*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1967015 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967015
Public bug reported:
Rather than opening a browser window, clicking on "Release notes" during
installation of Kubuntu Jammy daily build instead opens Kate with HTML
code. Presumably a browser isn't
I've not seen this since updating to Jammy. I haven't tested any other
releases.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824436
Title:
ksmtuned running at 100%
To manage notifications about
What command are you using to run debootstrap?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
What command are you using to run debootstrap?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This fails on a number of host/target combinations, but not all of them.
A mips64el target, for example, fails every time.
Would the maintainer(s) prefer separate bugs for each arch? The fault(s)
may not lie in the debootstrap package.
debootstrap 1.0.134
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
This fails on a number of host/target combinations, but not all of them.
A mips64el target, for example, fails every time.
Would the maintainer(s) prefer separate bugs for each arch? The fault(s)
may not lie in the debootstrap package.
debootstrap 1.0.134
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
This should be fixed in the next release.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/7e5923030e331f466ec1b56d875b023a274e9220
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This should be fixed in the next release.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/7e5923030e331f466ec1b56d875b023a274e9220
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If that's the case then this is working as intended.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If that's the case then this is working as intended.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is an old one! Does this still occur?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is an old one! Does this still occur?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cp needs the fully-qualified path - not just $0/progname
I've tested this on Bash, Dash, Zsh and Tcsh on Linux and FreeBSD and
${0} already expands to the fully-qualified path. It never expands to
${0}/progname as that would always fail. Can you give and example of
where this fails?
Also
cp needs the fully-qualified path - not just $0/progname
I've tested this on Bash, Dash, Zsh and Tcsh on Linux and FreeBSD and
${0} already expands to the fully-qualified path. It never expands to
${0}/progname as that would always fail. Can you give and example of
where this fails?
Also
Is this fixed? An s390x chroot can be debootstrapped now but is that due
to a workaround or has this bug been fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is this fixed? An s390x chroot can be debootstrapped now but is that due
to a workaround or has this bug been fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In Buster+ libsystemd0 gets pulled in but other than that it seems to
work okay. Is this fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In Buster+ libsystemd0 gets pulled in but other than that it seems to
work okay. Is this fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Isn't this what happens now? If I run a foreign debootstrap it completes
automatically on version 1.0.123+deb11u2.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Isn't this what happens now? If I run a foreign debootstrap it completes
automatically on version 1.0.123+deb11u2.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Seems to work fine here running "debootstrap focal focal".
What exact command are you running?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Seems to work fine here running "debootstrap focal focal".
What exact command are you running?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Works fine on Debian Bookworm on GCP too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed-hwe-6.2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046059
Title:
kernel cannot find lz4hc and z3fold modules on boot
Status in
Tried `apt source --build kbd:i386` but it fails.
/bin/ld: kdmapop.o:/tmp/chroots/kbd-1.15.5/src/version.h:8: multiple definition
of `progname'; setfont.o:/tmp/chroots/kbd-1.15.5/src/version.h:8: first defined
here
/bin/ld: kdfontop.o:/tmp/chroots/kbd-1.15.5/src/version.h:8: multiple
Public bug reported:
kbd is not built for i386 which leads to Bug #1463840
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of console-setup-linux:
console-setup-linux depends on kbd (>= 0.99-12) | console-tools (>=
1:0.2.3-16); however:
Package kbd is not installed.
Package console-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784135
Title:
libicu-dev and libicu-dev:i386 conflict with each other
Status in icu package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in
Working on this, will update soon.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Working on this, will update soon.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
** Project changed: ubuntu-ubuntu-server => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to trusty-backports.
Matching subscriptions: ubuntu-backporters
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
** Project changed: ubuntu-ubuntu-server => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626838
Title:
yakkety
I've never seen this. Is it fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This looks like a bug in Fedora, possibly in their implementation of
binutils.
Can you try again and report back?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've never seen this. Is it fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This looks like a bug in Fedora, possibly in their implementation of
binutils.
Can you try again and report back?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The merge request has a pending question.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
So how, exactly, does this cause an issue?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The merge request has a pending question.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
So how, exactly, does this cause an issue?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I did a bunch more testing, for fun:
Where host --> guest chroot using `fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap
--variant=fakechroot guest guest`
Jammy --> Stable: fail
Jammy --> Jammy: success
Jammy --> Testing: fail
Jammy --> Noble: fail
Stable --> Stable: success
Stable¹ --> Jammy: fail
Stable
I did a bunch more testing, for fun:
Where host --> guest chroot using `fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap
--variant=fakechroot guest guest`
Jammy --> Stable: fail
Jammy --> Jammy: success
Jammy --> Testing: fail
Jammy --> Noble: fail
Stable --> Stable: success
Stable¹ --> Jammy: fail
Stable
variant=fakechroot still fails in testing, but it apparently fails in a
different way. (Do I need a new bug report?)
`fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --variant=fakechroot testing testing`
fails.
Whereas `fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --variant=minbase testing
testing` succeeds.
But at
variant=fakechroot still fails in testing, but it apparently fails in a
different way. (Do I need a new bug report?)
`fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --variant=fakechroot testing testing`
fails.
Whereas `fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --variant=minbase testing
testing` succeeds.
But at
It's still available in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026885
Title:
nano is not available on i386
Status in nano package in Ubuntu:
New
Status
It's still available in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026885
Title:
nano is not available on i386
Status in nano package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in
Can this be closed? It's been a decade.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442338
Title:
No way to
remmina-plugin-xdmcp appears to have been dropped after Focal.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all=all=any=remmina-plugin-xdmcp=names
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to remmina in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442338
Title:
No way to
Any improvement with Jammy or Noble?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895420
Title:
gdm3 with xdmcp does not show login box to a remote X server
To manage
Can the whole task for Ubuntu be marked wontfix? (I can't do it)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539814
Title:
tar: futimens() with a bad file descriptor
I'm guessing that this can be closed now?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026885
Title:
nano is not available on i386
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026885
Title:
nano is not available on i386
This seems unnecessary for debootstrap. Can this be closed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This seems unnecessary for debootstrap. Can this be closed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is /tmp/jammy definitely an empty directory?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is /tmp/jammy definitely an empty directory?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Okay, okay, I made a real mess of that. Just to clarify:
- I mixed up output from Debian and Ubuntu. But the result is the same
in both cases.
- Turns out I've attached the patch four times. I apologise. I have learned.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Okay, okay, I made a real mess of that. Just to clarify:
- I mixed up output from Debian and Ubuntu. But the result is the same
in both cases.
- Turns out I've attached the patch four times. I apologise. I have learned.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Attached is the patch. It wouldn't attach from the terminal for some reason.
diff --git a/functions b/functions
index 1924e89..f5de832 100644
--- a/functions
+++ b/functions
@@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ while (read STDIN, $x, 1) {
}' "$@"
elif [ "$1" = "GETDEPS" ]; then
local pkgdest="$2";
Attached is the patch. It wouldn't attach from the terminal for some reason.
diff --git a/functions b/functions
index 1924e89..f5de832 100644
--- a/functions
+++ b/functions
@@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ while (read STDIN, $x, 1) {
}' "$@"
elif [ "$1" = "GETDEPS" ]; then
local pkgdest="$2";
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: imwellcushtymel...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Running a debootstrap where the target directory has a space causes the process
to fail.
For example:
debootstrap --arch=i386 --variant=minbase stable "I
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: imwellcushtymel...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Running a debootstrap where the target directory has a space causes the process
to fail.
For example:
debootstrap --arch=i386 --variant=minbase stable "I
This isn't something Ubuntu should be working on. Please file a request
upstream with the original maintainer.
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Are you still seeing this issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674137
Title:
ifdown unknown interface net-tools is broken
Status in Linux Mint:
New
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1763534
Title:
ifconfig -s (or -a -s) only outputs 8 characters of the interface
name, when
No information provided whatsoever.
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096873
Title:
Is this still an issue after a decade?
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878333
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921280
Title:
ifconfig does not display
1.60-26 landed in Xenial. Fixed.
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415159
Title:
Never fixed. Even in ESM Apps. Package is useless.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770646
Title:
openjdk-9-jdk cannot be installed
Status in openjdk-9 package in Ubuntu:
Fixed in Trusty+
** Changed in: file (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to file in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420963
Title:
file command reports
Fix landed in Bionic but Trusty and Xenial didn't get it. I can't check
the ESM apps without jumping through hoops.
** Tags removed: jaunty natty needs-upstream-report precise
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Tags removed: precise zesty
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289592
Title:
Unknown media types in /usr/share/mime/packages/kde.xml
** Tags removed: precise zesty
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289592
Title:
Unknown media types in
** Tags removed: precise zesty
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289592
Title:
Unknown media types in /usr/share/mime/packages/kde.xml
** Tags added: trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta-hwe in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727861
Title:
kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-IJy1zi/linux-
hwe-4.10.0/fs/cachefiles/namei.c:164!
Status
I've started seeing this for the Virtualbox modules. Could just be a
coincidence but thought I'd mention it.
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta-hwe-6.5 in Ubuntu.
** Project changed: subiquity => ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-meta-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta-hwe-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051418
Title:
Error in
** Tags removed: ubuntu
** Tags added: lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942774
Title:
No fallback English layout on "Who are you?" screen during
installation.
Noble on LXD works correctly too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed-hwe-6.2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046059
Title:
kernel cannot find lz4hc and z3fold modules on boot
Status in
I tried again in Qemu with 16.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04 and none of
them see this issue.
So I tried with Jammy on LXD and the issue does present itself. So the
issue appears to be with the UEC images.
I also tried Mantic on LXD and it works fine. So something has been
fixed between Jammy and
I tried again in Qemu with 16.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04 and none of
them see this issue.
So I tried with Jammy on LXD and the issue does present itself. So the
issue appears to be with the UEC images.
I also tried Mantic on LXD and it works fine. So something has been
fixed between Jammy and
New kernel, no change.
** Description changed:
I've been using zswap without any issues for a while, but fairly
recently (can't be certain when) the kernel became unable to find the
modules for lz4hc compression and the z3fold zpool.
- $ sudo dmesg | grep -E 'z3fold|lz4hc'
- [
Is there actually something to do here for xorg?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009145
Title:
Xubuntu defaults in /etc/xdg/xdg-xubuntu are ignored
Status in xorg
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032910
Title:
60x11-common_xdg_path sets wrong XDG_DATA_DIRS on Plasma
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
Is there actually something to do here for xorg?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009145
Title:
Xubuntu defaults in /etc/xdg/xdg-xubuntu are ignored
To manage notifications
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032910
Title:
60x11-common_xdg_path sets wrong XDG_DATA_DIRS on Plasma
Status in xorg package in
Is there actually something to do here for xorg?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009145
Title:
Xubuntu defaults in /etc/xdg/xdg-xubuntu are ignored
Status
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032910
Title:
60x11-common_xdg_path sets wrong XDG_DATA_DIRS on Plasma
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Was this fixed? There's no other reports of this in all these years.
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #393711
** Package changed: avahi (Debian) => nss-mdns (Debian)
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361131
Title:
constantly flashing bright green while typing
Wily is long gone.
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539305
Title:
package nano 2.4.2-1 failed to
** Tags added: focal jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998592
Title:
in specific situations, nano can eat characters
Status in nano package in Ubuntu:
Upstream Nano doesn't seem interested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782355
Title:
Invoke sudo and present password prompt when permission is denied to
** Tags added: noble
** Summary changed:
- nano is not available in Jammy i386
+ nano is not available in on i386
** Summary changed:
- nano is not available in on i386
+ nano is not available on i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Tags removed: ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922414
Title:
Xorg scripts fail with "has_option: command not found"
Status in Light Display Manager:
Invalid
101 - 200 of 2647 matches
Mail list logo
