Re: [alto] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17

2023-10-23 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Wes, On your first point, the WG discussed that point and the conclusion was to not obsolete SSE: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/slides-117-alto-alto-charter-items-issues-01 Re-reading the text in the draft, I do agree that your comment is fair and NEW text is needed

[alto] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-10-23 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[alto] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-15

2023-10-23 Thread Ted Lemon via Datatracker
Reviewer: Ted Lemon Review result: Ready with Nits This is the third dnsdir review of this document. Previous reviews, done by a different reviewer, marked it as ready or ready with nits, on the basis that this document doesn't make any changes to how NAPTR is used, and that's the only

[alto] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17

2023-10-23 Thread Wesley Eddy via Datatracker
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy Review result: Ready with Issues I only found 1 real "issue" in reading this document, and a few smaller nits, described below. None of these comments are specifically related to IoTDIR type of concerns, and it doesn't seem like the protocol would be intended for use in