f you have any
questions, let me know!
Best regards,
Daniele.
-- Daniele Arena - ANIX / Namex
E-mail:
http://www.anix.al/
Dear all,
The Call for Presentations for the RIPE 64 Meeting is out. The Meeting
will take place in Ljubljana next April, and the deadline to submit
proposals is on 3 February.
I hope you will be interested in attending and in sending proposals
for presentations.
Best regards,
Daniele
(on
Bonjour à tous,
Je vous fais suivre l'appel à présentations pour la conférence RIPE
64, qui va se tenir à Ljubljana en Avril. L'échéance pour les
propositions est le 3 février.
J'espère que quelqu'un de la communauté française puisse être
intéressé(e) à soumettre des présentations.
Bien à vous,
.
Bien à vous,
Daniele Arena
(Pour le RIPE Programme Committee)
-- Forwarded message --
From: RIPE NCC Meetings meet...@ripe.net
Date: Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Subject: RIPE 63: Call for Presentations
To: RIPE WG Chairs wg-cha...@ripe.net, ripe-l...@ripe.net
Dear colleagues
Hi Ricardo,
I was wondering if there is any web page with pointers to IXP's peering
matrices (such as http://www.swissix.ch/peermatrix.php)?
I don't think that there is a webpage (traceroute.org-like) that has
links to peering matrices. There are webpages with pointers to IXPs,
and IXPs may
I remember this because I had such a reload and it was during a period of
heavy cosmic activity.. as the hardware had always been reliable and was reliable
after this was beleived to be the cause
We have also started to use this as the standard excuse.
Up to now, people believe us...
Hi Vaclav,
I had the same problem with MySQL and other external packages, and I
couldn't find anything really appropriate. The smartest thing I could do
was to hack configure.in in this way:
snip
dnl
dnl MySQL include directory
dnl
AC_ARG_WITH(mysqlinc,
[ --with-mysqlinc=DIR
Akim,
If you allow me a word as a complete outsider, I personally think that
your wish to maintain documentation for every OS is extremely nice and
denotes a lot of courage, because maintaining such a thing can be hell. I
think this is Pavel's point: that this effort can fade in time, and we
Hi Akim,
Beware! These are two different machines and OSs. The gzipped file I sent
you is for Solaris8/SPARC, while the plaintext test 80 is the *only*
failed test for BSDI3.1 . Please tell me if you want me to send you the
full error file for BSDI3.1 .
As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Daniele Arena wrote:
As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to rerun them. Maybe I did something
wrong which blew all up?
Ehm... Sorry, but now there's something I don't get. Really. Is it in any
way possible that the tests give different results if run with different
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
Daniele As for the Solaris8 tests, I will try to rerun them. Maybe I
Daniele did something wrong which blew all up?
I don't think so. But I had the strange impression that some stuff
has be executed concurrently, and it should not have. But frankly,
For bash, the answer is: yes - no. You have the different outputs, the
first I sent today marked "sparc-sun-solaris2.8.gz" and the one I just
sent. They were both generated with bash.
I didn't try again with the other shells. I can do it, but not at once.
Cheers,
D.
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
Remains a big problem: the test suite is not deterministic on your
system. Is it sane? Have you already tried to install a sane GNU
package on it? Does it work properly? Was Autoconf built on the same
machine too? Is it in /tmp or through NFS?
The
On 30 Nov 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
You can check now.
Last CVS sources checked out, test rerun (with sh;). There are still tests
failed (21 of them), but the "torture" one is not failed anymore. See
attached file.
Good night:)
Daniele.
check.new.sparc-sun-solaris2.8.gz
Hi Autoconfers,
I'm slowly but steadily proceeding in makechecking autoconf on whatever
machine I can get hold of, during my spare minutes...:)
You told me to report any failed checks, so here are a couple of them on a
RISC running AIX 4.3.3 , with the CVS version checked out this afternoon.
Hi Pavel!
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello, Daniele!
[...]
./config.status: 7: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "}")
I'll be very interested to see your config.status
Then here it is... Enjoy!:)
Cheers,
Daniele.
config.status.gz
Hi Akim,
You can find it attached hereby.
Any other questions, I'm here.
Cheers,
Daniele.
On 25 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
When, the error message is not enough to understand what's going wrong
(and it makes no sense to me).
Could you run
/bin/sh -x ./config.status
At your orders, sir...;-)
Cheers,
Daniele.
On 25 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
Same process, could you run this one please?
+ ac_nl=
+ IFS=
+ debug=:
+ echo ./config.status
+ sed s,.*/,,
+ me=config.status
+ SHELL=/bin/sh
+ config_files=Makefile
+ ac_given_srcdir=.
+
Hi Akim,
Glad that you finally got the "bug".
On 25 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
OK, then the problem is that your shell is bad at following escaped
quotes. What I changed is this snippet:
[...]
I remove the
cannot find input file \\\`$f'
part of the error messages.
Hi All,
Since there was no tarball;) I thought I would checkout the CVS just to
have some fun. I started to test here and there, and got some positive
tests (make checks) with a SPARC(-clone) running Solaris 7. Just a tiny
weird thing, it ignored every test in update.m4:
125. ./update.m4:10
On 13 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
If you have some spare time, then testing the CVS version is good.
But if you have little time, please keep it for the next tarball we
will put on alpha.
When do you plan to publish the new tarball?
Cheers,
Daniele.
Hello everybody,
I might be able to test autoconf on some platforms (BSDI, Solaris, Alpha,
AIX...), as long as it does not involve spending a night doing that, but I
think i missed some information:
- Which version of autoconf do you want to be tested? The version on
22 matches
Mail list logo
