[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2010-01-16 Thread villeroy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 --- Additional comments from ville...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 17 07:56:21 + 2010 --- Work-around with a pattern field and the right field formatting:

[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2009-08-26 Thread berglundma
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 --- Additional comments from berglun...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 26 06:27:41 + 2009 --- fs, I appreciate your time and ask you to give me just a little more.

[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2009-08-26 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 26 07:03:38 + 2009 --- berglundma, I well understand that the behavior is as you described. What I'm

[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2009-08-26 Thread berglundma
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 User berglundma changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2009-08-25 Thread berglundma
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 Issue #|104504 Summary|TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time Component|Database access

[dba-issues] [Issue 104504] TimeField/FormattedField badly handle 24 hour time

2009-08-25 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104504 --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 25 20:39:03 + 2009 --- I'm tempted to resolve this as INVALID or WONTFIX - the scenario you describe