Bug#496997: btanks 0.8 final is out
Subject: btanks 0.8 final is out Package: btanks Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Please package new version, 0.8 final. Btw, it resolves all opened bugs on 0.7.5800 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.CP1251, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.CP1251 (charmap=CP1251) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please update btanks to 0.7.5800 xmas edition
thank you for your time ___ Pkg-games-devel mailing list Pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
Bug#447682: RFP: linux-source-2.6.23 needed
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Please add linux-source-2.6.23 to the unstable repo. There are several features I'm dying to try. (sorry for possible bug duplicate, stupid reportbug use wrong mta) Package name: linux-source Version: 2.6.23 Upstream Author: [NAME ] URL: [http://example.com] License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.] Description: [DESCRIPTION] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447682: RFP: linux-source-2.6.23 needed
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Please add linux-source-2.6.23 to the unstable repo. There are several features I'm dying to try. (sorry for possible bug duplicate, stupid reportbug use wrong mta) Package name: linux-source Version: 2.6.23 Upstream Author: [NAME ] URL: [http://example.com] License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.] Description: [DESCRIPTION] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447682: RFP: linux-source-2.6.23 needed
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Please add linux-source-2.6.23 to the unstable repo. There are several features I'm dying to try. (sorry for possible bug duplicate, stupid reportbug use wrong mta) Package name: linux-source Version: 2.6.23 Upstream Author: [NAME ] URL: [http://example.com] License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.] Description: [DESCRIPTION] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Bug c++/18448] New: g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
gcc-3.4.2/4.0.0
Linux 2.6.9 #17 Fri Nov 12 15:59:30 NOVT 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Fedora Core 3
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disa
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)
g++ test.cpp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] temp]$ g++ test.cpp
test.cpp: In function `int main()':
test.cpp:10: error: `A::A(const A)' is private
test.cpp:16: error: within this context
test.cpp:
class A {
public:
A() {}
const A operator=(const A a) {
return *this;
}
private:
A(const A a) {}
};
A a;
int main() {
A *pa = a;
*pa = A();
}
--
Summary: g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator
= on instantiated object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: megath at iof dot ru
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
--- Additional Comments From megath at iof dot ru 2004-11-12 10:43 --- Created an attachment (id=7527) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7527action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
--- Additional Comments From megath at iof dot ru 2004-11-12 13:10 --- about iCopy constructor access check while initializing a reference./i ? yes. sorry. *p = A() constructs copy of object now? what for ? doesnt it degrades perfomance? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
--- Additional Comments From megath at iof dot ru 2004-11-12 13:48 --- I just says it has to be accessable so, if gcc dont use copy ctor - what for it complains ?! and why is it error btw ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
--- Additional Comments From megath at iof dot ru 2004-11-12 13:57 --- thank you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448
