On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:59:26AM GMT, José Relvas via devel wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> `libtsm` was retired because it was orphaned. `kmscon` was retired because it
> relied on this package.
>
> I'm currently not in the "packagers" group, but I'm interested in taking
> ownership of these
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:15:15PM GMT, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I think for ex-redhatters it may be more appropriate to make a new bz
> account for their new email address?
Yes. I don't think the system will allow you to change emails for a
@redhat.com account.
Just making the new account
So, shall we set a retirement date for the old planet and announce it?
I'd like to propose:
2024-05-22
Thats in 2.5 weeks, which is a bit short, but we need time to move
people02 to rhel9 and such.
If that sounds ok to everyone, we should send out an announcement to
devel-announce/discussion
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:28:19PM GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 15:41 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 5/2/24 14:34, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > While I follow the philosophy of updating
> > > regularly, there are likely some who install Fnn, and
> > > never
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 11:32:21AM GMT, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> On 5/3/24 8:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > So, help would definitely be welcome fixing the matrix/irc issues in the
> > code, and then we could look at mass updating it.
> >
>
> I briefly look
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:24:57PM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > Somehow the news that various (some ? all? ) Fedora meetings have
> > moved off IRC, to Matrix passed me by. This is not helped by the
> > official project meeting
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:47:08PM GMT, Gerry Rigney wrote:
> Hey all, gerryrcom here, will lurk for a while but hope to be able to help
> out soon if required. Have experience in sys admin/ ops type work but mostly
> at a smaller scale that here :)
>
> Some scripting experience, mostly small
Hey everyone.
Fedora 38 is scheduled to go EOL on 2024-05-14
Thats just a bit less than 2 weeks from today!
I already moved a bunch of machines to f40 that were f38, but there's
some left:
These I need to untangle createrepo_c. We could upgrade them to f40, but
if we upgrade builders to f40 we
Hey folks.
hiredis 1.2.0 has been out a long while now, and with some prodding I am
finally looking at updating rawhide to it.
A interested user ran a mass prebuild:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/v02460/hiredis-1.2.0/packages/
Everything rebuilt fine.
ccache
collectd
coturn
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:20:37PM GMT, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> I screwed up the isomd5sum checksums in the 1.2.4 release while trying
> to fix support for small isos. I've reverted the change and 1.2.4-2 is
> building for rawhide and Fedora 40. Thanks to Jonathan Billings for the
> bug report
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 04:42:50PM GMT, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 22:06, Jonathan Steffan
> wrote:
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > Awesome. Once we sort out how we are going to support [releng] Issue #10765
> > (systemd-boot signing) will this upgrade enable us to consider signing
>
Hey folks.
Just a heads up that I have migrated sigul to the new 1.2 version with
rhel9 vault/bridge.
Please let me know if you see any signing issues in the coming days.
It seems to be processing as expected, so hopefully everything will be
transparent to everyone, and look for some nice
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:16:28AM GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 08:56 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > Personally, I think this is a beta requirement.
> > >
> >
> > IIUC the Fedora 41 Beta requirement is to successfully upgrade the system
> > from Fedora
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:46:17PM GMT, Paul Maconi wrote:
> Hello everyone! My name is Paul Maconi, aka @aggraxis on matrix, across
> the FAS, and a bunch of other places. I attended the meeting earlier
> today. Thank you again for the warm welcome.
Welcome again. Nice seeing you around...
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:00:09PM GMT, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 23:09 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 11:51 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > I've updated to F40. Everything works as expected, (I don't have an
> > > Nvidia card at present so
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> > at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
> >
>
> Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
> 41
>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:48:46AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> There's also the effort of distribuiting and archiving a few
> additional gigabytes, putting up the links on the website and browsing
> through them, some additional time and and additional step that can
> fail during
With the release of Fedora 40 yesterday, infrastructure freeze is now
over.
Our next freeze is for Fedora 41 beta, currently scheduled for
2024-08-20.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
infrastructure mailing list --
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 09:37:38AM GMT, Igor Kerstges wrote:
> Those questions regarding privacy are asked and answered to my satisfaction.
> I'd like to understand more implications about this change..
There are none. This proposal was withdrawn.
It may be adjusted and submitted for
Thanks everyone.
I got the builders updated. Hopefully that will do the right thing for
now. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
In the run up to f40 final we were using a koji with a patch to _not_
enable the builroot repo when making containers via kiwi plugin.
This was to fix the fact that pulling from the buildroot repo pulls
unsigned rpms, making all the rpms installed in the container unsigned.
Foolishly, I pulled a
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:40:11PM GMT, darknao wrote:
> Hi o/
>
> I would like to retire the old labs.fedoraproject.org website and redirect it
> to the new one on the main site at https://fedoraproject.org/labs/
>
> If possible, the redirect would be enabled on F40 release day so we don't
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 03:30:32PM GMT, Go Canes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 1:48 PM John Mellor wrote:
> >
> > With X being a completely unmaintainable mess, all new and bugfix
> > development stopped about 2 years ago. Most disturbing is that for the
> > last 2 years there have been
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:27:21AM GMT, Tim via users wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 13:47 -0400, John Mellor wrote:
> > However, given that absolutely everyone today has compute power
> > on their desk and everyone has a gpu for things like compositing instead
> > of what was available back
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:56:44AM GMT, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 04/17/2024 11:08 AM, t_...@tiscali.it wrote:
> > I'm on fedora since years.
> > If they'll completely drop X11, I need to change distro.
> > Any suggestion on which distro is good for continuing to
> > use the "VERY OLD" X11/Mwm ?
> >
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 03:45:40PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
> What about simply blocking access to the git repos/koji/bodhi for those
> without 2fa?
Well, git I suppose could be a hook that checks the status of the user,
but koji and bodhi don't really have any place to hook that in directly.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 19:52 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> > I was hesitant to have MFA for a while. Imagine losing a phone with tons
> > of tokens. What a hassle to recover from that. I found it less than
> > ideal
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:41:02PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent EOL of the Django 3.2 LTS series[^1], and Django being a
> key component of our mailing list infra for both Fedora and CentOS, I
> would like to propose the following plan to maintain Django in both
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:49:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 00:09 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >
> > What is the best way to formally propose
> > that 2FA is required for packagers after
> > some date
>
> There is already a FESCo ticket.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
> rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config files
> and rules for running rpminspect on Fedora builds. It is a
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:19:31PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 10:45:52AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
> >
> > Change: GNU Toolchain F41
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3
When I did the updates before final freeze, I missed updating the
builders with the latest koji package from the f39-infra tag.
At the time for some reason I thought it didn't matter, because the
patches were all hub related, but turns out thats not the case.
2 of the patches affect builders:
*
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:11:56PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 10:10 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:06 PM Antonio T. sagitter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything?
> > >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-04-08 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:07:39PM +, seanmott...@posteo.net wrote:
> Hi devel!
>
> I'm Sean (FAS: seaninspace). I've been working professionally in Linux
> Sysadmin/Engineering positions for over a decade now, and would like to help
> out more :)
>
> I've spent most of my Fedora time in QA
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:34:05PM +0100, jdie...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 16:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 09:28:31PM +0100, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > * Alternatively, we could update whatever's calling createrepo_c
> > >
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 08:11:42PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
>
> One approach that would be at least bring some light into "weak"
> (non technical layer) components (albeit not sure how feasible it is),
> could be:
>
> - Checking the resources of a packaged project.
>Resources in
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:00:13AM +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted.
> >
>
> Oh, sorry about that. This portion of the text was inadvertently altered
> during the review process. I've already corrected the text on the wiki.
>
> The
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 05:04:20PM +, Arnie T via devel wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> I just caught up with the article at the New York Times,
>
> Did One Guy Just Stop a Huge Cyberattack?
>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:26:14PM +, Arnie T via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed Fedora on 2 of my PCs a couple of weeks ago. One version of
> Fedora 39 release and one of Fedora 40 to see where things are going.
>
> I learned about this XZ-hack from Ars Technica & The Economist.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 14:27 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 4/3/24 06:36, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted.
> >
> > https://dnf5.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changes.html does not
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 04:24:08AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Why not the opposite:
> >
> > Download Workstation
> >
> > [I'm a linux user and know what I want, just show me the full list of
> > downloads, click here
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 06:17:59PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 02.04.24 um 23:32 schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 17:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > >
> > > I am a happy KDE user, since the good old days of version 1.0. I celebrate
> > > this decision! My
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 07:27:12AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 05:22:52PM +0530, Aditi Mishra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just for the information, I'm very new to fedora but want to contribute in
> the development of future fedora.
>
> Below are my specfications:
>
> IRC handle: aditiLinux
>
> * Skills that I can offer:
>
> -
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:36:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Ok, thats obvously somewhat tounge in cheek, but if we promote multiple
> > things, we need some way to describe them to uses who might not know the
> > history of things and do
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 09:28:31PM +0100, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 09:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:32:10PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 09:12 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > Our next
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 04. 24 v 7:45 odp. Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 07:13:56AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 14. 03. 24 v 9:58 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > > > FYI I plan to con
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
> Alright, so a substantial amount of information changed since the original
> submission of the change proposal. We aren't necessarily thinking of
> demoting Gnome. The overall spirit of the CP is that we think KDE, and to
> some
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote:
> >
> > I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on the
> > Fedora Account System. Maybe take that opportunity to make it a bit more
> > user
Greetings.
we are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 40
Final release. This is a final release freeze.
We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
release Fedora 40 when it's available.
You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 07:13:56AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14. 03. 24 v 9:58 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > FYI I plan to continue in AWS cleanup on Friday.
> >
> > I waited till Freeze is over - just to be safe. And now I want to delete
> > the old AMIs. Likely in several waves.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Here comes January edition of resources running in AWS. It's a snapshot of
> resources running today.
>
> Per request of Miro Vadkerti I grouped it by (FedoraGroup, region,
> ServiceName). I will try to make it more compact next
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:24:51PM +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > sting->stable marked updates be still included in
> > stable without having to go through the exception/blocker process?
> >
>
> I was told there would be one more
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:45:18PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> This is without AMIs and Snapshots that still produce looong list.
>
> Region: us-west-1
> Volumes - [id name (attached to instance, owner)]:
> * vol-0d7702fbe7ab94c6f N/A (famna.fedorainfracloud.org, N/A)
Oops. Thiw was me. I
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:07:13PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2024 23.08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> > > Not sure, if it was already mentioned -> containers. I had here a toolbox
&g
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 08:55:37PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> The repo files should be the same on Fedora containers, so if the container
> is F40 and the testing repo is enabled, it might have installed the malicious
> build.
Right, if it was dnf updated during the time that the bad
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
>
> Not sure, if it was already mentioned -> containers. I had here a toolbox
> environment with F40. That I had not in my first actions
> on the screen. The last state had 5.6.0-3 installed but not sure
> if the previous
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 03:52:12PM -0500, Alex Thomas wrote:
> Just to be clear, as I was getting ready to put 40 Beta on a test
> machine, this has been fixed. I do the install and run updates and the
> compromised version of xz is never installed?
Correct.
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 09:12:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks Arthur, yes, that was *exactly* the point.
>
> I would argue there's a danger of getting too tied up in very specific
> technical details of this attack. Yes, it's reasonable to think of ways
> to mitigate those specific
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 07:42:24AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> At this point, I'm used to MFA for stuff (and I use a password manager
> that handles 2FA OTPs too), but the Fedora implementation of MFA is
> uniquely bad because we have to do a lot in the terminal, and our MFA
> implementation
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:12:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote:
>
> From what I understood, F40 Beta, the official Beta release, available from
> the website as of March 26, has updates-testing disabled by default. That
Nope.
> was confirmed by several people in #devel yesterday when the Fedora
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:32:10PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 09:12 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Our next freeze is for Fedora 40 Final, currently scheduled for
> > 2024-04-02, which is NEXT TUESDAY!
>
> Could you please update fedora-
Hey folks, started a discussion thread:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/planning-for-infra-and-releng-hackfest-at-flock-2024/110244
Please read and reply over there (or I guess here if you really must ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:59:04AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I totally depend on x2go for connection to my remote server. With f40,
> what happens? Is login to X11 desktop supported? I assume this is
> required for x2go to work.
In f40, the kde desktop is no longer shipping a X11 session
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 01:50:17AM -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
> Hi
> I think there used to be an applet on the tray of the XFCE desktop for
> managing bluetooth.
> Did I dream it?
Fedora Xfce uses blueman for bluetooth. So, yes, there should be a
blueman applet in your tray. Do you have blueman
With the release of Fedora 40 Beta yesterday,
infrastructure freeze is now over.
Our next freeze is for Fedora 40 Final, currently scheduled for
2024-04-02, which is NEXT TUESDAY!
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
infrastructure
Just a reminder that, because Beta used it's 'target date #2'
(ie, today), the gap between the Beta release and Final freeze is only 1
week this time.
So, please take this time to do any last minute testing and bugfixing
and make sure any packages you expect to be in the final f40 base
Just a reminder that, because Beta used it's 'target date #2'
(ie, today), the gap between the Beta release and Final freeze is only 1
week this time.
So, please take this time to do any last minute testing and bugfixing
and make sure any packages you expect to be in the final f40 base
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:24:10PM +, Barry wrote:
> Why is the version of this announcement missing all the details
> here?
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-linux-40-beta-released/109684
I think it was being edited when you looked?
It seems to have the details now? Or is
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:36:02PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> After I requested [1] Celestia project upstream to better define
> licensing of all the textures and 3d models included in upstream data,
> it turned out that at least some content is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 [2]
> which
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:59:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:50:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> Keep in mind we also want to make the compose process faster too, I
> >> don't know if it's worth it to spend 20x
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:40:47AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote:
> > > >
> &
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote:
> >
> > Performing kernel regression tests:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression
> >
> > I am getting errors submitting as follows:
> >
> > Your
I'd like to update koji on builders.
This build (
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2423765 )
has added:
* A fix to make kiwi builds only use passed repos if there is one passed
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/4061 ).
I have tested this in staging and it does fix the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:41:49PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> Working on switching kerneltest over to openshift, and the final step
> is to update the proxies:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1872
>
> and then also run the iplison playbook so the oidc config gets copied
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 04:36:03PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > So, seems glibc32 was updated to update license headers?
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-cd577e1535
> >
> > So, it's in f40-updates-testing now.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
> glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
>
> As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
> some
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
> glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
>
> As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
> some
Planned Outage - fedora.im / chat.fedoraproject.org matrix server - 2024-03-14
07:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-03-14 07:00UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
Planned Outage - fedora.im / chat.fedoraproject.org matrix server - 2024-03-14
07:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-03-14 07:00UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI I plan to continue in AWS cleanup on Friday.
>
> I waited till Freeze is over - just to be safe. And now I want to delete the
> old AMIs. Likely in several waves. Going from oldest to ~2021.
Sure, but note that freeze is only
Planned Outage - fedora.im / chat.fedoraproject.org matrix server - 2024-03-14
07:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-03-14 07:00UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I have thought about this when proposing the Change to make dropping
> support for i686 easier. What you suggest is probably not as easy as you
> think - the packages that are required for multilib purposes change over
> time,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:40:05AM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>
>
> Quick definition: fora is the plural of forum, as in a web based forum to
> discuss a topic or technology, like https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/.
>
> Having said that...
>
> I love mailing lists. I have filters set up
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:19:11PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the
> native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt. Therefore two
> different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources.
>
> However I
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:44:51AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I can't quite point to proper evidence, but I have a feeling that
> email notifications are being lost from Pagure.
I'm guessing from below you mean the src.fedoraproject.org instance?
(pagure.io is the other one, so it's best
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:18:25PM -, Ryan Bach wrote:
> I want to know because maybe we can see hyperkitty updated after that.
It should be the day after the Beta is released.
We missed next week's 'early' date, so the next target is a week from
next tuesday.
Note though that
Thanks. This is done now.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
We need a newer pungi version that adds support for kiwi and has changes
for osbuild arm minimal. These are both things we are trying to land for
beta.
There's a 4.6.2 release upstream that we need.
So, I'd like to build this for f39 (which our compose hosts are) and
update them.
If something
Hey everyone.
The koji builders are currently using 6.7.6-200.fc39, which is mostly
fine, but on i386 builds there's some kind of memory issue and (some)
builds run out of memory and fail. ;(
See: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11775
I'd like to upgrade the buildhw-x86*
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:49:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> We were discussing this on IRC, so just to bring the topic up on the
> mailing list ...
>
> (1) Package libxslxwriter (note: "xslx") with only automated activity
> and no builds:
>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:20:30PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> This is without AMIs and Snapshots that still produce looong list.
>
> Region: ap-southeast-1
> Instances: (name, id, owner)
> * proxy38 (i-0a1ee820c765d573c, N/A)
> Volumes - [id name (attached to instance, owner)]:
> *
Greetings.
We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 40
Beta release. This is a pre release freeze.
We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
release the Fedora 40 Beta when it's available.
You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by
All that said, I have filed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11799
for us to investigate why it's not properly disabling the unresponsive
nodes and look into the underlying unresponsiveness issue.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:46:23PM -0500, Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:01 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:20 PM Christopher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
> > > lists.fedoraproject.org or
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
> aliases are currently broken
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Oh, OK. So it was a misunderstanding on my side. I thought that since e.g. F41
> has a bunch of packages taken from F40 and F39 and earlier, they will be
> signed
> by those respective keys. But we resign them, so
1 - 100 of 10451 matches
Mail list logo
