On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:34:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Would you like to take a crack at pulling out the normative
parts of that manual, perhaps with a wee bit of rationale, and see
where we stand?
That would be great, thanks!
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
I'd like having
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Hi policy folks,
We've now got to the stage where we seem to have a good webapps policy
in place, and would like to have it included in policy main as a
'sub-policy' document.
For reference, it's at
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Hi policy folks,
We've now got to the stage where we seem to have a good webapps policy
in place, and would like to have it included in policy main as a
'sub-policy' document.
For reference, it's at
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It may be a neat feature to check application/pgp-signature attachments
to see if they verify (possibly for keys in the keyring) and indicate
this somehow, perhaps by a coloured hinting of pre class=headers.
Thanks!
Neil
--
Sp3ct0L|ZcC dou you speak
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:32:20AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
GRUB 2 should be the default bootloader on x86.
Hi,
Could you fill in a goal page similar to ones in
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals?
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 01 septembre 2009 à 15:36 +0100, Chris Jackson a écrit :
Well, /etc needs to be on /, since otherwise you can't get to fstab to
mount it, and generally things like /etc/hostname will be different, so,
while I
Package: audacious
Version: 1.5.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #491615
Seems that this is still present in i386:
nmcgov...@nmcgovern:~$ gdb audacious
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is
And that previous message was me, but it seems I didn't set the eamil
correctly...
Neil
--
tore Jump in and have a quim!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:28:09PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
Perhaps there is a way to […] discourage all meta-discussion or
mentioning of fallacy, ad-hominem or strawman on the other
lists.
Perhaps you have a better way of succinct terms to
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:56:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The whole vote is to come up with a recommendation for the
decision makers
And should the decision makers not follow that recommendation, the
flamewars will truely begin.
The format and phrasing of this is:
The Debian
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:14:10AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Forking devotee at this point seems to serve little purpose,
given that upstream is not hostile.
Given that the secretary team haven't heared of these patches (AFAIK),
the mention of 'forking' is a bit of a
-DRAFT.sgml?view=log
Comments appreciated, I'd like to get these all in and integrated by end
of August, to push to the policy team for inclusion.
Thanks,
Neil McGovern
--
automake: the emo of Debian software. You just don't understand me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Giving a standard interface to reviewers is a laudable goal, but I do not see
reviewers except in elaborate scenarios about security. Therefore I will not
trade a real benefit for a hypothetical one, even if both are neglectible.
Package: acpi
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: minor
Hi,
It seems that acpi is getting a bit confused as to the difference between mAh
and mWh:
maul...@cheshire:~$ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
present: yes
design capacity: 74880 mWh
last full capacity: 71270 mWh
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:48:54PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
The botan library snafu has been resolved. It looks like the package
needs to wait for the latest botan and sqlite, and something weird
happened on the hppa buildd which I *hope* is not the beginning of
another horrible round of
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:05:05AM -0300, UlisesVitulli wrote:
I've found a problem which breaks functionality on one of my packages
and I've prepared a patch to solve it.
It's really very simply as you may find attached.
Hi,
That's fine. Please upload to SPU.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
When do the release team plan to start publishing approved release
goals? Any hope of having this done now during debconf?
Hi Peter,
Apologies for the delay in replying. There should be a notification to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Is this patch a valid candidate for inclusion in the next point
release?
Hi Julian,
I'm afraid we can't accept this:
* There's a change to the uploaders (which is a bit useless for a stable
point release)
* We don't really
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Please do so nlkt 0.3.2.1-3 fixing FTBFS bug can migrate to testing.
E-mail to sparc buildd was sent at Jul 18 and received no answer.
Hi Eugene,
It seems that this comes back from w-b:
nlkt: has uninstallable
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:46:04PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
Discussing about this on irc, some people seemed to agree with my view
that the female images are too sexual, and that the image of the
notebook on the pillow is disturbing.
I disagree. The images for the males are just as
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (24/07/2009):
Give me the freedom to choose.
It looks like we just reached the “Linux is about choice” Goswin point.
Goswin's law:
As the length of a debian discussion increases, the
Hi Arnaud,
I've just rejected your upload to SPU for nut.
We generally cannot accept 58,000 line changes in SPU. Especially
without requesting it on debian-release@lists.debian.org
Additionally, you have added a file, called :. This seems to be a
copy of debian/changelog.
It also seems to
Hi all,
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which is
preventing the removal (finally!) of GTK 1
Thanks,
Neil
--
pixie
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which
Hi all,
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which is
preventing the removal (finally!) of GTK 1
Thanks,
Neil
--
pixie
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which
Hi all,
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which is
preventing the removal (finally!) of GTK 1
Thanks,
Neil
--
pixie
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:42:53PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:32:04AM -0300, Margarita Manterola said:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Holger Levsenhol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
5. eva blanco will do nametags, she can contact Marga (in spanish) to get
the
://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004-08-10-dbg.2
--
Neil McGovern
Board Member, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:24:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:13:22AM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
But all of that said, it still needs trusted people to review the
packages, which is where we've traditionally started to have scaling
problems.
This is
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:47:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Has Debian even ever received a cease and desist letter from a IP
lawyer? Under which circumstances? I am bit tired of lawyers being
mentioned each time the NEW problems are discussed, while it seems,
based on history, that
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:31:45PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please?
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can openssl 0.9.8k-3 be pushed to testing? It fixed a number
of security issues.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ;
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:31:45PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please?
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Can openssl 0.9.8k-3 be pushed to testing? It fixed a number
of security issues.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ;
Firstly, thanks for your mail, apologies that I haven't replied sooner,
we've had EU and local elections, so I've been busy runnign around with
leaflets, knocking on doors, kissing babies etc. like any politician. No
expenses though...
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:36:01PM -0600, Grant Grundler
.
This means that ftpmasters will be asked to remove HPPA from testing and
unstable from the 30th June. It is suggested that HPPA porters may wish
to consider using debian-ports.org if they wish to continue with the
port.
Regards,
Neil McGovern
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/04/msg00299
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
This means that ftpmasters will be asked to remove HPPA from testing and
unstable from the 30th June. It is suggested that HPPA porters may wish
to consider using debian-ports.org if they wish to continue with the
port.
Erk
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:24:32PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
I've some packages that seem to be blocked by lua-lpeg/lua-wsapi (ABI
bump), but after spending some time surfing release.d.o I didn't manage
to uderstand why they are not moving to testing.
Basically, package A breaks package B,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:37:11PM +1200, Hamish wrote:
Hi,
the goes osm2pgsql packages are now both ready to go into testing
but they mutually exclude each other from doing so. requesting
paired-hinting.
Added:
# GIS itesm 20090530
easy osm2pgsql/0.52.20080408-3 geos/3.1.0-1
Thanks,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
icewm
linpopup
wmclockmon
cheops
codebreaker
gaby
dbmix
gcrontab
gbuffy
gcvs
gcx
geg
gman
gps
gqcam
gtkpool
libjsw
i2e
mah-jong
mbrowse
predict
xemacs21
swami
xoscope
xscorch
All removed
ledcontrol
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
icewm
linpopup
wmclockmon
cheops
codebreaker
gaby
dbmix
gcrontab
gbuffy
gcvs
gcx
geg
gman
gps
gqcam
gtkpool
libjsw
i2e
mah-jong
mbrowse
predict
xemacs21
swami
xoscope
xscorch
All removed
ledcontrol
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:10:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
the following source packages have at least one binary package, which
is now uninstallable, because one or more of it's depencies have been
removed (GTK 1.2, Imlib1). Please remove them from testing:
Hi Moritz,
From a
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:53:58PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
That would be premature. As I understand it, we're waiting on (and I'm
actively soliciting) input for other purposes of the information in the
‘debian/copyright’ file; not least from the legal counsel at SPI.
I could be wrong, but
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
gnome-libs has been removed from unstable. Please remove the two remaining
packages using it from testing: powershell and soundtracker
RC bugs are in place so that they can't migrate back before they've been
fixed.
removal
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 02:47:04AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
This has clear advantages for being able to post-process, check, search, and
navigate copyright information using whatever tools the community decides
would
be profitable.
I'm not quite clear as to why this is an advantage yet
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment:
AMENDMENT START
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:45:18PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:42:29AM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
I'm not quite clear as to why this is an advantage yet Currently, this
seems to have been designed to provide interfaces for future tools to
use, while not regarding
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:02PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first GR was passed in June 2003 and there were 804 developers.
The last GR was passed in November 2008 and there were 1018 developers.
Actually, to be fair, the first vote was 1999, with 357 developers.
Neil
--
vorlon We
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:59:34AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
That's a fair question, but AUIU, it is not up to the proposer, having
already proposed, to decide when the vote gets called.
It's up to the proposer or any of the seconders to do so.
Neil
--
pixie hermanr_: I never studied german
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment:
AMENDMENT START
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:02PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
The first GR was passed in June 2003 and there were 804 developers.
The last GR was passed in November 2008 and there were 1018 developers.
Actually, to be fair, the first vote was 1999, with 357 developers.
Neil
--
vorlon We
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:59:34AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
That's a fair question, but AUIU, it is not up to the proposer, having
already proposed, to decide when the vote gets called.
It's up to the proposer or any of the seconders to do so.
Neil
--
pixie hermanr_: I never studied german
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:49:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
It appears that shorewall-{common,perl,shell} are in need of hinting in
order to propogate. I'd appreciate if someone could hint them.
easy hint added.
Neil
--
[..] Debian (in the form of a large, busy, and frequently
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:45:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
ImageMagick in Lenny has non-free fonts with it (see bug #510751).
The proposed update is to upload the current version in testing
Please upload.
Neil
--
jmtd irssiproxy appears to be crack cut with washing up
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Other potential usages of Debian moneys are bounties, to which I'm not
opposed in principle. However, they should obey to very specific
rules. The first one is that no one already contributing to Debian
should be authorized to
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
920 cdrom://Lenny_DVD_1 lenny/main Packages
900 ftp://ftp2.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
980 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
[...]
Can someone explain, WHY the SECURITY mirror
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So, please advise.
From a RT point of view, this isn't going to have a fix in for lenny.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So, please advise.
From a RT point of view, this isn't going to have a fix in for lenny.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So, please advise.
From a RT point of view, this isn't going to have a fix in for lenny.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 08:06:55PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:37:34AM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On the day, we'llneed the stable-release-tag-magic-thing updating to
lenny too, so I'mlooking for a volunteer :)
I should be able to help. What needs to be done
Hi all,
As you may have noticed, it's the intention to release this weekend, on
Valentines Day. This means that there needs to be updates to the
website. I'm trying to get the various teams to produce some text for
me, and I should be able to produce a nice webwml patch for you all
shortly.
On
Hi all,
This is a quick mail to invite those interested to a meeting tonight to
discuss the timetable for the release.
Please note that this is a practial meeting, and due to the tight
timescales we're working towards, topic discipline is appreciated.
Apologies for the short notice.
Neil
--
Hi Debian CD!
To try and get the website ready in time for release, it would be great
if the CD section of the website could be updated[0].
I can create the patches to the webwml if you need me to, but it would
be really good if you could go over http://www.debian.org/CD/ and tell
me what's out
Hi Debian boot!
To try and get the website ready in time for release, it would be great
if the boot section of the website could be updated.
I can create the patches to the webwml if you need me to, but it would
be really good if you could go over
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:20:04PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:55:08PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
wrote:
Version 0.10.8-4.1 fixes a security bug!
Unblocked
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:51:38PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
sshguard is useful to me, and I'd like to see it stay in, but in its
current state of neglect it's probably not practical. My offer to co-maintain
still stands, but I doubt a new upstream will make it into lenny at this
late
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:28:34AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please, consider, this is urgent, as there's a security fix in this
package. Is there any way to skip the 9 days delay?
Upload with urgency high?
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:37:24PM +0100, Jérémie Corbier wrote:
and I would like to be allowed to upload it to t-p-u since wide-dhcpv6-client
in
its current state in testing is completely unusable.
Please upload.
Neil
--
* stockholm bangs head against budget
h01ger outsch
stockholm
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
from Luk's hints file:
| # 20081218
| […]
| unblock guile-1.6/1.6.8-6.1
please make it: guile-1.6/1.6.8-6.3
Unblocked.
Neil
--
[local irc server has just been brought up]
godog suddenly there's quite some
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Version 0.10.8-4.1 fixes a security bug!
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:09:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/debian-med/biofox_diff.txt
* New upstream release, compatible with Firefox 3 (Closes: #512371).
* Updated debian/watch.
Both ok.
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not ok.
What's wrong, Debhelper or the typo? Most freeze exemptions I
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the release. Your
previous request
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:09:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/debian-med/biofox_diff.txt
* New upstream release, compatible with Firefox 3 (Closes: #512371).
* Updated debian/watch.
Both ok.
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not ok.
What's wrong, Debhelper or the typo? Most freeze exemptions I
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the release. Your
previous request
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:22:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, there was no response to my diff from RM so I guess it is accepted
the way I tried to address their concerns. I just uploaded
Thanks, ACCEPTed.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:09:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/debian-med/biofox_diff.txt
* New upstream release, compatible with Firefox 3 (Closes: #512371).
* Updated debian/watch.
Both ok.
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
Not ok.
What's wrong, Debhelper or the typo? Most freeze exemptions I
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the release. Your
previous request
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:11:50PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes:
please unblock
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:54:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hello folks,
Could you unblock opensaml2 2.0-2 for lenny? The changelog is:
* Include fix for https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/CPPOST-7
(Metadata with EncryptionMethod elements fails to load)
* Include fix for
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:39:06AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
diff --exclude='*other_packages*' --exclude='*tests*' -urN
twill-0.9~b1/debian/changelog twill-0.9/debian/changelog
Unblocked.
Neil
--
pixie hermanr_: I never studied german
pixie I can just read some of it because it makes
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:27:06AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Would a one-line change of build-dependencies to fix Bug#512604 be
accepted?
Yes, to T-P-U though. However, isn't this affected by #459459?
Would any of the other parts, if isolated from that largest change of
being
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:36:55PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It's a simple enough script renaming agreed by upstream to fix an RC bug.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ;
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:11:00AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Btw., will squeeze be 6.0?
Unknown yet, and probably won't be for some time.
Neil
--
Yoe is _that_ gunnar?
weasel yes
Yoe what happened to his tires?
towersbe He's shrunk. I think his wife washed him at too high a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:41:14PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I've just uploaded this, which contains an important documentation fix
relating to choice of databases which has just come to our attention.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why
severity 512624 important
thanks
This doesn't make the package unusable, or mostly so.
Neil
--
i get an error... i forget what it is ... but definitely an error, well, maybe
a warning... or an informational message... but definitely an output
Verbatim quote from #debian, irc.freenode.net,
severity 512624 important
thanks
This doesn't make the package unusable, or mostly so.
Neil
--
i get an error... i forget what it is ... but definitely an error, well, maybe
a warning... or an informational message... but definitely an output
Verbatim quote from #debian, irc.freenode.net,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.3.2-2+lenny6 fixes a regression introduced
in -2+lenny5. The patch is trivial. Please unblock it.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
linuxpoet rails is a perversion
mc someone who use pgsql as calculator
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:27:54AM +, David Watson wrote:
Could you please unblock pybridge-0.3.0-4, this upload fixes the serious
bug #512576.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key -
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:10:42PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Please unblock slmon. The changes are minor but mainly to remove the
build-deps on old gnome-libs. Here is the changelog:
Unblocked.
Neil
--
weasel dpkg: shut up
dpkg No, I won't, and you can't make me. :P
weasel hah. _I_
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:15:16PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Please unblock synce-trayicon. It is a minor change to remove an
unnecessary build-dep on a gnome-lib. Here is the changelog:
Unblocked.
Neil
--
02:14:04 stockholm crap. my squirrelmail does not work
02:14:07 stockholm
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:24:51PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi,
Please unblock glotski. It's a small change to remove an unneeded
build-dep on a gnome-libs binary. Here is the changelog entry:
Unblocked.
Neil
--
h01ger ETOOMUCHSPANISHTOOFAST
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:33:03PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Please consider unblocking gwc . The number of changes are significant
but small (Mainly to kill more gnome-lib build-depends). If you would
like to see a diff, please let me know. Here are the last two changelog
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Please consider unblocking mrwtoppm 0.1.1-2.2. Another unnecessary
gnome-libs build-dep. I did bump compat on this one though. Here is
the changelog entry:
Sorry, I'm not happy with a change to debian/compat at this late
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:46:40PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Please unblock ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2. Another unnecessary build-dep on a
gnome-lib (and some minor lintian fixes). Here is the changelog:
Any idea what:
--- ogle-gui-0.9.2/debian/ogle-gui.desktop
+++
801 - 900 of 1882 matches
Mail list logo
