On 4/19/24 15:15, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 14:38 -0400, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:42 PM Paul Smith wrote:
The main advantages to alloca are twofold:
1) efficiency for small local buffers, which GNU Make uses a lot.
2) simplification of the code because
On 4/19/24 14:38, Dmitry Goncharov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:42 PM Paul Smith wrote:
The main advantages to alloca are twofold:
1) efficiency for small local buffers, which GNU Make uses a lot.
2) simplification of the code because you don't have to track this
memory and ensure it's
On 4/19/24 10:27, Paul Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 09:54 -0400, Dennis Clarke via Bug reports and
discussion for GNU make wrote:
Where does one even begin to discover where something ( everything? )
went so horribly wrong?
The very first thing you should try is re-configuring GNU Make
As the subject line says ...
---
Running tests for GNU Make on linux
GNU Make 4.4.1
---
This is highly unexpected on a plain jane Linux x86_64 type box :
--
Running tests for GNU make on Linux esther 6.1.63-genunix x86_64
GNU Make 4.3
On 2020-01-11 13:22, Martin Dorey wrote:
>> accept prerequisites and implement them as
> the user expects, which violates POSIX ... and which never happened
> before
>
> I fear implementing what the makefile author asked for instead of
> what they got... could expose other latent issues in their
