Bug#922089: ITP: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme -- Go wrapper for the GPGME library

2019-02-11 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme Version : 0.0~git20170102.b243242-1 Upstream Author : Miloslav Trmač * URL : https://github.com/mtrmac/gpgme * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Go

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I intend to have this package team maintained. You can find the repository at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I intend to have this package team maintained. You can find the repository at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage

Re: Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I intend to have this package team maintained. You can find the repository at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-containers-storage Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/containers/storage * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : Go

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-containers-storage Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/containers/storage * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : Go

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-containers-storage Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/containers/storage * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : Go

Bug#921949: ITP: golang-github-containers-storage --

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-containers-storage Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/containers/storage * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : Go

Accepted restic 0.9.4+ds-2 (source) into unstable

2019-02-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 18:53:40 -0500 Source: restic Binary: restic Architecture: source Version: 0.9.4+ds-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description: restic

[Bug 1341307] Re: fs2ram places /var/cache on tmpfs, Breaks unrelated packages

2019-02-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
** Changed in: fs2ram (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Changed in: vdradmin (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1341307] Re: fs2ram places /var/cache on tmpfs, Breaks unrelated packages

2019-02-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Nathan, could you please elaborate why you marked this bug as invalid? What makes you think this was fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341307 Title: fs2ram places /var/cache on

[pkg-go] Bug#921849: restic 0.9.4 `-q` outputs `open repository`

2019-02-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: restic Version: 0.9.4+ds-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream When used for instance in a cron job for backup, I would get emails that have this content: /etc/cron.hourly/backup_restic: open repository open repository open repository This has been reported upstream at:

Bug#921849: restic 0.9.4 `-q` outputs `open repository`

2019-02-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: restic Version: 0.9.4+ds-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream When used for instance in a cron job for backup, I would get emails that have this content: /etc/cron.hourly/backup_restic: open repository open repository open repository This has been reported upstream at:

Accepted golang-github-pquerna-ffjson 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable

2019-02-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description: ffjson - faster JSON serialization for Go golang-github-pquerna-ffjson-dev - faster JSON serialization for Go Closes: 919278 Changes: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson (0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Accepted slirp4netns 0.2.1-1 (source) into unstable

2019-01-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:43:49 -0500 Source: slirp4netns Binary: slirp4netns Architecture: source Version: 0.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Adrian, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package > that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved > from buster 9 months ago). > That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out. > A

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Adrian, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package > that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved > from buster 9 months ago). > That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out. > A

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think > > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping > > this bug at RC se

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think > > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping > > this bug at RC se

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional > cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to > build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional > cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to > build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional > cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to > build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
t apparently we are just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below. Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java? What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster? Best, -rt On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
t apparently we are just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below. Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java? What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster? Best, -rt On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
t apparently we are just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below. Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java? What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster? Best, -rt On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:29 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > To make progress on the debian packaging, I see three options: > > a) Wait for upstream to make a release (cf. > https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/pull/200) > b) upload with an epoc > c) upload a

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:29 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > To make progress on the debian packaging, I see three options: > > a) Wait for upstream to make a release (cf. > https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/pull/200) > b) upload with an epoc > c) upload a

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-17 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Juan, Thank you for your work on the package. I'm happy to sponsor uploads to Debian for you as necessary. Did you see my question in my previous email regarding whether skopeo also works with the sjoerdsimons fork that we currently have in Debian? If it would, I think Debian would be better

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-17 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Juan, Thank you for your work on the package. I'm happy to sponsor uploads to Debian for you as necessary. Did you see my question in my previous email regarding whether skopeo also works with the sjoerdsimons fork that we currently have in Debian? If it would, I think Debian would be better

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Petri, I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing list last march [1]. The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11, and we as package maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your response back then was that

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Petri, I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing list last march [1]. The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11, and we as package maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your response back then was that

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-01-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Petri, I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing list last march [1]. The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11, and we as package maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your response back then was that

Accepted fuse-overlayfs 0.3-1 (source amd64) into unstable

2019-01-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:21:58 -0500 Source: fuse-overlayfs Binary: fuse-overlayfs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description

Bug#909032: Additional build failures

2019-01-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Seems that additional issues have shown up: dh_auto_configure make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2' dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build cd _build && go install -gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"

Bug#909032: Additional build failures

2019-01-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Seems that additional issues have shown up: dh_auto_configure make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2' dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build cd _build && go install -gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"

[pkg-go] Bug#909032: Additional build failures

2019-01-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Seems that additional issues have shown up: dh_auto_configure make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2' dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build cd _build && go install -gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"

Accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux 1.0.0-1 (all source) into experimental

2019-01-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Closes: 901745 Description: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux-dev - common selinux implementation Changes: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (1.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Team upload. . [ Alexandre Viau ] * Point Vcs

Accepted golang-github-opencontainers-selinux 1.0.0-1 (all source) into experimental

2019-01-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Closes: 901745 Description: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux-dev - common selinux implementation Changes: golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (1.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Team upload. . [ Alexandre Viau ] * Point Vcs

Bug#919278: ITP: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson -- faster JSON serialization for Go

2019-01-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1 Upstream Author : Paul Querna * URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Bug#919278: ITP: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson -- faster JSON serialization for Go

2019-01-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1 Upstream Author : Paul Querna * URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Bug#919278: ITP: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson -- faster JSON serialization for Go

2019-01-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1 Upstream Author : Paul Querna * URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go

Accepted fuse-overlayfs 0.2-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-01-12 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:19:58 -0500 Source: fuse-overlayfs Binary: fuse-overlayfs Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description

Accepted keepassx 2.0.3-2 (source amd64) into unstable

2019-01-12 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:05 -0500 Source: keepassx Binary: keepassx Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description: keepassx

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 00:55 Dmitry Smirnov On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 11:04:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > All in all, the package looks good for upload to me. May I ask where we > are > > with that? > > Wait a sec, did you check the following forwarded bug

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 00:55 Dmitry Smirnov On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 11:04:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > All in all, the package looks good for upload to me. May I ask where we > are > > with that? > > Wait a sec, did you check the following forwarded bug

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Cool, thanks! On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote: > Hi Reinhard. > > Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests: > > ``` > === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess > --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s) > commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Cool, thanks! On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote: > Hi Reinhard. > > Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests: > > ``` > === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess > --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s) > commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:

Re: Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Cool, thanks! On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote: > Hi Reinhard. > > Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests: > > ``` > === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess > --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s) > commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:

Bug#880199: Packaging blockers

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, I've looked at packaging skopeo as well, and according to the dh-make-golang tool, there are apparently 3 dependencies blocking this ITP: 2019/01/09 06:54:27 Build-Dependency "github.com/containers/storage" is not yet available in Debian, or has not yet been converted to use

Bug#880199: Packaging blockers

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, I've looked at packaging skopeo as well, and according to the dh-make-golang tool, there are apparently 3 dependencies blocking this ITP: 2019/01/09 06:54:27 Build-Dependency "github.com/containers/storage" is not yet available in Debian, or has not yet been converted to use

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Dmitry, I wonder where we are with this ITP about packaging oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling. I've cloned salsa:go-team/packages/oci-image-tools and testbuilt it in a debian/unstable. Lintian output seems reasonable to me. So does debian/copyright. All in all, the package looks good for

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Dmitry, I wonder where we are with this ITP about packaging oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling. I've cloned salsa:go-team/packages/oci-image-tools and testbuilt it in a debian/unstable. Lintian output seems reasonable to me. So does debian/copyright. All in all, the package looks good for

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Juan, are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well, and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go This package never got uploaded. However, I also noticed that

Bug#898689: ITP: golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go -- Golang bindings for httt://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

2019-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Juan, are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well, and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go This package never got uploaded. However, I also noticed that

Bug#907632: [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++

2019-01-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
No problem at all. Thanks for taking care of the sync for me, Steve! Reinhard On January 2, 2019 2:30:50 PM EST, Steve Langasek wrote: >On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 04:32:38PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On 12/25/18 11:53 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > Package: aspectc++ &

Bug#907632: [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++

2019-01-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Steve, On 12/25/18 11:53 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: aspectc++ > Version: 1:2.2+git20170823-7 > Followup-For: Bug #907632 > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch > > Hello, > > Based on the bug history, I don't think this is a bug in gcc-8

Accepted slirp4netns 0.1~git20181119.5e4789b-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

2019-01-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 09:52:59 -0500 Source: slirp4netns Binary: slirp4netns Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1~git20181119.5e4789b-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler

Bug#917889: ITP: fuser-overlayfs -- An implementation of overlay+shiftfs in FUSE for rootless containers.

2018-12-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Packaging available at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuse-overlayfs This program is going to use fuse3, which is not co-installable with fuse2. cf. - http://lists.debian.org/ca+fnjvb3j4h81k+bcxm3d2zjgheenjxhws06c5avicr51jg...@mail.gmail.com -

Bug#917889: ITP: fuser-overlayfs -- An implementation of overlay+shiftfs in FUSE for rootless containers.

2018-12-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Packaging available at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuse-overlayfs This program is going to use fuse3, which is not co-installable with fuse2. cf. - http://lists.debian.org/ca+fnjvb3j4h81k+bcxm3d2zjgheenjxhws06c5avicr51jg...@mail.gmail.com -

Bug#917889: ITP: fuser-overlayfs -- An implementation of overlay+shiftfs in FUSE for rootless containers.

2018-12-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: fuser-overlayfs Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano 2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi * URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs * License : GPLv3

Bug#917889: ITP: fuser-overlayfs -- An implementation of overlay+shiftfs in FUSE for rootless containers.

2018-12-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: fuser-overlayfs Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano 2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi * URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs * License : GPLv3

Bug#917889: ITP: fuser-overlayfs -- An implementation of overlay+shiftfs in FUSE for rootless containers.

2018-12-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: fuser-overlayfs Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano 2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi * URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs * License : GPLv3

Bug#917337: ITP: slirp4netns -- User-mode networking for unprivileged network namespaces

2018-12-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler Package name: slirp4netns Version : git HEAD Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns License : GPLv2+ Programming Lang: C Description : User

Bug#917337: ITP: slirp4netns -- User-mode networking for unprivileged network namespaces

2018-12-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler Package name: slirp4netns Version : git HEAD Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns License : GPLv2+ Programming Lang: C Description : User

Bug#917337: ITP: slirp4netns -- User-mode networking for unprivileged network namespaces

2018-12-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler Package name: slirp4netns Version : git HEAD Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns License : GPLv2+ Programming Lang: C Description : User

Accepted aspectc++ 1:2.2+git20181008-2 (source) into unstable

2018-10-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:08:17 -0400 Source: aspectc++ Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc Architecture: source Version: 1:2.2+git20181008-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard

Accepted aspectc++ 1:2.2+git20181008-1 (source) into unstable

2018-10-21 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 10:05:31 -0400 Source: aspectc++ Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc Architecture: source Version: 1:2.2+git20181008-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard

Bug#903948: Dokuwiki: Link-Assistant in oldstable hangs

2018-09-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: found -1 0.0.20140505.a+dfsg-4+deb8u1 On 09/27/2018 01:28 AM, Matthias Faulstich wrote: > Dear Reinhard, > > the bug should be fixed in the repository > https://non-gnu.uvt.nl/ > as reported here > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903948 > > The fixed Package there is

Bug#857807: Proposed fix https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dokuwiki/merge_requests/1

2018-09-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: tag -1 patch Hi, I think the issue is that the file got dropped from the package, yet the default package is still referencing it. I took the liberty of taking the image from the jessie package and propose a change at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dokuwiki/merge_requests/1. Tanguy,

Bug#907632: [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: gcc-8 Version: 8.2.0-4 Affects: aspectc++ X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Relevant part from https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0 In file included from

Bug#907632: [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: gcc-8 Version: 8.2.0-4 Affects: aspectc++ X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Relevant part from https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0 In file included from

Bug#907632: [ppc64-el] Breaks building aspectc++

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: gcc-8 Version: 8.2.0-4 Affects: aspectc++ X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Relevant part from https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0 In file included from

Bug#890024: npapi-vlc: upcoming Firefox ESR dropping support for NPAPI

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable. Let's proceed with the RM bug.

Bug#890024: npapi-vlc: upcoming Firefox ESR dropping support for NPAPI

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable. Let's proceed with the RM bug.

Bug#890024: npapi-vlc: upcoming Firefox ESR dropping support for NPAPI

2018-08-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable. Let's proceed with the RM bug. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#902220: Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: retitle -1 Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1 Well, I just checked, even the latest trunk does not support LLVM 6.0.1. Or rather, it builds (with some minor, obvious modifications), but doesn't work. I haven't tested LLVM 6.0.0, it may or may not work. This needs to be looked into more.

Bug#902220: Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: retitle -1 Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1 Well, I just checked, even the latest trunk does not support LLVM 6.0.1. Or rather, it builds (with some minor, obvious modifications), but doesn't work. I haven't tested LLVM 6.0.0, it may or may not work. This needs to be looked into more.

Bug#902220: Processed: reopening 902220

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On 08/29/2018 08:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > AspectC++ upstream code already seems to support LLVM 6 (untested). That's contradictory to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906972#10 This needs to be looked into more. Also, why do you need to have this bug at severity serious?

Bug#902220: Processed: reopening 902220

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On 08/29/2018 08:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > AspectC++ upstream code already seems to support LLVM 6 (untested). That's contradictory to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906972#10 This needs to be looked into more. Also, why do you need to have this bug at severity serious?

Bug#902220: Processed: reopening 902220

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: severity -1 normal Hi Adrian, Thanks for your bug maintenance work, much appreciated! On 08/28/2018 08:27 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> reopen 902220 > Bug #902220 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [aspectc++] >

Bug#902220: Processed: reopening 902220

2018-08-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: severity -1 normal Hi Adrian, Thanks for your bug maintenance work, much appreciated! On 08/28/2018 08:27 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> reopen 902220 > Bug #902220 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [aspectc++] >

Accepted aspectc++ 1:2.2+git20170823-8 (source) into unstable

2018-08-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 10:17:28 -0400 Source: aspectc++ Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc Architecture: source Version: 1:2.2+git20170823-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard

[Bug 1782402] Re: any export AC3 causes segfault

2018-07-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Unfortunately, apport-collect didn't collect the crash file. Please check if there is an corresponding crash file for this segfault in /var/crash and report it using "ubuntu-bug /var/crash/". We can then mark the new bug as duplicate of this one as necessary. Alternatively, you could use

[Bug 1336527] Re: add --version argument

2018-07-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336527 Title: add --version argument To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1782402] Re: any export AC3 causes segfault

2018-07-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Unfortunately, this is not enough. Please use apport-collect (http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/en/man1/ubuntu-bug.1.html) to attach the missing information. The backtrace indicates that the crash comes from avcodec_open2(), which is found in the ffmpeg package. However, your trace did

Bug#904163: libavcodec-extra57 should PROVIDE package libavcodec57

2018-07-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: tags -1 -d-i Control: retitle -1 "Investigate the use of versioned provides in place of the alternative dependencies in shlibdeps" Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi James, On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM James Cowgill wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 21/07/18

Bug#904163: libavcodec-extra57 should PROVIDE package libavcodec57

2018-07-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: tags -1 -d-i Control: retitle -1 "Investigate the use of versioned provides in place of the alternative dependencies in shlibdeps" Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi James, On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM James Cowgill wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 21/07/18

[Bug 1782402] Re: any export AC3 causes segfault

2018-07-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down

Accepted dokuwiki 0.0.20160626.a-2.1 (source) into unstable

2018-07-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 11:59:53 -0400 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source Version: 0.0.20160626.a-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Tanguy Ortolo Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler Description

Bug#903305: dokuwiki: diff for NMU version 0.0.20160626.a-2.1

2018-07-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler
y Antoine Beaupré +(Closes: #889281) + * Fix loading of css (Closes: #894018) + * Fix 'Invalid argument supplied for foreach() .../lib/exe/js.php' +(Closes: #866245) + + -- Reinhard Tartler Sat, 07 Jul 2018 11:59:53 -0400 + dokuwiki (0.0.20160626.a-2) unstable; urgency=medium * de

Re: FFmpeg 4.0 transition

2018-06-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi James, Hi Sebastian, thank you, I clearly must have missed the transition bug. Best, Reinhard On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:18 PM James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/06/18 20:09, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I notice that we have an FFmpeg 4

FFmpeg 4.0 transition

2018-06-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi everyone, I notice that we have an FFmpeg 4.0 transition coming up: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ffmpeg.html However, I fail to find the email to debian-release or bug report coordinating the release. Maybe I missed it, or there was some talk about this on IRC? In any

Accepted aspectc++ 1:2.2+git20170823-7 (source) into unstable

2018-06-25 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:59:10 -0400 Source: aspectc++ Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc Architecture: source Version: 1:2.2+git20170823-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler Changed-By: Reinhard

Accepted smplayer 18.5.0~ds1-2 (source) into unstable

2018-06-19 Thread Reinhard Tartler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:58:18 -0400 Source: smplayer Binary: smplayer smplayer-l10n Architecture: source Version: 18.5.0~ds1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Reinhard

Bug#901837: RFP: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools -- OCI Runtime Tools

2018-06-19 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Dmitry, https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools gives me a 404. Is this ITP a placeholder? Thanks for your work on this. On that note, is there a team or mailinglist for coordinating work on container tools? I might be interested in getting

Bug#901837: RFP: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools -- OCI Runtime Tools

2018-06-19 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi Dmitry, https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools gives me a 404. Is this ITP a placeholder? Thanks for your work on this. On that note, is there a team or mailinglist for coordinating work on container tools? I might be interested in getting

Accepted smplayer 18.5.0~ds1-1 (source) into unstable

2018-06-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Tartler Description: smplayer - Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv smplayer-l10n - Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv - translation files Closes: 897863 898943 Changes: smplayer (18.5.0~ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Reinhard Tartler ] * New upstream release. * Disable

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2018-06-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
The README (cf. https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/oci-image-tools) refers to a the tool "skopeo". Do you plan on packaging https://github.com/projectatomic/skopeo as well? -- regards, Reinhard

Bug#900900: ITP: oci-image-tools -- OCI image tooling

2018-06-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
The README (cf. https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/oci-image-tools) refers to a the tool "skopeo". Do you plan on packaging https://github.com/projectatomic/skopeo as well? -- regards, Reinhard

Bug#870233: smplayer: executes javascript code downloaded from insecure URL

2018-06-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
​Sorry, I messed up Ricardo's email address in my previous follow-up, so his reply went to me only. I'm quoting his input with his permission: ​Older versions of SMPlayer downloaded a javascript function from > http://updates.smplayer.info/yt.js in order to decrypt a signature, > which it's

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >