Public bug reported:
The code for fetching the pagination links is hard coded to use WebOb's
Request path_url property. In setups where a proxy is used to forward
requests to neutron nodes, the href shown to the requesting tenant
doesn't match the one he/she made the request against.
Thirding sponsorship.
I didn¹t review as much as the other two, but I helped merge a couple of
the patches. Agreed with Jay otherwise; we¹re almost there, let¹s finish
it.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
-Original Message-
From: Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 3:30 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hey Shane,
For what it's worth, it's still alive in the sense that we're using it
at Rackspace, and push out commits on occasion. You can find newer commits
here: https://github.com/rackerlabs/melange
With that said, we want to go to Neutron ourselves, so I'll second what
Wayne
To add to this, the majority of my reviews come out of the period in the
morning before my team's daily standup. I've found that sufficient for
getting some reviews in, and conversely, fights off the tremendous burnout
I used to get when we had review days back in the beginning of the project.
Good idea!
Only thing I would point out is there are a fair amount of changes, especially
lately, where code is just moving from one portion of the project to another,
so there may be cases where someone ends up being authoritative over code they
don't totally understand.
From: Alessandro
I'll second the jinja2 recommendation. I also use it with Pyramid, and
find it non-obtrusive to write and easy to understand.
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, July
All,
I think Trey Morris has been doing really well on reviews again, so I'd
like to propose him to be reinstated for Nova core. Thoughts?
-Dietz
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Hey all,
We just started work on a new plugin for Quantum that we're calling
Quark. The blueprint lives here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quark
In short, we want to provide an alternative to the existing NVP plugin
that's a bit more cognizant of how much it
+1
From: Tong Li liton...@us.ibm.commailto:liton...@us.ibm.com
Date: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:34 PM
To: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.commailto:vishvana...@gmail.com
Cc:
+1
On 7/19/12 9:46 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Padraig has been contributing a lot of code to all parts of nova, and
has been contributing a lot to reviews[1]. I think he would make a
great addition to
The problem here is there are two opposing points: the idea that there are
too many core reviewers, and the idea that patches aren't being reviewed
fast enough.
*Drags a yak into the room* Beyond that, what makes 20 better than 25, or
15, especially in light of the fact that we're not happy with
If you wanted to use Yagi, it would be trivial to add a JSON only notifier to
Yagi. If you're interested and need a hand, feel free to hit Dragon or I for
assistance.
From: Monsyne Dragon mdra...@rackspace.commailto:mdra...@rackspace.com
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:39:08 +
To: Luis Gervaso
I started looking into moving the notification drivers as well, but punted
because of the reliance on multiple things, RPC included. For us, it's a
nice to have but not a need.
As for your plan, it seems sensible to me.
On 4/2/12 3:26 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
max_messages actually corresponds to how many messages we try to send to the
configured recipient before it moves onto the next queue in the list.
Basically, it's super rudimentary QoS.
As for expiration, that's controlled by redis itself. Under the persistence
configuration section, you can
Hey guys,
Dragon has really stepped up lately on reviewing patches into Nova, and has a
ton of knowledge around Nova proper, so I propose he be added to Nova core. I
think he'd be a great addition to the team.
Matt
___
Mailing list:
+1!
On 11/30/11 8:05 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1 ... good call!
From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on
behalf of Vishvananda Ishaya
+1 from me, too
On 11/30/11 4:47 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2011/11/29 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com:
Mark is maintaining openstack for Fedora and has made some excellent
contributions to nova. He has also been very prolific with reviews
lately. Lets add him to core
Couldn't agree more with this
On a side-note, I'm now going to sign all emails as
Weird,
-Matt
On 10/28/11 12:54 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:39 AM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
I am concerned about some of the implications that are being discussed.
For the record, I'm currently running XenServer 6 inside of a VMWare
Fusion install on my Mac, with 2GB of RAM dedicated to the entire VM. I
created a new instance_type that creates 64MB instances. Works great so
far!
On 10/28/11 3:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Frans
To answer this, yes, it's possible. Rails does it already, in some
fashion. They have some convention for generating all routes, which I
think is one of the most important take aways here, and they provide a DSL
for implementing other routes very easily. From there, one could readily
generate the
Giuseppe,
I'm not sure that's the error that's causing the problem, but it seems
indicative of a larger issue: namely that the other compute node (the one
that received the VHD in the migration) perhaps cannot talk to the dom0?
Matt
On 9/20/11 11:29 AM, Giuseppe Civitella
[jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 8:20 AM
To: Matt Dietz
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Integration tests
Wow, another integration test framework emerges out of the woodwork :)
Looking forward to getting all of these into a single place... and
clearing
Ditto
On 9/12/11 2:10 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Can we discuss pulling novaclient into Nova's source tree at the design
summit?
+1
This email may include confidential information. If you
Actually to extend this, Novaclient is used for zone communication inside
of nova. It not being included is silly, at this point
On 9/12/11 1:37 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Regarding novaclient, I
Suite looks great, Soren!
Wanted to mention that we actually developed our own suite of tests, which you
can find at https://github.com/ohthree/backfire I'm planning to reconcile the
difference so we can stop the independent efforts, but it's going to take time.
Something else I'd like to see
I would think we have enough tracking information to support the goal of
identifying failures. In any scenario, some of the failures will simply be
unrecoverable.
Regarding the process crashing, who's to say the retry process also
wouldn't crash? We could endlessly argue the arbiter/watchdog
+1 from me
On 5/31/11 3:10 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Todd Willey t...@ansolabs.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
While I was checking branch merges, I noticed that Brian Lamar
+1
On 5/11/11 4:24 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1
On 5/11/11 3:01 PM, Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Subject says it all. I think Brian's demonstrated that his code
reviews are thoughtful and thorough, and he knows
+1
On 5/11/11 12:07 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark's been a very good reviewer and an invaluable resource on the API
side, particularly regarding serialization. I propose he join
nova-core.
-jay
___
Mailing list:
+1
On 5/11/11 3:16 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
++ on your suggestions.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We have quite a large backlog of merge proposals here:
...@enstratus.com
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 23:17:29 -0500
To: Jorge Williams
jorge.willi...@rackspace.commailto:jorge.willi...@rackspace.com
Cc: Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.commailto:matt.di...@rackspace.com,
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
openstack
it's on target
with what you're suggesting
Thanks!
From: George Reese
george.re...@enstratus.commailto:george.re...@enstratus.com
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:07:22 -0500
To: Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.commailto:matt.di...@rackspace.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack
+1
On 5/10/11 3:20 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince)
for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews
welcomed!
Matt Dietz
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
I'll add myself to the pool for Xen
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.commailto:vishvana...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:08:35 -0700
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Lieutenants (Again)
Hey Everyone,
A couple people have
PM, Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.com wrote:
I think a forum as a means of communication is great. However, I'm not
sure I feel it's the right fit here. My main concern in this regard is
that there would be a separation of important discussions.
I think the class of questions on a forum would
Your reviews have been very thorough for FF.
+1
On 3/24/11 4:58 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Trey Morris trey.mor...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend
+1 to this!
On 2/17/11 3:28 PM, Soren Hansen so...@ubuntu.com wrote:
+1! (Yup, that was +factorial(1), for those keeping score at home)
2011/2/17 Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com:
I'd like to help out on the review process as
per
+1 :-D
From: Josh Kearney
josh.kear...@rackspace.commailto:josh.kear...@rackspace.com
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:32:04 -0600
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] Proposal to be a member of Nova Core
I'd like to volunteer my time to help out
41 matches
Mail list logo
