to dh-vim-addon, which installs a vim package, allowing the use of `packadd!` to enable packages.

Bug#465240: [debsign] add support for signing Release files

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: devscripts Version: 2.20.4 Followup-For: Bug #465240 X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org Following up on this: debsign -r for Release files would still be quite useful. - Josh Triplett

Bug#943037: Status of this bug?

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
What's the current status of this bug? I'd love to have a version of git-hub that doesn't depend on Python 2; it's the last thing on my system that still wants Python 2.

Bug#943037: Status of this bug?

2020-11-14 Thread Josh Triplett
What's the current status of this bug? I'd love to have a version of git-hub that doesn't depend on Python 2; it's the last thing on my system that still wants Python 2.

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-11-12 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:45:07PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Johannes Schauer (2020-09-29 08:22:18) > > > > $ sudo mmdebstrap --variant=apt --include='systemd-sysv udev' \ > > > > > --setup-hook='mkdir -p ./cache.ess "$1"/var/cache/apt/archives' \ > > > > >

Bug#969174: firefox: FF80 seems to have broken all add-ons on existing profiles

2020-11-11 Thread Josh Triplett
I'm experiencing this as well. I've installed webext-ublock-origin-firefox, and each time I restart the browser, uBlock Origin isn't enabled (no toolbar icon, and ads not blocked) until I go into about:addons and toggle it off and back on. HTTPS Everywhere, installed via the upstream addon

Bug#972840: screen manpage documents "caption top", but it isn't supported

2020-10-24 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: screen Version: 4.8.0-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org The screen manual page documents a "caption top" option (as well as "caption bottom"), but those options aren't actually supported. (I wish they were; that's https://bugs.debian.org/548845 .) --

Bug#963059: x11-common: false linebreak in 20x11-common_process-args function has_option

2020-10-21 Thread Josh Triplett
. That'll fix this issue. - Josh Triplett On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:00:53PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Josh, please have a look at this, is it possible to fix without reverting > support for Xsession.d? > > On 15.10.2020 15.51, Andrey Kiselev wrote: > > Package: x11-common >

Bug#963059: x11-common: false linebreak in 20x11-common_process-args function has_option

2020-10-21 Thread Josh Triplett
. That'll fix this issue. - Josh Triplett On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:00:53PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Josh, please have a look at this, is it possible to fix without reverting > support for Xsession.d? > > On 15.10.2020 15.51, Andrey Kiselev wrote: > > Package: x11-common >

Bug#972538: ThinkPad TrackPoint Keyboard II: with bluetooth, middle-mouse scrolling doesn't work in all applications

2020-10-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libinput10 Version: 1.16.2-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I have a ThinkPad TrackPoint Keyboard II ( https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/accessories-and-monitors/keyboards-and-mice/keyboards/KBD-BO-TrackPoint-KBD-US-English/p/4Y40X49493 ), which works via either

Bug#972538: ThinkPad TrackPoint Keyboard II: with bluetooth, middle-mouse scrolling doesn't work in all applications

2020-10-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libinput10 Version: 1.16.2-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I have a ThinkPad TrackPoint Keyboard II ( https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/accessories-and-monitors/keyboards-and-mice/keyboards/KBD-BO-TrackPoint-KBD-US-English/p/4Y40X49493 ), which works via either

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-10-17 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:56:19AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:34:06 -0700 Jonathan Nieder > > wrote: > > >> Even so, some *rough* consensus on the plan is very useful for > >> helping people evaluate that first step. > > > > Here is a

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-10-17 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:56:19AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:34:06 -0700 Jonathan Nieder > > wrote: > > >> Even so, some *rough* consensus on the plan is very useful for > >> helping people evaluate that first step. > > > > Here is a

Bug#972361: zlib-ng feature non-functional due to stripped-out sources

2020-10-16 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: librust-libz-sys+zlib-ng-dev Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org librust-libz-sys-dev strips out the zlib-ng sources, but the librust-libz-sys+zlib-ng-dev package still exists. If you're going to exclude the sources, please consider excluding the feature-package as well.

Re: LPC 2020 Hackroom Session: summary and next steps for isolated user namespaces

2020-10-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:26:06PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > 3. Find a way to allow setgroups() in a user namespace while keeping > >in mind the case of groups used for negative access control. > >This was suggested by Josh Triplett and Geoffrey

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-09 Thread Josh Triplett
ter, but the point is that > this is why it's good to discuss format changes from a requirements > perspective, so that if we do need to make an incompat change, we can > kill multiple birds with a single stone. I would be quite interested in that. > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:59

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-09 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 07:54:09PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:38:58PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 10:54:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > > the head", and continued with the notion that anything o

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-08 Thread Josh Triplett
r: > "noblock_validity" in the superblock mount options field of the images > you create. Yeah, I can do that. That's a much better solution, thank you. It would have been problematic to have to change the userspace that mounts the filesystem to pass new mount options ("noblock_validity") for the new kernel. But if I can embed it in the filesystem, that'll work. I'll do that, and please feel free to drop the original proposed patch as it's no longer needed. Thanks, Darrick. - Josh Triplett

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:25:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Oct 8, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 08:57:12PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > >> I *do* think that inline_data is an under-appreciated feature that I > >>

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:14:24PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > That sounds like a conversation that would have been a lot more > > interesting and enjoyable if it hadn't started with "can we shoo

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 08:57:12PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > If those aren't the right way to express that, I could potentially > > adapt. I had a similar such conversation on linux-ext4 already (about > > inline dat

Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package

2020-10-07 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:21:39 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > I like this approach and think we should do the same in Debian. > Users, which have the full systemd package installed don't have any > negative side effects, which could result from splitting out > systemd-tmpfiles/systemd-sysusers and

Bug#946456: systemd: Provide systemd-sysusers as an independent package

2020-10-07 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:21:39 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > I like this approach and think we should do the same in Debian. > Users, which have the full systemd package installed don't have any > negative side effects, which could result from splitting out > systemd-tmpfiles/systemd-sysusers and

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-07 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 10:32:11AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:03:04AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > But can we *please* take your custom tool out back and shoot it in the > > > head? > > > > Nope. As mentioned, this isn't abou

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-07 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:35:33AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:03:06PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I'm not trying to create a problem here; I'm trying to address a whole > > family of problems. I was generally under the impression that mounting &g

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-06 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:18:34PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > What Josh is proposing I'm pretty sure would also break "e2fsck -E > > unshare_blocks", so that's another reason not to accept this as

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
e, as long as it isn't "any userspace that isn't e2fsdroid can be broken at will". I'd be willing to work to adapt the userspace bits I have to work around the regression, but I'd like to get this on the radar so this doesn't happen again. - Josh Triplett

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:36:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:14:54AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Ran into an ext4 regression when testing upgrades to 5.9-rc kernels: > > > > Commit e7bfb5c9bb3d ("ext4: handle

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:22:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/5/20 8:35 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:08:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 10/5/20 10:39 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:22:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/5/20 8:35 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:08:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 10/5/20 10:39 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28

Bug#971724: Please support putting /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/$lib_path files into -dbgsym packages

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
${some_library_path}? In addition, some packages want to import additional scripts from that auto-load file, so it'd be helpful to be able to provide a list of additional files to put in the -dbgsym package. Thanks, Josh Triplett

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:08:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/5/20 10:39 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 10/4/20 11:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> libstdc++6, installed on every system

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:08:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/5/20 10:39 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 10/4/20 11:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>> libstdc++6, installed on every system

Re: ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:46:01AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 05-10-20 01:14:54, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Ran into an ext4 regression when testing upgrades to 5.9-rc kernels: > > > > Commit e7bfb5c9bb3d ("ext4: handle add_system_zone() failure in > > e

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/4/20 11:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > libstdc++6, installed on every system due to dependencies, contains > > various Python scripts for GDB under /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ . These > > scripts shoul

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/4/20 11:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > libstdc++6, installed on every system due to dependencies, contains > > various Python scripts for GDB under /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ . These > > scripts shoul

ext4 regression in v5.9-rc2 from e7bfb5c9bb3d on ro fs with overlapped bitmaps

2020-10-05 Thread Josh Triplett
at previously worked correctly to fail when upgrading to v5.9-rc2 or later. Fix this by defaulting block_validity to off when EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SHARED_BLOCKS is set. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett Fixes: e7bfb5c9bb3d ("ext4: handle add_system_zone() failure in ext4_setup_system_zone()&qu

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-04 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libstdc++6 Version: 10.2.0-13 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org libstdc++6, installed on every system due to dependencies, contains various Python scripts for GDB under /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ . These scripts should go in a dev package, not in a library package. --

Bug#971680: /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ should go in a dev package

2020-10-04 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libstdc++6 Version: 10.2.0-13 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org libstdc++6, installed on every system due to dependencies, contains various Python scripts for GDB under /usr/share/gcc-10/python/ . These scripts should go in a dev package, not in a library package. --

Bug#971360: fonts-noto-color-emoji: error in glyphs display

2020-10-01 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: fonts-noto-color-emoji Version: 0~20200916-1 Followup-For: Bug #971360 X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I noticed this as well. Specifically, the thumbs-up emoji (U+1F44D) renders as a thumbs-down emoji. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug

Bug#948125: Please use partx (in essential util-linux) rather than kpartx

2020-10-01 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:33:36AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:55:00AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > vmdb2 depends on the kpartx package; could it, instead, use partx from > > the essential util-linux package? > > Speaking as upstream here: I h

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-09-30 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:23:38PM -0700, jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Over the years, "Essential" has made it difficult to reduce installation > > size, to reduce chroot/container size, or to coordinate various > &

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-09-30 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:23:38PM -0700, jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Over the years, "Essential" has made it difficult to reduce installation > > size, to reduce chroot/container size, or to coordinate various > &

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

2020-09-30 Thread Josh Triplett
Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > > "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > S> In addition, the packages in *main* > S> > S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for > S> compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre- > S> Depends",

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

2020-09-30 Thread Josh Triplett
[Accidentally sent this early before it was finished.] Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > > "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > S> In addition, the packages in *main* > S> > S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for > S> compilation or execution (thus, the

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-09-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:15:45PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:00:04 -0700 Josh Triplett > wrote: > > This change does not propose eliminating the concept of Essential, > > What is the point of Essential? To omit declaring dependencies on the

Bug#954794: New packages must not declare themselves Essential

2020-09-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:15:45PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:00:04 -0700 Josh Triplett > wrote: > > This change does not propose eliminating the concept of Essential, > > What is the point of Essential? To omit declaring dependencies on the

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-28 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:09:03AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-27 08:07:26) > > > Yes, one bit is missing. For the initial Essential:yes package set, > > > mmdebstrap deletes the *.deb files itself after installing them. So

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-27 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:18:54 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 22:47:50) > > On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 22:09:57 +0200 Johannes Schauer > > wrote: > > > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 21:47:56) > > >

Bug#971055: extlinux: Please provide a way for --device to bypass the "doesn't match device" check

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: extlinux Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I'd like to use extlinux as part of building a bootable disk image, without requiring root. Given a directory of files, I can build an ext4 image containing those files using the

Bug#971055: extlinux: Please provide a way for --device to bypass the "doesn't match device" check

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: extlinux Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I'd like to use extlinux as part of building a bootable disk image, without requiring root. Given a directory of files, I can build an ext4 image containing those files using the

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 22:09:57 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 21:47:56) > > > so... you want something like this: > > > > > > $ mmdebstrap --customize-hook='sync-out /var/cache/apt/archives ./cache' > > > unstable /de

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:14:38 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 11:03:12) > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 07:28:57AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 06:28:18) > > > > mmdebstrap seem

Bug#971014: Reproducible bug in inline_data handling with ACL

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Adding CC to linux-ext4@. On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 01:23:33AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > In the course of creating some filesystems containing Debian > installations using `mke2fs -d`, I managed to find a bug in the > `inline_data` handling, which seems to apply to files contai

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 07:28:57AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Josh Triplett (2020-09-26 06:28:18) > > mmdebstrap seems to re-download packages every time it runs. I'd love to > > have > > a way to cache those packages, so that it can run substantially

Bug#971014: Reproducible bug in inline_data handling with ACL

2020-09-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.46~WIP.2019.10.03-1 Severity: normal File: /sbin/mke2fs X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org This bug exists in both 1.45.6-1 (sid) and 1.46~WIP.2019.10.03-1 (experimental). In the course of creating some filesystems containing Debian installations using `mke2fs -d`,

Bug#971002: extlinux does not support ext4 with inline_data

2020-09-25 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: extlinux Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org extlinux cannot seem to handle ext4 files or directories whose data is stored inline in the inode (with the `inline_data` option). It's possible to work around this, by ensuring

Bug#971002: extlinux does not support ext4 with inline_data

2020-09-25 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: extlinux Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org extlinux cannot seem to handle ext4 files or directories whose data is stored inline in the inode (with the `inline_data` option). It's possible to work around this, by ensuring

Bug#971001: Please support caching packages outside the chroot

2020-09-25 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: mmdebstrap Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org mmdebstrap seems to re-download packages every time it runs. I'd love to have a way to cache those packages, so that it can run substantially faster the second and subsequent times. -- System Information:

Bug#970934: Please either change or document 0700 permissions on partial directories

2020-09-25 Thread Josh Triplett
be (for instance) 0755. If there's a specific reason why these directories need to prevent world-readability, I'd love to see documentation of that. If there isn't (or isn't anymore), I'd love to see those directories become 0755. Thanks, Josh Triplett

Re: Bug#969942: ITP: tty-share -- Terminal sharing over the Internet

2020-09-09 Thread Josh Triplett
Ansgar wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:27:28AM +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso > > Ruviaro wrote: > > > * Package name: tty-share > > > Version : 0.6.2 > > > Upstream Author : Vasile Popescu > > > * URL :

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Support non-blocking pidfds

2020-09-03 Thread Josh Triplett
When a > function is called that returns EAGAIN the function isn't called again > until the event loop indicates the the file descriptor is ready. > Supporting EAGAIN when waiting on pidfds makes such libraries just work > with little effort. Thanks for the patch series, Christian! This will make it much easier to use pidfd in non-blocking event loops. Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett - Josh Triplett

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds

2020-09-03 Thread Josh Triplett
es just work with little effort. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200811181236.GA18763@localhost/ > Link: https://github.com/joshtriplett/async-pidfd > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Sargun Dhillon > Cc: Jann Horn > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Oleg Nesterov

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds

2020-09-03 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:38:47PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 09/02, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > > It also makes the API more consistent and uniform. In essence, waitid() is > > > treated like a read on a

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pidfd: support PIDFD_NONBLOCK in pidfd_open()

2020-09-03 Thread Josh Triplett
se-on-exec flags. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200811181236.GA18763@localhost/ > Link: https://github.com/joshtriplett/async-pidfd > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Sargun Dhillon > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > Suggested-by: Josh Triplett > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett

Bug#969179: iwlwifi: firmware error results in extremely poor connection until reboot

2020-08-28 Thread Josh Triplett
Source: linux Version: 5.7.17-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I get errors like the following regularly, particularly when on video calls; as soon as the error happens, most or all packets stop going through, and the connection becomes extremely unreliable. Aug 28 09:31:38

Bug#969179: iwlwifi: firmware error results in extremely poor connection until reboot

2020-08-28 Thread Josh Triplett
Source: linux Version: 5.7.17-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I get errors like the following regularly, particularly when on video calls; as soon as the error happens, most or all packets stop going through, and the connection becomes extremely unreliable. Aug 28 09:31:38

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Parallelize Intra-Procedural Optimizations using the LTO Engine.

2020-08-24 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 06:04:48PM -0300, Giuliano Belinassi wrote: > Hi, Josh > > On 08/21, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 07:00:13PM -0300, Giuliano Belinassi wrote: > > > This patch series add a new flag "-fparallel-jobs=" to contro

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Parallelize Intra-Procedural Optimizations using the LTO Engine.

2020-08-21 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 07:00:13PM -0300, Giuliano Belinassi wrote: > This patch series add a new flag "-fparallel-jobs=" to control if the > compiler should try to compile the current file in parallel. [...] > Bootstrapped and Regtested on Linux x86_64. > > Giuliano Belinassi (6): > Modify gcc

Re: FIGNORE not effective if it contains a full filename

2020-08-19 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:33:49PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 8/19/20 3:15 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Bash Version: 5.0 > > Patch Level: 18 > > Release Status: release > > > > Description: > > If FIGNORE contains the complete file

FIGNORE not effective if it contains a full filename

2020-08-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: x86_64 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/bash-vu7ylu/bash-5.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wno-parentheses -Wno-format-security uname

Re: pidfd and O_NONBLOCK

2020-08-11 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:10:45PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:12:36AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > As far as I can tell, O_NONBLOCK has no effect on a pidfd. When calling > > waitid on a pidfd for a running process, it always blocks unless

pidfd and O_NONBLOCK

2020-08-11 Thread Josh Triplett
to return EWOULDBLOCK? This would make it easier to use pidfd in some non-blocking event loops. - Josh Triplett

Bug#966817: New dependency on lzip not documented in changelog

2020-08-02 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 11:14:06AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Josh Triplett wrote: > > lintian 2.86.0 introduces a new dependency on lzip, but does not > > document that dependency in the changelog. > > Lzip is used in checks/f

Bug#966817: New dependency on lzip not documented in changelog

2020-08-02 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 11:14:06AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Josh Triplett wrote: > > lintian 2.86.0 introduces a new dependency on lzip, but does not > > document that dependency in the changelog. > > Lzip is used in checks/f

Bug#966817: New dependency on lzip not documented in changelog

2020-08-02 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: lintian Version: 2.86.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org lintian 2.86.0 introduces a new dependency on lzip, but does not document that dependency in the changelog. I found commit fa8fd784e98199476b9b1bf4756b87f9b9c26f2e, but that doesn't explain what lintian

Bug#966817: New dependency on lzip not documented in changelog

2020-08-02 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: lintian Version: 2.86.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org lintian 2.86.0 introduces a new dependency on lzip, but does not document that dependency in the changelog. I found commit fa8fd784e98199476b9b1bf4756b87f9b9c26f2e, but that doesn't explain what lintian

Re: inherit TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE v2

2020-08-01 Thread Josh Triplett
On July 31, 2020 11:53:08 PM PDT, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >[note: private reply now to start a flame fest with the usual suspects] [You still CCed LKML.] >On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:11:46PM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> > we've had a bug in our resolution

Bug#966576: Night Light leaves screen warm-colored if sunrise happens with screen locked

2020-07-30 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: gnome-settings-daemon Version: 3.36.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org I use the Night Light feature to make the screen color warmer between sunset and sunrise. Often, I'll lock the screen after sunset (when it's currently warm-colored), and then in the morning,

Re: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support

2020-07-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:40:38PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > We just need to make sure that any kernel CI infrastructure tests that > > right away, then, so that failures don't get introduced by a patch from > > someone without a Rust toolchain and not noticed until someone with a > > Rust

Bug#966222: Please build with nbd support

2020-07-24 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: fio Version: 3.21-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org $ fio nbd.fio fio: engine nbd not loadable fio: failed to load engine Please consider building fio with nbd support enabled. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT

Re: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support

2020-07-16 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:06:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 9:39 PM Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 03:31:51PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > As an example: > > > Ubuntu LTS releases upgrade to a new Rust ve

Bug#965092: Please package newer version with support for EBS direct snapshot writes

2020-07-15 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: python3-botocore Version: 1.17.9+repack-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org There's a new version of botocore (and awscli) available, which adds support for the new APIs to directly write an EBS snapshot (StartSnapshot, PutSnapshotBlock, CompleteSnapshot).

Bug#965092: Please package newer version with support for EBS direct snapshot writes

2020-07-15 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: python3-botocore Version: 1.17.9+repack-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org There's a new version of botocore (and awscli) available, which adds support for the new APIs to directly write an EBS snapshot (StartSnapshot, PutSnapshotBlock, CompleteSnapshot).

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >