Hi Duy, The recipe in question was done by the Instrument Cluster EG, we can work on this with the group (main contact Yamaguchi-san). They do meet every other monday. See: https://lists.automotivelinux.org/g/agl-dev-community/calendar
We do exacly what Paul describes all the time in meta-agl to pass the yocto- check-layer: e.g. https://git.automotivelinux.org/AGL/meta-agl/tree/meta-agl-core/recipes-core/ systemd/systemd_%25.bbappend and https://git.automotivelinux.org/AGL/meta-agl/tree/meta-agl-core/recipes-core/ systemd/systemd_aglcore.inc The condition can be on DISTRO_FEATURES or other variables. We try not to overload the usage of DISTRO_FEATURES as a change there will trigger a reparse in a lot of locations and hence possibly rebuilds. Thus the use of AGL_FEATURES in above example for anything that is directly related to AGL and is not a DISTRO_FEATURE in yocto already. For dlt-daemon in your example, we have these options and recommendations: a) use such a conditional include as shown above ... simple but it will not fix all the issues b) use :append:<some_other_conditional> only in .bbappend files (name says it all ;) ) e.g. :append:aglcontainerguest or e.g. :append:aglcontainerhost The 2nd condition / override is important here to pass the check. A simple :append would triger c) distill the recipe down to just the required changes & if possible upstream these (e.g. PACKAGECONFIG options) ... config file changes can also be added in a "dlt-daemon-conf" package and replace or amend the original files. This helps most. a) will have immediate effect but only c) and b) will lower the workload mid- term. A path forward would then be: Upstream the PACKAGECONFIG bits . It might make sense to rework the package so there is a configuration sub-package that is replaceable by the user. Then most conf file changes are in a separate package and can be easily replaced by the user w/o even touching the main (binary) package. That is of importance for reproducible builds and binary feeds. Am Montag, 8. April 2024, 14:36:38 CEST schrieb Duy via lists.yoctoproject.org: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for your response. > Here is one of the recipe bbappend files I'm working on: > meta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%.bbappend · > master · Automotive Grade Linux / AGL / meta-agl-devel · GitLab ( > https://gitlab.com/automotivegradelinux/AGL/meta-agl-devel/-/blob/master/me > ta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%25.bbappend?ref_ > type=heads ) > meta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%.bbappend · > master · Automotive Grade Linux / AGL / meta-agl-devel · GitLab ( > https://gitlab.com/automotivegradelinux/AGL/meta-agl-devel/-/blob/master/me > ta-agl-ic-container/recipes-extended/dlt-daemon/dlt-daemon_%25.bbappend?ref_ > type=heads ) > > I think some configurations are better to be upstreaming, e.g: Adding new > PACKAGES, adding new PACKAGECONFIG. It avoids adding too much to bbappend. > If you have any idea, please share it. > > Best Regards, > Duy Dang
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62929): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/62929 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/105397924/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
