Re: [DISCUSS] The Future of Apache Marmotta - Move to Attic?

I guess it's obvious that the core community has moved out. The question is: is there enough support for keeping the project running or we should move it to the Attic? On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:53 AM Alain Bouju wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm ok to continue the project. I've done some code work on

Cannot checkout. An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.

Hi, I have a little problem doing a checkout of a repository. Y get this error: Cannot checkout. An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. svn: Can't write to connection: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. I have the 1.14.0 version of Tortise

Re: [rdflib-dev] Query sparql endpoint giving HTTP Error 406: Not Acceptable

t; > > sparql = SPARQLWrapper(endpoint) > sparql.setQuery(query) > > sparql.addDefaultGraph("urn:x-evn-master:assetonto") > sparql.setOnlyConneg(True) > sparql.setReturnFormat(CSV) > result = sparql.query().convert() > > > kind regar

Re: [rdflib-dev] Query sparql endpoint giving HTTP Error 406: Not Acceptable

Please, report the details if the issue to GitHub, and we'll try to troubleshoot it. On Mon., Jul. 6, 2020, 08:32 Richard Dijkstra wrote: > I am not able to go to too much detail because my lack of knowledge of > proper requests etc > But interesting might be that the Python library

Re: [rdflib-dev] New rdflib core devs, 5.0.0 soon

Great to see new people continuing with the work here. Let us know how the old folks can help with something. Cheers, On Thu, Mar 12, 2020, 17:19 Nicholas Car wrote: > Dear rdflib devs, > > > New maintainers > -- > Ashley Sommer (@ashleysommer), Natanael Arndt

Re: new website

I'm surprised we haven't properly announced such cool launch. https://twitter.com/wikier/status/1176903475906482176 On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:32 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > The new website looks great Aaron. Nice work to everyone involved ! > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:26 PM Aaron Markham >

Re: [rdflib-dev] Namespaces with #

Then, if it looks like a bug, report it to GitHub. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 01:05 Kristina wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 15:01:42 UTC+2 schrieb Sergio Fernández: > > What do you have defined as @base? > > > > > > https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/#base-iri

Re: [rdflib-dev] Namespaces with #

What do you have defined as @base? https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/#base-iri That would be used by RDFLib to parse your file. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 05:56 Kristina wrote: > Hello, > > my ontology is written in JSON-LD. I use RDFLib to parse it and prepared > Query for SPARQL. So far, it

Re: [Python-es] Reemplazando Jinja2 con f-strings

Un f-string es código, no un string. Yo no seguiría ese camino... es una mala idea y potencialmente un riesgo. ¿Por qué no seguir con Jinja? On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 20:05 AGTUGO wrote: > Dada la evaluación dentro de los f-strings, parece natural reemplazar los > lenguajes de plantillas, como

Re: geoSPARQL in MARMOTTA-584

Hi Allain, that topic branch may be a bit behind develop (I'll try to take care of that this week). But still you should send a PR with your patch targeting that topic branch. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 4, 2019, 04:16 Alain Bouju wrote: > Dear Marmotta Team, > > It's seems in >

Re: [Python-es] Extraer tamaño de hoja archivo pdf

Saber si es A3 o A4, estoy trabajando con Python 3.7. >> Gracias. >> ___ >> Python-es mailing list >> Python-es@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-es >> > ___ > Python-es mailing li

Re: [ansible-project] Loop problem

Didn't know about that function! Thank you so much. El domingo, 14 de abril de 2019, 0:08:20 (UTC+2), Kai Stian Olstad escribió: > > On 13.04.2019 23:53, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Currently as the script is displayed, it creates 1 and send it all to > all >

Re: [ansible-project] Loop problem

escribió: > > On 13.04.2019 19:47, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am using Ansible along with HashiCorp's Vault to store sensible data. > > I will be weekly sending a Secret_ID to each server, in order for them > to > > get a token. With t

[ansible-project] Re: Loop problem

t; El sábado, 13 de abril de 2019, 19:47:17 (UTC+2), Sergio Fernández escribió: > > Hi, > > I am using Ansible along with HashiCorp's Vault to store sensible data. > I will be weekly sending a Secret_ID to each server, in order for them to > get a token. With this token, the

[ansible-project] Re: Loop problem

{ item }}" El sábado, 13 de abril de 2019, 19:47:17 (UTC+2), Sergio Fernández escribió: > > Hi, > > I am using Ansible along with HashiCorp's Vault to store sensible data. > I will be weekly sending a Secret_ID to each server, in order for them to > get a token. With th

[ansible-project] Loop problem

Hi, I am using Ansible along with HashiCorp's Vault to store sensible data. I will be weekly sending a Secret_ID to each server, in order for them to get a token. With this token, they can access the contents of the Vault. The problem is that we must send a secret ID per host, and they can only

Re: RDF-Patch...

Sorry for the late reply. If that's the case, please jump into dev@marmotta, so we can address the issue authorizing PATCH requests. Thanks! On Fri, Mar 8, 2019, 05:09 Alan Snyder wrote: > I got it working! I had to enable PATCH in the security module for all > update methods - I'll figure

[ansible-project] Boot signal from a remote Pi

Hi there! I would like to know the best way to perform this: I will be using the Vault (from Hashicorp) to store API keys for my app, so I will be storing the Vault Token in my Raspberry Pi, inside a tmpfs mount, so every time the Raspberry Pi halts, the API token must be renewed somehow. I

[VOTE][LAZY] move git repo to gitbox

Hi, Infra stated that we need documented consensus on this. So, let’s have at it. This vote will close in 72 hours. My +1 here. I've using gitbox for quite a bit in two other projects (mxnet and openwhisk) with no issues and much seamless integration from github. -- Forwarded message

Re: [Mormotta] Distributed Mode?

See http://marmotta.apache.org/platform/cloud.html On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 08:23 emanuel peter Hi, > > I am currently trying to understand what Apache Mormotta has to offer. > > 1) Is it possible to run it in a distributed mode? > 2) If yes: Can data be replicated and/or sharded/partitioned? > >

OR expression in index_parameters.yml

the longer version. Thank you for your help! Sergio Fernández Rubio - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiofdz/ ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.genieacs.com http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [VOTE] Retire ODF Toolkit

+1 It'd be good to state the intention of the podling to continue under the TDF (The Document Foundation) umbrella or the project is going to die completely. On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 20:54 Dave Fisher The ODF Toolkit community has VOTEd to Retire. > > The thread: >

Re: Approaching Apache's 200th top level project and more than 300 projects have gone through the incubator

very cool! On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 23:48 Justin Mclean Hi, > > It looks like the next project to graduate after Griffin will be the ASF’s > 200th top level project! > > We’ll also recently passed the 300th project to go through the incubator. > [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1.

Re: [Python-es] Distintos Encodings en Python

, Oct 31, 2018 at 6:16 AM Pixu Kideak wrote: > Gracias por el consejo Sergio. > > ¿Cómo podría forzar a que el script / app fuera obligado a utilizar > Unicode? > > Saludos ;-) > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 13:44, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> Utiliza siempr

Re: [Python-es] Distintos Encodings en Python

g list > Python-es@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-es > -- Sergio Fernández http://www.wikier.org ___ Python-es mailing list Python-es@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-es

Re: [VOTE] - Adopt "Become a Committer and PPMC Member" Document

+1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one. Here my two cents to the discussion: You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less effort in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2018

last committers or PPMC members elected? > > None > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](s2graph) Andrew Purtell > Comments: > [ ](s2graph) Seetharam Venkatesh > Comments: > [ ](s2graph) Sergio Fernández > Comments: >

Re: [rdflib-dev] Re: rdflib v5.0

Sounds like a good plan :-) On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, 06:49 Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > (I've CC'd the rdflib-dev mailing list as well - so that everyone is on > board!) > > I've had a chat with Jörn, and come up with the following road-map: > > RDFLib Roadmap >

Re: Include MKLDNN into default mxnet pip package

If there is no downside on platforms not supporting AVX512 instructions, then +1 On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 14:10 Alex Zai wrote: > Hey all, > We have been working hard these past few months to integrate and stabilize > Intel’s MKLDNN deep learning CPU accelerator into Mxnet and have made >

Re: Apache MXNet (incubating) Python Docker Images

Python 2.7 reaches End of Life by the end on 2019.Take that into account. About Python 3.x, why not having 3.6 docker images? I know 3.7 is not yet supposed by MXNet. But starting with 3 5 doesn't make much sense for me On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 11:52 Meghna Baijal wrote: > Hi All, > > I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.6 based on RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 05:31 Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we have fixed some bugs and added some features since Commons CSV 1.5 has > been released, so I would like to release Commons CSV 1.6 based on RC1 > > Commons CSV 1.6 is available for review here: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 Release

Zha, you should check you have permissions to post to annou...@apache.org, because I don't think you announcement made it through: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?annou...@apache.org:lte=1M:mxnet [image: Screen Shot 2018-09-19 at 12.05.14 PM.png] On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:51 PM Sheng Zha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway 0.9.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: - incubating suffix and disclaimer - signatures and checksums - LICENSE files - Apache License headers - No binaries distributed - No unexpected binary files As well as Justin, I have one minor comment that doesn't block the release: some JavaScript files do

Re: [DISCUSS] Estabilish the "FreeMarker Generator" product

+1 And then we should invite the two of them as commiters. On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 00:33 Daniel Dekany wrote: > Dear PMC members, > > It would be good to hear the voice of more of you. Even if it's just > "I agree", please respond, so we know that you're aware. This belongs > to "FreeMarker

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 08:40 Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered > Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many releases and have grown the > community. > > Vote: > [ ] +1 - Recommend Graduation of Apache Pulsar as a TLP >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 08:40 Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > The Apache Pulsar project is ready to graduate as a TLP. They entered > Incubation on June 1, 2017, have had many releases and have grown the > community. > > Vote: > [ ] +1 - Recommend Graduation of Apache Pulsar as a TLP >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

meaningless projects. > > What are some ways to activate our community? Can you help me? > > 2018년 9월 10일 (월) 14:52, Sergio Fernández 님이 작성: > > > signed-off > > > > I think we should discuss the future of the podling sooner than later. I > > can see the gradu

Re: [rdflib-dev] Running sparqlwrapper package using fuseki

uld be? > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:55 PM Sergio Fernández > wrote: > >> That you're proxying in a Flask app the SPARQl query I think is not >> relevant for the issue. >> >> Check the Fuseki documentation: >> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving

Re: [rdflib-dev] Running sparqlwrapper package using fuseki

That you're proxying in a Flask app the SPARQl query I think is not relevant for the issue. Check the Fuseki documentation: https://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/#sparql-over-http Because I think you're pointing to the wrong endpoint. I think it should be something like /ds/query

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

your own commentary. > > [ ] Initial setup > [ ] Working towards first release > [x] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > [ ] Other: > > Date of last release: > > 2017-08-26 > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > None > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests (md5 checksums can be removed) * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good * no binary files in the source release * clean build (osx 10.12.6) I'd

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC1

+1 (binding) On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 16:53 Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version > 1.2.1.RC1. Voting will start now (Monday, Jul 9th) and end at 5:50 PM > PDT, Thursday, July 12th. > > Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc1: >

ICLAs?

Hi, one detail I've notices: is the Podling collecting all ICLA when people contribute to the project? I can' find traces for most of the folks in this list: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md Because that's a minor, but important, detail for the viability of

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

Exactly, 1.2.2 addressing the warning issue. Specially since 1.3.0 is being already discussed at dev@. Anyway, the podling can learn from these things. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 00:34 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Agree with Dave: incubating releases are not cheap… > > Also agree. Seems to me

Re: Regarding 1.2.1 Release

Besides that I can't agree with the arguments about the warning at 1.2.1-RC1-incubating, but I guess I haven't much to say. Remember that "if it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen". On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 17:37 Anirudh wrote: > Hi all, > > After an offline discussion, the current

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

Agree with Dave: incubating releases are not cheap... On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 20:02 Anirudh wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thank you for your inputs. To give more context, the reason we are doing > the release is to fix a backwards incompatible change with the save_params > API. This issue impacted some of

Re: 3.4.0 announcement?

Ok, sorry, I thought I missed it ;-) On Mon, Jun 25, 2018, 03:15 Jakob Frank wrote: > Not yet, I was on vacations and offline... I'll compile an announcement > today/tomorrow. > > On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 at 19:39 Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > Maybe I missed it... but

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good * no binary files in the source release * clean build (osx 10.12.6) Some minor details I'd like to

3.4.0 announcement?

Maybe I missed it... but we haven't officially announced the new release yet, right?

Re: [RELEASE][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0

Happy to help. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 21:40 Chris Olivier wrote: > thank you for the explanation > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:25 PM Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > No, the result at dev@ it's fine. You just need 3 binding votes together > > in > > the two votes

Re: [RELEASE][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0

> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > Just wanted to refresh what > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#ppmc_and_binding_votes > says: > > "The only time when a PPMC member’s vote is binding is for the addition > of

Re: [RELEASE][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0

as binding those votes at the RESULT email. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 17:38 Chris Olivier wrote: > what do you mean? just curious. > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:44 PM Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > Please, notice PPMC votes are not binding. > > > > On Fri, Jun 2

Re: [RELEASE][VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0

Please, notice PPMC votes are not binding. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 09:35 Anirudh wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies for replying instead of sending out a new email. > > This vote has passed with 6 +1s: > > Binding: > Sandeep > Haibin > Indhu > > Non Binding: > Carin > Pedro > Lai > > I will proceed

Re: users@mxnet

e current community was at discuss forum and > many > > > users > > > >>>> prefer it, having a mail-list is only a burden we will bring > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Tianqi > > > >>>> > > > >>>&g

Re: users@mxnet

se use of the term "Apache > way" to force our mind into the entire community... Maybe I am wrong.. > > Tianqi > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > Well, I do respect what you discussed in that meetup, if course. But for > >

Re: users@mxnet

Tianqi > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > Are we targeting just Seattle as our community? I really hope we are > > thinking a bit beyond that... > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 21:22 Tianqi Chen > wrote: > > > >

Re: users@mxnet

say we stick > with that given the user community prefers that > > Tianqi > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > Then, if everybody agree, let's request the mailing list creation to > INFRA > > ;-) > > > > Marco, I woul

Re: users@mxnet

ll emails automatically get copied to dev@ to ensure > high > visibility initially. What do you think? > > Sebastian schrieb am Fr., 15. Juni 2018, 20:51: > > > I have already proposed this many times in the past and would strongly > > encourage it. > > > > -s >

users@mxnet

Hi, is there any good reason why the podling doesn't have a users@ mailing list yet? Honestly speaking, I'm not a big fan of the other tools the podling is using. Slack and Web forums a cool tools, and I used them a lot in other contexts. But when it comes to transparency and community, mailing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.4.0

+1 (binding) Thanks, Jakob! On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 09:23 Jakob Frank wrote: > Dear Marmotta community, > > since the final issues for Apache Marmotta 3.4.0 have been resolved a > few weeks ago, I've taken the liberty to finally start the > Marmotta 3.4.0 release process. > > A candidate for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.4.0 based on RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 12:51 Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons DBCP 2.3.0 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons DBCP 2.4.0. > > Apache Commons DBCP 2.4.0 RC1 is available for

Re: Vote to stop using JIRA

Hi, I'm not going to express my opinion on this matter, because the community is who has to decide what's best for the project. I just want to say that there is no ASF/Incubator requirement that a project/podling must use Jira as issue tracking system. There are other projects using other hosted

Re: State of S2Graph

Hi John, I apologise, last month report time was a very bad personal time for me, so I missed it. Overall IMO the podling is lacking community growing out of the original company the source was donated. Very few active committers, a from the same org. We have discussed few times what could be a

Re: backward compatibility of models saved with 1.2.0

mas > > 2018-05-29 11:50 GMT-07:00 Sergio Fernández : > > > Hi Mario, > > > > I can't give you much details. But it looks there is a bug exporting the > > parameters' names to a JSON models. > > > > I wonder if anybody else in the community has faced thi

Re: backward compatibility of models saved with 1.2.0

r users to retrain their model if they update > MXNet. That's a serious issue and we'd love to follow up. > > Best regards, > Marco > > Sergio Fernández schrieb am Di., 29. Mai 2018, 02:35: > > > Hi, > > > > I can't find anything related on that in the 1.2.-0-incuba

backward compatibility of models saved with 1.2.0

Hi, I can't find anything related on that in the 1.2.-0-incubating changelog, so I assume models produced by the latest version would be backward compatible with old versions, such as 1.1.0. But we've found that the parameter model produced is very different and doesn't load. Can you point me to

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Slider podling

+1 On Sun, May 20, 2018, 10:59 Billie Rinaldi wrote: > After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided > upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider > podling. Here is my +1 (binding). > > [ ] +1 Retire Slider > [ ] +0 No

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC3

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good despite the many third-party code (CC-BY files from RC2 are gone) * no binary files in the source

Re: Towards Marmotta 3.4.0

The issue with the JAXRS Doclet seem related with Java 8, which in the end is not our baseline version. I'll also try to take a look to this issue in the next few days. So we could try to finally push out 3.4.0 ;-) On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 06:18 Jakob Frank wrote: > Hey

Re: Towards Marmotta 3.4.0

Anyways Ostrich is not part of the current release build, isn't it? On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 12:38 Sebastian Schaffert < sebastian.schaff...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I replaced the old gtest implementation with the upstream implementation, > which contains a proper LICENSE file (BSD). The other

Re: Define an access polycy

Hi, few years ago we explored that idea, using PPO at the time: https://bitbucket.org/srfgkmt/s-watchdog The idea, although it worked, with an obvious impact on query tine, it never got beyond a student project. We never had user nor industrial interest on that research. But it you feel it has

Re: Adding indexes (Kiwi)

Hi, what you did is just perfect. You're more than welcome to customize the indexes that your particular use case requires. Cheers, On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 20:59 JOSE ENRIQUE ORTIZ VIVAR < jose.ort...@ucuenca.edu.ec> wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a Linked Data project which uses Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * LICENSE & NOTICE file * headers * no binaries in the source release * clean build On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 15:31 Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.28! Note that as this is not > an incubating release

Re: Road to RDF4J and next release

to have in a post-3.4 version. Since it > > includes package/class renames, it should be a 4.0! > > > > Best, > > Jakob > > > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 at 02:27 Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org > <mailto:wik...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > >> Co

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

rg> > * David E. Jones<jone...@apache.org> > * Jacopo Cappellato <jaco...@apache.org> > * Jacques Le Roux <jler...@apache.org> > * Nan Lei <nan...@apache.org> > * Sergio Fe

Re: Road to RDF4J and next release

Cool, Jakob! Now that MARMOTTA-668 we can work on releasing 3.4.0, finally ;-) This weekend it's gonna be difficult for me. But if nobody took care before, I could commit some time the upcoming week. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Xavier Sumba wrote: > I was

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

My +1 (binding). So far I've checked: * incubating suffix * incubator DISCLAIMER exists * signatures and checksums match * LICENSE& NOTICE file look good enough, although it may require a further review * no binary files included in the source release * release builds Glad to see the good

Re: Introducing myself as an incubation mentor

Welcome on board, Bertrand! On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi OpenWhisk community, > > Felix Meschberger is busy with other things, he has asked me to > replace him as an incubation mentor and the OpenWhisk PPMC has > accepted. > > I'm

Re: [VOTE] Retire iota

+1 (binding) On Feb 4, 2018 14:44, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Iota podling. > > The podling has discussed retirement [1], has not made a single release > and there's been little activity on it’s mailing list [2]

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

t; > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Monday, January 29, 2018, 4:35:38 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> > >> > Great, Daniel! > >> > > >> > Let's move to the next step and

Re: Some examples on how a VOTE for release looks like

Guys, your mentors are here to support you on those things ;-) The process is well described at https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html But let me know if you have any specific questions. The first incubating release is normally the most difficult one. I guess the nature of

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

ully) on gene...@incubator.apache.org. > > The votes were: > Jacopo Cappellato +1 (binding) > Jacques Le Roux +1 (binding) > Ralph Goers +1 (binding) > Sergio Fernández +1 (binding) > Dániel Dékány +1 non-binding PPMC > David E Jones +1 non-binding PPMC >

Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (COMDEV-248) add /dist/ health issues

betwixt removed from the dist area in r24307 On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:35:35 +0100, Se

Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (COMDEV-248) add /dist/ health issues

Hi Gilles, On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:35:35 +0100, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> From ComDev, just discovered checker.a.o, and got into the following >> report >> with problems: >>

Re: [Statistics] Language level

I think the de facto rule for all new components should be the current JDK LTS. So +1 for Java 8. On Jan 15, 2018 15:01, "Gilles" wrote: > Hi > > Which should we target for that component? > IOW, has someone a case for less than Java 8? > > Gilles > > >

Re: Who should I contact to talk about GSoC 2018?

ComDev: d...@community.apache.org On Jan 16, 2018 00:14, "吴晟 Sheng Wu" wrote: > Hi All, > > > Several students reach me, ask me about GSoC 2018. Who should I ask? > > > Thanks. > > > -- > Sheng Wu > Apache SkyWalking creator and PPMC member

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Server 3.1.0-incubating RC3

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * Source releases match with source repo * Signatures and digests * Headers, LICENSE files. * Build on a clean env OpenJDK 1.8.0_144, Maven 3.5.0, Debian amd64) I've noticed some minor issues at L files, as I think Justin already pointed out, that should be

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache FreeMarker Project from Incubator to TLP

be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache FreeMarker Project: > > * Dániel Dékány <ddek...@apache.org> > * David E. Jones

Re: [Net] When should we update net from Java 6 to 7?

Is the any implementation requiring to upgrade? IMO always the lower, the better. On Jan 12, 2018 18:54, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Hi All: > > When should we update Commons Net from Java 6 to 7? > > Gary >

Re: [VOTE] Accept ECharts for Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Jan 12, 2018 14:13, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE & I vote +1 to bring the ECharts project in > as an Apache incubator podling. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (COMDEV-248) add /dist/ health issues

>From ComDev, just discovered checker.a.o, and got into the following report with problems: https://checker.apache.org/projs/commons.html What do we usually do with such problems on dormant components? -- Forwarded message -- From: Henk Penning (JIRA) Date:

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Release Plugin 1.0 base on RC1

What about casting this first release as 0.1? Then we solve the chicken & egg problem: we can verify it the actual components before releasing 1.0 (which semantically speaking has a strong meaning. On Jan 11, 2018 04:35, "Gary Gregory" wrote: I wonder if: - This should

[collections] new fluent/builder api

As Gary just did for iterator/iterable methods, I'd like to discuss the idea of adding fluent/builder api. I can draft the methods if people agree on that addition.

Re: First authentication

Hi Francesco, 3.3.x comes with a very annoying bug regarding login: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-534 It's going to be fixed in 3.4.0 if we find time to finally cast the release. So, in the meantime, I guess you have three options (I summarize them to have it documented): 1)

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

+1 (binding) On Jan 8, 2018 19:57, "John D. Ament" wrote: > All, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling. > > The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC > to confirm this retirement. > > [ ] +1 to retire > [ ] +/- 0

Re: Resolution draft for graduation, members

* Dániel Dékány <ddek...@apache.org> > * David E. Jones <jone...@apache.org> > * Jacopo Cappellato <jaco...@apache.org> > * Jacques Le Roux <jler...@apache.org> > * Sergio Fernández

Re: [math][statistics] StatUtils

Me neither. But, on the other hand, is not StringUtils the most used class across all the Commons components? Just to understand how people will actually make use of the new library. On Jan 5, 2018 02:35, "Gary Gregory" wrote: I am not a fan of call classes

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-release-plugin

+1 On Jan 4, 2018 17:56, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-release-plugin] to be > managed in the same fashion as the commons-build-plugin, and by that I mean: > > * Use COMMONSSITE as the jira area > * Create a git repo

Re: [ALL] Who want's access to @ApacheCommons

On Dec 30, 2017 12:01, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 27.12.2017 um 18:10 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>: > I'm happy to help on that, but I'm just a raw committer, not sure if it > would be appropriate. Sure thing! Just give me y

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2018

Great, thanks Daniel! On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote: > I have upload a draft. It's a draft though, so in case someone will > want changes in it, delay signing off as far as you can. > > > Wednesday, December 27, 2017, 4:10:11

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >